The neuronal building blocks of the navigational toolkit in the central complex of insects

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2022.100972Get rights and content

The central complex in the brain of insects is a group of midline-spanning neuropils at the interface between sensory and premotor tasks of the brain. It is involved in sleep control, decision-making and most prominently in goal-directed locomotion behaviors. The recently published connectome of the central complex of Drosophila melanogaster is a milestone in understanding the intricacies of the central-complex circuits and will provide inspiration for testable hypotheses for the coming years. Here, I provide a basic neuroanatomical description of the central complex of Drosophila and other species and discuss some recent advancements, some of which, such as the discovery of coordinate transformation through vector math, have been predicted from connectomics data.

Introduction

Spatial orientation is perhaps the most fundamental and vital task of the nervous system of all nonsessile animals. Any goal-directed behavior, such as food search, mate-finding, escaping, or homing, requires prior knowledge of the orientation of the animal’s body in space with respect to a defined external system of cues. Therefore, the nervous system has to hold internal representations of the axes of the body that is attached to it (Figure 1a). It also has to encode the heading direction: the spatial relationship between the sensory organs, which are often located on the head, and external stimuli that can be tracked. This heading direction does not always coincide with the traveling direction (Figure 1b). Therefore, it is important, especially for more sophisticated orientation behaviors, such as vector navigation, that the neuronal system also tracks the actual travel direction of the body. It is further useful (and for vector navigation indispensable) to be able to estimate travel velocity and integrate it over time to gauge distances. Many of the representations and mechanisms outlined above have specific neuronal correlates in the central complex (CX).

Volumetric movement (i.e. movement in 3D space) entails translation along or rotation around the three cardinal axes of the body (i.e. it has six degrees of freedom, Figure 1a). While the ability to perform a stable flight generally requires control over all six degrees of freedom, traveling between two points requires mainly control over movements in the horizontal plane. Although there is some evidence that neurons in the CX are not only tuned to azimuth (i.e. orientation in the horizontal plane), but also to elevation of visual stimuli 1, 2, 3, so far, most neuronal correlates of directional coding that have been identified in the CX, were limited to the horizontal plane 4, 5, 6, 7, 8••, 9••. One possible reason for this is that insects stabilize their gaze in the rollandpitch axes through compensatory head movements using visual and mechanosensory feedback, thereby reducing the input to the head-centered sensory systems to the horizontal plane 10, 11. A second possibility is that the restraining of insects to this plane in physiological setups has so far precluded the discovery of a three-dimensional system as described in mammals [12].

Electrophysiological work in crickets, monarch butterflies, dung beetles, bees, and particularly in locusts has elucidated many sensory and physiological properties of central-complex neurons in the past 20 years 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1, 3. In the past decade, the genetic toolkit available in Drosophila has advanced our understanding of the inner workings of the central- complex circuits at a breathtaking pace. In this review, I aim to provide a guided tour through the central complex, following the flow and processing of spatial information rather than providing a comprehensive overview of recent publications, which has been nicely done elsewhere 20, 21, 22.

Section snippets

Nomenclature

Parallel research in Drosophila and other species has led to different naming conventions for neuropils and neurons. Here, I will use the current Drosophila nomenclature [23], adding the alternate names, where appropriate. A lookup table for conversion between the systems can be found in [24].

General anatomy

The CX (Figure 1c) consists of the fan-shaped body (FB)/upper division of the central body (CBU), the ellipsoid body (EB)/lower division of the central body (CBL), the protocerebral bridge (PB), and the paired noduli (NO). The EB receives input mainly through the bulbs, which can consist of several substructures as in flies, butterflies, and beetles, or can be separated into medial and lateral bulbs as in bees and locusts 25, 21. FB, EB, and PB are divided into a variable number of vertical

The input stage: ER (TL) neurons

Sensory information enters the EB through tangential neurons that receive input in the bulbs or the lateral accessory lobes (LAL) and provide output to all columns of the EB (EB ring neurons, ER/tangential neurons of the CBL, TL, Figure 2) 26, 25. The majority of these neurons encode visual information, but a subset processes antennal mechanosensory stimuli 23••, 27•• or is involved in thermoresponsive motor behavior [28]. In many species, these neurons are sensitive to the plane of linearly

Heading direction: EPG (CL1a)

The next element downstream from ER neurons are ellipsoid body-protocerebral bridge-gall (EPG) neurons (Figure 2), which receive input in the EB and project to the PB and the gall 5, 36. These neurons are termed columnar neurons of the CBL type 1 (CL1a) in other species. EPG neurons are regarded as the head-direction neurons of the insectorientation-circuit 5, 37, 38, 39, 40. The activity of the population of these neurons manifests as a single ‘bump’ of activity in the EB, which, like the

Heading direction and rotational velocity: PEN (CL2)

When the animal turns, that is, it rotates around its yaw axis, the internal representation of head-direction in the EB needs to get updated. This requires a neuronal representation of rotation velocity, which is found in protocerebral bridge-ellipsoid body-noduli (PEN) neurons, termed columnar neurons of the CBL type 2 (CL2) in other species (Figure 2). PEN neurons receive input from EPG neurons in the EB and connect to the NO and the PB [23]. PEN and EPG neurons that branch in the same column

Reformatting and distribution of heading signal: Δ7 (TB)

Δ7 neurons are prominently characterized by having two output areas that are separated by seven columns that are either input areas or have no branches (4, 42, Figure 2). In locusts, the homologs of these neurons are called tangential neurons of the PB type 1 (TB1) were described to form an ordered representation of polarized light-orientation angles in the PB, which was the first description of a functional correlate of the columnar structure of the CX [4]. Δ7 Neurons are a central element of

Translational velocity: LNO (TN), SpsP

Processes described so far were only considering information about azimuth (heading) and changes thereof (rotational velocity). However, if an animal is moving, the orientation network also needs to incorporate information about the direction and velocity of translation. Translational-velocity information enters the CX through lateral accessory lobe-noduli (LNO) neurns, termed tangential neurons of the noduli (TN) in other species, that project from the LAL to specific compartments of the

Heading direction and translational velocity: PFN (CPU4)

Protocerebral bridge-fanshaped-body-noduli (PFN) neurons receive input in the PB and the NO and have outputs in the FB (42, 9••, 8••, Figure 2). These neurons are called columnar neurons of the CBU type 4 (CPU4) in other species. They are the most numerous columnar cell type in the CX (Drosophila: 437, bumblebee: 854) 23••, 24•. Many PFN subtypes respond to visual stimuli as well as airflow [43]. Two subtypes (PFNv and PFNd) have been shown to be conjunctively tuned to heading information and

Traveling direction: hΔB

The target of PFNv and PFNd neurons in the FB are neurons in the FB, termed hΔB 23••, 8••, 9••. Like other types of hΔ (or pontine) neurons, these connect two columns of the FB that are offset by half the width of the FB (Figure 3b, right). While EPG neurons encode the heading direction of the animal, that is, the direction that the head is facing with relation to an external frame of reference, hΔB neurons encode the actual direction of motion within that reference frame (Figure 3c). That

Conclusions

In the past years, huge advancements have been made in understanding the neuronal underpinnings of spatial orientation of insects at the neuronal level. Most of these studies were focused on circuits of the EB and PB. While increasingly more data from FB neurons are contributing to the understanding of the CX, the role of this neuropil is still poorly understood. Recent findings support the idea that state-dependency and context-dependency is incorporated into the system here, probably through

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Tanya Wolff, Stuart Berg, Hideo Otsuna, and Shin-ya Takemura, for providing the 3D model of the Drosophila central complex. Funding was obtained from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Germany), grant number: PF 714/5-1.

References and recommended reading (54)

  • J.D. Seelig et al.

    Neural dynamics for landmark orientation and angular path integration

    Nature

    (2015)
  • D. Turner-Evans et al.

    Angular velocity integration in a fly heading circuit

    eLife

    (2017)
  • J. Green et al.

    A neural circuit architecture for angular integration in Drosophila

    Nature

    (2017)
  • C. Lyu et al.

    Building an allocentric travelling direction signal via vector computation

    Nature

    (2022)
  • J. Lu et al.

    Transforming representations of movement from body- to world-centric space

    Nature

    (2022)
  • A. Miles and J. Wallman, Multisensory Control in Insect Oculomotor Systems, 1993,...
  • J. Zeil et al.

    Vision and the organization of behaviour

    Curr Biol

    (2008)
  • A. Finkelstein et al.

    3-D maps and compasses in the brain

    Annu Rev Neurosci

    (2016)
  • S. Heinze et al.

    Sun compass integration of skylight cues in migratory monarch butterflies

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • T.A.T. Nguyen et al.

    Sun compass neurons are tuned to migratory orientation in monarch butterflies

    Proc Biol Sci

    (2021)
  • H. Vitzthum et al.

    Neurons of the central complex of the locust Schistocerca gregaria are sensitive to polarized light

    J Neurosci

    (2002)
  • U. Pegel et al.

    Two compasses in the central complex of the locust brain

    J Neurosci

    (2019)
  • R. Rosner et al.

    Responses of compass neurons in the locust brain to visual motion and leg motor activity

    J Exp Biol

    (2019)
  • Y.E. Fisher

    Flexible navigational computations in the Drosophila central complex

    Curr Opin Neurobiol

    (2022)
  • A. Honkanen et al.

    The insect central complex and the neural basis of navigational strategies

    J Exp Biol

    (2019)
  • B.K. Hulse et al.

    A connectome of the Drosophila central complex reveals network motifs suitable for flexible navigation and context-dependent action selection

    eLife

    (2021)
  • M.E. Sayre et al.

    A projectome of the bumblebee central complex

    eLife

    (2021)
  • Cited by (9)

    • The neurobiology of the Monarch butterfly compass

      2023, Current Opinion in Insect Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text