Elsevier

Computational Materials Science

Volume 154, November 2018, Pages 234-242
Computational Materials Science

Stability and superconductivity properties of metal substituted aluminum diborides (M0.5Al0.5B2)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.08.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The stability table and superconducting properties such as screened Coulomb potential, electron-phonon coupling and critical temperature of planar boron sheet included ternary crystalline compounds of MgB2-type M0.5Al0.5B2 (M = Li, Be, Na, Mg, K, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Hf, Ta, W, Re, and Os) have been investigated by first-principles density functional theory calculations with spin-orbit coupling. It is shown that the M = Li, Mg, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Hf, Ta, and W-substituted compounds are thermodynamically stable at the ambient conditions. Among them, Nb0.5Al0.5B2 has the lowest cohesive energy while Ti0.5Al0.5B2 has the lowest formation enthalpy. Except for Be0.5Al0.5B2, all compounds are mechanically stable, and fourteen of them are dynamically stable also. So, a dozen of M0.5Al0.5B2 (M = Li, Mg, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Hf, and Ta) compounds are satisfying all three stability conditions. The calculated electronic properties show that all structures have metallic character and interestingly the radii of the substituted atoms correlate with surface area of regular B6 hexagons and volumes of metal-boron pyramids. All of them are hard materials, and V0.5Al0.5B2 has the highest semi-empirical microhardness (27 GPa). According to the precise phonon dispersion and electron-phonon coupling calculations, Tc’s of the stable compounds are lower than that of MgB2 (39 K), and Tc0.5Al0.5B2 has higher Tc (∼7 K) than the others.

Introduction

Due to the exclusive property of superconductivity character [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], the structures with stacking layers are recently becoming interest [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. One of well-known extraordinary layered structure is MgB2 [1], and its unexpectedly high superconductivity Tc (∼39 K) stimulated the extensive searches on understanding how these kinds of materials behave structurally and electronically [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. Recent observations and calculations showed that boron-based ternary alkali, alkaline-earth and transition metal borides in the form of honeycomb network systems confident the researchers for increasing critical temperature (Tc) [1], [9], [10], [28], [29], [30], [31]. However, to develop the superconductivity of binary, ternary, quaternary borides and borocarbides, the impressive results have been recently reported by experiment and theory [28], [29], [32], [33], [34], [35]. For instance, it was shown that hole doping to LiBC, which is a layered semiconductor structure, leads to superconductivity character [16], [29], [33], [35], [36], [37]. Moreover, numerous elemental boron allotropes [26], [38], [39] may gain superconductivity character by compressing [34], [40]. And also, a number of honeycomb network systems of metal borides are improving the superconducting characters with doping of 1A group elements such as lithium, sodium, potassium, etc. [8], [27], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46].

However, using the knowledge of being the boron p-electrons were dominant at near the Fermi energy in the electronic structure of MgB2, Slusky et al. [47] shown that the addition of electrons to the MgB2 with partial substation of Al for Mg loss the superconductivity. Also, recent experiments and calculated Eliashberg functions showed that it depends very sensitively on concentrations of Al and C [12], [48], [49], [50]. It has been primarily observed that the superconductivity in Mg1−xAlxB2 decrease with Al doping [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], and Tc(x) fall with increasing Al concentration x and diminish for x > 0.5 [59], [60], [61]. On the other hand, it was shown that electron-phonon coupling in MgB2 and the strong covalent nature of the σ bands lead the interaction of the bond-stretching modes [23], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], and phonon anomalies can be used to predict superconducting Tc for AlB2-type structures [67], [68], [69]. In this concept, the structural, electronic band structure, and full phonon dispersion properties were analyzed for the phases of Mg1−xAlxB2 (in the range of 0 < x < 1) within the framework of density-functional theory using the self-consistent virtual-crystal approximation [48], [49], [70], [71]. Moreover, with the Raman [72] and EPR [73] study, it was shown that the optimal composition of the superstructure phase is M0.5Al0.5B2, a superconductor with Tc ∼ 12 K. Bianconi et al. [74] studied the superconducting properties of Mg1−xAlxB2 and it was pointed out that by changing the Al/Mg, the boron σ bands cross Fermi surface and they have also indicated the origin of Tc amplification in Al1−xMgxB2 from 5 K in AlMgB4 to 39 K in MgB2. Superconducting and structural properties of a Al1−xMgxB2 series were studied systematically and superconducting gaps variation as a function of Al substance investigated experimentally [69], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], and superconducting phenomena described within a multiband version into intraband and interband contributions [82], [83], [84], [85].

In this study, the structural, mechanical and superconducting properties of MgB2-type ternary M0.5Al0.5B2 (M = Li, Be, Na, Mg, K, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Hf, Ta, W, Re, and Os) compounds are systematically studied by using first-principles of density functional theory with and without spin-orbit coupling. Detailed stability analysis which includes thermodynamic, mechanic and dynamic properties is presented. Possible correlations are inquired between the calculated results and the available literature such as atomic size, data of MgB2 and Mg0.5Al0.5B2.

Section snippets

Computational details

The first-principles plane-wave pseudopotential calculations are performed by using CASTEP (CAmbridge Serial Total Energy Package) [86]. In the calculations, atomic coordinates and unit cell parameters are fully relaxed with BFGS (Broyden, Fletcher, Goldfarb, Shanno) scheme [87]. The Vanderbilt ultrasoft (USPP) [88] and norm-conserving (NCPP) pseudopotentials [89] are used to model the ion-electron interactions, and exchange-correlation effects are treated within the generalized gradient

Crystal structure

In this study, the X-ray powder diffraction data [54] for Mg0.5Al0.5B2 is used to begin the simulations and to design the crystal structure of M0.5Al0.5B2 compounds. The crystal structure resembles AlB2-type (or MgB2) hexagonal structure of P6/mmm space group (see Fig. 1(a)). The unit cell contains one formula unit of M0.5Al0.5B2, and the structure includes parallel boron layers which form of interconnected six-member regular honey-comb boron hexagons intercalated with aluminum and other metal

Conclusion

In conclusion, the stability characteristics and superconductivity properties of M0.5Al0.5B2 (M = Li, Be, Na, Mg, K, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Hf, Ta, W, Re, and Os) compounds have been studied by first-principles density functional calculations. With the thermodynamic, mechanic and dynamic stability analysis, it is concluded that M = Li, Mg, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Hf, and Ta-substituted compounds are stable. In all structures, the actual binding properties consist of the

Author contribution

All authors contribute equally in all processes of the work.

Acknowledgment

All first-principles calculations were performed by high-performance computing center (HPCC) at Gazi University. Also, the some numerical calculations including superconducting properties with spin-orbit coupling (SOC) reported in this paper were partially performed at TUBITAK ULAKBIM, High Performance and Grid Computing Center (TRUBA resources).

References (120)

  • U. Welp et al.

    Physica C

    (2003)
  • J. Kortus

    Physica C

    (2007)
  • P.P. Singh

    Solid State Commun.

    (2002)
  • P. Badica et al.

    Physica C

    (2007)
  • H. Takeya et al.

    Physica C

    (2006)
  • M.S. Bailey et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2007)
  • A.Q.R. Baron et al.

    Physica C

    (2007)
  • A. Floris et al.

    Physica C

    (2007)
  • I.D.R. Mackinnon et al.

    Comput. Mater. Sci.

    (2017)
  • S.A. Kuzmichev et al.

    Solid State Commun.

    (2012)
  • B.G. Pfrommer et al.

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (1997)
  • X. Gonze et al.

    Comput. Phys. Commun.

    (2016)
  • J. Nagamatsu et al.

    Nature

    (2001)
  • J. Kortus et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2001)
  • S. Suzuki et al.

    J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.

    (2001)
  • J.M. An et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2001)
  • K.D. Belashchenko et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2001)
  • G. Satta et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2001)
  • A. Bussmann-Holder et al.

    J. Phys.: Condens. Matter

    (2012)
  • K. Togano et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2004)
  • B. Albert et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2009)
  • S. Tsuchiya et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2009)
  • J. Kortus et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2005)
  • M.S. Park et al.

    Supercond. Sci. Tech.

    (2005)
  • V.P.S. Awana et al.

    Supercond. Sci. Tech.

    (2009)
  • Z.C. Pan et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2006)
  • T. Bazhirov et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2014)
  • S.Y. Lu et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2016)
  • S.K. Saha et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2016)
  • T. Oguchi

    J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.

    (2002)
  • I.I. Mazin et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2002)
  • A. Brinkman et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2002)
  • H.J. Choi et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2002)
  • P. Zhang et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2008)
  • H.J. Choi et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2009)
  • Y. Zhao et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2016)
  • S.Y. Wu et al.

    Supercond. Sci. Tech.

    (2016)
  • M.M.D. Esfahani et al.

    PCCP

    (2017)
  • M. Gao et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2015)
  • J.H. Liao et al.

    PCCP

    (2017)
  • S.Y. Xie et al.

    PCCP

    (2015)
  • A.N. Kolmogorov et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2008)
  • D.C. Johnston et al.

    Superconductivity in Ternary Compounds II

    (1982)
  • C. Buzea et al.

    Supercond. Sci. Tech.

    (2001)
  • H. Rosner et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2002)
  • A. Lazicki et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2010)
  • M.I. Eremets et al.

    Science

    (2001)
  • Y.M. Ma et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2004)
  • S.K. Bose et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2005)
  • P. Badica et al.

    J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Hardness of Re-, Ru-, Os-based borides and metal substituted aluminum diborides of MgB <inf>2</inf> type M <inf>0.5</inf> Al <inf>0.5</inf> B <inf>2</inf>

      2019, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      The authors calculated hardness of diborides by means of three different methods: Xue [16], Šimůnek [20] and Chen [24], however, the bond strength method [20] was incorrectly applied. We have used the data from the work of Aydin et al. [28], and calculated hardness of all diborides in their work by the present method. The results are compared in Table 2.

    • Fermi surface and hardness enhancement study on ternary scandium and vanadium based borides by first principles investigation

      2019, Computational Materials Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fermi surface study on HfB2 boride has been reported by Sichkar et al. [21]. Stability of ternary transition metal-doped aluminium diborides has been reported by Aydin et al. [22]. Discovery of elusive structures of various transition metal borides has been reported by Liang et al. [23].

    • Ab initio study of Li-Mg-B superconductors

      2022, Physical Review Materials
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text