Perspectives of targeted mass spectrometry for protein biomarker verification

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.09.014Get rights and content

The identification of specific biomarkers will improve the early diagnosis of disease, facilitate the development of targeted therapies, and provide an accurate method to monitor treatment response. A major challenge in the process of verifying biomarker candidates in blood plasma is the complexity and high dynamic range of proteins. This article reviews the current, targeted proteomic strategies that are capable of quantifying biomarker candidates at concentration ranges where biomarkers are expected in plasma (i.e. at the ng/ml level). In addition, a workflow is presented that allows the fast and definitive generation of targeted mass spectrometry-based assays for most biomarker candidate proteins. These assays are stored in publicly accessible databases and have the potential to greatly impact the throughput of biomarker verification studies.

Introduction

A biomarker is a measurable indicator that correlates to a specific biological or disease state. Biomarkers play an important role in various clinical applications [1]. Besides screening for an early diagnosis, biomarkers are measured for the classification and staging of diseases in order to assign patients for targeted treatments, to monitor treatment response, and to detect disease recurrence. The process from the discovery of a biomarker to its clinical application can be subdivided into different phases [2, 3]. The initial phase, typically referred to as discovery, aims to produce a list of biomarker candidates through various genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic technologies. In the following phase, referred to as verification, the correlation of these candidates to the disease is verified over a large cohort of samples. The candidate markers that perform well through the verification are then selected for the clinical validation phase.

Blood plasma is of particular interest as a source for biomarkers, because it is easily accessible and presumably contains quantifiable molecules that provide information characterizing the physiologic and pathologic state of the human body in the form of proteins shed or secreted from the tissue where a pathologic state is present [4, 5]. The major difficulty in finding blood-based biomarkers is the complexity and dynamic range of protein concentrations in human plasma [6, 7]. Tissue-derived proteins, the targets for biomarkers, are found in plasma in the ng/ml concentration range, six orders of magnitude below the classical plasma proteins [6, 8]. In order to identify specific, disease-related, changes in the proteome and circumvent the challenges of plasma proteomics, recent biomarker studies have focused on the analysis of tissue or cell lines for the generation of biomarker candidate lists [8, 9, 10, 11]. This usually leads to a list from hundreds to thousands of candidate proteins, which subsequently need to be verified in human plasma samples. However, despite the large investment and the effort to generate lists of candidates, only a few protein biomarkers are currently used routinely in the clinical setting. In recent years, the rate of newly approved diagnostic markers has been steadily decreasing due in part to the demanding technical requirements for the verification of the candidate proteins in plasma samples [11, 12]. The technology must be sensitive to allow for the quantification of proteins in the ng/ml concentration range in a highly complex background, and all candidates must be quantified with high reproducibility, accuracy, and in a high-throughput manner over large numbers of patient samples.

Currently, the most commonly used approach for verification and clinical validation is the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The advantages of ELISA assays are their high specificity by implementing a pair of antibodies against the candidate protein and their high sensitivity, permitting the quantification of proteins in human plasma at concentrations below the ng/ml range. However, the limiting factors for the ELISA as a technique for plasma biomarker verification are the restricted possibility to multiplex assays and the availability of antibodies for novel candidate proteins, combined with the lengthy and expensive development of new assays. Therefore, the development of an alternate method for protein quantification with high reproducibility and throughput is needed in order to improve the success rate of approved biomarkers [13]. One solution is a targeted quantitative proteomic concept, such as selected reaction monitoring (SRM) (also referred to as multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)) [14••]. This review focuses on the recent advances in targeted mass spectrometric approaches and their impact on biomarker studies.

Section snippets

Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for plasma biomarker verification

SRM is a mass spectrometric technique for the targeted detection and quantification of selected proteotypic peptides (PTPs) with known fragmentation properties in a complex sample matrix [15•, 16] (Figure 1). The purpose of PTPs is to serve as surrogates for the candidate protein. They have on the one hand a unique amino acid sequence for the candidate protein and on the other hand are also easily detectable by mass spectrometry (MS).

To date, SRM is a technology that has been shown to fulfill

Generation of SRM assays and their public accessibility

One trait all sample preparation strategies have in common is the development and validation of SRM assays before they can be applied for protein quantification to plasma. Three pieces of information are important for the generation of SRM assays [14••]: first, the target proteins should be selected, which in the case of a biomarker study are usually given by the generated candidate list; second, for each target protein the PTPs have to be identified; and third, for each PTP the best

Conclusion

Recent advances in the SRM technology show the potential to bridge the gap between the generation of candidate lists and their verification in plasma [55]. The strength of this technology is the ability to develop sensitive and selective assays for proteins in a more cost-effective and time-saving manner compared to standard ELISA assays. Moreover, it has the unique feature to quantify multiple proteins in one analysis with high reproducibility, two factors that play an important role in the

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the NIH under Contract No. N01-HV-28179 as well as from the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 3100A0-107679. PP is the recipient of a Marie Curie intra-European fellowship. Dr Alexander Schmidt from the Institute of Molecular Systems Biology (ETH Zurich) is acknowledged for critical reading of this article.

References (57)

  • S.A. Gerber et al.

    Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2003)
  • J. Sherman et al.

    How specific is my SRM? The issue of precursor and product ion redundancy

    Proteomics

    (2009)
  • N.L. Anderson et al.

    A human proteome detection and quantitation project

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2009)
  • N. Ida et al.

    A highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the measurement of interleukin-8 in biological fluids

    J Immunol Methods

    (1992)
  • J. Ludwig et al.

    Biomarkers in cancer staging. Prognosis and treatment selection

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2005)
  • N. Rifai et al.

    Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2006)
  • R. Morrison et al.

    The interface between biomarker discovery and clinical validation: the tar pit of the protein biomarker pipeline

    Prot Clin Appl

    (2008)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    Mass spectrometric detection of tissue proteins in plasma

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2006)
  • L.A. Liotta et al.

    Serum peptidome for cancer detection: spinning biologic trash into diagnostic gold

    J Clin Invest

    (2006)
  • V. Faça et al.

    Proteomic analysis of ovarian cancer cells reveals dynamic processes of protein secretion and shedding of extra-cellular domains

    PLoS ONE

    (2008)
  • V. Faca et al.

    A mouse to human search for plasma proteome changes associated with pancreatic tumor development

    PLoS Med

    (2008)
  • R. Aebersold et al.

    Perspective: a program to improve protein biomarker discovery for cancer

    J Proteome Res

    (2005)
  • S. Gutman et al.

    The US Food and Drug Administration perspective on cancer biomarker development

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2006)
  • V. Lange et al.

    Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial

    Mol Syst Biol

    (2008)
  • P. Mallick et al.

    Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2007)
  • B. Kuster et al.

    Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2005)
  • T. Addona et al.

    Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2009)
  • V. Lange et al.

    Targeted quantitative analysis of streptococcus pyogenes virulence factors by multiple reaction monitoring

    Mol Cell Proteomics

    (2008)
  • Cited by (153)

    • A targeted mass spectrometry immunoassay to quantify osteopontin in fresh-frozen breast tumors and adjacent normal breast tissues

      2019, Journal of Proteomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, lack of specific antibodies towards many potential biomarkers, as well as the low capacity of multiplexing in ELISA, has spurred the development of alternative methods. Here, targeted mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics in the selected, multiple or parallel reaction monitoring (SRM, MRM or PRM) mode in combination with stable isotope labelled peptide standards (SIS), such as AQUA (absolute quantification) peptides [23], has become increasingly popular [24]. In the SRM/MRM mode, triple quadrupole mass analyzers measure signal intensities of previously selected parent ion/fragment ion transitions characteristic for proteotypic peptides and their isotope labelled counterparts.

    • Preparation of pillar[5]arene immobilized trypsin and its application in microwave-assisted digestion of Cytochrome c

      2019, Materials Science and Engineering C
      Citation Excerpt :

      The host–guest couples in supramolecular chemistry are specially a hopeful candidate for the surface-immobilized protein due to the cavity diameter of macromolecules [18,19]. Proteins' quantitation is vital for the monitoring of disease progression, early diagnosis [20]. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a popular technique for protein identification [21].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text