A complete cellular manufacturing system design methodology based on axiomatic design principles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2004.12.006Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper provides a framework and a road map for people who are ready to transform their traditional production system from process orientation to cellular orientation, based on Axiomatic Design (AD) principles. A feedback mechanism for continuous improvement is also suggested for evaluating and improving the cellular design against pre-selected performance criteria. A complete implementation of the proposed methodology at a manufacturing company and resulting performance improvements are also provided.

Introduction

With the increasing popularity of lean thinking, cellular manufacturing has become a significant focal point in manufacturing. In concert with this development, there have been numerous publications on design and improvement of cellular manufacturing systems (CMSs). Among these, we can list part family and machine group determination (Nancy & Wemmerlöv, 2002), evaluation of grouping efficiency measures (Sarher & Mondal, 1999), group scheduling (Wemmerlöv, 1992), machine layout in cells (Aneke & Carrie, 1986) and capacity planning in cellular manufacturing (Sule, 1991). Numerous modeling techniques have also been proposed for part family and machine group determination, including visual analysis (Burbridge, 1969; Groover, 1987), coding and classification (Choi, 1992; Hyer & Wemmerlöw, 1987), clustering algorithms (Singh & Rajamani, 1996), mathematical methods (Heragu & Chen, 1998; Sofianopoulou, 1999) and artificial intelligence approaches (Soleymanpour, Vrat, & Shankar, 2002; Zhao & Wu, 2000). All these approaches are developed to satisfy only one or limited functional requirements of the CMS design. Approaches, which include all aspects of cellular system design, are very limited. Silveira (1999) provides one such approach. This approach intends to integrate concepts and techniques into an integrated system in a logical sequence. This approach, however, is mostly based on his past experience and lacks detailed principles for implementation. With its scientific basis, the authors believe that axiomatic design (AD) approach (Suh, 1990) will provide a sound and systematic basis to cellular manufacturing design.

Many AD applications in designing products, systems, organizations and software have appeared in the literature in the last 10 years. AD theory and principles have been introduced first time by Suh (1990). Black and Schroer (1988) provide definition and use of decouplers for achieving flexibility in CMSs. Gunasekera and Ali (1995) have provided a three-stage approach to metal forming process. The stages are composed of conceptual stage, initial stage and final stage, respectively. The conceptual stage is designed using AD approach. Suh (1997) provided a conceptual approach for defining, classifying and design of systems using AD methodology. Suh, Cochran & Paulo (1988) provided an AD-based model for an ideal production system in line with lean principles. Babic (1999) provides a decision support system for arrangement of flexible manufacturing systems. This approach uses AD design principles together with FLEXY intelligent system. Cochran, Eversheim, Kubin, and Sesterhenn (2000) convert complex production system into small, flexible and decentralized production segments. In this approach they use lean principles in conjunction with segmentation and AD principles. Cochran, Kim & Kim (2000) provide a performance evaluation system for production system. Chen, Chen, and Lin (2000) proposed a knowledge-based decision support system using independence axiom of AD in order to improve cell performance. Houshmand and Jamshidnezhad (2002) also provide a lean manufacturing based production system design model using AD approach. In this model organizational capabilities, technological capabilities and value stream analysis are used as the basis. In addition to the design of manufacturing systems, AD approach has also been used in software design (Kim, Suh, & Kim, 1991), product design (Tseng & Jiao, 1997) and quality system design (Suh, 1995) areas. These studies have convincingly shown the applicability and benefits of AD in solving industrial problems.

Considering the literature mentioned above, a road map including all functional requirements of CMS design is not found. In this study, a methodology is developed using AD principles in order to fill this void in the design process.

Section snippets

Methodology

With this work, a road map for people who are ready to transform their traditional production system from process orientation to cellular orientation, based on AD principles is provided. In addition, a feedback mechanism for continuous improvement is also provided for evaluating and improving the cellular design against pre-selected performance criteria (Fig. 1).

Selection of project team, ensuring broad-based participation, analysis of current conversion process, and determining conversion

Principles of axiomatic design

The ultimate goal of AD is to establish a scientific basis for design and to improve design activities by providing the designer with a theoretical foundation based on logical and rational thought processes and tools (Suh, 2001). In accomplishing this goal, the AD provides a systematic search process through the design space to minimize the random search process and determine the best design solution among many alternatives. The most important concept in axiomatic design is the existence of the

Cellular manufacturing system design through AD principles

Step 1. Choose FRs in the Functional Domain. The first step in designing CMS is to define the functional requirements (FRs) of the system at the highest level of its hierarchy in the functional domain (Suh, Cochran, & Paulo, 1998). At this stage many functional requirements may be established. Each functional requirement established at this stage may lead to a completely different cellular manufacturing design. Therefore, extreme care should be given to all functional requirements before a

Implementation and results

A manufacturing company producing aluminum walkways, bridges, stairs and ramps in USA was focused on CMS implementation for customized production. The proposed methodology was implemented step by step in transforming its system from the existing classical manufacturing to a CMS. Each stage of implementation based on proposed methodology is summarized in the following sections.

Conclusions

In this paper we provide a complete and concise methodology for transforming a process oriented manufacturing facility into a CMS. The methodology is based on Axiomatic Design principles. The proposed process is also implemented at a company that manufactures aluminum ramp rails, landings and stairwells. The results show that the proposed methodology is sound, easy to follow and implement. Details of the feedback mechanism for continuous improvement of the cellular system under the guidelines

References (33)

  • M. Choi

    Manufacturing cells design

    Production and Inventory Management Journal

    (1992)
  • D.S. Cochran et al.

    The application of AD and lean management principles in the scope of production system segmentation

    International Journal of Production Research

    (2000)
  • Cochran, D. S., Kim, Y. S., Kim, J. (2000). The alignment of performance measurement with the manufacturing system...
  • O. Garza et al.

    Reducing flow between manufacturing cells: A sensitivity analysis

    International Journal of Production Research

    (1994)
  • M. Groover

    Automation, production systems and computer integrated manufacturing

    (1987)
  • J.S. Gunasekera et al.

    A three-step approach to designing a metal-forming process

    JOM

    (1995)
  • Cited by (92)

    • The role of perceived organizational supports and management nationality amid physical Workplace's planned quality change

      2023, Asia Pacific Management Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although some studies have adopted a multi-case study approach (e.g., Ho, 1999; Warwood & Knowles, 2004), cross-case comparison is rare. Fourth, most extant studies perceive 5S as a set of housekeeping practices based on the one-size-fits-all principle (Ahuja & Khamba, 2008; Brown, 1996; Durmusoglu & Nomak, 2005; Ho, 1999; Hubbard, 1999; Bullington, 2003; Kulak et al., 2005; McKone et al., 2001; O'hEocha, 2000; Patten, 2006). Such a perception has restricted the theoretical development of 5S because it discourages researchers from investigating 5S with behavioral and strategic perspective.

    • Hydrogen energy storage method selection using fuzzy axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process

      2020, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is also used for selecting the most appropriate design among a set of alternatives [67]. The fAD approach is first developed by Ref. [45] and applied to two different problems, a transportation company selection problem and a comparison problem of advanced manufacturing systems [43]. use AD principles for developing a framework and road map to transform a traditional process orientation production system to a cellular orientation.

    • A simulation-based methodology for the analysis of the effect of lean tools on energy efficiency: An application in power distribution industry

      2019, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cellular manufacturing is a popular method in Lean Production that brings similar processes and parts together at the shopfloor. Many companies try to transform their shopfloor from traditional job-shop layout to cellular manufacturing layout to increase their efficiency and productivity (Kulak et al., 2005). Production Control: Two levels, push and pull production control systems, were considered for this factor.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +90 212 293 1300x2746.

    2

    Tel.: +1 352 392 6753.

    View full text