Elsevier

Clinics in Dermatology

Volume 26, Issue 5, September–October 2008, Pages 464-476
Clinics in Dermatology

Phototherapy and photochemotherapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.11.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Phototherapy, whose first application for psoriasis dates back to almost a century now, is still an actual mainstay of treatment. We discuss in detail the radiophysical aspects involved in the therapy, the different treatment modalities, and all aspects related to clinical application of phototherapy. By looking at new insights on the molecular mode of action, it becomes evident that phototherapy is in fact the oldest “biological” therapeutic strategy, whose target is directly the T-cell–mediated immunopathology of psoriasis. In an outlook, we discuss finally the current cost effectiveness calculations, important issues in times of increasingly tight public health budgets. In summary, this review points out that phototherapy is clearly a first-line therapy that is safe and effective. Guidelines in the patient management still have to be harmonized, however, and further trials to improve the fine tuning of irradiation protocols are still necessary.

Introduction

Around the turn of the 19th century, Sardemann used for the first time ever a carbon arc lamp to treat psoriasis in a patient.1 In 1923, Alderson then described “heliotherapy in psoriasis”. He used a quartz-jacketed mercury discharge lamp to treat his first patients.2 William Goeckermann, a dermatologist at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minn) followed and introduced a combination of coal tar and subsequent UV-B, which soon came to fame as the “Goekermann regimen”.3 Roughly 70 years later, in 1974, the combination of oral psoralen intake and subsequent UV-A irradiation was reported by the groups of Parrish4 and Wolff,5 publications that mark the initiation of modern psoralen–UV-A (PUVA) photochemotherapy for psoriasis. Phototherapy is thus an old and established treatment modality for this disease, which bothers 2% of the world's population.6 Since the beginnings, it has been subject to a continuous refinement process over the many years of its clinical application. This has kept its place in the dermatologist's arsenal until today. That is justified, as we will show. We enter now an age of new biologicals being appraised as novel therapy for psoriasis. These new bioengineered medications carry a large potential but also a substantial risk. For example tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α–blocking strategies can lead to fatal systemic infections such as legionellosis.7 Biologicals are extremely valuable for some indications. They are very expensive, however, and their broad use is not justified in our view. All of this in times of reduced public budgets for health care makes the old phototherapy modalities far from being redundant. In fact, phototherapy is also, strictly seen, a “biological” therapy. The photons and free radicals induced by UV radiation directly tackle the molecular pathology of psoriasis without the side effect of profound systemic immunosuppression.

Section snippets

Radiophysical aspects of phototherapy and photochemotherapy

Ultraviolet radiation clears psoriasis with varying efficacy depending on the wavelength. Wavelength dependency was determined with monochromatic UV radiation and resulted in the action spectrum for psoriasis as established by Parrish,2 who picked up and expanded earlier investigations by Fisher and Alsins.8 This action spectrum revealed that the most efficient wavelengths against psoriasis in the UV-B range are 304 and 313 nm.9 Wavelengths of less than 300 nm also achieve significant clearing

“Biological” “mode of action” for phototherapy

Since 1967, it has been known that already, a single dose of UV-B leads to a reduced synthesis of DNA, RNA, and proteins that entails a decreased rate of mitosis of the epidermal cells.13, 14 This short-term effect is then reversed when the repair starts 48 to 72 hours after irradiation, and the cells proliferate again at full speed. From this fact, one can directly deduce that an efficient UV-B phototherapy needs at least a session every other day to be effective. Another effect of

Natural phototherapy

Natural sunlight has been used as a UV source throughout history for a long time before modern phototherapy was developed. Even today, sunbathing at the dead sea is very popular among patients. From a photobiologist's point of view, there is indeed a rationale for this. The specific geographic location of the dead sea provides a favorable spot for natural phototherapy.49 Because of the southern latitude, the sunlight has relatively high energy in the UV-B range, which is a fact caused by the

Broadband UV-B

The traditional broadband UV-B sources were the first to be used for phototherapy in psoriasis. Nowadays, they have lost their popularity, but in some units, they are still used.1, 12 In comparative studies, they are clearly less efficient than narrow-band UV-B or PUVA.3 For patient safety, broadband UV-B therapy, which implies significant exposure to wavelength spectra of less than 300 nm and even less than 280 nm (UV-C), carries in theory a greater risk of long-term development of nonmelanoma

Narrow-band UV-B (UV-B 311 nm)

Narrow-band UV-B phototherapy has replaced the traditional broadband UV-B therapy. The success of narrow-band UV-B started in Europe with the invention of the Phillips TL01 lamp. In the United States, the invention was much delayed by the fact that these devices only became available in 1998 in the US market.10 That fact probably explains why the mentioned broadband UV-B protocol is still around in the United States.49 At least 6 independent studies have found the new narrow-band UV-B equipment

The history of PUVA therapy

Already, in ancient Egyptian times, plant extracts containing psoralens were used to treat patients with vitiligo. Psoralen–UV-A therapy thus looks back to more than a 3500-year history. Interestingly, it took until 1947 to finally invent PUVA in its modern form, first again for treating vitiligo.22 In 1951, Pinkus was then the first to use psoralens for the treatment of patients with psoriasis, but it took until 1974 for the first PUVA study with oral 8-methoxypsoralen (MOP) intake in patients

What is PUVA?

Psoralen–UV-A is basically a controlled and repeated induction of phototoxic reactions that has proven its efficacy in virtually all subtypes of psoriasis.3 Only generalized pustular psoriasis and erythemogenic psoriasis are difficult to treat with PUVA alone and normally need a combination therapy with retinoids such as etretinate. Phototoxic reactions are delayed, with an erythema reaction peaking 48 to 72 hours after irradiation. Therefore, accurate UV-A dosimetry is distinctly required for

Oral PUVA therapy

The first clinical trials in the 1970s were set up using oral PUVA therapy. In the United States and in Europe, 2 slightly differing protocols of oral PUVA were evaluated in these trials, and both proved their efficacy.73, 74 Their characteristics are shown in Table 3. The main differences between the 2 protocols are the UV-A starting dose and the increment scheme. The European study used the individually determined minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) as starting point, whereas the Americans used a

Bath PUVA therapy

Topical application of psoralen was first described by Fischer and Alsins8, and then Hannuksela and Karvonen81 demonstrated its high efficacy in a first comparative study with systemic PUVA in 1978. Several studies have confirmed this and rated bath PUVA equally or even better than systemic PUVA.21 Most of these trials, however, contained small patient numbers and did not meet basic International Conference on Harmonization standards for equivalence trials, a fact that has lead to disapproval

Combinations of phototherapy with other treatment strategies

Ultraviolet B and PUVA can be combined with several other agents used for psoriasis. Ultraviolet B together with methotrexate (MTX) in 26 patients worked very well, with 15 mg MTX per week with MTX started 3 weeks before initiating UV-B. When psoriasis is cleared, MTX should be stopped.59 One has to be aware, however, of the rare, but serious side effect of a generalized phototoxic reaction with this combination.49 Methotrexate has also been used together with PUVA, but because of the

Balneophototherapy

This new variant is basically a combination of salt water bathing and subsequent UV-B 311 nm irradiation and thus an imitation of the natural heliotherapy and bathing at the dead sea already discussed. The patient is bathed in a brine of 5% to 15% magnesium-rich salt and irradiated subsequently with UV-B 311 nm while the skin is still wet. The magnesium ions in the brine supposedly help to decrease antigen presentation in the skin.96 The salt-water–soaked skin requires less UV-B irradiation,

New phototherapy strategies: the excimer laser

The xenon chloride excimer laser is in fact nothing different from a monochromatic 308-nm–emitting UV-B source. Because its wavelength is right in between the 2 action spectrum optima of 304 and 131 nm, it offers a highly efficient UV therapy without other interfering spectra. Only a few studies have been conducted so far with small patient samples. Two studies found more than a 75% improvement of the target plaque and more than a 90% improvement of the target lesion in 50% of cases. These

Photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new treatment modality that has recently also been tried out for psoriasis. It involves the topical application of 5-aminolaevulinic acid and subsequent irradiation with visible light. There are several light sources used; a common spectrum is the range of 600 to 750 nm.102 The irradiation causes a photochemical reaction in the skin during which the 5-aminolaevulinic acid creates reactive oxygen species. Thus, PDT has some parallels with conventional PUVA in

Cost-effectiveness issues of phototherapy

In times of increasingly tight health budgets, economic issues become more and more important for clinicians, especially when working in an office-based environment. Economic data therefore supplement clinical management decisions today. So far, only little data are available on the costs of common treatments for psoriasis and especially on the phototherapy treatment.105 The total expenditure for the treatment of patients with psoriasis per year is difficult to calculate. Estimations for the

Which therapy to choose

Patients with psoriasis experience difficulty and desire a quick and efficient improvement of their disease. The impact of psoriasis on the quality of patients' lives has been shown to be similar to that of other major diseases such diabetes and heart failure.109 Phototherapy improves the quality of life and thus achieves this treatment goal. If one looks at current guidelines of international consensus conferences, biologicals, traditional systemic agents, and phototherapy are all set on the

Conclusions

Patients with psoriasis require individual management and long-term planning of therapeutic strategies. The risk-vs-benefit ratio in many cases speaks in favor of phototherapy, the cost-effectiveness issue as well, and so far, no single other treatment strategy for psoriasis has been accepted as equally safe as narrow-band UV-B and PUVA.3, 115 Phototherapy is the oldest and best established “biological” therapy for psoriasis around. There is still a lot to establish in terms of clinical

References (115)

  • K. Storbeck et al.

    Narrow-band UVB (311 nm) versus conventional broad-band UVB with and without dithranol in phototherapy for psoriasis

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1993)
  • P.M. Gordon et al.

    A randomized comparison of narrow-band TL-01 phototherapy and PUVA photochemotherapy for psoriasis

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1999)
  • T. Henseler et al.

    Oral 8-methoxypsoralen photochemotherapy of psoriasis. The European PUVA study: a cooperative study among 18 European centres

    Lancet

    (1981)
  • J.W. Melski et al.

    Oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy for the treatment of psoriasis: a cooperative clinical trial

    J Invest Dermatol

    (1977)
  • V. Streit et al.

    Treatment of psoriasis with polyethylene sheet bath PUVA

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1996)
  • M. Lebwohl et al.

    Consensus conference: acitretin in combination with UVB or PUVA in the treatment of psoriasis

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2001)
  • N.J. Lowe et al.

    Acitretin plus UVB therapy for psoriasis. Comparisons with placebo plus UVB and acitretin alone

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1991)
  • I. Marcil et al.

    Squamous-cell cancer of the skin in patients given PUVA and ciclosporin: nested cohort crossover study

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • C.M. Schempp et al.

    Magnesium ions inhibit the antigen-presenting function of human epidermal Langerhans cells in vivo and in vitro. Involvement of ATPase, HLA-DR, B7 molecules, and cytokines

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2000)
  • B.L. Diffey et al.

    An appraisal of ultraviolet lamps used for the phototherapy of psoriasis

    Br J Dermatol

    (1987)
  • H. Honigsmann

    Phototherapy for psoriasis

    Clin Exp Dermatol

    (2001)
  • J.A. Parrish et al.

    Photochemotherapy of psoriasis with oral methoxsalen and longwave ultraviolet light

    N Engl J Med

    (1974)
  • Wolff K, Honigsmann H, Gschnait F, Konrad K. [Photochemotherapy of psoriasis: clinical experiences with 152 patients...
  • Soderlin M, Blomkvist C, Dahl P, Forsberg P, Fohlman J. Increased risk of infection with biological immunomodifying...
  • T. Fischer et al.

    Treatment of psoriasis with trioxsalen baths and dysprosium lamps

    Acta Derm Venereol

    (1976)
  • M. Zanolli

    Phototherapy treatment of psoriasis today

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2003)
  • C. Green et al.

    A comparison of the efficacy and relapse rates of narrowband UVB (TL-01) monotherapy vs. etretinate (re-TL-01) vs. etretinate-PUVA (re-PUVA) in the treatment of psoriasis patients

    Br J Dermatol

    (1992)
  • D.K. Taylor et al.

    Guidelines for dosimetry and calibration in ultraviolet radiation therapy: a report of a British Photodermatology Group workshop

    Br J Dermatol

    (2002)
  • K. Fukuyama et al.

    Effect of ultraviolet light on RNA and protein synthesis in differentiated epidermal cells

    Nature

    (1967)
  • J.H. Epstein et al.

    Defect in DNA synthesis in skin of patients with xeroderma pigmentosum demonstrated in vivo

    Science

    (1970)
  • B. Staberg

    Psoriasis. Transcapillary and interstitial transport of plasma proteins, cutaneous blood, flow, and effect of phototherapy

    Dan Med Bull

    (1985)
  • R.S. Dawe et al.

    History of psoriasis response to sunlight does not predict outcome of UVB phototherapy

    Clin Exp Dermatol

    (2004)
  • N.K. Gibbs

    Narrowband UV-B phototherapy clears psoriasis through a combination of local and systemic effects

    Arch Dermatol

    (2003)
  • J.F. Walter et al.

    Psoralen plus black light inhibits epidermal DNA synthesis

    Arch Dermatol

    (1973)
  • J. Wenk et al.

    UV-induced oxidative stress and photoaging

    Curr Probl Dermatol

    (2001)
  • K. Kostovic et al.

    Phototherapy of psoriasis: review and update

    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat

    (2004)
  • J.D. Bos et al.

    Psoriasis: dysregulation of innate immunity

    Br J Dermatol

    (2005)
  • R.A. Clark et al.

    Misbehaving macrophages in the pathogenesis of psoriasis

    J Clin Invest

    (2006)
  • A. Stratis et al.

    Pathogenic role for skin macrophages in a mouse model of keratinocyte-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation

    J Clin Invest

    (2006)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Activated macrophages are essential in a murine model for T cell–mediated chronic psoriasiform skin inflammation

    J Clin Invest

    (2006)
  • G. Fierlbeck et al.

    Psoriasis induced at the injection site of recombinant interferon gamma. Results of immunohistologic investigations

    Arch Dermatol

    (1990)
  • M. Ozawa et al.

    Immunopathogenesis of psoriasis

    Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy

    (2004)
  • P. Ettehadi et al.

    Elevated tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) biological activity in psoriatic skin lesions

    Clin Exp Immunol

    (1994)
  • S.E. Jacob et al.

    Simultaneous measurement of multiple Th1 and Th2 serum cytokines in psoriasis and correlation with disease severity

    Mediators Inflamm

    (2003)
  • C. Bonifati et al.

    Correlated increases of tumour necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6 and granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor levels in suction blister fluids and sera of psoriatic patients—relationships with disease severity

    Clin Exp Dermatol

    (1994)
  • M.H. Kagen et al.

    Regulatory T cells in psoriasis

    Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop

    (2006)
  • Z. Bata-Csorgo et al.

    Kinetics and regulation of human keratinocyte stem cell growth in short-term primary ex vivo culture. Cooperative growth factors from psoriatic lesional T lymphocytes stimulate proliferation among psoriatic uninvolved, but not normal, stem keratinocytes

    J Clin Invest

    (1995)
  • M.S. Duthie et al.

    The effects of ultraviolet radiation on the human immune system

    Br J Dermatol

    (1999)
  • G. Sethi et al.

    Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and caspases in UV-B–induced apoptosis of murine peritoneal macrophages

    Photochem Photobiol

    (2004)
  • J.G. Krueger et al.

    Successful ultraviolet B treatment of psoriasis is accompanied by a reversal of keratinocyte pathology and by selective depletion of intraepidermal T cells

    J Exp Med

    (1995)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Insight on pyrimido[5,4-g]indolizine and pyrimido[4,5-c]pyrrolo[1,2-a]azepine systems as promising photosensitizers on malignant cells

      2022, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is considered safer and more selective than other antiproliferative therapies, as it is based on the use of non-toxic substances in the absence of light. Drug photochemotherapy includes three main practices: PUVA therapy (a psoralen derivative activated by UVA light on the unhealthy skin) [1]; extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), where collected leukocytes are exposed to UVA irradiation in the presence of 8-methoxypsoralen prior to reinfusion to the patient; and photodynamic therapy or PDT, in which a systemic or topical photosensitizing porphyrin derivative is activated by visible light in the area to be treated [2]. While PUVA therapy owes its effectiveness to the photoaddition of psoralens to biological targets, i.e., DNA, and its applications ranges from proliferative skin diseases to autoimmune disorders [3], PDT is mainly based on the production of singlet oxygen by the photosensitizer under the effect of blue and/or red light.

    • Redox-Phen solution: A water equivalent dosimeter for UVA, UVB and X-rays radiation

      2018, Radiation Physics and Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite their inherent dangerousness, they are the type of radiation that everyone interacts with most frequently. In fact, UV radiation is a major part of the sun light spectrum reaching the earth (Diffey, 2002), and both UV and X-rays radiations are adopted in many medical procedures (Khan and Gibbons, 2014; Schneider et al., 2008). Treatments such as phototherapy and radiotherapy make use of high doses of these radiations to treat skin diseases and cancer.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text