Shock enhancement effect of lightweight composite structures and materials
Introduction
Recent terrorist blast attacks have caused catastrophic consequences, in terms of fatalities and psyche of fear among the population, as well as enormous financial losses. When an explosive charge is detonated in air, the rapidly expanding gaseous reaction products compress and move the surrounding air outwards at supersonic speeds. The rapid expansion of the detonation products creates a shock wave with discontinuities in the pressure intensity, temperature, and velocity. Upon entering a body, the sudden pressure changes and complex stress/shear wave interaction can cause large compression of air-filled organs (e.g. the lungs) and tearing of muscle tissue and blood vessel [1]. In the last decade, blast induced injury has become a major medical concern in both academia and clinical research [2].
To reduce the injury or damage caused by explosion, it is conceptually straightforward to employ soft media (e.g. polymeric or metallic foams) and ballistic-resistant textile materials (e.g. Kevlar) as a passive shock mitigation device. Soft or porous media are generally excellent energy absorbers which attenuate impact loads by cell collapse mechanism at almost constant stress. Textile body armor materials consist of a large number of high-strength fibers to provide an effective protection against ballistic loads. Currently, these lightweight composite structures/materials have been used widely in personal protective equipment (PPE). However, when they are applied for blast wave mitigation, their protective performance is highly questionable. Numerous experimental evidences have demonstrated that the transmitted overpressures are significantly enhanced through a foam or fabric barrier, and animals covered with a layer of foam markedly increased the severity of lung injury [3], [4]. At occupational overpressure levels for heavy weapon operators, tests on the volunteers showed that the ballistic vest caused an increase in intra-thoracic pressure over that was observed when the vest was not worn [5]. Such counter-intuitive phenomenon was termed as shock enhancement. The shock enhancement phenomenon is an amplification of shock amplitude or impulse/energy transfer that takes place instead of expected mitigation. It is clear that a better understanding on this effect would be essentially critical to the development of more effective protective structures/materials for PPE against blast loads.
To provide a deeper insight into the shock enhancement effect, this paper presents a review of publications appeared in the open literature. The review focuses on three types of lightweight composite structures/materials commonly used in the protective applications, namely low-density polymeric foams, textile materials, and high-density metallic foams. Studies pertaining to fundamental investigations (mainly experimental and theoretical studies) are considered with the emphasis placed on the shock enhancement mechanism, and the key parameters affecting such behavior. Finally, limitations of the studies reviewed herein are discussed and the issues which need to be addressed in further research are highlighted.
Section snippets
Low-density polymeric foams
Low-density polymeric foams are usually polymer-based and have a high porosity (usually higher than 95%). They contains a large volume fraction of gas-filled pores, which can either be sealed (closed-cell foam), or form an interconnected network (open-cell foam) [6]. This type of foams typically behaves elastically and is highly compressible, even at low pressures. When the pressure is removed, the foam can recover to its original shape. Fig. 1 shows a typical stress–strain response of low
Textile materials
Textile materials consist of assemblies of fibers with given orientations and low packing density. The fibers can be relatively rigid (e.g. Kevlar) or flexible (e.g. Polycotton). The holes in the fabric weave can provide the textile material with some degree of permeability, leading its mechanical behavior somewhat similar to that of low density open-cell foams. Like foams, shock amplification has also been observed in the textile materials, but at a lower degree. Currently, most studies on
High-density metallic foams
Unlike the low-density polymeric foams, in high density foams (typically metallic foams), the stress transmission is mainly determined by the solid phase and the contribution of air entrapped in the cells can be neglected [6]. Therefore, the properties of open and closed-cell foams with the same density are similar. Most of the high density foams exhibit elasto-plastic behavior, as shown in Fig. 4. The stress–strain response consists of three regions, namely linear elastic region, plastic
Discussion and future research
The heterogeneous nature of the cellular and textile materials make it a challenging task to study their behaviors, particularly under the intense, dynamic loading conditions such as high speed impact and blasting. Although a great deal of research in this important area is available, both the experimental and theoretical studies are still limited.
For elastomeric foams, the current tests and analytical/computational models have been focused on the open-cell foams with very low density, where
Conclusions
This paper presents a review of experimental and analytical/computational research on the shock enhancement effect observed in the polymeric foams, textile materials, and metallic foams subject to blast and high speed impacts.
Due to the low density and high porosity nature of polymeric foams, air flow in the pores play an important role in the overall response. The reflection of the wave in the air and its interaction with the compression wave in the solid phase is considered as one of the
Acknowledgments
This research was partially supported by the Bioengineering Center, Wayne State University. The financial support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Professor Longmao Zhao, Taiyuan University of Technology, for his valuable comments and suggestion.
References (63)
- et al.
Explosions and blast injuries
Ann Emerg Med
(2001) - et al.
Experimental investigation of gas percolation through porous compressible material under the effect of shock wave
Physica A
(1997) - et al.
Head-on interaction of weak planar shock waves with flexible porous materials – analytical model
Int J Multiph Flow
(1995) - et al.
Numerical simulation of the propagation of shock waves in compressible open-cell porous foams
Int J Multiph Flow
(1994) - et al.
Surface pressure effects from shock wave impact on inclined and curved clothing
Int J Impact Eng
(2010) - et al.
Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood
Int J Impact Eng
(1997) - et al.
Structural plastic shock model for one-dimensional ring systems
Int J Impact Eng
(1983) - et al.
Attenuation or enhancement – a one-dimensional analysis on shock transmission in the solid phase of a cellular material
Int J Impact Eng
(2002) - et al.
Close-range blast loading of aluminium foam panels
Int J Impact Eng
(2002) - et al.
Dynamics of metal foam deformation during Taylor cylinder – Hopkinson bar impact experiment
Compos Struct
(2003)
Dynamic compressive strength properties of aluminium foams. Part I – experimental data and observations
J Mech Phys Solids
The use of metal foam projectiles to simulate shock loading on a structure
Int J Impact Eng
Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: part I experiments
J Mech Phys Solids
Dynamic compressive strength properties of aluminium foams. Part II – ‘shock’ theory and comparison with experimental data and numerical models
J Mech Phys Solids
High-velocity plate impact of metal foams
Int J Impact Eng
Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: part II analysis
J Mech Phys Solids
The correct analysis of shocks in a cellular material
Int J Impact Eng
Aluminium foam integral armor: a new dimension in armor design
Compos Struct
An experimental investigation of shock propagation in periodically layered composites
J Mech Phys Solids
Deformation and failure of blast-loaded metallic sandwich panels — experimental investigations
Int J Impact Eng
Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading
Int J Impact Eng
Finite element analysis of the dynamic response of clamped sandwich beams subject to shock loading
Eur J Mech A/Solids
A numerical simulation on the blast impact of square metallic sandwich panels
Int J Impact Eng
Analytical investigation and optimal design of sandwich panels subjected to shock loading
Mater Des
Some theoretical considerations on the dynamic response of sandwich structures under impulsive loading
Int J Impact Eng
Blast injuries
New Engl J Med
The role of stress waves in thoracic visceral injury form blast loading: modification of stress transmission by foams and high-density materials
J Biomech
The influence of personal blast protection on the distribution and severity of primary blast gut injury
J Trauma
Cloth ballistic vest alters response to blast
J Trauma
Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd ed.
The impact of a shock wave on porous compressible foams
J Fluid Mech
Cited by (48)
Stress wave propagation and force transmission in polymeric closed cell foams subjected to air shock loading
2023, Extreme Mechanics LettersExperimental and numerical investigation of G-UHPC based novel multi-layer protective slabs under contact explosions
2022, Engineering Failure AnalysisEnergy absorption and impact resistance of sandwich composite alloy structures under dynamic impact
2020, Journal of Alloys and CompoundsCitation Excerpt :Composite materials, as a combination of two or more different kinds of materials through physical or chemical processes, possess wide application potentials in hi-tech areas such as space vehicles, rail transit, and wind power generators for their superior overall properties including high strength, high specific modulus, and structural designability [1–4].
Basalt scale-reinforced aluminium foam under static and dynamic loads
2018, Composite Structures