Elsevier

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volume 32, February 2015, Pages 65-72
Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Intermediate filament structure: the bottom-up approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.12.007Get rights and content

Intermediate filaments (IFs) result from a key cytoskeletal protein class in metazoan cells, but currently there is no consensus as to their three-dimensional architecture. IF proteins form elongated dimers based on the coiled-coil structure within their central ‘rod’ domain. Here we focus on the atomic structure of this elementary dimer, elucidated using X-ray crystallography on multiple fragments and electron paramagnetic resonance experiments on spin-labelled vimentin samples. In line with conserved sequence features, the rod of all IF proteins is composed of three coiled-coil segments containing heptad and hendecad repeats and interconnected by linkers. In addition, the next assembly intermediate beyond the dimer, the tetramer, could be modelled. The impact of these structural results towards understanding the assembly mechanism is discussed.

Introduction

Intermediate filaments (IFs) have a clear-cut importance for the functioning of metazoan cells. However, at present there is no consensus with regard to the architecture and assembly mechanism of these nanofilaments. In fact, the 10 nm wide IFs have proven to be much more challenging for structural studies than microtubules and F-actin, for both of which a complete 3D description, including atomic resolution data on their respective building blocks and the symmetry of the assembled filament, has long been available [1, 2].

All IF proteins, classified into five main families (‘types’, see http://www.interfil.org), have a distinct tripartite organization. In their primary structure, one can discern a highly α-helical central domain (‘rod’), flanked by the N-terminal (‘head’) and C-terminal (‘tail’) domains highly variable in sequence and length and typically containing little secondary structure [3]. The rod domain forms an α-helical coiled coil, one of the principal motifs of protein architecture (Box 1), composed of two parallel in register chains. Most IF proteins form homodimers, although preferential heterodimers such as keratins as well as further heterotypic assemblies in vivo are also observed [4]. It is the coiled-coil rod that is responsible for the overall elongated shape of the elementary dimer, which measures 45–48 nm in cytoplasmic IF proteins and 50–52 nm in nuclear lamins [5, 6].

Even though the assembly of IFs in their natural habitat  either the cytoplasm or the nucleus  occurs in the presence of many other protein factors, various IF types could also be reproduced in vitro by manipulating with solution parameters. Thus IFs qualify as self-assembling systems [7]. There are several assembly principles that are valid for all IFs. First, the axes of the dimers are aligned roughly in the filament direction; second, dimers associate laterally via several distinct modes [8]; and finally, longitudinal growth of the filament depends on the end-to-end interaction of dimers. The exact assembly pathway varies for different IF types [4, 9]. For instance, vimentin is found in a low molarity neutral buffer in the form of tetramers resulting from two half-staggered antiparallel dimers (so-called A11 tetramers). Subsequent increase of ionic strength yields higher lateral assembly intermediates such as octamers and the so-called unit-length filaments (ULFs) typically containing 4 octamers, followed by longitudinal assembly that eventually results in native-like filaments [4, 10].

Here we will focus on the considerable advances that have been made in the recent years towards the atomic structure of the elementary IF dimer, contributing to a better understanding of both the IF architecture and assembly mechanism.

Section snippets

Sequence signature of IF proteins

Early on, it was realized that the seven-residue (‘heptad’) periodicity in the distribution of hydrophobic residues, indicative of a left-handed coiled coil (Box 1), is the prevalent motif of the IF rod. Correspondingly, algorithms looking specifically for regions with heptad repeats were employed, which resulted in the original model of the IF dimer (reviewed in [9]) that included four segments of continuous left-handed coiled coil (with the last segment containing a ‘stutter’, see Box 1). The

Experimental studies of IF dimer

Over the last years, considerable efforts have been made towards the experimental elaboration of the IF dimer structure. Principally, two methods, X-ray crystallography and electron paramagnetic resonance on site-directed spin-labelled protein samples (SDSL-EPR) were employed. With few exceptions, the experiments have been carried out with human vimentin as the ‘model’ IF protein.

Crystallization of a full-length IF protein is clearly an impossible task, due to its intrinsic propensity to

Coil1 structure

The originally determined crystal structure of a vimentin fragment corresponding to coil1A showed a monomer rather than a coiled-coil dimer [15], which was related to the low thermodynamic stability of this segment. Introducing an artificial mutation Y117L into this fragment resulted in a coiled coil with increased stability, which could also be resolved as such (PDB code 3G1E, Figure 2a) [17]. The hydrophobic core of the dimer followed the predicted heptad pattern (Figure 1), which was also

Coil2 structure

A small C-terminal portion of vimentin coil2 was first crystallized as a fusion with GCN4 leucine zipper. This was followed by a crystal structure of the C-terminal half of coil2 (Figure 2b) [15]. The latter structure confirmed, in particular, the unwinding of the left-handed coiled coil at the predicted stutter (residue 351). More of a surprise, the crystal structure of a vimentin fragment corresponding to the first half of coil2 (PDB code 3KLT) showed an antiparallel four-helix bundle formed

Linker L12, head and tail domains

The linker L12 is the only part of the rod still refractory to crystallographic studies. It varies only modestly in length (about 15 residues) across different IF types, and also appears to contain a conserved pattern H×H×H (H  hydrophobic and x  any residue) often predicted as a short β-strand (Figure 1). The linker L12 appears to be a flexible hinge connecting the fairly rigid coil1B and coil2 segments, which is qualitatively supported by electron microscopy (EM) on rotary-shadowed isolated

Structure of IF tetramer

Interestingly, the crystals of the coil1B vimentin fragment with PDB code 3UF1 revealed tetramers consisting of two dimers running antiparallel [19••]. This arrangement reproduces the A11-type tetramer of the full-length protein. Indeed, the observed 3UF1 tetramer is centred on residue 191 just like the full-length tetramers, as shown using SDSL-EPR and compatible with early chemical crosslinking data [8, 35]. The formation of the 3UF1 tetramer involves specific interdimeric salt bridges and is

Coiled-coil stability

A ‘by-product’ of preparing IF rod fragments for crystallography was the observation that their dimerization capacity is highly variable. The full-length vimentin molecule is dimeric in as high as 6 M urea [10], which suggests that the complete coiled-coil rod, being a cooperative system, is very stable. At the same time, the coiled coil formed by a vimentin fragment corresponding to the relatively short coil1A showed only a marginal stability, having a melting temperature of 32 °C at 1 mg/ml [17

Conclusions and outlook

Redundant crystallographic data on vimentin fragments, supported by sequence-based predictions and SDSL-EPR experiments, have provided a nearly complete picture of the IF rod structure, which is composed of three α-helical segments interconnected by linkers. The first two segments contain almost exclusively heptad repeats, yielding a regular left-handed coiled coil, but the N-terminal region of the third segment features hendecad periodicity that results in a parallel α-helical bundle.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Harald Herrmann for many exciting discussions, and to Stephen Weeks for helpful feedback on the manuscript. This research was supported by the KU Leuven (grant OT13/097 to SVS), by Research Foundation Flanders FWO (grant G070912N to SVS) and by the EU COST Action ‘Nanonet’.

References (62)

  • J.F. Hess et al.

    Characterization of the linker 2 region in human vimentin using site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance

    Biochemistry

    (2006)
  • J.F. Hess et al.

    Characterization of structural changes in vimentin bearing an epidermolysis bullosa simplex-like mutation using site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance

    J Biol Chem

    (2005)
  • A. Aziz et al.

    Site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance determination of vimentin head domain structure

    J Biol Chem

    (2010)
  • A. Aziz et al.

    Head and rod 1 interactions in vimentin: identification of contact sites, structure, and changes with phosphorylation using site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance

    J Biol Chem

    (2009)
  • J.F. Hess et al.

    Structural characterization of human vimentin rod 1 and the sequencing of assembly steps in intermediate filament formation in vitro using site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance

    J Biol Chem

    (2004)
  • T.A. Smith et al.

    Sequence comparisons of intermediate filament chains: evidence of a unique functional/structural role for coiled-coil segment 1A and linker L1

    J Struct Biol

    (2002)
  • M. Guharoy et al.

    Intrinsic structural disorder in cytoskeletal proteins

    Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)

    (2013)
  • H. Herrmann et al.

    Characterization of distinct early assembly units of different intermediate filament proteins

    J Mol Biol

    (1999)
  • H. Herrmann et al.

    Intermediate filaments: primary determinants of cell architecture and plasticity

    J Clin Invest

    (2009)
  • J. Kayser et al.

    Assembly kinetics determine the structure of keratin networks

    Soft Matter

    (2012)
  • A.V. Sokolova et al.

    Monitoring intermediate filament assembly by small-angle X-ray scattering reveals the molecular architecture of assembly intermediates

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2006)
  • M.E. Brennich et al.

    Impact of ion valency on the assembly of vimentin studied by quantitative small angle X-ray scattering

    Soft Matter

    (2014)
  • R. Kirmse et al.

    Three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy on intermediate filaments

    Methods Cell Biol

    (2010)
  • C. Mencarelli et al.

    Isomin: a novel cytoplasmic intermediate filament protein from an arthropod species

    BMC Biol

    (2011)
  • F.H.C. Crick

    The packing of alpha-helices: simple coiled-coils

    Acta Crystallogr

    (1953)
  • E. Nogales et al.

    Structure of the alpha beta tubulin dimer by electron crystallography

    Nature

    (1998)
  • K.C. Holmes et al.

    Atomic model of the actin filament

    Nature

    (1990)
  • H. Herrmann et al.

    Intermediate filaments: molecular structure, assembly mechanism, and integration into functionally distinct intracellular Scaffolds

    Annu Rev Biochem

    (2004)
  • U. Aebi et al.

    The nuclear lamina is a meshwork of intermediate-type filaments

    Nature

    (1986)
  • H. Herrmann et al.

    Intermediate filaments: from cell architecture to nanomechanics

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2007)
  • D.A.D. Parry et al.

    Intermediate filaments: molecular architecture, assembly, dynamics and polymorphism

    Q Rev Biophys

    (1999)
  • Cited by (89)

    • Intermediate Filaments

      2022, Encyclopedia of Cell Biology: Volume 1-6, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text