Original ArticleA Two-site Pilot Randomized 3 Day Trial of High Dose Left Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Suicidal Inpatients
Introduction
Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death for Americans of all ages and is the number two killer of US young adults [1], [17], [23], [27], [37]. More Americans now die from suicide than die from car accidents [2], [3]. Someone in the US dies by suicide every 13 min [3]. Suicide is a major problem in the military [4]. For the past several years more soldiers have died by suicide than were killed in combat [5], [6]. Eighteen US veterans die each day by suicide [7].
Despite these grim statistics, clinicians have no truly effective treatment for acute suicidal crisis. Much of the research in the area of suicide has focused on understanding risk factors and trends, while perhaps undertaking large initiatives to reduce overall rates. Much less attention has been paid to developing new treatments for patients who are actively struggling with thoughts of suicide or who have recently tried to kill themselves. Recently there is renewed interest in acute treatments that have anti-suicide effects such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) [8], clozapine, lithium [9], [10], [11] and ketamine [12]. While suicide is common, it remains relatively rare, requiring large samples with extended followup to show an effect [13]. However studying enriched samples – patients who have recently attempted suicide – is particularly difficult, and these patients are often deemed too sick to study [14]. Thus, there have been relatively few controlled studies of interventions in the acute setting of a recent suicide attempt; what we refer to in this manuscript as a ‘suicidal crisis.’ Patients attempting suicide and those at high risk are routinely hospitalized in order to keep them from killing themselves and to remove them from the stresses in their lives that may be aggravating the situation. Hospital admission, with its structure and counseling, does result in reductions in suicidality [15], [16]. Commonly medications are adjusted or changed; however, the effect of antidepressant medications requires several weeks and thus is unlikely to quickly treat the suicidal crisis [17].
Repeated daily left prefrontal rTMS is a non-invasive approach to treating depression, differing from medications and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) [18], [19]. The FDA has now cleared two devices for treating depression. Recent studies suggest that stimulating the prefrontal cortex non-invasively with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) might rapidly reduce suicidal thinking [20]. Other open-label studies have demonstrated the feasibility of delivering higher doses of TMS in a short timeframe [21].
Daily prefrontal TMS is thought to treat depression by improving cortical-limbic regulatory control over emotional drive [18]. Some researchers have conceptualized suicidal crisis as a dysfunctional brain event (like a stroke). Although patients are not routinely psychotic, there is clear evidence that the governing prefrontal cortex is unable to do its job of regulating emotional drive, put problems in context, and plan for the future [22].
We therefore conducted this study to test the safety, feasibility, and potential efficacy of delivering high doses of rTMS to suicidal inpatients. As mentioned above, studying these patients is difficult, for both regulatory and administrative reasons. We sought inpatients either who recently attempted to kill themselves or who were hospitalized because their thoughts of suicide were so intense that they were not safe. Because no prior data existed about the safety of using TMS in this setting, or of this high dose of TMS to a vulnerable population such as patients in suicidal crisis, we could only conduct this first study in an inpatient setting. Moreover, as there were no efficacy data for treating suicidality with rTMS, and because patients were in a critical, life-threatening condition, we were ethically compelled to conduct this study in an adjunctive fashion such that subjects also received their prescribed anti-suicidal treatments, which allowed subjects to get the full benefits of hospitalization, medication changes and counseling.
Section snippets
Study overview
The study was conducted at 2 study sites in the United States: Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center (RHJVAMC) associated with the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC), Bethesda, MD. Active enrollment extended from December 2010 through March 2013, with 6 month followup complete by August 2013. This study was part of the INjury and TRaUmatic STress (INTRuST) Consortium, coordinated through the University of California, San
Patients
377 patients were screened (98 WRNMMC; 279 RHJVAMC), and 78 were found eligible (37 WRNMMC; 41 RHJVAMC). 42 subjects were randomized; however, one was removed from analysis due to incorrect consent. Thus 41 were randomized correctly (14 WRNMMC; 27 RHJVAMC; 21 sham, 20 active). True completers were those subjects who completed three days of treatment with the maximum 6000 pulses per session. Only 27 of the 41 were true completers (9 WRNMMC; 18 RHJVAMC; 17 sham, 10 active). 5 subjects were acute
Discussion
This pilot study demonstrates that it is feasible and safe to administer a very large dose (number of stimuli in a given time) of prefrontal rTMS to inpatients who are admitted in a suicidal crisis. Nine treatments in 3 days were reasonably well-tolerated without major side effects, even in this severely ill cohort that is rarely studied due to their severity of illness. Additionally, although the planned primary analysis was not significant, there are suggestions of a rapid anti-suicide effect
Acknowledgments
The investigators would like to thank the INTRuST staff in general and Drs. Lisa Kallenberg, MD, clinical trialist, and Ariel Lang (INTRuST co-I). We are indebted at the RHJVAMC to Dr. Hugh Myrick (VA mental health service line chief) for being an advocate of this study and helping to provide space and support, and to the nursing staff and physicians on the 3 North Inpatient Unit. We also thank John Walker for his help in designing the TENS switch unit used for the sham system. We thank Dr.
References (59)
- et al.
Details on suicide among US physicians: data from the National Violent Death Reporting System
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
(2013) - et al.
Lithium in the public water supply and suicide mortality in Texas
J Psychiatr Res
(2013) - et al.
Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?
Brain Stimul
(2008) - et al.
Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation system
Brain Stimul
(2008) - et al.
Focal Electrical Stimulation as a Sham Control for rTMS: does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal rTMS?
Brain Stimul
(2008) - et al.
Development and evaluation of a portable sham TMS system
Brain Stimul
(2008) - et al.
Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial
Biol Psychiatry
(2007) - et al.
Significant analgesic effects of one session of postoperative left prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a replication study
Brain Stimul
(2008) - et al.
Endogenous opioids mediate left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS-induced analgesia
Pain
(2012) - et al.
Fast left prefrontal rTMS acutely suppresses analgesic effects of perceived controllability on the emotional component of pain experience
Pain
(2011)
Controllable versus uncontrollable stressors bi-directionally modulate conditioned but not innate fear
Neuroscience
Activation of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex during an uncontrollable stressor reproduces both the immediate and long-term protective effects of behavioral control
Neuroscience
Suicide: the long and winding road from research to practice
Depress Anxiety
Suicide among adults aged 35-64 years–United States, 1999-2010
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Suicide among United States military personnel: determining the root causes
Depress Anxiety
Injuries due to firearms and air guns among U.S. military members not participating in overseas combat operations, 2002-2011
MSMR
Deaths by suicide while on active duty, active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, 1998-2011
MSMR
Suicide data report
The role of ECT in suicide prevention
J ECT
Review: lithium reduces the risk of suicide compared with placebo in people with depression and bipolar disorder
Evid Based Ment Health
Lithium in the prevention of suicide in mood disorders: updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Br Med J
A preliminary naturalistic study of low-dose ketamine for depression and suicide ideation in the emergency department
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol
Treatment of suicide attempters with bipolar disorder: a randomized clinical trial comparing lithium and valproate in the prevention of suicidal behavior
Am J Psychiatry
Hard outcomes: clinical trials to reduce suicide
Am J Psychiatry
Predictors of psychiatric inpatient suicide: a national prospective register-based study
J Clin Psychiatry
Review of predictors of suicide within 1 year of discharge from a psychiatric hospital
Curr Psychiatry Rep
Emergency treatment of young people following deliberate self-harm
Arch Gen Psychiatry
The expanding evidence base for rTMS treatment of depression
Curr Opin Psychiatry
Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of medication-resistant depression
Am J Psychiatry
Cited by (139)
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
2023, Psychiatric Clinics of North AmericaAre suicide risk scales sensitive to change? A scoping review
2023, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchEffects of neuronavigation-guided rTMS on serum BDNF, TrkB and VGF levels in depressive patients with suicidal ideation
2023, Journal of Affective Disorders
Funded by U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC).
Funding mechanism: Contract #W81XWH-08-2-0159, DOD INTRuST.
Conflicts of interest: Relationship with the vendor: Although the equipment was loaned for this trial from one vendor (Neuronetics), significant firewalls existed between the vendor and the trial, similar to the NIH OPT-TMS trial. None of the investigators has any financial conflict of interest with the vendor, other than other TMS research studies, nor have they for the past 5 years. Second, the equipment was loaned for the trial but the study design, conduct, data, data analysis and manuscripts to emerge are independent of the vendor and did not involve the vendor. The vendor was notified of safety issues and device malfunctions as they must notify the FDA about this regarding their device.
Dr. George has no equity stake in any TMS device manufacturer and does not accept speaker or consultant fees from TMS device manufacturers. He has had research studies within the past three years with Neuronetics, Brainsway, Cervel, Neosync, St. Judes, Medtronic and MECTA.