Elsevier

Clinical Imaging

Volume 38, Issue 2, March–April 2014, Pages 100-103
Clinical Imaging

Original Article
The value of ultrasound elastography in differentiation of malignancy in thyroid nodules

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.008Get rights and content

Abstract

We aimed to determine the value of ultrasound elastography (US-E) using carotid artery pulsation in differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid nodules. One hundred ten nodules were evaluated by US-E, and stiffness scores were compared to biopsy results. When cutoff for malignancy was determined as score 4, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, 95%, 40%, and 100%, respectively. We suggest fine needle aspiration biopsy to be performed in all score 4 nodules, while biopsy may be unnecessary in score 1 nodules. Benign biopsy result in a score 4 nodule should suggest radiological–pathological disagreement, and repeat biopsy should be recommended.

Introduction

Thyroid gland nodules are common, and palpable nodules are found in between 4% and 7% of the adult population [1], [2]. Widespread use of ultrasound (US) imaging and development of high-resolution scanners have significantly improved the detection of thyroid nodules [2]. According to US imaging and autopsy results, the incidence of thyroid nodules may increase up to 50% of population [3], [4], [5]. The rate of malignancy among thyroid nodules range between 5% and 15% [6], [7]. US imaging is a definitive method for detection of thyroid nodules; however, the predictive value of US in differentiation of malignant nodules is limited [8], [9]. Currently, the best available method for discrimination of malignant from benign thyroid nodules is fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) [10], [11], [12]. Despite its high sensitivity and specificity, FNAB is an invasive procedure and may give nondiagnostic results in 10% to 20% of biopsies [6].

Palpation is clinically used to evaluate the stiffness of a thyroid nodule; however, it is a subjective method, and findings depend on the size and location of the nodule as well as the examiner’s skill [13]. Elastography is a recently introduced noninvasive technique which estimates the stiffness of tissues by assessing distortion under compression [14], [15]. US elastography has been successfully applied in the breast and more recently in the prostate gland [16]. Previous ex vivo and in vivo studies have documented significant differences in stiffness of normal thyroid tissue and tumors of the thyroid gland [17], [18]. However, out-of-plane motion of the nodule during external compression and compression of the thyroid gland due to pulsation of the carotid artery may limit this technique [17]. Carotid pulsation has also been used as a source of compression for elastography of the thyroid gland [19], [20].

In this study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic value of US elastography in the differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid nodules using carotid artery pulsation as the source of compression.

Section snippets

Patients

The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from the patients. The patients who were diagnosed with a thyroid nodule and had an indication for an FNAB were included into the study. The patients were selected prospectively and consecutively. The patients who did not have a final histopathological or cytological diagnosis were excluded from the study.

Lesion evaluation

US elastography examinations were performed using a 5–13-MHz linear transducer (Acuson

Results

A total of 110 thyroid nodules of 99 patients were included in the study. Five nodules from five patients were excluded from the study because of insufficient material as the final cytological result. Two nodules from one patient were also excluded because the patient was lost after a diagnosis of suspicious findings for malignancy with FNAB. A total of 103 nodules from 93 patients (24 men, 69 women) were analyzed in the study. The mean age of the patients was 52.8±12.5 years (ranging between 24

Discussion

Advances in imaging techniques have increased the number of documented thyroid nodules considerably; however, characterization of the lesion accurately is not always possible [23], [24]. In determination of the malignant lesion, presence of microcalcifications, irregular margins, and intranodular (type III) vascularization are reported to have a high specificity but low sensitivity [25], [26]. Despite its advantages, US-guided FNAB is an invasive procedure which may cause sampling errors,

References (44)

  • A Brander et al.

    Thyroid gland: US screening in a random adult population

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • S Ezzat et al.

    Thyroid incidentalomas. Prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography

    Arch Intern Med

    (1994)
  • E Koike et al.

    Ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules: prediction of malignancy

    Arch Surg

    (2001)
  • H Gharib et al.

    Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: an appraisal

    Ann Intern Med

    (1993)
  • L Hegedüs

    Clinical practice. The thyroid nodule

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • S Takashima et al.

    Thyroid nodules: re-evaluation with ultrasound

    J Clin Ultrasound

    (1995)
  • MC Frates et al.

    Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound. Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement

    Radiology

    (2005)
  • JR Goellner et al.

    Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid, 1980 to 1986

    Acta Cytol

    (1987)
  • GH Tan et al.

    Solitary thyroid nodule. Comparison between palpation and ultrasonography

    Arch Intern Med

    (1995)
  • BS Garra et al.

    Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results

    Radiology

    (1997)
  • A Lyshchik et al.

    Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography

    Radiology

    (2005)
  • T Rago et al.

    Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2007)
  • Cited by (11)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text