Shock enhancement effect of lightweight composite structures and materials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Polymeric foams, textile materials and metallic foams are commonly used lightweight composite structures and materials for personal protective equipment (PPE) and protective structures in the battle field, because of their capabilities in reducing the risk of damages against ballistic impact. Under blast loading, however, a “shock enhancement” phenomenon has been observed in these materials, that is, the transmitted pressure is amplified, rather than attenuated as one would expect. Experimental evidences also demonstrated that covering animals with a layer of foam or textile could markedly increase the severity of lung injury. A number of studies have been published documenting such counter-intuitive effect. This review attempts to compile the state-of-arts and latest advances in this important subject. Experimental investigations on the pressure amplification of the aforementioned materials are summarized. Analytical/computational models that describe this phenomenon, particularly emphasizing on the mechanism and some key parameters affecting shock enhancement behavior, are also included. Finally, limitations of studies reviewed herein are discussed and issues which need to be addressed in further research are highlighted.

Introduction

Recent terrorist blast attacks have caused catastrophic consequences, in terms of fatalities and psyche of fear among the population, as well as enormous financial losses. When an explosive charge is detonated in air, the rapidly expanding gaseous reaction products compress and move the surrounding air outwards at supersonic speeds. The rapid expansion of the detonation products creates a shock wave with discontinuities in the pressure intensity, temperature, and velocity. Upon entering a body, the sudden pressure changes and complex stress/shear wave interaction can cause large compression of air-filled organs (e.g. the lungs) and tearing of muscle tissue and blood vessel [1]. In the last decade, blast induced injury has become a major medical concern in both academia and clinical research [2].

To reduce the injury or damage caused by explosion, it is conceptually straightforward to employ soft media (e.g. polymeric or metallic foams) and ballistic-resistant textile materials (e.g. Kevlar) as a passive shock mitigation device. Soft or porous media are generally excellent energy absorbers which attenuate impact loads by cell collapse mechanism at almost constant stress. Textile body armor materials consist of a large number of high-strength fibers to provide an effective protection against ballistic loads. Currently, these lightweight composite structures/materials have been used widely in personal protective equipment (PPE). However, when they are applied for blast wave mitigation, their protective performance is highly questionable. Numerous experimental evidences have demonstrated that the transmitted overpressures are significantly enhanced through a foam or fabric barrier, and animals covered with a layer of foam markedly increased the severity of lung injury [3], [4]. At occupational overpressure levels for heavy weapon operators, tests on the volunteers showed that the ballistic vest caused an increase in intra-thoracic pressure over that was observed when the vest was not worn [5]. Such counter-intuitive phenomenon was termed as shock enhancement. The shock enhancement phenomenon is an amplification of shock amplitude or impulse/energy transfer that takes place instead of expected mitigation. It is clear that a better understanding on this effect would be essentially critical to the development of more effective protective structures/materials for PPE against blast loads.

To provide a deeper insight into the shock enhancement effect, this paper presents a review of publications appeared in the open literature. The review focuses on three types of lightweight composite structures/materials commonly used in the protective applications, namely low-density polymeric foams, textile materials, and high-density metallic foams. Studies pertaining to fundamental investigations (mainly experimental and theoretical studies) are considered with the emphasis placed on the shock enhancement mechanism, and the key parameters affecting such behavior. Finally, limitations of the studies reviewed herein are discussed and the issues which need to be addressed in further research are highlighted.

Section snippets

Low-density polymeric foams

Low-density polymeric foams are usually polymer-based and have a high porosity (usually higher than 95%). They contains a large volume fraction of gas-filled pores, which can either be sealed (closed-cell foam), or form an interconnected network (open-cell foam) [6]. This type of foams typically behaves elastically and is highly compressible, even at low pressures. When the pressure is removed, the foam can recover to its original shape. Fig. 1 shows a typical stress–strain response of low

Textile materials

Textile materials consist of assemblies of fibers with given orientations and low packing density. The fibers can be relatively rigid (e.g. Kevlar) or flexible (e.g. Polycotton). The holes in the fabric weave can provide the textile material with some degree of permeability, leading its mechanical behavior somewhat similar to that of low density open-cell foams. Like foams, shock amplification has also been observed in the textile materials, but at a lower degree. Currently, most studies on

High-density metallic foams

Unlike the low-density polymeric foams, in high density foams (typically metallic foams), the stress transmission is mainly determined by the solid phase and the contribution of air entrapped in the cells can be neglected [6]. Therefore, the properties of open and closed-cell foams with the same density are similar. Most of the high density foams exhibit elasto-plastic behavior, as shown in Fig. 4. The stress–strain response consists of three regions, namely linear elastic region, plastic

Discussion and future research

The heterogeneous nature of the cellular and textile materials make it a challenging task to study their behaviors, particularly under the intense, dynamic loading conditions such as high speed impact and blasting. Although a great deal of research in this important area is available, both the experimental and theoretical studies are still limited.

For elastomeric foams, the current tests and analytical/computational models have been focused on the open-cell foams with very low density, where

Conclusions

This paper presents a review of experimental and analytical/computational research on the shock enhancement effect observed in the polymeric foams, textile materials, and metallic foams subject to blast and high speed impacts.

Due to the low density and high porosity nature of polymeric foams, air flow in the pores play an important role in the overall response. The reflection of the wave in the air and its interaction with the compression wave in the solid phase is considered as one of the

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the Bioengineering Center, Wayne State University. The financial support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Professor Longmao Zhao, Taiyuan University of Technology, for his valuable comments and suggestion.

References (63)

  • P.J. Tan et al.

    Dynamic compressive strength properties of aluminium foams. Part I – experimental data and observations

    J Mech Phys Solids

    (2005)
  • D.D. Radford et al.

    The use of metal foam projectiles to simulate shock loading on a structure

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2005)
  • I. Elnasri et al.

    Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: part I experiments

    J Mech Phys Solids

    (2007)
  • P.J. Tan et al.

    Dynamic compressive strength properties of aluminium foams. Part II – ‘shock’ theory and comparison with experimental data and numerical models

    J Mech Phys Solids

    (2005)
  • S.L. Lopatnikov et al.

    High-velocity plate impact of metal foams

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2004)
  • S. Pattofatto et al.

    Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: part II analysis

    J Mech Phys Solids

    (2007)
  • J.J. Harrigan et al.

    The correct analysis of shocks in a cellular material

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2010)
  • B.A. Gama et al.

    Aluminium foam integral armor: a new dimension in armor design

    Compos Struct

    (2001)
  • S. Zhuang et al.

    An experimental investigation of shock propagation in periodically layered composites

    J Mech Phys Solids

    (2003)
  • F. Zhu et al.

    Deformation and failure of blast-loaded metallic sandwich panels — experimental investigations

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2008)
  • K.P. Dharmasena et al.

    Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2008)
  • X. Qiu et al.

    Finite element analysis of the dynamic response of clamped sandwich beams subject to shock loading

    Eur J Mech A/Solids

    (2003)
  • F. Zhu et al.

    A numerical simulation on the blast impact of square metallic sandwich panels

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2009)
  • F. Zhu et al.

    Analytical investigation and optimal design of sandwich panels subjected to shock loading

    Mater Des

    (2009)
  • F. Zhu et al.

    Some theoretical considerations on the dynamic response of sandwich structures under impulsive loading

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2010)
  • G.R. DePalma et al.

    Blast injuries

    New Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • G.J. Cooper et al.

    The role of stress waves in thoracic visceral injury form blast loading: modification of stress transmission by foams and high-density materials

    J Biomech

    (1991)
  • N.P.J. Cripps et al.

    The influence of personal blast protection on the distribution and severity of primary blast gut injury

    J Trauma

    (1996)
  • Y.Y. Phillips et al.

    Cloth ballistic vest alters response to blast

    J Trauma

    (1988)
  • L.J. Gibson et al.

    Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd ed.

    (1997)
  • B.W. Skews et al.

    The impact of a shock wave on porous compressible foams

    J Fluid Mech

    (1993)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Energy absorption and impact resistance of sandwich composite alloy structures under dynamic impact

      2020, Journal of Alloys and Compounds
      Citation Excerpt :

      Composite materials, as a combination of two or more different kinds of materials through physical or chemical processes, possess wide application potentials in hi-tech areas such as space vehicles, rail transit, and wind power generators for their superior overall properties including high strength, high specific modulus, and structural designability [1–4].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text