Using integrated quality function deployment and theory of innovation problem solving approach for ergonomic product design

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.019Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A multidisciplinary approach for ergonomic product design is proposed.

  • The proposed integrated model and approach procedure consists of four steps.

  • Identification of the CSNs, the HoQ, TRIZ and fuzzy decision theory are integrated.

  • The ergonomic product design process is improved by using the proposed approach.

  • An integrated kitchen stove innovative design is verified the proposed approach.

Abstract

A multidisciplinary approach integrating method of identification of customer satisfaction needs (CSNs), the House of Quality (HoQ) chart of quality function deployment (QFD), theory of innovation problem solving (TRIZ) and fuzzy group decision-making theory for ergonomic product innovative design and evaluation in the early design stages was proposed. An integrated model and the approach procedures consists of four steps. In step 1, identification of CSNs is based on a data source triangulation approach, questionnaire survey, 5-point liner numeric rating scale, factor analysis, and Cronbach’s coefficient alpha statistic are utilized to guarantee that the CSNs are complete and reliable. In step 2, a correlation matrix is built to identify the critical ergonomic design areas and the key problems are established by analysis of the negative relationships obtained from interrelationship half-matrix at the roof of the HoQ. In step 3, to solve the problems, TRIZ main tools and contradiction analysis are utilized. Several innovative alternatives are generated by combining appropriate Inventive Principles of TRIZ, the critical ergonomic design areas and the ergonomic design principles. In step 4, a general and easy fuzzy group decision-making method for evaluating of the best design alternatives is presented. A case study of the integrated kitchen stove innovative design and evaluation is conducted to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach.

Introduction

Product design is a critical factor during the early phase of new product development (Crawford, 1997, Chapter 4). Enhancing customer satisfaction and providing innovative products become crucial strategies for success. Product designers normally focus on functionality, quality and cost, which have long been the most important factor in product design. However, in recent years, research in ergonomics and design aesthetics has illuminated that product functionality, quality and cost may not be the main determinant of customer satisfaction but that other design elements such as safety, comfort (Vink, Overbeeke, & Desmet, 2005, Chapter 4), usability and pleasurable appeal (Jordan, 1998, Jordan, 2000), emotion (Nagamachi, 2002), attractiveness and individuation (Liu, 2003) also play an important role. The focus of ergonomics is to study the role of humans in the safe and efficient operation of complex industrial systems and the application of ergonomic principles and anthropometric data to the design of products. An ergonomic product may be expressed through the elements of safety, comfort, easiness, size, etc. With regard to design aesthetics, it may refer to the objective features of a stimulus such as shape, color, tone and texture (Postrel, 2003, Schifferstein and Hekkert, 2007) or to the subjective reaction like attractiveness to the specific product features.

Customers have been pursuing ergonomically well-designed and aesthetic product. The reason for customers shifts is that ergonomic product design based on anthropometric dimensions and ergonomic principles may prevent the risk of occupational injuries (Sperling et al., 1993) and ergonomically well-designed product also offer comfortable use and high pleasure to the customers (Motamedzade, Choobineh, Mououdi, & Arghamj, 2007). Through experiments, Sonderegger and Sauer (2010), reported that perceived usability was positively influenced by the design aesthetics of the product. Design aesthetics is an important tool to attracts customers and gain their attentions. Product designers should thus provide ergonomic and aesthetic expertise to ergonomic product design problem through innovative methods and tools.

With regard to the design mehods for new product development, quality function deployment (QFD) is an important methodological approach to increase customer satisfaction and reduce the product costs and development cycle time. Proposed by Akao (1997, Chapter 1), QFD was originally developed at Mitsubishi’s Kobe shipyards in 1972. According to House of Quality (HoQ) chart, the most recognized and widely used form of QFD, voice of customer can be availably and entirely translated into engineering characteristics. QFD has been successfully applied by industries around the world (Bergman, 1994, Geuma et al., 2012, Vezzetti et al., 2011).

In addition, originally proposed by Altshuller, the theory of innovation problem solving (TRIZ) solves technical problems and provides innovative product structures by employing a knowledge base built from the analyses of approximately 2.5 million invention patents. The TRIZ approach has applied to numerous design problem-solving such as therapy bike design proposal for cerebral palsy children (Lin & Luh, 2009), vacuum cleaner design (Russo, Regazzoni, & Montecchi, 2011), five cooling device concept solutions to overcome the interface conflicts (Wessel, Tom, & Vaneker, 2011), and Technology Forecasting of washing machine (Solomani, Hua, Shi, & Wang, 2004). In each of these cases TRIZ is used as problem solving tool in order to provide solutions for innovative product design. Besides, designers provided eco-friendly solutions to product design problem through TRIZ methods to help implement eco-friendly designs. Fresner et al. (2010), used TRIZ in cleaner production to minimize industrial waste and emissions by increasing the efficiency of the use of materials and energy. Pelt and Hey (2011), compared the BetaMax by Sony Corporation with the Video Home System (VHS) by Japan Victory Corporation to exemplify technologically superior products failing to become a success. Several TRIZ specialists, as a result, have made efforts to integrate TRIZ with other design methods and tools. Alan Van Pelt addressed the application of TRIZ together with Human-Centered Design (HCD). Others have proposed integration with the Neuro Linguistic Programming to understand customers (Mann, 2002, Chapter 5) or the Kano model (Hashim & Dawal, 2012). Hipple (2006) interprets many consumer products from the perspective of the TRIZ methodology and Mann (2002, Chapter 2) provides an extension of the classical 9-Windows tool to include consideration of behavior, capability, and beliefs, values, and identity. Known as an innovative idea generation tool, TRIZ was prevailed and accepted in worldwide corporations such as Philips, Samsung, Siemens and Motorola.

Moreover, several alternatives of ergonomic product innovative design are generated in the early design stages. The method for evaluating of the best design alternatives is critical to success in new product development. Recently, Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making (MCGDM) method is used in many real-world decision-making situations in various kinds of engineering and management fields (Hatami-Marbini and Tavana, 2011, Mojtahedi et al., 2010, Vahdani et al., 2013). Selecting of design alternatives is a MCGDM problem which involves many factors of both customer needs and business constraints. In the early design stages, evaluation of design alternatives is difficult to precisely express by crisp data because the information available is usually subjective or imprecise. So, it is more appropriate to present the data by fuzzy numbers instead of crisp numbers (Buyuközkan et al., 2012, Geng et al., 2010).

Despite of many success stories on both QFD and TRIZ applications, all of them implementation are not without problems. QFD is effective to indicate what problems to solve in order to satisfy customer needs, but does not necessarily offer a guide on how to generate solutions for the problem identified. With regard to overcome this challenge, TRIZ is one of the effective tool, However, TRIZ specialists are in doubt whether the problem or contradiction to be solved is the right one. Accordingly, a method of integrated QFD and TRIZ at product design stage for generating innovative alternatives is proposed. Besides, evaluating of ergonomic design alternatives is formulated as MCGDM problem and the evaluation criteria of alternatives have subjective perceptions. Therefore, fuzzy group decision-making method is proposed for the ergonomic design alternatives evaluation to ensure a more efficient and rational decision process. In this paper, we put forward a multidisciplinary approach integrating identification of customer satisfaction needs (CSNs), HoQ chart of QFD, TRIZ and fuzzy group decision-making theory for ergonomic product innovative design and evaluation in the early design stages.

Section snippets

The House of Quality (HoQ) chart of QFD

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a method for developing a design quality aimed at satisfying the customer and then translating the consumer needs into design targets and major quality assurance points to be used throughout the production stage.

The primary chart used in QFD is the House of Quality (HoQ). According to the HoQ, customer needs are translated into engineering characteristics, and subsequently into part or component characteristics, the process operations, and production

An multidisciplinary approach

The HoQ chart of QFD in its traditional form presents many defects (Sections 2.1.2 Defects of the traditional QFD, 2.2.3 Defects of TRIZ) on its implementation. A combination of both can compensate for their defects. Besides, how to identify customer needs accurately and extensively and evaluation design alternatives are not yet mentioned in both of the method. Therefore, we put forward a multidisciplinary approach integrating identification of customer satisfaction needs (CSNs), HoQ chart of

Case study

The traditional ceiling rage hood and gas hob for household, as shown in Fig. 9, Fig. 10, exist some design deficiencies. For example, it is not completely suck fumes, not safe to use, not save space, etc. Besides, ergonomics studies show that the Chinese women who are exposed to cooking oil fumes (COFs) at home suffer from high risks of lung cancer (Li et al.,1994), respiratory diseases (Svendsen, Sjaastad, & Sivertsen, 2003), cervical intraepithelial neoplasm and bladder cancer (Tai-An et

Discussion

The integrated model for combining identification of the CSNs, the HoQ of QFD, TRIZ and fuzzy group decision-making was proposed in ergonomic product design. And the whole process is involved in four steps: (1) Identification of the CSNs by using the data source triangulation approach and statistical analysis. (2) Establishment of the critical ergonomic design areas and the key problems by constructing the HoQ of QFD. (3) Several alternatives are generated by application of TRIZ. (4)

Conclusion

In this paper, we put forward an integrated model and a multidisciplinary approach integrating identification of customer satisfaction needs (CSNs), HoQ chart of QFD, TRIZ and fuzzy group decision-making theory for ergonomic product innovative design and evaluation in the early design stages. The proposed approach comprises of four steps. In step 1, we develop a method of identification of CSNs based on a data source triangulation approach, questionnaire survey, 5-point liner numeric rating

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the anonymous referees for the comments and suggestions, which have helped to improve the paper. In addition, the authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Council of the Republic of China, for financially supporting this research under Contract No. 71161018.

Fanglan Zhang, born in 1980, is currently an associate professor in Yanshan University, China. She is currently a Ph. D. candidate in School of Mechatronics Engineering, Nanchang University, China. Her research interests include theory of innovative product design, industrial engineering, ergonomics. Tel.: +86 018633526082; E-mail: [email protected].

References (44)

  • C.H. Lo et al.

    One-step QFD based 3D morphological charts for concept generation of product variant design

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2010)
  • J. Marsot

    QFD: a methodological tool for integration of ergonomics at the design stage

    Applied Ergonomics

    (2005)
  • S.M.H. Mojtahedi et al.

    Project risk identification and assessment simultaneously using multi-attribute group decision making technique

    Safety Science

    (2010)
  • M. Motamedzade et al.

    Ergonomic design of carpet weaving hand tools

    Industrial Ergonomics

    (2007)
  • M. Nagamachi

    Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development

    Applied Ergonomics

    (2002)
  • H. Raharjo et al.

    Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: A systematic approach to exploit quality function deployment potentials

    Computers & Industrial Engineering

    (2008)
  • D. Russo et al.

    Eco-design with TRIZ laws of evolution

    Engineering Procedia

    (2011)
  • R.R. Seva et al.

    Product design enhancement using apparent usability and affective quality

    Applied Ergonomics

    (2011)
  • A. Sonderegger et al.

    The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability

    Applied Ergonomics

    (2010)
  • L. Sperling et al.

    A cube model for the classification of work with hand tools and the formulation of functional requirements

    Applied Ergonomics

    (1993)
  • B. Vahdani et al.

    A new design of the elimination and choice translating reality method for multi-criteria group decision-making in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment

    Applied Mathematical Modelling

    (2013)
  • E. Vezzetti et al.

    A product lifecycle management methodology for supporting knowledge reuse in the consumer packed goods domain

    Computer-Aided Design

    (2011)
  • Cited by (80)

    • Effective radical innovations using integrated QFD and TRIZ

      2021, Computers and Industrial Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      To extend the approach to subsequent design and production processes, Yeh et al. (2011) identified two conflict determinants from four different HoQs (product HoQ, design HoQ, process HoQ and production HoQ) to resolve system conflicts at different stages. Meanwhile, to extend the approach in a wider range of engineering fields, Zhang et al. (2014) applied this integration approach for ergonomic product innovative design. Wang et al. (2017) incorporated this approach to service solutions.

    • Quality Function Deployment: A Bibliometric-Based Overview

      2024, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Fanglan Zhang, born in 1980, is currently an associate professor in Yanshan University, China. She is currently a Ph. D. candidate in School of Mechatronics Engineering, Nanchang University, China. Her research interests include theory of innovative product design, industrial engineering, ergonomics. Tel.: +86 018633526082; E-mail: [email protected].

    Minglang Yang, born in 1949, is currently a professor in Nanchang University, China. His main research interests include theory of innovative product design, industrial engineering, ergonomics. Tel.:+86 013870982988; E-mail: [email protected].

    Weidong Liu, born in 1962, is currently a professor in Nanchang University, China. His main research interests include quality engineering and reliability engineering. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text