Elsevier

Burns

Volume 46, Issue 5, August 2020, Pages 1157-1169
Burns

Protection of sildenafil citrate hydrogel against radiation-induced skin wounds

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.11.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Reproducible model of acute radiation induced skin injury was developed in rats using gamma irradiation.

  • Sildenafil citrate hydrogel formulation was used to treat radiation wounds showed beneficial results.

  • Significant reduction in percentage wound contraction and skin damage score in treated tissues as compared with non irradiated control.

  • Nitric oxide recovery was found in treated tissues.

  • Histopathology analysis showed high re-epithelization and repair in the treated group.

Abstract

Radiation induced skin wound/dermatitis is one of the common side effects of radiotherapy or interventional radiobiology. In order to combat impaired healing of radiation wounds, alternative therapy to use sildenafil citrate (SC) topical hydrogel as a therapeutic option was proposed that has known to enhance nitric oxide in wounds. Our aim was to develop a radiation induced skin wound model and to investigate the wound healing efficacy of 5% SC hydrogel formulation in Sprague-Dawley rats. In the present study, the radiation wound inducing dose was optimized using a multi-dose localized γ-radiation trail with 10−55 Gy range (15 Gy interval). Optimal irradiation dose for wound induction was selected based on radiation skin damage assessment criteria followed the relative change from <35 Gy or>55 Gy showed significant variation and median 45 Gy γ-dose was selected for studying acute effects of radiation on wound healing. Significant (p < 0.05) higher wound contraction (88 ± 1.02%), skin damage reduction (81 ± 0.82%), tensile strength (45 ± 1.61%), nitric oxide and protein recovery (53 ± 0.72%) at dermal level prove the wound healing efficacy of 5% SC hydrogel formulation as compared to Rad 45 Gy control. In addition, the dose modifying factor (DMF) for SC hydrogel treatment was found to be 1.83 and 1.57 with respect to total wound area contraction and skin damage reduction. Skin histopathology in treated tissues showed improved granulation tissue formation, less inflammatory infiltrates and mature collagen fibres in the dermis. Thus, the modality could help to improve delayed wound healing in irradiated skin tissues.

Introduction

Radiation induced skin wounds are gaining significance with enhanced possibility of external radiation exposures during cancer radiotherapy treatment, nuclear spoilages, radiological emergencies [1]. It carries the risk of excessive high doses to the skin which in turn, associated with radiation induced free radical generation, resulting in cascading skin reactions with deterministic effects [2,3]. The effects could be distinguished as either prompt/acute/sub acute/chronic skin reactions [4]. In present technological era, the incidence of radiation induced skin wound is no longer rare and the potential risk of radiation exposure to the skin is >3 Gy to the threshold of 10 Gy dose [1]. The prominent dose limiting effect on proliferative skin tissue ranges from a mild rash to even severe ulceration [5]. Such dose dependent exposure of radiation might cause damage to skin basal epithelial, keratinocyte (s), fibroblast (s), and dermal endothelial cells with permanent erythema, dermal atrophy and ulceration [6].

Local skin wounds induced by radiation is limit to various attributes, namely (a) radiation dose; (b) dose rate; (c) time of exposure; (d) collimation system to avoid internal scattering; (e) incident rate on skin; (f) prophylactic and curative drug application; (f) animal model system and; (g) whether the skin is intact or already broken/wounded due to extrinsic trauma [7].

The existing treatment regimens included corticosteroids, topical aloe vera lotions [8], synthetic dressings like Biobrane, Tegaderm that has shown some protection to manage radiation induced skin wounds [9]. Overall, these strategies limits the clinical severity, yet showed adverse effect profile such as variable efficacy, down regulating lipid synthesis and impaired permeability barrier function that makes them not ideal for continuous therapy [10]. One of the major challenges is standardization of suitable model in lower animals to visualise comprehensive structural and functional derangements in the skin due to such radiation induced wounds. Consequently, there is a quest to identify the potential agent that is able to mitigate the acute impact as well as long term recovery.

The present study focuses on two major aspects: first aspect was standardization of preclinical model of radiation induced skin wound (dermatitis) at increasing gamma exposure. The second focus area was to evaluate the wound healing efficacy of preselected sildenafil citrate (SC) hydrogel formulation (5% SC). In a recent study, our groups had already showed safety and significant efficacy of topical 5% SC hydrogel (˜97%) in a traumatic wound model [11]. Therefore, the present study evaluates healing efficacy of the 5% SC hydrogel formulation for radiation induced skin wounds in terms of dose modifying factor (DMF), radiation wound contraction, skin damage scoring, tensile strength, protein damage along with tissue histopathology to establish preclinical protection for gamma-irradiation induced skin wounds.

Section snippets

Chemicals

SC, carbopol, TRIzol reagent, Phosphatidylcholine, Griess reagent, Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (EDTA) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). 2-[4-(2- Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4), Triethanolamine (99%), 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) and Guanidine hydrochloride were purchased from SRL Chemicals, India. The c-DNA synthesis kit was purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories, and DyNAmo color flash SBYR green

In-vivo selection of exposure dosage for radiation induced wounds in lower animals

In-vivo localized radiation exposure [group II; subgroup A–E (10−55 Gy)] showed no lethality for a period of 28 days. Skin damage was assessed during this period and relative damage assessment in skin was conducted to evaluate optimized exposure dosage. Changes in skin were distinct by 8th day and scored for quantitative assessment too. The dose dependent effect was visualised between 25-45 Gy as compared to non-irradiated control. The relative changes with different exposure range revealed

Discussion

Wound healing of the irradiated skin remains a significant clinical issue in the patients of cancer radiotherapy and accidental radiation exposures. The main acute cutaneous effect of radiation exhibits immediate or delayed erythema, swelling, fibrous thickening, hair loss, desquamation, ulceration and necrosis [[24], [25], [26]]. All these morphological signs and symptoms fall under the different stages of radiation injury mainly prodromal (6−24 h), latent (48 h to 1 week), manifest illness

Conflict of interest

All the authors of the manuscript have contributed towards the designing, conceptualization, data curation, analysis, formatting and editing. The author’s declare no competing financial interest and thereby declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Shweta Kulshrestha is grateful to the University Grant Commission, New Delhi (UGC) for providing financial support and to the Director, Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Allied Sciences (INMAS), DRDO for provision of research facility and support. Special thanks to Dr Mitra Basu Sc ‘F’ for concept development, Dr Sandeep Sukhla, Sc ‘E’ for the guidance in calculating dose modifying factor (DMF) of a drug, Dr BG Roy animal house facility, INMAS and Mr. Rajesh Chauhan, technical staff for taking

References (49)

  • J.O. Archambeau et al.

    Pathophysiology of irradiated skin and breast

    Int J Radiat Oncol*Biol*Phys

    (1995)
  • B. Stallmeyer et al.

    The function of nitric oxide in wound repair: inhibition of inducible nitric oxide-synthase severely impairs wound reepithelialization

    J Invest Dermatol

    (1999)
  • W. Jaschke et al.

    Radiation-induced skin injuries to patients: what the interventional radiologist needs to know

    Cardiovas Interventional Radiol

    (2017)
  • J.H. Kim et al.

    Mechanisms of radiation-induced skin injury and implications for future clinical trials

    Int J Radiat Biol

    (2013)
  • D.L. Miller et al.

    Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures

    Radiology

    (2002)
  • N. Hamada et al.

    Classification of radiation effects for dose limitation purposes: history, current situation and future prospects

    J Radiat Res

    (2014)
  • F.N. Bray et al.

    Acute and chronic cutaneous reactions to ionizing radiation therapy

    Dermatol Ther

    (2016)
  • S. Heggie et al.

    A Phase III study on the efficacy of topical aloe vera gel on irradiated breast tissue

    Cancer Nurs

    (2002)
  • J. de Leon et al.

    Wound care centers: critical thinking and treatment strategies for wounds

    Wounds: Compend Clin Res Pract

    (2016)
  • J.W. Hopewell et al.

    The relative biological effectiveness of fractionated doses of fast neutrons (42 MeV d → Bc) for normal tissues in the pig

    Br J Radiol

    (1990)
  • S. Singh et al.

    In-vivo development of radiation induced skin injury using gamma irradiation

    J Med Phys Res

    (2019)
  • L.H. Rifkin et al.

    An athymic rat model of cutaneous radiation injury designed to study human tissue-based wound therapy

    Radiat Oncol

    (2012)
  • R. Pidikiti et al.

    Dosimetric characterization of an image-guided stereotactic small animal irradiator

    Phys Med Biol

    (2011)
  • M. Takikawa et al.

    New model of radiation-induced skin ulcer in rats

    Plast Surg Hand Surg

    (2011)
  • Cited by (11)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text