Elsevier

Computer Communications

Volume 29, Issue 5, 6 March 2006, Pages 611-617
Computer Communications

Macro/micro-mobility fast handover in hierarchical mobile IPv6

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2004.12.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Mobile Internet Protocol version 6 (MIPv6) has been proposed to solve the problem of mobility in the new era of Internet by handling routing of IPv6 packets to mobile nodes that have moved away from their home network. Users will move frequently between networks, as they stay connected to the Internet. Thus, as mobility increases across networks, handovers will significantly impact the quality of the connection and user application.

However, MIPv6 only defines means of managing global (macro)-mobility but does not address micro-mobility separately. Instead, it uses the same mechanism in both cases. This involves long handover delay and signaling load. The Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) protocol has been proposed as an extension of basic MIPv6 to solve this problem by splitting the handover management into macro-mobility and micro-mobility schemes. HMIPv6 introduced a new protocol agent called Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) to manage mobility and serve as a local entity to aid in mobile handover. The handover (or registration) operation is the operation when MN registers its presence to its Home Agent (HA) and Correspondent Node (CN).

This paper proposes a mechanism to perform fast handover in HMIPv6 by adopting the multicast technique to the MAP for both macro-mobility and micro-mobility management. Our proposal is designed to minimize service disruption that occurs during the registration operation. We simulate the performance using network simulator (NS-2) and we present and analyze the performance testing for our proposal by comparing it with the basic hierarchical mobile IPv6. The results show that our scheme allows the MN to receive packets faster than the basic HMIPv6.

Introduction

There has recently been almost universal recognition that Mobile IP [1], the current standard for IP-based mobility management, needs to be enhanced to meet the needs of future cellular environment. Mobile IP supports user mobility in the network layer that allows mobile IP to be transparent to other layers. However, Mobile IP has several drawbacks. IETF introduced Mobile IPv6 as the successor of Mobile IPv4 and every drawback in Mobile IPv4 are solved in Mobile IPv6 [2]. Although Mobile IPv6 supports mobility, several mobility requirements have not been achieved. The list of main requirements specific to an IP-based mobility management protocol are as follows [3]:

  • Hierarchical structure—to localize scope of location updates,

  • Support seamless Handover—Packet redirection with minimal delay, and

  • Provides compatibility with QoS such as support for real time applications

Mobile IPv6 faces some problems due to its handover management. The problems occurs when a mobile node moves from one access point to another access point in a small coverage area (micro-mobility), which reduces frequent handover, such that MIPv6 will not be suitable for such scenario under that circumstances. MIPv6 generates significant amount of signaling traffic in the core network, even for local movement, followed by long interruption during the handover.

Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) [4] proposed as an extension to the basic Mobile IPv6 in order to solve these problems in mobile IPv6. It does this by splitting the mobility management into macro- and micro-mobility. Even though it may reduce the handover delay and overhead in term of bytes or packets but it still suffers from long delays.

In this paper we describe a modification to hierarchical mobile IPv6 to support fast handover by adopting the multicast mechanism in HMIPv6 protocol. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Firstly, the nature of the problems pertinent in Mobile IPv6 is discussed. Secondly, a brief review of Mobile IPv6 and HMIPv6 is presented. Thirdly, a description of our proposed solution for HMIPv6 macro/micro-mobility management is introduced. Fourthly, simulation results and performance testing is presented. And finally the paper is concluded in Section 5.

Section snippets

Mobility management in MIPv6

Mobile IPv6 protocol consists of a home agent (HA) that serves the mobile node (MN) when it is within home network and access router (AR) advertises the address every time an MN moves into its network. When the MN wants to roam to foreign network, the MN will acquire a new care of address (CoA) advertised by AR. The MN then register its new CoA to its HA and CN. This is done as follows:

  • 1.

    MN sends binding update message (BU) to HA and CN through the new access router (AR).

  • 2.

    The new AR begins to act

Proposed macro/micro-mobility management scheme

To further reduce the handover delay in HMIPv6 protocol, we propose two separate modifications for both handover mobility schemes.

Simulation setup and performance testing

The simulation study presented in this paper uses the Columbia IP Micro-mobility Software [4], which supports separate models including Hierarchical Mobile IP together with detailed description, online source code and documentation. We have implemented the proposed multicast schemes for macro/micro-mobility management extensions into the HMIPv6 described in [4] using the NS-2 network simulator version 2.1b [5]. NS-2 allows the user to configure the parameters of the topology that is already

Conclusion

In this paper we have proposed a scheme to perform fast handovers for hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks in the macro-mobility and micro-mobility management. Fast handover performance is achieved by forwarding the multicast packets from the mobility anchor point to every adjacent access router. We have simulated the performance in NS-2 network simulator. From the simulation results, we have shown that our proposal allows the MN to receive packets faster than the HMIPv6 scheme. Issues like how

References (5)

  • C. Perkins, IP Mobility Support for IPv4, revised draft-ietf-mobileip-rfc2002-bis-08.txt, IETF, September...
  • J.D. Solomon

    Mobile IP—the Internet Unplugged

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Design, implementation and experimental evaluation of an end-to-end vertical handover scheme on NCTUns simulator

    2012, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
    Citation Excerpt :

    A number of techniques have evolved to support mobility. Mobile IP [3], a network layer support for mobility, has sprouted several variants for optimization, including FMIP [4] for fast handover, HMIP [5] for reducing signalling delays, MIP-RR [6] for localizing registration, F-HMIP [7] for reducing packet loss and localizing the signalling, PMIP (proxy) [8] for absolving MN of signalling wories, P-MIP (paging) [9] for economizing the battery power, etc. Path extension [10] and multi-casting [10] approaches, with their pros and cons, have also been considered for seamless mobility in heterogeneous networks.

  • An improved scheme towards fast handover in a hierarchical mobile network

    2011, 2011 30th URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, URSIGASS 2011
  • Quality of Service Support for MPLS-based Wired-Wireless Domains

    2010, End-to-End Quality of Service Engineering in Next Generation Heterogenous Networks
  • Achieving seamless mobility through handover coordination in a network-based localized mobility managed heterogeneous environment

    2010, IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text