Development, ontogeny, and maintenance of TCRαβ+ CD8αα IEL
Introduction
Intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) are comprised of innate lymphoid cells and T cells within the gut epithelium [1, 2, 3]. The T cell IEL include conventional resident memory TCRαβ+ CD4+ and CD8αβ+ T cells, as well as unconventional TCRαβ+CD4−CD8αα+β− and TCRγδ+ IEL [1,4]. Despite these differences in their origin, IEL bear notable functional and phenotypic commonality, including expression of T-bet, NK receptors of the Ly49 family, IL-15 receptors, and an activated phenotype with high expression of CD69 [1,5]. IEL patrol the epithelium and help to maintain homeostasis and integrity of the barrier surface between gut lumen and the body [1,6,7]. Effector mechanisms include stimulation of antimicrobial peptide production in epithelial cells through HVEM stimulation [8] and epithelial cell proliferation via an AHR regulated pathway [9]. IEL further have a cytolytic profile, including Granzyme B expression [1,4,10]. Within IEL, this review will focus on the TCRαβ+CD4−CD8αα+β− IEL (hereafter called CD8αα IEL) and emerging concepts about their development.
Section snippets
Intestinal CD8αα IEL
There are two main features that distinguish CD8αα IEL from conventional CD8+ or CD4+ IEL: (1) self-reactive TCRs and (2) a co-receptor that consists solely of CD8αα homodimers. CD8αα homodimers bind the nonclassical MHC class I molecule thymus leukemia antigen (TL), which is expressed by intestinal epithelial cells [11,12]. Some research suggests CD8αα regulates TCR signaling strength, and TL-deficient mice develop more severe disease in experimental models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [
Thymic development of CD8αα IEL precursors
Recent work has shed much light on the developmental pathways of CD8αα IEL. Although there was controversy in the past about the site of CD8αα IEL development [15,27,28], there now is agreement that the majority of these cells arise in the thymus [1,4]. IELp have been identified within the CD4−CD8− (DN) TCRαβ+ pool [17•,18••,19••,29,30••]. During thymic maturation, IELp, like conventional T cells, upregulate MHC class-I (i.e. H-2Kb in C57BL/6 mice) and also CD122 [18••,19••,31]. CD122 is a
A second thymic precursor for CD8αα IEL
While the PD-1+ self-reactive IELp is a prominent and well-studied precursor, recent reports indicate that an alternative and potentially functionally distinct precursor also exists [17•,19••]. Within the TCRαβ+ DN population, IELp were reported to express either PD-1 [18••] or Tbet [30••], yet these two populations are mutually exclusive [19••]. The PD-1+Tbet− (Type A) IELp reside in the thymic cortex, and were reduced in both classical and nonclassical MHC class-I knockout models (suggesting
Emigration and tissue seeding of CD8αα IEL
After selection in the thymus, conventional T cell progenitors upregulate the transcription factor KLF2 and the sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) and migrate along an S1P gradient through thymic perivascular spaces and into the vasculature [31,43, 44, 45]. The same emigration mechanism seems to apply to IELp, as the presence of gut CD8αα IEL was dependent on both KLF2 and S1PR1, even though neither of these molecules were expressed by CD8αα IEL in the gut [46]. Instead, KLF2 and S1PR1
Future questions for the study of CD8αα IEL
In the last decade or so, much effort has been put into better understanding the developmental pathways and functional values of CD8αα IEL. Traditionally, studies of IELp populations heavily rely on adoptive transfer experiments, in which donor populations are injected into congenically distinct T cell deficient (i.e. Rag-10 or Rag-20) hosts. This approach can rightly be criticized as compromised, as only a small number of IELp can be isolated from thymi, and because they need to be transferred
Conflict of interest statement
Nothing declared.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgement
KAH received funding from the National Institutes of Health (R37 AI39560).
References (51)
- et al.
CD8αα(+) innate-type lymphocytes in the intestinal epithelium mediate mucosal immunity
Immunity
(2014) - et al.
Intraepithelial type 1 innate lymphoid cells are a unique subset of IL-12- and IL-15-responsive IFN-gamma-producing cells
Immunity
(2013) - et al.
Exogenous stimuli maintain intraepithelial lymphocytes via aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation
Cell
(2011) - et al.
Combined deletion of CD8 locus cis-regulatory elements affects initiation but not maintenance of CD8 expression
Immunity
(2002) - et al.
Precursors of functional MHC class I- or class II-restricted CD8alphaalpha(+) T cells are positively selected in the thymus by agonist self-peptides
Immunity
(2002) - et al.
CD8αα intraepithelial lymphocytes arise from two main thymic precursors
Nat Immunol
(2017) - et al.
Thymus ontogeny and the development of TCR alpha beta intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes
Cell Immunol
(1996) - et al.
The transcription factor T-bet is induced by IL-15 and thymic agonist selection and controls CD8αα(+) intraepithelial lymphocyte development
Immunity
(2014) - et al.
Murine thymic selection quantified using a unique method to capture deleted T cells
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
(2013) - et al.
Models of self-peptide sampling by developing T cells identify candidate mechanisms of thymic selection
PLoS Comput Biol
(2013)
Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don’t see)
Nat Rev Immunol
Intrinsic requirement for the vitamin D receptor in the development of CD8αα-expressing T cells
J Immunol
The light and dark sides of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes
Nat Rev Immunol
Diverse developmental pathways of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes
Nat Rev Immunol
Mouse TCRalphabeta+CD8alphaalpha intraepithelial lymphocytes express genes that down-regulate their antigen reactivity and suppress immune responses
J Immunol
Intestinal epithelial and intraepithelial T cell crosstalk mediates a dynamic response to infection
Cell
Tissue adaptation of regulatory and intraepithelial CD4(+) T cells controls gut inflammation
Science
HVEM signalling at mucosal barriers provides host defence against pathogenic bacteria
Nature
Differential expression of granzyme B and C in murine cytotoxic lymphocytes
J Immunol
T cell responses modulated through interaction between CD8alphaalpha and the nonclassical MHC class I molecule, TL
Science
Expression of the thymus leukemia antigen in mouse intestinal epithelium
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Thymus leukemia antigen controls intraepithelial lymphocyte function and inflammatory bowel disease
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
The V beta repertoire of mouse gut homodimeric alpha CD8+ intraepithelial T cell receptor alpha/beta + lymphocytes reveals a major extrathymic pathway of T cell differentiation
J Exp Med
Thymic progenitors of TCRαβ+ CD8αα intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes require RasGRP1 for development
J Exp Med
Elevated T cell receptor signaling identifies a thymic precursor to the TCRαβ(+)CD4(-)CD8β(-) intraepithelial lymphocyte lineage
Immunity
Cited by (20)
T-Cell Development
2022, Clinical Immunology: Principles and Practice, Sixth EditionAn Integrated Epigenomic and Transcriptomic Map of Mouse and Human αβ T Cell Development
2020, ImmunityCitation Excerpt :Cells with moderate affinity for self MHC peptide are rescued from cell death (positive selection) and become conventional CD4+ or CD8+ single-positive (SP) thymocytes and T cells (Singer et al., 2008; Taniuchi, 2018; Xiong and Bosselut, 2012). In contrast, cells with high affinity for intrathymic ligands are actively deleted (negative selection) or differentiate into diverse “agonist-selected” fates, including regulatory T (Treg) cells or precursors of CD8α+ CD8β– (CD8αα) gut intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IELp) (Li and Rudensky, 2016; McDonald et al., 2018; Ohkura et al., 2013; Ruscher and Hogquist, 2019). The development of these thymocyte lineages and the transcriptional programs that underlie their differentiation are incompletely understood, in part because of the heterogeneity characteristic of thymocyte populations.
Editorial overview: The value of commitment in the lymphocyte world
2019, Current Opinion in ImmunologyA guide to thymic selection of T cells
2024, Nature Reviews Immunology
- 1
Current address: Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.