Elsevier

Journal of Chromatography A

Volume 1257, 28 September 2012, Pages 25-33
Journal of Chromatography A

An approach based on ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry to quantify O6-methyl and O6-carboxymethylguanine DNA adducts in intestinal cell lines

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.040Get rights and content

Abstract

O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG) and O6-carboxymethylguanine (O6-CMG) are characteristic promutagenic and toxic DNA adducts formed by nitrosated glycine derivates and N-nitrosopeptides. Since endogenous nitrosation has been hypothesised as a plausible origin for the association between red and processed meat intake and colorectal cancer, a highly sensitive, fast and specific quantitative assay is needed to correlate the dose of individual DNA adducts with the effects of food consumption and individual digestive and metabolic processes. An ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS) assay for quantitation of O6-MeG and O6-CMG, using the deuterated analogues as internal standards (ISTD), was developed. Samples of calf thymus DNA containing O6-MeG and O6-CMG were purified by acid hydrolysis and solid phase extraction prior to quantification by UHPLC–MS/MS in the selected reaction monitoring mode. The method was successfully validated in terms of repeatability (RSD < 10%), reproducibility (RSD < 15%) and linearity (99.9%) by incubating 0.1 mg calf thymus DNA with the known N-nitroso compound potassium diazoacetate (KDA). The limit of quantitation was 30 fmol mg−1 DNA for O6-MeG or 1 adduct per 108 nucleotides and 50 fmol mg−1 DNA for O6-CMG or 1.7 adducts per 108 nucleotides. Subsequently, the method was applied to human colon carcinoma cell lines, Caco-2 and HT-29, treated with KDA to illustrate its capability to quantify O6-MeG and O6-CMG DNA adducts using biological relevant models in vitro. This method will support further research to unravel the mechanistic basis of endogenous nitrosation processes upon consumption of red and processed meat products.

Highlights

► Optimisation of the extraction of O6-carboxymethylguanine and O6-methylguanine. ► Development and proper validation of an UHPLC–MS/MS detection method. ► Working with pre-extracted DNA instead of cultured cell lines is more efficient. ► Applicability of the detection method for in vitro and in vivo experiments.

Introduction

Detection of DNA adducts is widely used for monitoring the exposure of cellular DNA to genotoxic agents. Knowledge of the nature and amounts of DNA adducts formed in vivo or in vitro provides valuable information regarding the mutational effects that may result from particular exposures. Epidemiological and clinical studies have consistently demonstrated that the consumption of meat and in particular red and processed meat is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [1]. The formation of the DNA adducts O6-carboxymethyl-2′-deoxyguanosine (O6-CMdG) and O6-methyl-2′-deoxyguanosine (O6-MedG) has been associated with increased colorectal cancer risk upon intake of red and processed meat.

These particular DNA adducts (O6-CMdG and O6-MedG) are the result of endogenously formed alkylating N-nitroso compounds (NOCs), which are metabolised to highly reactive methylating agents that interact with the nucleophilic centres of DNA bases [2], [3]. In turn, the formation of these endogenous NOCs has been hypothesised as a plausible origin for increased colon cancer risk, since a dose–response relation with the faecal excretion of NOCs for red and processed meat but not for white meat intake has been established [4], [5], [6]. Evidence of human exposure to NOCs, reinforcing the presence of alkylating agents in the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract [7], [8] is based on the fact that O6-CMdG and O6-MedG are indeed detectable in colonic biopsies and human blood DNA samples [9], [10], [11].

The identification and quantification of very low DNA adduct concentrations, in vivo or in vitro requires ultrasensitive methodologies. This is particularly true for the analysis of human samples or in vitro applications on cell lines, where only small amounts of sample, and therefore DNA, are available. The methods currently used for DNA adduct determination include immunoassays [12], [13] and capillary electrophoresis-laser induced fluorescence immunoassays [14], 32P-postlabeling [15], GC/ECD [16] and HPLC with fluorescence detection [17], [18]. In recent years there has been a continuous improvement in the analytical approaches used to study these adducts, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with mass spectrometric detection playing an increasing role in these developments [19], [20], [21], [22]. HPLC coupled to mass spectrometric detection achieves a perfect balance between a high specificity and sensitivity. Specificity is further improved when utilising the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode of tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometers. LC–MS has already been applied to both O6-MeG and O6-MedG adducts [21], [23], however to the best of our knowledge no studies so far have reported MS-based methods with combined detection of O6-methyl adducts and O6-carboxymethyl adducts either as the bases or the nucleosides.

For this reason, the aim of our present study was to investigate the potential of triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (QqQ-MS) coupled to ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) to quantify in a highly sensitive and specific manner the DNA adducts of interest, O6-MeG and O6-CMG, in vitro in colonic cell lines treated with the known NOC potassium diazoacetate (KDA), and for future experiments in vivo in human exfoliated colonocytes. To this purpose, a sample pre-treatment and UHPLC–MS/MS detection method were developed followed by an extensive validation study performed with a standard reference DNA; calf thymus (CT) DNA. This newly developed UHPLC–MS/MS method was then applied in vitro to measure the generated adduct levels in NOC-treated human colon carcinoma cell lines (Caco-2 and HT-29).

Section snippets

Reagents and chemicals

Caution: KDA is carcinogenic. It should be handled in a well ventilated fume hood with extreme care and with personal protective equipment.

The chemical standard O6-MeG was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and the internal standard O6-methyl-d3-guanine (O6-Me-d3-G) was obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals Inc. (Toronto, Canada). O6-CMG was derived via 0.1 M formic acid hydrolysis at 70 °C for 1 h, from O6-CMdG with subsequent purification [12]. The stock solutions of the

Development of sample clean-up

To evaluate DNA adduct recovery, a proper execution of the DNA hydrolysis step is required. Mild acid hydrolysis of DNA samples with 0.1 M formic acid (F.A.) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) was compared for its purine base-releasing capacity [12]. Besides the type of acid used, a different hydrolysis time and temperature were investigated, respectively, 30 min at 80 °C and 60 min at 70 °C. The hydrolysed CT-DNA samples were analysed by UHPLC–MS/MS to investigate the O6-MeG and O6-CMG content. The rate

Discussion

The present study describes the optimisation and validation of a high-throughput, accurate and robust analysis method for the combined detection of O6-carboxy and O6-methylguanine DNA adducts. This quantitative analytical method has been subsequently applied to measure the DNA adduct formation in vitro on the human colonic carcinoma cell lines HT-29 and Caco-2 (and their pre-extracted DNA) after incubation with the known gastro-intestinal N-nitroso compound KDA and in vivo on human colonocytes

Conclusion

The results of the present study acknowledge the excellent applicability of triple quadrupole mass spectrometry coupled to ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography for the simultaneous detection of DNA adducts, more specifically O6-methylguanine and O6-carboxymethylguanine, in a accurate, sensitive, robust and high throughput manner. The performance characteristics (i.e. specificity, selectivity, repeatability, linearity, precision, recovery and limit of quantification) of this validated

Funding sources

L. Vanhaecke is a postdoctoral fellow from the Research Foundation – Flanders (Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO)-Vlaanderen).

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank M. Naessens, L. Dossche, J. Goedgebeur and D. Stockx for their practical assistance in the laboratory.

References (28)

  • S.S. Mirvish

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (1975)
  • S.S. Mirvish

    Cancer Lett.

    (1995)
  • S.A. Moore et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2010)
  • U. Nair et al.

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (2007)
  • N.J. van Sittert et al.

    Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech.

    (2000)
  • P.B. Farmer et al.

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (2005)
  • F.G. Zhang et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B

    (2006)
  • S.L. Tan et al.

    Mutat. Res. Gen. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen.

    (2011)
  • T. Norat et al.

    J. Natl. Cancer I

    (2005)
  • D.E.G. Shuker et al.

    Cancer Res.

    (1997)
  • S.A. Bingham et al.

    Carcinogenesis

    (1996)
  • R. Hughes et al.

    Carcinogenesis

    (2001)
  • S.A. Bingham et al.

    J. Nutr.

    (2002)
  • B.C. Challis

    Cancer Surv.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (28)

    • DNA adduct profiling of in vitro colonic meat digests to map red vs. white meat genotoxicity

      2018, Food and Chemical Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The fecal inoculum used to perform the colonic digestion was selected ad random (P5). DNA adducts in meat digests were extracted and purified according to a protocol previously described by Vanden Bussche et al. (Vanden Bussche et al., 2012) and Hemeryck et al. (2015). In brief; at first, 2 internal standards (O6-d3-MeG and M1G-13C3) were added to each sample.

    • DNA adductomics to study the genotoxic effects of red meat consumption with and without added animal fat in rats

      2017, Food Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      DNA concentration and purity in each sample were determined with a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Isogen Lifescience, Ijsselstein, The Netherlands). The DNA obtained in each individual sample was then subjected to a previously reported and validated DNA adduct extraction protocol (Vanden Bussche, Moore, Pasmans, Kuhnle, & Vanhaecke, 2012). In brief, all DNA samples were hydrolyzed in 0.1 M formic acid at 80 °C during 30 min.

    • Increased oxidative and nitrosative reactions during digestion could contribute to the association between well-done red meat consumption and colorectal cancer

      2015, Food Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In brief, 182 μL of filter sterilized sample was incubated for 18 h at 37 °C with 100 μg calf thymus-DNA. After addition of internal standard (50 μL, 20 ng/mL O6-d3-MeG), the concentration of O6-C-MeG in the mixture was quantified using LC–MS/MS following the method of Vanden Bussche, Moore, Pasmans, Kuhnle, and Vanhaecke (2012), which was adapted for fecal suspensions. A standard curve of O6-C-MeG was made by performing hydrolysis of O6-C-MedG standard in 0.1 mol/L formic acid at 70 °C for 1 h. O6-C-MeG in samples was quantified using the standard curve and the internal standard area ratio expressed as ng O6-C-MeG/mL digesta.

    • High resolution mass spectrometry based profiling of diet-related deoxyribonucleic acid adducts

      2015, Analytica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ethyldiazoacetate (EtDA) (the precursor of potassium diazoacetate (KDA)), crotonaldehyde (CRO) and 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane (the precursor of malondialdehyde (MDA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA) as well. Prior to preparation of stock and working solutions, O6-CMdG, O6-MedG, O6-d3-MedG, CrodG and CrodG-13C,15N2 were hydrolyzed from guanosines (nucleotides) to guanines (nucleobases) in 0.1 M formic acid at 80 °C during 30 min [19]. All standards were diluted in MeOH and stored (−20 °C) in stock and working solutions of respectively 500 ng μL−1 and 5 ng μL−1.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text