Wait until your father gets home? Mother's and fathers’ spanking and development of child aggression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.11.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Study results indicated that mothers use spanking more frequently than do fathers.

  • Mothers’– but not fathers’ - spanking predicted subsequent child aggression.

  • Processes linking spanking to child aggression differed for mothers and fathers.

  • Spanking by either parent did not improve children’s behavior over time.

Abstract

This study examined whether fathers’ and mothers’ spanking contributed to development of child aggression in the first 5 years of life. We selected parents (N = 1,298) who were married or cohabiting across all waves of data collection. Cross-lagged path models examined fathers’, mothers’, and both parents’ within-time and longitudinal associations between spanking and child aggression when the child was 1, 3, and 5 years of age. Results indicated that mothers spanked more than fathers. When examining fathers only, fathers’ spanking was not associated with subsequent child aggression. When examining both parents concurrently, only mothers’ spanking was predictive of subsequent child aggression. We found no evidence of multiplicative effects when testing interactions examining whether frequent spanking by either fathers or mothers was predictive of increases in children’s aggression. This study suggests that the processes linking spanking to child aggression differ for mothers and fathers.

Introduction

Most American parents use spanking, defined as “the use of physical force with the intention of causing a child to experience pain, but not injury, for the purpose of correcting or controlling a child’s behavior,” (Donnelly & Straus, 2005, p. 3) to discipline children. Studies show that spanking often begins early and occurs frequently. In one study that used the dataset examined in the present study (Fragile Families and Child Well-Being Study, or FFCWS), approximately one-third of mothers reported that they had spanked their 1-year-old child in the past month (Maguire-Jack, Gromoske, & Berger, 2012). Other research showed that 70% of mothers indicated they had spanked their child at least once by the time he or she was 2-years-old (Zolotor, Robinson, Runyan, Barr, & Murphy, 2011). In another FFCWS study that examined frequency of spanking by both mothers and fathers, the majority of three-year-olds (68%) were spanked at least once in the previous month by a parent, with a third of children spanked 1 to 2 times and two thirds of children spanked 3 or more times in the previous month (Lee, Taylor, Altschul, & Rice, 2013). By age 9 or 10, up to 94% of children have been spanked at least once in their lifetime (Straus & Stewart, 1999). For the most part, prior studies examining the effects of spanking on child wellbeing have focused on mothers’ use of the practice (for exceptions see Lee, Taylor, Altschul and Rice, 2013, MacKenzie et al., 2013); much less is known about the potential impacts of fathers’ use of discipline. In the current study we address this gap and utilize a transactional parent-child framework to extend prior research regarding the nature of mother, father, and child relationships in the first five years of life.

A growing body of empirical research indicates that spanking is associated with the development of children’s aggressive and antisocial behavior (Berlin et al., 2009, Gershoff, 2002, Grogan-Kaylor, 2004, Lansford et al., 2011, MacKenzie et al., 2013, Maguire-Jack et al., 2012). A recent FFCWS study showed that early maternal spanking is linked to children’s behavioral problems through the first decade of life (MacKenzie et al., 2013). One reason for this link may be that parents’ use of spanking models the use of aggression to solve problems (Bandura, 1973), and children imitate their parents’ use of aggression to solve their own conflicts or disagreements with peers and siblings. Furthermore, family coercion theory suggests that when parents use aggression or other forms of coercion to deal with problems, children may, over time, become resistant to its effects. As a result, the use of spanking is likely to escalate in frequency and severity, partly in response to children’s increased misbehavior, whether real or perceived by the parent (Patterson, 1982).

Such coercive family processes are developed and maintained through transactional processes between parent and child that unfold over time (Sameroff, 2009). Indeed, empirical evidence supports the presence of transactional mechanisms. First, after accounting for the child’s initial level of aggressive behavior or difficult temperament, prior studies using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study’s Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K) and FFCWS have shown that spanking is associated with subsequent increases in child aggression in the first few years of life (Gershoff et al., 2012, Gromoske and Maguire-Jack, 2012, Lee, Altschul and Gershoff, 2013, Maguire-Jack et al., 2012). This is true in studies with direct pathways accounting for the influence of child behavior on mothers’ parenting (Gershoff et al., 2012, Maguire-Jack et al., 2012) and in the context of a parenting relationship high in maternal warmth (Lee, Altschul and Gershoff, 2013, Gershoff, 2013). Similar transactional processes have been shown in studies of the Child Development Project and the Pitt Mother-Child Project with respect to the use of spanking and harsh discipline and increased risk for child antisocial behavior during the elementary and middle school years (Lansford et al., 2011).

Second, mothers appear to use more spanking with children whom they rate as having difficult temperaments, and mothers increase their use of spanking over time in response to children’s increased aggression. A study by Berlin et al. (2009) showed that child fussiness at age 1 was related to more spanking and verbal punishment of the child at age 3. Similarly, negative child emotionality at age 1 has been associated with increased maternal spanking at age 3, and higher levels of child aggression at age 3 have been found to predict maternal spanking at age 5 (Lee, Altschul and Gershoff, 2013, Maguire-Jack et al., 2012). Such studies provide evidence supporting the basic tenets of the coercive family-process model (Patterson, 1982). Children respond to mothers’ greater use of physical discipline by becoming more aggressive, and it appears that mothers subsequently increase their reliance on spanking in response to children’s aggressive misbehavior.

However, prior transactional processes studies of spanking and the development of child aggression have not included fathers (e.g., Berlin et al., 2009, Gershoff et al., 2012, Gromoske and Maguire-Jack, 2012, Lee, Altschul and Gershoff, 2013, Maguire-Jack et al., 2012). This is problematic for a number of reasons. First, children in two-parent families are likely to be spanked by both parents (Lee, Taylor, Altschul and Rice, 2013, Straus and Stewart, 1999, Taylor et al., 2010). In addition, there is reason to believe that fathers’ disciplinary practices have a significant influence on children’s wellbeing. For example, one study showed fathers’ permissive discipline, but not mothers’, was associated with preschool children’s higher levels of externalizing behavior problems (Jewell, Krohn, Scott, Carlton, & Meinz, 2008). In two prior studies that examined fathers separately (i.e., not accounting for maternal influences), fathers’ spanking was associated with increased child aggression in pre-school (Lee, Taylor, Altschul, & Rice, 2013) and adolescence (Prinzie, Onghena, & Hellinckx, 2006). However, these studies did not examine mothers’ and fathers’ spanking together, and so could not isolate the relative contribution of each parent. Since mothers’ and fathers’ use of spanking is correlated (Lee, Taylor, Altschul, & Rice, 2013) not estimating the effects of both together may potentially overestimating the influence of one or the other parent’s use of spanking.

Furthermore, although traditional gender roles position mothers as nurturing caregivers and fathers as breadwinners and disciplinarians (Ferrari, 2002), studies suggest that mothers spank more frequently than fathers (Day et al., 1998, Straus and Stewart, 1999). This may be due to the fact that mothers spend more time with young children (Craig, 2006, Yeung et al., 2001) and therefore have more opportunities to engage in discipline than do fathers. However, even though fathers seem to spank less than mothers, it is not known whether fathers’ use of spanking has equal salience given the perception of their roles as differing from that of mothers—particularly the perception of their role as disciplinarian within the family context.

Given that the literature on spanking has almost exclusively focused on mothers, our primary research question was to examine whether paternal spanking predicts increased child aggression over time, and whether paternal spanking is reactive to children’s aggression in the same way that maternal spanking has been found to be (Lee, Altschul and Gershoff, 2013, Maguire-Jack et al., 2012). Our first step was to extend prior studies that showed links between fathers’ spanking and child aggression by analyzing the extent to which father-child associations may be transactional or reciprocal, that is, the extent to which fathers’ use of spanking is influenced by changes in child aggression. We used cross-lagged path models to examine whether changes in fathers’ use of spanking between ages 1 and 3 had a significant influence on the development of child aggression at age 3 and changes in child aggression between ages 3 and 5, and the extent to which child aggression at age 3 influenced changes in fathers’ use of spanking between ages 3 and 5. We control for child temperament because even in infancy some parents react to difficult or “fussy” child temperament with spanking and harsh punishment (Martorell & Bugental, 2006). Guided by theory and prior studies showing strong evidence of transactional processes in mother-child associations, we hypothesized that fathers’ use of spanking would be associated with increased child aggression at subsequent ages, and that higher levels of child aggression would be predictive of fathers’ more frequent use of spanking at subsequent ages.

We also show these transactional processes for mothers in our sample of two-parent families. We present this model as a point of comparison for our father models, noting that our model replicates prior research that has established the existence of transactional mother-child processes (e.g., Lee, Altschul and Gershoff, 2013, Maguire-Jack et al., 2012). The current sample differs from prior studies in that it included only mothers who were in two-parent families.

In our final research question, we examined whether spanking by fathers had associations with child aggression that explained unique variance in child aggression beyond effects of maternal influences. To answer this question, we tested a model that included cross-lags between paternal and maternal spanking and children’s aggression over time. We also examined multiplicative and additive effects of fathers’ and mothers’ spanking, specifically whether frequent spanking by either parent was predictive of increases in children’s aggression and whether more spanking by both parents lead to more child aggression. With very little prior research examining both fathers’ and mothers’ spanking and potential differential effects by gender of parent, our analyses were guided by the expectation that the influence of fathers and mothers would be similar.

Even in two-parent households, mothers spend more time with children (Craig, 2006, Yeung et al., 2001), and mothers and fathers may differ in their estimates of fathers’ involvement (Mikelson, 2008). Therefore, we control for fathers’ and mothers’ self-reports of their involvement in daily activities with the child, including routine caregiving and play. We control for symptoms of depression as well as parenting stress and alcohol consumption because studies of mothers (Farmer and Lee, 2011, Silverstein et al., 2009, Taylor et al., 2009) and fathers (Davis et al., 2011, Lee et al., 2011, Reeb et al., 2014, Wilson and Durbin, 2010) have linked these factors to poorer parenting and physical punishment of young children. Furthermore, maternal distress and depression (Ciciolla et al., 2013, Goodman et al., 2011; Taylor, Manganello, Lee, & Rice, 2010) are direct and mediating factors linked to the development of child aggression. Given the nature of our sample, which consisted of two-parent families, we also controlled for parental IPV, or the presence of psychological aggression between parents. Studies show that psychological aggression between parents (Taylor et al., 2010) and lower overall parental relationship quality (Taylor et al., 2010, Verhoeven et al., 2010) are associated with greater spanking and punishment of children; these factors have also been linked to higher levels child aggression (Ehrensaft and Cohen, 2012, Kim et al., 2014). To the extent possible with the FFCWS data, we used fathers’ report of his behavior. Although mothers are mostly accurate in their estimates of fathers’ parenting behaviors, there is some evidence that mothers underestimate the frequency of fathers’ parenting aggression (Lee, Lansford, Pettit, Bates, & Dodge, 2012).

Section snippets

Data and participants

This study used data from fathers and mothers who participated in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS) core interviews and the add-on In-Home Longitudinal Study of Pre-School Aged Children. The FFCWS is a birth-cohort study conducted in 20 U.S. cities with populations over 200,000. Respondents were recruited at hospitals and over the telephone at the time of the child’s birth. Both verbal and written informed consent were obtained from participants at each interview, and

Results

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics for key study variables, as reported by mothers and fathers. More mothers than fathers reported spanking their child at all three ages. At age 1, 21.3% of mothers and 19.4% of fathers reported that they had spanked their child at least once in the past month. At age 3, 52.8% of mothers and 43.9% of fathers reported that they had spanked their child at least once in the past month. At age 5, 45.7% of mothers and 35.2% of fathers reported that they had

Discussion and conclusion

In multiple studies using data from longitudinal, diverse samples of parents and children, research continues to build a strong case that spanking is detrimental to children and is associated with children’s greater aggressive behavior (Berlin et al., 2009, Gershoff, 2002, Gershoff et al., 2012, Grogan-Kaylor, 2004, Lansford et al., 2011, Lee, Altschul and Gershoff, 2013, MacKenzie et al., 2013, Maguire-Jack et al., 2012). However, prior studies of spanking that included fathers have generally

Acknowledgements

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Shawna J. Lee, University of Michigan, School of Social Work, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Phone: 734-763-6565. Fax: 734-763-3372. Email: [email protected]. The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study is funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) through grants R01HD36916, R01HD39135, and R01HD40421, as well as a consortium of private foundations. The

References (59)

  • M.J. Carlson et al.

    Fathers in fragile families

  • L. Ciciolla et al.

    Reciprocity among maternal distress, child behavior, and parenting: Transactional processes and early childhood risk

    Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

    (2013)
  • C.E. Cooper et al.

    Family structure transitions and maternal parenting stress

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (2009)
  • L. Craig

    Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children

    Gender and Society

    (2006)
  • R.N. Davis et al.

    Fathers’ depression related to positive and negative parenting behaviors with 1-year-old children

    Pediatrics

    (2011)
  • R.D. Day et al.

    Predicting spanking of younger and older children by mothers and fathers

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (1998)
  • M. Donnelly et al.

    Corporal punishment of children in theoretical perspective

    (2005)
  • M.K. Ehrensaft et al.

    Contribution of family violence to the intergenerational transmission of externalizing behavior

    Prevention Science

    (2012)
  • A.Y. Farmer et al.

    The effects of parenting stress, perceived mastery, and maternal depression on parent-child interaction

    Journal of Social Service Research

    (2011)
  • E.T. Gershoff

    Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2002)
  • E.T. Gershoff

    Spanking and child development: We know enough now to stop hitting our children

    Child Development Perspectives

    (2013)
  • E.T. Gershoff et al.

    Longitudinal links between spanking and children’s externalizing behaviors in a national sample of White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian American Families

    Child Development

    (2012)
  • S.H. Goodman et al.

    Maternal depression and child psychopathology: a meta-analytic review

    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

    (2011)
  • G.W. Graham

    Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world

    Annual Review of Pyschology

    (2009)
  • A. Grogan-Kaylor

    The effect of corporal punishment on antisocial behavior in children

    Social Work Research

    (2004)
  • A.N. Gromoske et al.

    Transactional and cascading relations between early spanking and children’s social-emotional development

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (2012)
  • K.B. Guzzo et al.

    Couple relationship status and patterns in early parenting practices

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (2008)
  • G.W. Holden et al.

    Research findings can change attitudes about corporal punishment

    Child Abuse and Neglect

    (2013)
  • L.-T. Hu et al.

    Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

    Structural Equation Modelling

    (1999)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Machine learning-based imputation soft computing approach for large missing scale and non-reference data imputation

      2021, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
      Citation Excerpt :

      Statistical Imputation uses the process of replacing missing values with estimated ones based on some statistical information available in the dataset [23]. The most common statistical methods used in the literature relied on statistical software packages such as ‘Full Information Maximum Likelihood’ (FIML) [24-29], ‘Multiple Imputation’ [30-33], ‘Hot-Deck imputation’ [34-37] and ‘Mean Substitution’ [38]. Aside from statistical means, Imputation methods inspired by machine learning are based on the construction of a predictive model to estimate absent values from the information available in the dataset, numerous methods have been used; some were based on traditional Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, such as KNN [39], Decision Tree [40] and Naïve Bayes [41].

    • Physical punishment and child outcomes: a narrative review of prospective studies

      2021, The Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      In five of the six samples, physical punishment predicted increases in aggressive behaviour over time. 15 studies used FFCWS data with consistent findings of detrimental effects of physical punishment across different analytical methods and age groups.57–71 Associations with increases in aggressive behaviours were observed in four of the remaining five independent samples, including in Canada,72 Switzerland,73 and the USA.30,74

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text