Cancer Letters

Cancer Letters

Volume 432, 28 September 2018, Pages 93-102
Cancer Letters

Original Articles
Methylation-mediated miR-155-FAM133A axis contributes to the attenuated invasion and migration of IDH mutant gliomas

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2018.06.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • MiR-155 is down-regulated in IDHMT gliomas and is an independent risk factor for glioma patients.

  • MiR-155 is down-regulated via IDH mutation-induced promoter CpG island methylation.

  • Cancer testis antigen FAM133A is a direct downstream target of miR-155.

  • FAM133A predicts favorable prognosis for glioma patients.

  • Down-regulation of FAM133A promotes glioma invasion/migration by regulating MMP14.

Abstract

Gliomas with isocitrate dehydrogenases gene mutations (IDHMT) were found to be less aggressive than their wildtype (IDHWT) counterparts. However, the mechanism remains unclear. The current study aims to investigate the role of silenced oncogenic microRNAs in IDHMT gliomas, which were largely ignored and may contribute to the less aggressive behavior of IDHMT gliomas. Microarrays, bioinformatics analysis of the data from TCGA and qPCR analysis of samples from our experimental cohort (LGG: IDHWT = 10, IDHMT = 31; GBM: IDHWT = 34, IDHMT = 9) were performed. The results show that miR-155 was consistently down-regulated in IDHMT gliomas. Establishment of IDH1R132H overexpressing glioma cell line and bisulfite sequencing PCR suggested that miR-155 down-regulation was associated with IDH1R132H mutation induced promoter CpG islands methylation. The cancer testis antigen FAM133A is a direct downstream target of miR-155 and is a negative regulator of glioma invasion and migration possibly by regulating matrix metallopeptidase 14 (MMP14). Together, we found that methylation-regulated miR-155-FAM133A axis may contribute to the attenuated invasion and migration of IDHMT gliomas by targeting MMP14.

Introduction

In the last decade, somatic mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDHMT) were found to be widespread in lower grade gliomas (LGG, WHO grade II and III) and secondary glioblastomas (GBM) [1], and were thought to be the earliest event in glioma development [2,3]. Meanwhile, IDHMT gliomas were found to be less aggressive than the WHO grade-matched wild-type counterparts [4]. The possible mechanisms include the attenuated invasion and migration [5], decreased proliferation [6], altered metabolic pathways [7,8] and sensitization to chemo-/radio-therapy [9,10]. Based on the profound influence of IDH mutation on gliomas, the current WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system (2016) has placed IDH mutation as a standard prognostic molecular marker to help better define the specific entities of gliomas [11].

IDH mutations are located specifically within the enzymatically active sites at the amino acid residue arginine 132th (for IDH1) and 172th (for IDH2), with IDH1R132H and IDH2R172K substitutions being most common [12]. These mutations give IDH a neomorphic enzymatic activity catalyzing α-KG to a new metabolite (R)-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate (R-2HG), an onco-metabolite inhibiting α-KG-dependent enzymes, resulting in widespread genomic DNA hypermethylation [13]. The causal role of IDH mutation to the G-CIMP [14,15] had challenged researchers to find specific promoter methylation-mediated down-regulated gene signatures which may explain the tumor biology of IDHMT gliomas. Tumor suppressor genes such as RBP1 (retinol-binding protein 1) [16], miR-148a [17] and MTSS1 [18] have been found to be silenced by promoter CpG island methylation and can contribute to glioma formation, linking vital roles of IDH mutation in gliomagenesis. On the other hand, the role of silenced oncogenes or oncogenic miRNAs, which may play roles in the less malignant behaviors of IDHMT gliomas, has been largely under-investigated.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs regulating gene expression by binding to the 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) of target mRNAs, leading to mRNA cleavage and degradative repression [19]. It has been widely demonstrated that miRNAs play extremely important roles in regulating the malignant phenotypes of gliomas [20]. In this study, we identified a methylation-mediated miR-155-FAM133A axis in regulating the invasion/migration of IDHMT gliomas, which provides new insight into understanding the less aggressive malignant behaviors of IDHMT gliomas.

Section snippets

Glioma cohorts and clinical samples

A total of 41 LGG and 43 GBM tissues from our cohort (XQ cohort) with complete clinical follow-up information were recruited in this study. Another validation cohort from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was investigated in silico. Characteristics of patients are detailed in Supplementary Table 1.

Cell culture

Human anaplastic astrocytoma cell line SF268 (WHO grade III) [21] and GBM cell lines U251, SNB19, SF295 (WHO grade IV) [21] with less than 5 total passage times were directly selected from the

Oncogenic miR-155 is down-regulated in IDH-mutant gliomas

We initially isolated primary GBMs cells (IDHWT = 4 and IDHMT = 2) for miRNA-array analysis to determine miRNAs differentially expressed (DE-miRs) between IDHWT and IDHMT gliomas (Fig. 1A). To validate the list of candidates, we sought for clinical analysis either from publicly available database or from our own hospital. We first investigated an independent cohort of glioma patients from TCGA, including 121 cases of lower grade gliomas (LGG, IDHMT = 87) and early glioblastomas (eGBM, IDHWT

Discussion

Migration and invasion, key features of glioma aggressiveness, are largely responsible for difficulty of achieving surgical total resection and poor patients' prognosis [33]. Interestingly, it has been repeatedly reported that the migration and invasion are inhibited in IDHMT gliomas [5,10,34,35], this may in part explain the less aggressive behaviors of IDHMT gliomas. In this study, we provide new evidence that down-regulation of oncogenic miR-155 can contribute to the attenuated

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. Clive Da Costa (Francis Crick Institute, London, UK) for providing useful suggestions and carefully commenting on this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC:81272783).

References (44)

  • I. Ulasov et al.

    The emerging role of MMP14 in brain tumorigenesis and future therapeutics

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2014)
  • D. Cui et al.

    R132H mutation in IDH1 gene reduces proliferation, cell survival and invasion of human glioma by downregulating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling

    Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.

    (2016)
  • A.G. Baltz et al.

    The mRNA-bound proteome and its global occupancy profile on protein-coding transcripts

    Mol. Cell

    (2012)
  • A. Lai et al.

    Evidence for sequenced molecular evolution of IDH1 mutant glioblastoma from a distinct cell of origin

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2011)
  • M. Sanson et al.

    Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 codon 132 mutation is an important prognostic biomarker in gliomas

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2009)
  • L.B. Bralten et al.

    IDH1 R132H decreases proliferation of glioma cell lines in vitro and in vivo

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2011)
  • M. Esmaeili et al.

    IDH1 R132H mutation generates a distinct phospholipid metabolite profile in glioma

    Canc. Res.

    (2014)
  • M.J. Seltzer et al.

    Inhibition of glutaminase preferentially slows growth of glioma cells with mutant IDH1

    Canc. Res.

    (2010)
  • Q. SongTao et al.

    IDH mutations predict longer survival and response to temozolomide in secondary glioblastoma

    Canc. Sci.

    (2012)
  • D.N. Louis et al.

    The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary

    Acta Neuropathol.

    (2016)
  • C.G. Duncan et al.

    A heterozygous IDH1R132H/WT mutation induces genome-wide alterations in DNA methylation

    Genome Res.

    (2012)
  • S. Turcan et al.

    IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype

    Nature

    (2012)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Lower-Grade Gliomas: Predicting DNA Methylation Subtyping and its Consequences on Survival with MR Features

      2021, Academic Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hypermethylation mediated silencing of tumor suppressor genes and hypomethylation mediated increased expression of oncogenes are well known examples (11). Previous studies have identified alterations of DNA methylation in gliomas (12–14). It has been convincingly demonstrated that DNA methylation profiling is highly reproducible and robust even from poor quality material and small samples (15).

    • Short-chain fatty acids combined with intronic DNA methylation of HIF3A: Potential predictors for diabetic cardiomyopathy

      2021, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      DNA was extracted from blood leukocytes and stored at −30 °C until the subsequent pyrosequencing analysis. We conducted quantitative methylation analyses using the MassARRAY system (Sequenom, San Diego, CA) [24]. We used the Epidesigner online application (http://www.epidesigner.com/) to design PCR primers for the HIF3A gene.

    • Identification and characterization of a novel mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 inhibitor for glioma treatment

      2021, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Migration is a critical feature of glioma aggressiveness and one of the main reasons for unsuccessful surgical total resection and poor prognosis [22]. However, it is controversial about mutant IDH1 and cancer migration, either promotion [18], inhibition [23], or no effects [24] have been reported. It is noted that most of these studies were carried out in mutant IDH1 overexpressed cells.

    • Tanshinone prevents alveolar bone loss in ovariectomized osteoporosis rats by up-regulating phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase

      2019, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      CpG islands and sites were predicted through the online software methprimer. Methylation of CpG sites was determined by BSP as described previously (Huang et al., 2018). Briefly, genomic DNA was isolated and treated with the Methyllamp DNA Modificaiton Kit (Epigenteck, USA) and was subjected to amplification using the EpiTaqHS kit (Takara, Japan).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text