Elsevier

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volume 314, 15 April 2017, Pages 378-387
Chemical Engineering Journal

Impact of SRT on the efficiency and microbial community of sequential anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of textile industry wastewater

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.156Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Impact of SRT on sulfate reducing and sulfide oxidizing MBRs were investigated.

  • Color was completely removed in the anaerobic MBR independent on SRT.

  • COD and sulfate removal performance of AnMBR decreased at short SRTs.

  • Metal-S and Ca-P were the inorganic foulants in AnMBR and AeMBR, respectively.

  • Hydrogenophaga spp. and Georgenia sp. dominated in AnMBR and AeMBR, respectively.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of SRT (infinite, 60 and 30 days) on the treatment and filtration characteristics of sequential anaerobic sulfate-reducing and aerobic sulfide-oxidizing MBRs treating textile wastewater. The influent COD, dye and sulfate concentrations were kept constant at 2000, 200 and 1000 mg/L, respectively. The decreased SRT caused substantial and partial decreases in COD oxidation and sulfate reduction, respectively, due to decrease of biomass concentration. Complete color removal was observed in the AnMBR and a slight increase in color was detected in the AeMBR. Sludge filterabilities were assessed with specific resistance to filtration, capillary suction time, and supernatant filterability tests. Compact and non-porous cake layer formed in the AnMBR. Metal-sulfide and Ca-P were detected in the cake layers of AnMBR and AeMBR, respectively, by SEM-EDS analyses. Desulfuromonas thiophila and Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus were dominant sulfate-reducing and sulfide oxidizing bacteria in AnMBR and AeMBR, respectively.

Introduction

Textile industry wastewater is highly variable in nature due to the use of multiple processes especially during several washing and rinsing cycles [1]. The world market share of azo dyes are around 60–70% [2], [3]. In dyeing operation, around 20–50% of the dyes stay in the water phase, which lead to serious pollution of water resources. The textile industry wastewaters contain several other auxiliary chemicals in addition to dyes, which make the generated wastewater quite complex and variable [3], [4].

Different physico-chemical [5] as well as biological methods [6] are used for textile wastewater treatment. Physico-chemical processes are generally considered expensive and sometimes non-environmentally friendly due to the generation of high amount of sludge and secondary pollution. Biological processes are considered to be environmentally friendly approaches compared to physico-chemical methods due to the possibility of complete removal of organic pollutants with lower cost [7], [8]. Therefore, biological processes should be preferred or they should be used in combination with other physico-chemical treatment processes, such as ozonation, membrane filtration and chemical precipitation.

In recent years, several types of membranes have been increasingly used for wastewater treatment [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. The membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology combines biological treatment process and membrane technology for more effective wastewater treatment. In the MBR, both micro- and ultra-filtration membranes (0.03–0.4 μm) can be used for complete physical retention of microorganisms [14]. Due to higher performance compared to classical activated sludge processes, MBR processes have been used increasingly for textile wastewater treatment [8].

Yurtsever et al. [8] observed that anaerobic MBR (AnMBR) performed better compared to aerobic MBR (AeMBR) in terms of color removal performance, however, literature studies concentrated on AeMBR [15] and only few studies have been performed on AnMBR treating textile wastewater [8], [16], [17].

In textile wastewater, sulfate concentration is generally quite high due to its addition to dye bath for the adjustment of ionic strength [18]. In our previous study, we have observed that AnMBR performs well for sulfate-rich textile wastewater treatment. The presence of sulfide in the bioreactor caused accumulation of metal-sulfide precipitate on membrane, which may increase the fouling. Although sequential AnMBR and AeMBR is effective in the treatment of textile industry wastewater treatment [19], both the biological and the filtration performances should be optimized.

AnMBRs have several advantages, i.e. biogas production, lower sludge production, whereas higher fouling tendencies and lower operational fluxes restrain their wide spread application [8], [20], [21]. Supplementation of mixed liquor with granular or powdered activated carbon (PAC) may alleviate the membrane fouling and increase the operational fluxes of AnMBRs [21], [22], [23]. Additionally solid retention time (SRT), one of the most important operational parameters in biological processes [20], [24], may have impact on biological and filtration performances and its effect on sequential anaerobic sulfate-reducing and aerobic sulfide-oxidizing MBRs have not been studied before.

Powdered activated carbon (PAC) is widely used as an adsorbent due to significant porous structure [23]. Addition of PAC to the MBRs decreases soluble and colloidal organic concentration and reduces fouling, especially pore blocking. Also, PAC addition can increase the shear effect of aeration on the membrane and may reduce cake formation. Although PAC addition on the fouling alleviation has been extensively studied in municipal wastewater treating aerobic MBRs treating, studies on industrial wastewaters treating AnMBRs are limited [25].

Several studies have been conducted to associate the fouling problems in MBRs with the microbial community using different molecular biological techniques [17], [26], [27], [28]. New generation sequencing, specially, Illumina Miseq system becomes prevalent with some advantages such as presenting relatively low abundance of microbial community, time efficiency and decreased cost day by day. Illumina Miseq was recently performed in psychrophilic (15 °C) AnMBR treating domestic wastewater for the evaluation of membrane biofilm development [29].

This study aims at investigating the influence of SRT on the robustness of sequential anaerobic sulfate-reducing and aerobic sulfide-oxidizing MBRs treating synthetic textile wastewater. Also, fouling control by PAC addition has been emphasized. Additionally, the bacterial community changes in both MBRs were studied.

Section snippets

Anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors

In the study, a sequential process consisting AnMBR and AeMBR was operated at different SRTs for longer than 200 days. The total and the working volumes of the plexiglass AnMBR (11 × 14 × 37 cm) were 5.7 L and 4 L, respectively. The total and working volumes of AeMBR (8 × 14 × 38 cm) were 4.3 L and 2.5 L, respectively. A sequential operating mode was adopted, i.e. the wastewater was fed to the first AnMBR and its effluent was used as a feed for the AeMBR (Fig. S1).

Both MBRs were equipped with flat sheet

Results and discussions

The impact of SRT on the process performance of sequentially operated MBRs was evaluated for sulfate-containing textile wastewater treatment. The impacts of SRT on the MBRs were discussed separately considering both removal and filtration performances.

Conclusions

The impacts of SRT on the performance of sequentially operated anaerobic sulfate reducing and aerobic sulfide oxidizing MBRs were investigated. The average COD removal performance (86–65%) and sulfate removal performance (95–82%) decreased at short SRTs due to decreased biomass concentration. Complete decolorization was attained in AnMBR at all SRTs (>99%). The filterability of AnMBR sludge was 4–8 times lower compared to that of AeMBR. Metal-sulfide and Ca-P precipitates are the main inorganic

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK Project No: 113Y336) and Istanbul Medeniyet University Research Fund (Project No: F-KDT-2016-780).

References (50)

  • S.K. Nataraj et al.

    Cellulose acetate-coated α-alumina ceramic composite tubular membranes for wastewater treatment

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • S.K. Nataraj et al.

    Membrane-based microfiltration/electrodialysis hybrid process for the treatment of paper industry wastewater

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2007)
  • Y. Dong et al.

    A forward osmosis membrane system for the post-treatment of MBR-treated landfill leachate

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • P. Le-Clech et al.

    Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • N.O. Yigit et al.

    Membrane fouling in a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor operated under various conditions

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • H. Lin et al.

    A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications, membrane fouling and future perspectives

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • A. Yurtsever et al.

    Effect of NaCl concentration on the performance of sequential anaerobic 4 and aerobic membrane bioreactors treating textile wastewater

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • K. Cirik et al.

    Effect of electron donor source on the treatment of Cr(VI)-containing textile wastewater using sulfate-reducing fluidized bed reactors (FBRs)

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • A. Yurtsever et al.

    Treatment of textile wastewater using sequential sulfate-reducing anaerobic and sulfide-oxidizing aerobic membrane bioreactors

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2016)
  • R.K. Dereli et al.

    Implications of changes in solids retention time on long term evolution of sludge filterability in anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating high strength industrial wastewater

    Water Res.

    (2014)
  • C. Shin et al.

    Pilot-scale temperate-climate treatment of domestic wastewater with a staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR)

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2014)
  • A. Akram et al.

    Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC)

    Process Biochem.

    (2008)
  • R.K. Dereli et al.

    Effect of sludge retention time on the biological performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating corn-to-ethanol thin stillage with high lipid content

    Water Res.

    (2014)
  • Y. Satyawali et al.

    Effect of PAC addition on sludge properties in an MBR treating high strength wastewater

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • D.W. Gao et al.

    Linking microbial community structure to membrane biofouling associated with varying dissolved oxygen concentrations

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (73)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text