Elsevier

Carbohydrate Research

Volume 431, 5 August 2016, Pages 6-14
Carbohydrate Research

The comparison of glycosphingolipids isolated from an epithelial ovarian cancer cell line and a nontumorigenic epithelial ovarian cell line using MALDI-MS and MALDI-MS/MS

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2016.05.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • GSLs were extracted from SKOV3 and T29 cells using Folch partition (FP).

  • Seventeen neutral GSLs were detected in FP lower phases from both cell lines.

  • Five neutral GSLs were detected only in FP lower phase of SKOV3 cells.

  • Several gangliosides were detected in FP upper phases of SKOV3 and T29 cells.

  • GSLs detected only in SKOV3 cells are more glycosylated than GSLs in T29 cells.

Abstract

Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) are important biomolecules, which are linked to many diseases such as GSL storage disorders and cancer. Consequently, the expression of GSLs may be altered in ovarian cancer cell lines in comparison to apparently healthy cell lines. Here, differential expressions of GSLs in an epithelial ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 and a nontumorigenic epithelial ovarian cell line T29 were studied using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) and MALDI-MS/MS. The isolation of GSLs from SKOV3 and T29 cell lines was carried out using Folch partition. GSLs were successfully detected by MALDI-MS, and structurally assigned by a comparison of their MALDI-MS/MS fragmentation patterns with MS/MS data found in SimLipid database. Additionally, LIPID MAPS was used to assign GSL ion masses in MALDI-MS spectra. Seventeen neutral GSLs were identified in Folch partition lower (chloroform/methanol) phases originating from both cell lines, while five globo series neutral GSLs were identified only in the Folch partition lower phase of SKOV3 cell line. Several different sialylated GSLs were detected in Folch partition upper (water/methanol) phases of SKOV3 and T29 cell lines. Overall, this study demonstrates the alteration and increased glycosylation of GSLs in an epithelial ovarian cancer cell line in comparison to a nontumorigenic epithelial ovarian cell line.

Introduction

Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) are complex biomolecules that are found in lipid rafts, which are small subdomains of the cell membrane [1]. They are involved in many biological functions such as ontogenesis (development of an organism), cell differentiation, cell adhesion and recognition, signal transduction and immunogenicity [2]. GSLs contain one or more carbohydrates attached to C-1 hydroxyl group of ceramide and are derived from a complex family of compounds called sphingolipids (SLs). Ceramide is the core structure of GSLs and consists of a sphingoid base with an amide-linked fatty acid. The major sphingoid base is sphingosine and the fatty acid of ceramide can be saturated or unsaturated with the number of carbon atoms ranging from 14 to more than 30 [1a]. But, most commonly the fatty acid chains of GSLs contain from 14 to 24 carbon atoms [3]. Glucosyl ceramide is the precursor for about 90% of mammalian GSLs and galactosyl ceramide is the precursor for about 10% of mammalian GSLs [2b]. More complex GSLs can be derived through the extension of the carbohydrate by the addition of different sugars in stepwise manner via glycosidic bonds. A large variety of GSLs is possible depending on the variations of the carbohydrate and the lipid structure. Mostly, the diversity of GSLs depends on the variation of the carbohydrate [1a].

GSLs are amphipathic compounds because of the hydrophilic head group and hydrophobic fatty acid and sphingosine alkyl chains. They are soluble in chloroform and chloroform/methanol mixtures, and less soluble in biologically compatible solvents such as water. Liquid-liquid extraction can be used to isolate lipids because the partition depends on polarity of lipids. A mixture of chloroform and methanol (2:1 in volume) can be used to extract pure lipids from tissues or cells as proposed by Folch [4]. The chloroform/methanol extract can be equilibrated with water or saline solution leading to separation of upper aqueous phase and lower organic phase (Folch partition). Folch partition allows total lipids to be partitioned into the lower phase leaving polar lipids and non-lipid contaminants in the upper phase [4c]. It has been applied to extract GSLs from cells or tissues successfully [5]. Moreover, extraction of GSLs can be optimized by using different solvents, such as isopropanol and hexane, along with chloroform and methanol [5b].

Purification, identification, structural characterization and quantitation are important steps which should be achieved to understand the diversity and functions of GSLs in biological systems. Identification, structural elucidation and quantitation of GSLs in cells or tissues are possible with combination of conventional and high-throughput analytical techniques. These include thin-layer chromatography (TLC), high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), immunochemical methodologies, mass spectrometric techniques, and HPLC coupled to mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) [3], [6]. TLC has been used for a long time to separate and quantify GSLs because of its easiness, cost effectiveness and ability to separate GSLs [7]. However, HPLC [8] and HPLC-MS are widely used for high-throughput separation and quantitation of GSLs [7](a), [8](e), [9]. MS is a very sensitive technique, which can be used to detect GSLs that are present in very low amounts in biological samples. GSL structures have been studied using different MS instruments involving ion sources such as MALDI [8](e), [10], electrospray ionization (ESI) [5](b), [9](d), [10](e), [11] and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) [7a]. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and multistage MS/MS (MSn) provide more structural information and can be used for structural elucidation of GSLs [9](d), [10](a), [11], while mass spectrometric imaging (MSI) enables the detection of GSLs in thin tissue sections [10](b), [12]. Additionally, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and methylation studies can be used to determine the anomeric configuration and linkages of sugar units of GSLs [1a].

GSLs are important bioactive molecules, which are accumulated in the human body due to some genetic defects causing disorders including Niemann-Pick type C disease [13] and lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs), such as Gaucher disease, Fabry disease, Tay-Sachs disease and Sandhoff disease [14]. GSLs have also been studied because of their roles in some kidney diseases [15]. It has been shown that expression and glycosylation of GSLs change due to cancer, and numerous tumor-associated GSL antigens have been reported [2](a), [16]. Namely, GSL changes in ovarian [10](b), [17], breast [5b], gastric, colorectal, lung, and pancreatic cancer [16b] have been studied. Generally, GSLs are expressed more in tumors than in normal cells or tissues. The aberrantly glycosylated GSLs are accumulated in tumors and can promote the tumor progression [16](b), [18].

Ovarian cancer is a leading health issue and shows the greatest mortality rate among women's reproductive cancers [19]. Previous studies have reported that acidic GSLs, such as sulfatides (sulfated GSLs) [10](b), [17](a) and gangliosides (sialic acid containing GSLs) [17b], are elevated in ovarian cancer. Makhlouf et al. have reported the increase in total sulfatides in ovarian cancer tissues while Santin et al. have reported the increase in total gangliosides in plasma and ascites fluid from ovarian cancer patients [17]. However, the characterization of individual sulfatides or gangliosides, which are most responsible for the elevation of total amount of GSLs, has not been done. Not only sulfatides and/or gangliosides are elevated in ovarian tumors but also some other GSLs, such as neutral GSLs, can be altered in ovarian tumors. For example, Jacob et al. recently reported that neutral GSL P1 is expressed in ovarian cancer tissues and cultured cancer cells based on flow cytometry and LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis [20]. Consequently, they have reported GSL P1 as a novel tumor-associated carbohydrate antigen. Furthermore, GSL expressions in different ovarian cancer cell lines, including SKOV3, were studied using flow cytometry, and a few types of GSLs, such as globo series, neolacto series and sialic acid-containing GSLs (gangliosides), were detected using GSL-specific antibodies [21]. The results of this study indicated that different ovarian, colon, and breast cancer cell lines express distinct GSLs.

Here, the differences between GSL expressions in ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells and nontumorigenic ovarian T29 cells were analyzed by MALDI-MS. GSLs in these epithelial cell lines were investigated in this study because epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type of ovarian cancer [22]. SKOV3 cell line was derived from a human ovarian adenocarcinoma [23], and has been used widely to study ovarian cancer [21]. T29 cells are immortalized ovarian surface epithelial cells that originate from the outer epithelial layer of normal human ovaries. They were cultured and transfected with SV40 sequences to express the large T and small t antigens to inactivate p53 and Rb proteins [24]. Next, these cells were immortalized by introduction of a full-length hTERT cDNA [24].

The main goals of this study were to identify and characterize GSLs present in cancerous SKOV3 and noncancerous T29 ovarian cells, and to compare GSL expressions in both cell lines. These goals were achieved by the analysis of GSLs extracted from ovarian cells using MALDI-MS and MALDI-MS/MS and by searching through LIPID MAPS and SimLipid databases. The results indicate that several different neutral GSLs are expressed in SKOV3 cells in comparison to T29 cells, with differences being mostly due to aberrant glycosylation of neutral GSLs. A few different sialylated GSLs isolated from SKOV3 and T29 cells were also detected.

Section snippets

Results and discussion

Fig. 1 shows MALDI-MS spectra of GSLs in Folch partition lower phases of SKOV3 (Fig. 1a) and T29 (Fig. 1b) cells acquired in positive ion mode using 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) as the matrix. The singly-charged sodiated GSL ions with m/z 806.6, 832.6, 834.6, 884.5, 968.6, 994.6, 996.6, 1046.6, 1130.6, 1156.7, 1158.7, 1197.7, 1199.7, 1249.6, 1277.7, 1333.7, 1359.7, 1361.8, 1411.7, 1495.8, 1523.8 and 1549.8, which are observed in the mass spectrum of Folch partition lower phase (LP)-SKOV3

Conclusion

Folch partition was used to extract GSLs from SKOV3 and T29 cell lines, and these GSLs were successfully identified by combining MALDI-MS and MALDI-MS/MS with database search. Differential expression and increased glycosylation of GSLs in ovarian cancer SKOV3 cell line were observed in comparison to GSLs found in nontumorigenic T29 ovarian cell line. Seventeen neutral GSLs were identified in both cell lines while five neutral GSLs, including four globopentaosyl ceramides, were detected only in

Materials and equipment

SKOV3 cell line was provided by Dr. William Taylor and T29 cell line was provided by Dr. Jinsong Liu (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas) and Dr. Deborah Chadee (Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Toledo). Tissue culture dishes with grip rings (diameter × height: 100 × 20 mm) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Dulbecco's Modification of Eagle's Medium (DMEM, with 4.5 g/L glucose, L-glutamine and sodium pyruvate), 1X trypsin EDTA solution (0.25%

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the research funding from The University of Toledo. Funding for the acquisition of MALDI-MS instrument was provided by an NSF-MRI grant (award #0923184). Authors thank Dr. Jinsong Liu and Dr. Deborah Chadee for providing T29 cell line, Ms. Maisha Rashid for the support on cell culturing, and Dr. Christopher Burlak for useful discussions.

References (32)

  • S. Hakomori

    Glycoconj J.

    (2000)
    C.A. Lingwood

    Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.

    (2011)
    A. Regina Todeschini et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2008)
    P.H.H. Lopez et al.

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (2009)
    S. Hakomori

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2008)
  • I. Meisen et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2011)
  • C.A. Haynes et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.

    (2009)
  • H. Farwanah et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.

    (2009)
    V.P. Skipski et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1967)
    T. Taki et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (1994)
    J. Bodennec et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2003)
  • J.E. Groener et al.

    Clin. Chem.

    (2007)
    H. Kadowaki et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1989)
    M. Ullman et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (1985)
    L. Wang et al.

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (2006)
    S. Holst et al.

    Mol. Cell Proteom.

    (2013)
  • S. Kirsch et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2008)
    Y. Masukawa et al.

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2009)
    T.P. Roddy et al.

    Clin. Chem.

    (2005)
    E. Ito et al.

    Glycoconj J.

    (2013)
  • Y. Suzuki et al.

    J. Biochem.

    (2006)
    Y. Liu et al.

    Mol. Cancer

    (2010)
    B. Stahl et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1991)
    A.B. Yin et al.

    J. Vis. Exp.

    (2013)
    S.G. Penn et al.

    Eur. Mass Spectrom.

    (1997)
    P. Juhasz et al.

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (1992)
    T. Fujiwaki et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.

    (2006)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Glycobiology

    (2008)
  • E.E. Jones et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2014)
  • D. te Vruchte et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • A.R. Mather et al.

    Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.

    (2011)
  • S. Hakomori

    Cancer Res.

    (1985)
    S. Hakomori et al.

    Chem. Bio

    (1997)
    S. Hakomori

    Cancer Res.

    (1996)
  • A.M. Makhlouf et al.

    Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer

    (2004)
    A.D. Santin et al.

    BJOG

    (2004)
  • S. Hakomori

    Tohoku J. Exp. Med.

    (1992)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (2014)
  • S. Alam et al.

    Glycobiology

    (2015)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Recent advances in the mass spectrometric analysis of glycosphingolipidome – A review

      2020, Analytica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      The rat brain tissue [20,22,71,75–81] is often used as a model to demonstrate new analytical methods [20,82,83]. An appreciable amount of glycosphingolipids have been found in the following: lung [84], heart [85], intestines [86–88], kidneys [74,89,90], retina [91], ovarian cells [92,93], breast cancer stem cells [94–97], fetal tissues [98,99], and cerebrospinal fluids [100–102]. Blood and urine are suitable for biomarker studies because 1) they can be obtained quite easily in a less invasive procedure, and 2) during pathologic states, some of the glycosphingolipids could be shed-off from the surface of diseased tissues or cells and end up in blood circulation [103].

    • Determination of the origin of doubly-cationized monosialylated fragments in MS/MS spectra of singly-cationized LSTb and GM1 using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry

      2017, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is because the binding affinity of alkali metal cations to carbohydrates is directly proportional to cation size so Cs+ stabilizes the carbohydrates the most [47]. Recently, MALDI-LID-MS/MS was employed in positive ion mode for the identification and structural characterization of gangliosides isolated from SKOV3 (ovarian cancer) and T29 (normal ovarian) cell lines [16]. All identified gangliosides were monosialylated, and detected as either [M+Na]+ or [M−H+2Na]+ions [16].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text