A study of replacement rules for a parallel fleet replacement problem based on user preference utilization pattern and alternative fuel considerations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.01.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Parallel fleet replacement problems deal with determining an optimal replacement schedule that results in a minimal total cost of owning and operating a fleet within a finite planning horizon. In this paper, the fleet consists of service vehicles, varying in age and cumulative mileage, commonly owned by government agencies or private business organizations. The paper focuses on three main aspects of the problem, including the effects of some widely used replacement rules, consideration of alternative fuel vehicles for replacement, and a new “user preference” utilization pattern. The vehicle replacement rules under study include purchase-new-vehicles-only, no-splitting-in-selling, one-purchase-choice, older-vehicles-selling, and all-or-none rules. The initial fleet consists of gasoline vehicles, while alternative-fuel vehicles using either compressed natural gas (CNG) or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are included as challengers in every replacement decision period. The user preference utilization pattern denotes a pattern in which yearly usage of vehicles declines as the vehicles grow older or have higher cumulative mileage. Integer programming formulation of the defined problem that incorporates these new factors is provided. Small numerical examples under various scenarios and a large problem instance with model parameters estimated from actual data are solved to optimality to gain some insights about the replacement rules and other considered factors.

Highlights

► We study effects of replacement rules for fleet replacement problem. ► User preference utilization and alternative fuel are considered. ► Cost effective rules: one-purchase-choice, sell older first, and sell in cluster. ► Buy-new-only is non-economical; consider buying some young used vehicles instead. ► LPG-vehicles are more economical than CNG- and gasoline-vehicles.

Introduction

Parallel fleet replacement problems (PFRPs) involve determining an optimal replacement schedule that results in a minimum total cost of owning and operating a fleet of vehicles over a finite or infinite planning horizon. In general, a vehicle’s performance or efficiency deteriorates over its useful life due to usage and age. In other words, when vehicles become older or have higher cumulative mileages, they incur higher costs to own and operate. These costs include operating cost, maintenance cost, repair cost, fixed cost, and other overhead costs. Such higher costs combined with less efficiency call for vehicle replacement.

From a real application standpoint, fleet replacement problems occur in many situations. Examples are government agencies and private business organizations that maintain fleets of vehicles to satisfy public service or user demands for transportation. Vehicles in the fleet can be organized into classes categorized by size and/or function. Within a class, vehicles usually vary in their ages and cumulative mileages. This variety directly affects user preferences for using newer vehicles, given that various vehicles are available to provide the same service or function. This utilization pattern is referred to as “user preference” in this paper. When replacement decisions are made, the effect of this utilization pattern should be considered. This is because as older vehicles are replaced by new vehicles, the new ones become the most highly utilized, which makes their operational costs higher than those of the older vehicles. The pattern of user preference utilization is inconsistent with an often-made assumption in many previous studies that the operating and maintenance (O&M) cost is a non-decreasing function of age, which is a result of implicitly assuming constant annual utilization for all vehicles (or assets in other applications). Thus, this utilization pattern is studied in this paper.

In addition to the user preference utilization pattern, two other real-world aspects of the problem are considered. These include the current situation of high and fluctuating gasoline prices and the availability of other cheaper fuel alternatives, and some often-used replacement rules in making replacement decisions. The objectives are to investigate the effects of these real-world aspects, especially the replacement rules, on the optimal fleet replacement schedule. The problem is formulated as an integer program, and a set of problem instances is solved to optimality under various scenarios to examine the effect of these factors. The fleet data used in the computational study are taken from an actual fleet, gathered from several reliable sources, or estimated from real data. The findings from solving the large problem instance then lead to suggestions for fleet replacement decisions. Although the focus is particularly on the replacement of a vehicle fleet, the findings should be applicable to other replacement problems with similar characteristics.

There are a large number of relevant research studies on replacement problems in the literature, but to the best of our knowledge no studies have explicitly taken user preference utilization patterns or alternative fuel vehicles into account. The serial replacement problem of a single asset is well studied; see, for example, Fraser and Posey, 1989, Hopp and Nair, 1991, and Bean, Lohmann, and Smith (1994). In multiple-asset cases, replacement decisions are considered in parallel, and thus are called parallel replacement problems because assets are interdependent for one or more of the following reasons: (1) they exist to satisfy a prespecified level of demand (Hartman, 1999); (2) their replacements compete for a common limited budget pool (Karabakal, Lohmann, & Bean, 1994); (3) an economy of scale is associated with asset investment costs (Chen, 1998, Hopp et al., 1993, Jones et al., 1991, Tang and Tang, 1993). In other words, the parallel replacement problem involves tradeoffs between the capital expenses of acquiring new assets, capital gains from salvage values of old assets, and the operational costs of new versus old assets. Recent studies on the parallel replacement problem with various problem characteristics and settings can be found in Hartman, 2000, Hartman, 2001, Hartman, 2004, Hartman, 2006, Hartman and Ban, 2002, and Chang (2005), among others.

Hartman (2000) considers a generalized parallel replacement problem with replacement costs, budget, and demand constraints. An integer programming formulation for the problem is presented, as well as the linear programming relaxation, which is shown to have integer extreme points if the binary variables for economies of scale are fixed. Hartman, 2001, Hartman, 2004 studies the parallel replacement problem that explicitly considers the deterioration effects of age and cumulative utilization factors. The studies assume that the decision maker has some control over asset utilization patterns, and that workload allocation is treated as part of the decision. The effects of probabilistic asset utilization on replacement decisions are reported in Hartman (2001), and an efficient optimal solution procedure based on a stochastic dynamic programming approach is provided for the two-asset problem in Hartman (2004).

Hartman and Ban (2002) consider the series–parallel replacement problem, where assets are multiple heterogeneous machines in a parallel flow shop environment. They formulate an integer program for determining the optimal purchase, salvage, utilization, and storage decisions for each asset over a finite horizon. The model is found to be difficult to solve; therefore they provide the valid inequalities to improve the lower bound by LP relaxation, and the initial upper bound by a dynamic programming approach. Chang (2005) presents a fuzzy strategic analysis for equipment replacement that models existing equipment cost and market obsolescence fuzzily, in addition to equipment deterioration. Two numerical examples are also given. Hartman (2006) investigates the replacement rule, in which an asset is replaced at the end of its economic life, to see whether this is a good rule for the finite-horizon problem. The cases when the replacement rule is good and when it is significantly off-optimal are identified.

Section snippets

Utilization patterns and their relationship to cost assumptions

In the literature of parallel replacement problems, one of the often-made assumptions is that the operating and maintenance (O&M) cost is a non-decreasing function of asset age (and/or cumulative utilization). That is because assets require more repairs and maintenance as they get older. This assumption is valid for some real-world applications in which asset age has no effect on the user’s preference, so that the utilization is approximately constant for all assets (i.e. machines and

Mathematical formulation

The mathematical formulation for the PFRP is adopted from the more complex model proposed in Hartman (1999). The main difference is that in this model the utilization per period for vehicles at a certain age is subject to known user demand (user preference utilization pattern), and thus is a model parameter that is fixed a priori; whereas in Hartman’s 1999 model, utilization is defined as part of the decision variables. That is, Hartman’s 1999 model assumes that the replacement decision maker

Replacement rules

This section contains a discussion of five replacement rules which can be applied to, or are often used in, PFRP, and shows how they are modified and incorporated into the mathematical model so that their effects on the optimal replacement solution can be investigated. The discussion requires additional decision variables as defined below.

xoijbinary variable, which takes a value of 1 when there are one or more vehicles with fuel option o at age i purchased in period j, or 0 otherwise
yoijbinary

Numerical examples

Two numerical problems are presented in this section. Both problems are hypothetical and solved to optimality to gain some insight about the problem. First, a small fleet problem is solved with a short planning horizon under various scenarios. The objective is to show that most often-used replacement rules will not lead to the optimal replacement solution in some scenarios, even for a small fleet with a short planning horizon that has a high impact from end-of-study effect. Then, a large fleet

Conclusion

In this paper we investigate some commonly used replacement rules for a parallel fleet replacement problem under a user preference utilization pattern. The numerical findings suggest that the purchase-new-vehicles-only rule is a very non-economical rule, and that the decision maker should consider buying some used vehicles of younger age. Other widely used replacement rules – including one-purchase-choice for each period, older-vehicles-selling first, and no-splitting-in-selling – although not

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF), Grant No. MRG-5080379; and by the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission.

References (18)

  • P.T. Chang

    Fuzzy strategic replacement analysis

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (2005)
  • J.M. Fraser et al.

    A framework for replacement decisions

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (1989)
  • J.C. Hartman et al.

    The series-parallel replacement problem

    Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing

    (2002)
  • J.C. Hartman

    Multiple asset replacement analysis under variable utilization and stochastic demand

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (2004)
  • J.C. Bean et al.

    Equipment replacement under technological change

    Naval Research Logistics

    (1994)
  • Z. Chen

    Solution algorithms for the parallel replacement problem under economy of scale

    Naval Research Logistics

    (1998)
  • Department of Land Transport, Ministry of Transport, Thailand (2009). Statistics....
  • J.C. Hartman

    A general procedure for incorporating asset utilization decisions into replacement analysis

    The Engineering Economist

    (1999)
  • J.C. Hartman

    The parallel replacement problem with demand and capital budgeting constraints

    Naval Research Logistics

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (26)

  • Economic optimization analysis of different electric powertrain technologies for vans applied to last mile delivery fleets

    2023, Journal of Cleaner Production
    Citation Excerpt :

    The success of finding a globally optimal solution in linear problems and the great variety of available commercial solvers makes MILP a suitable mathematical optimization tool. The proposed optimization model extends the replacement model developed by Figliozzi (Feng and Figliozzi, 2013) taking into account configurable starting fleet conditions, age replacement rules (Parthanadee et al., 2012), and a TCO model that includes an economic analysis of the energy supply facilities. Subsequently, it is built a multiple scenario approach.

  • Planning low carbon oriented retrofit of diesel-driven cranes to electric-driven cranes in container yards

    2022, Computers and Industrial Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Stasko and Oliver Gao (2012) studied the purchase, resale, and retrofit of vehicles in the case of random vehicle failure. For more studies on fleet management, see Parthanadee et al. (2012), Shi et al. (2014), and Ansaripoor et al. (2016). However, few studies focus on the management of port equipment, especially the management of YCs.

  • Deployment and retrofit strategy for rubber-tyred gantry cranes considering carbon emissions

    2021, Computers and Industrial Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    On the other hand, green fleet management with different types of vehicles involved is referred as a supplementary source. The problem has been tackled using integer programming (Stasko & Gao, 2010; Parthanadee, Buddhakulsomsiri, & Charnsethikul, 2012), stochastic dynamic programming (SDP; Hsu, Li, Liu, & Chao, 2011; Kleindorfer, Neboian, Roset, & Spinler, 2012), approximate dynamic programming (ADP; Stasko & Gao, 2012), stochastic programming (SP; Ansaripoor, Oliveira, & Liret, 2014), and a multistage dynamic network (Shi, Song, & Powell, 2014). For instance, Stasko and Gao (2012) presented an approximate dynamic programming approach for making vehicle purchase, resale, and retrofit decisions in a fleet setting with stochastic vehicle breakdowns.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text