Elsevier

Cognition

Volume 166, September 2017, Pages 174-183
Cognition

Original Articles
Unconscious integration of multisensory bodily inputs in the peripersonal space shapes bodily self-consciousness

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.028Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the role of multisensory integration as a key mechanism of self-consciousness. In particular, integration of bodily signals within the peripersonal space (PPS) underlies the experience of the self in a body we own (self-identification) and that is experienced as occupying a specific location in space (self-location), two main components of bodily self-consciousness (BSC). Experiments investigating the effects of multisensory integration on BSC have typically employed supra-threshold sensory stimuli, neglecting the role of unconscious sensory signals in BSC, as tested in other consciousness research. Here, we used psychophysical techniques to test whether multisensory integration of bodily stimuli underlying BSC also occurs for multisensory inputs presented below the threshold of conscious perception. Our results indicate that visual stimuli rendered invisible through continuous flash suppression boost processing of tactile stimuli on the body (Exp. 1), and enhance the perception of near-threshold tactile stimuli (Exp. 2), only once they entered PPS. We then employed unconscious multisensory stimulation to manipulate BSC. Participants were presented with tactile stimulation on their body and with visual stimuli on a virtual body, seen at a distance, which were either visible or rendered invisible. We found that participants reported higher self-identification with the virtual body in the synchronous visuo-tactile stimulation (as compared to asynchronous stimulation; Exp. 3), and shifted their self-location toward the virtual body (Exp.4), even if stimuli were fully invisible. Our results indicate that multisensory inputs, even outside of awareness, are integrated and affect the phenomenological content of self-consciousness, grounding BSC firmly in the field of psychophysical consciousness studies.

Introduction

Based on clinical and experimental research in humans, it has been proposed that multisensory integration is a key mechanism for self-consciousness. In particular, bodily self-consciousness (BSC) has been shown to depend on the integration of multisensory bodily stimuli (Blanke, 2012, Blanke et al., 2015, Ehrsson, 2012a, Tsakiris, 2010). Research has focused on two central aspects of BSC: people normally self-identify with a given body, which they perceive as their own (self-identification) and they experience their self at the location of their body (self-location) (Blanke, 2012, Blanke and Metzinger, 2009). The notion that BSC depends on multisensory integration of bodily inputs is evidenced by neurological patients who present deficits in multisensory integration together with an altered perception of their own body (Blanke et al., 2004, Blanke et al., 2002), and by experimental manipulations of BSC in healthy subjects using multisensory conflicts (Ionta et al., 2011, Lenggenhager et al., 2007, Petkova and Ehrsson, 2008, Petkova et al., 2011, Salomon et al., 2013). For example, in the full body illusion, viewing an avatar’s body being stroked, while concurrently receiving the same tactile stimulation on one’s own body, makes participants self-identify with the avatar (Ehrsson, 2007, Petkova and Ehrsson, 2008) and induces changes in self-location such that subjects perceive themselves closer to the avatar’s position (Ionta et al., 2011, Lenggenhager et al., 2007).

Under normal conditions, multisensory body-related stimuli occur within a limited distance from the body, which defines the peripersonal space (PPS Serino et al., 2015). Accordingly, neuronal populations have been described both in monkeys and in humans integrating somatosensory stimulation on the body with visual and/or auditory stimuli specifically when presented close to the body (Graziano and Cooke, 2006, Ladavas and Serino, 2008, Rizzolatti et al., 1997). PPS and BSC are thought to involve common neural structures in premotor, posterior parietal, and temporo-parietal cortex (Blanke et al., 2015, Grivaz et al., 2017, Makin et al., 2008) and it has recently been shown that the full body illusion leads to a shift in PPS from the physical body toward the virtual body that participants identify with (Noel, Pfeiffer, Blanke, & Serino, 2015), compatible with an extension of the PPS boundary (Serino, Canzoneri, Marzolla, di Pellegrino, & Magosso, 2015). These data link processing and integration of multisensory stimuli within PPS to self-consciousness, and to BSC in particular (Blanke et al., 2015, Noel et al., 2016).

Conscious experience has also been related to the integration of sensory information in the brain by other authors (Dehaene and Naccache, 2001, Mudrik et al., 2014, Tononi, 2008). Indeed, consciousness is characterized by a unity of experience in which information from multiple sensory modalities is integrated and bound together (Bayne, 2002, James et al., 1981). Recent experimental work has shown that non-visual stimuli that are consciously perceived may be integrated with stimuli rendered invisible through various masking paradigms (i.e. auditory (Alsius and Munhall, 2013, Lunghi et al., 2014), tactile (Lunghi and Alais, 2013, Lunghi et al., 2010, Salomon et al., 2015), olfactory (Zhou, Jiang, He, & Chen, 2010), proprioceptive (Salomon, Lim, Herbelin, Hesselmann, & Blanke, 2013) and vestibular (Salomon, Kaliuzhna, Herbelin, & Blanke, 2015)). It was further shown that even a subliminal auditory and a subliminal visual stimulus can be integrated despite unawareness (Faivre et al., 2014, Noel et al., 2015). It is unknown, however, whether integration of unconscious multisensory events affects self-consciousness, and BSC in particular, which is often considered a distinct and specific form of conscious content (Dehaene and Changeux, 2011, Faivre et al., 2015, Gallagher, 2000).

Previous research on the multisensory basis of BSC focused on the integration of sensory inputs that are presented above the visual and tactile thresholds for conscious access. Yet as it has been argued that BSC is based on low-level and pre-reflexive brain mechanisms, it is possible that the sensory events shaping the experience of the self need not be consciously perceived. While there is no experimental evidence suggesting that the multisensory integration processes of BSC do not require conscious awareness of the multisensory stimuli, interactions between unconscious multimodal stimuli have been shown in humans (see above) (Faivre et al., 2014, Salomon et al., 2015, Salomon et al., 2013) and at the neuronal level in anesthetized animals (Graziano et al., 1997, Meredith and Stein, 1986, Stein and Stanford, 2008). Here, in a series of four experiments, we tested for the first time whether multisensory integration of bodily stimuli underlying BSC also occurs for signals presented below the threshold of conscious perception. We first asked whether tactile stimuli on the body are preferentially integrated with visual stimuli presented within; as compared to outside the PPS, when visual inputs were subliminal and tactile inputs supraliminal (Exp. 1) or when visual were subliminal and tactile inputs were near-threshold (Exp. 2). Next, we investigated whether it is possible to manipulate BSC by using visuo-tactile stimulation administered below the threshold for conscious access. To this aim, we coupled tactile stimulation on the body with invisible synchronous visual stimuli on a virtual body to induce the full body illusion (Lenggenhager et al., 2007) and tested whether this would affect self-identification, as assessed by questionnaires (Exp.3) and self-location, as assessed by the location of PPS boundaries (Exp. 4).

Section snippets

Participants

In total 98 participants (31 females, mean age = 23.0 ± 2.7) were included in this series of experiments. Thirty-two subjects took part in Exp. 1, 15 in Exp. 2, 25 in Experiment 3, and 26 in Exp. 4 (the first experiment being a between-subject experimental design, while the latter three being within-subjects). All participants were right-handed, had normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity, reported normal hearing and touch, and had no history of psychiatric or neurological disorder. All

Invisible looming stimuli within the PPS affect tactile perception (Exp. 1)

We analysed RT to the tactile stimulation as a function of the different distances of the virtual ball and its direction, in the visible and invisible conditions. As shown in Fig. 2A, there was a clear distance dependent modulation of RT, as a function of the location of the visual stimulus, both for the Visible and Invisible conditions. This was not the case for Receding visual stimuli, excluding the possibility that the present finding was a mere temporal effect (see Supplementary material

Unconscious multisensory integration in PPS

The self is essential to our understanding of consciousness (Blanke and Metzinger, 2009, Damasio, 2012, Metzinger, 2004) and recent work has highlighted the role of multisensory integration and PPS in self-consciousness, especially in BSC (for reviews see Blanke, 2012, Blanke et al., 2015, Ehrsson, 2012b, Faivre et al., 2017, Noel et al., 2016). The present study brings novel comprehensive evidence that multisensory integration in PPS does not require conscious awareness and, importantly, that

Author contributions

R.S., J.P.N., A.S., and O.B., conceived of the experiments, which were performed by R.S., J.P.N., M.L., and analysed by R.S., J.P.N., and A.S. N.F.; T.M. provided valuable analysis tools and conceptual contributions to the manuscript, which was written by R.S. and A.S. All authors edited and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

O.B. is supported by the Bertarelli Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the European Science Foundation. A.S. is supported by W Investments S.A., Switzerland (industrial grant ‘RealiSM’), by Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P3_163951), by the Leenards Foundation. R.S. was supported by the National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) “SYNAPSY – The Synaptic Bases of Mental Diseases” financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation (n° 51AU40_125759). NF is an EPFL

References (76)

  • P. Grivaz et al.

    Common and distinct brain regions processing multisensory bodily signals for peripersonal space and body ownership

    Neuroimage

    (2017)
  • S. Ionta et al.

    Multisensory mechanisms in temporo-parietal cortex support self-location and first-person perspective

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • J.-R. King et al.

    Brain mechanisms underlying the brief maintenance of seen and unseen sensory information

    Neuron

    (2016)
  • B. Lenggenhager et al.

    Spatial aspects of bodily self-consciousness

    Consciousness and Cognition

    (2009)
  • C. Lunghi et al.

    Touch disambiguates rivalrous perception at early stages of visual analysis

    Current Biology

    (2010)
  • E. Macaluso et al.

    The representation of space near the body through touch and vision

    Neuropsychologia

    (2010)
  • T.R. Makin et al.

    On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2008)
  • J.P. Noel et al.

    Peripersonal space as the space of the bodily self

    Cognition

    (2015)
  • J.-P. Noel et al.

    Cognitive neuroscience: Integration of sight and sound outside of awareness?

    Current Biology

    (2015)
  • R. Salomon et al.

    Balancing awareness: Vestibular signals modulate visual consciousness in the absence of awareness

    Consciousness and Cognition

    (2015)
  • C. Teneggi et al.

    Social modulation of peripersonal space boundaries

    Current Biology

    (2013)
  • M. Tsakiris

    My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership

    Neuropsychologia

    (2010)
  • W. Zhou et al.

    Olfaction modulates visual perception in binocular rivalry

    Current Biology

    (2010)
  • A. Alsius et al.

    Detection of audiovisual speech correspondences without visual awareness

    Psychological Science

    (2013)
  • A. Arzi et al.

    Humans can learn new information during sleep

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2012)
  • S.V. Astafiev et al.

    Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2004)
  • D. Banakou et al.

    Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    (2013)
  • D. Banakou et al.

    Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    (2014)
  • Bayne, T. (2002). The unity of...
  • O. Blanke

    Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience

    (2012)
  • O. Blanke et al.

    Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin

    Brain

    (2004)
  • O. Blanke et al.

    Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions

    Nature

    (2002)
  • E. Canzoneri et al.

    Dynamic sounds capture the boundaries of peripersonal space representation in humans

    PLoS ONE

    (2012)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1977)
  • A. Damasio

    Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain

    (2012)
  • O. Deroy et al.

    The complex interplay between multisensory integration and perceptual awareness

    Multisensory Research

    (2016)
  • H.H. Ehrsson

    The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences

    Science

    (2007)
  • Ehrsson, H. H. (2012a). The concept of body ownership and its relation to multisensory integration. In: The New...
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text