Elsevier

Bone

Volume 47, Issue 5, November 2010, Pages 848-858
Bone

Review
Towards quantitative 3D imaging of the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.07.026Get rights and content

Abstract

Osteocytes are the most abundant cells in bone and the only cells embedded in the bone mineral matrix. They form an extended, three-dimensional (3D) network, whose processes interconnecting the cell bodies reside in thin canals, the canaliculi. Together with the osteocyte lacunae, the canaliculi form the lacuno-canalicular network (LCN). As the negative imprint of the cellular network within bone tissue, the LCN morphology is considered to play a central role for bone mechanosensation and mechanotransduction. However, the LCN has neither been visualized nor quantified in an adequate way up to now. On this account, this article summarizes the current state of knowledge of the LCN morphology and then reviews different imaging methods regarding the quantitative 3D assessment of bone tissue in general and of the LCN in particular. These imaging methods will provide new insights in the field of bone mechanosensation and mechanotransduction and thus, into processes of strain sensation and transduction, which are tightly associated with osteocyte viability and bone quality.

Introduction

Bone is a hierarchically organized tissue, which is able to repair and adapt itself dynamically to its mechanical environment. The different aspects of bone adaptation, such as osteogenesis, bone modeling, and bone remodeling processes, are typically observed at the whole organ and tissue level. But it is at the cellular level (1–10 μm) where bone forming cells (osteoblasts) and bone resorbing cells (osteoclasts) alter the local structure of the bone tissue. Consequently, it is of vital importance to examine bone at the cellular level.

The most abundant bone cells are osteocytes. They are the only cells embedded in the calcified bone matrix and they occupy small cavities called osteocyte lacunae. Osteocytes are connected with neighboring cells by means of dendritic cell processes. In this way, osteocyte cell bodies and osteocyte processes form a three-dimensional (3D) cellular network, called the osteocyte network. The processes interconnecting the cell bodies within the mineral matrix reside in thin canals, which are called canaliculi. Accordingly, the osteocyte lacunae and the canaliculi represent the negative imprint of the osteocyte network within the bone matrix, which we will refer to as lacuno-canalicular network (LCN) in this article.

Contrary to osteoblasts and osteoclasts, the many functions attributed to osteocytes are not yet fully understood [1]. In particular, osteocytes are thought to sense and to respond to mechanical stimuli and to send signals triggering resorption and formation to osteoclasts and osteoblasts, respectively. Consequently, they are thought to play a pivotal role for bone mechanosensation and mechanotransduction processes, which are essential for bone modeling and remodeling [2], [3], [4], [5]. Moreover, osteocytes are believed to be involved in the regulation of bone phosphate metabolism [6], [7] and their viability is thought to be closely associated to the many aspects of bone quality [8], [9]. It is primarily due to the abundance of osteocytes throughout the bone matrix and their vast interconnectivity, which provide the requisites for strain sensing and cellular communication involved in bone mechanosensation and mechanotransduction. Signals may be transmitted through osteocyte processes or via bone fluid within the LCN. However, up to now, there is no conclusive answer to the questions how strain is sensed by osteocytes or how potential signals are conveyed to other cells [1]. Possible strain sensing mechanisms include direct strain sensation by the osteocyte due to matrix deformations or indirect strain sensation mediated by fluid flow [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. In any case, all these strain-sensing mechanisms imply that the signal sensed by the osteocytes depends on the geometry of the LCN.

To clarify the paradox that the magnitude of macroscopic in vivo load magnitudes is too small to cause a cellular response in bone cells in vitro [11], [16], [17], [18], [19] strain-sensing mechanisms need closer attention. Hence, local matrix strains or fluid flow-induced shear stresses should ideally be measured in response to macroscopic strains in situ. This could further elucidate the role of the osteocytes for bone mechanosensation and mechanotransduction. Unfortunately, the direct strain measurements in situ pose an intricate problem because the LCN is inaccessible for direct observation. For this reason, different computational models, such as finite element (FE) and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models, have been proposed to investigate local matrix strains around osteocyte lacunae and canaliculi [20], [21], [22] and to study wall shear stresses at the cell–fluid interface [23], [24], respectively. Calculated strain values were found to be several times higher than the imposed macroscopic strains. Additionally, it was shown that geometric idealization of the LCN may not be appropriate to calculate local strains [20] and further, cause a profound underestimation of forces transduced to osteocytes via fluid flow-induced shear stresses [24]. Consequently, refined computational models should be created, which are derived directly from 3D image data of the LCN at the cellular and sub-cellular level. The 3D images will then facilitate both morphometric assessment of the LCN and form a basis for direct conversion of these images to 3D microstructural models to be used for simulations. Nevertheless, the relative inaccessibility of the LCN, which is buried deeply within the bone matrix, did not allow for a true 3D mapping of the LCN so far.

Due to the absence of an established strategy to assess the 3D nature of the LCN, this article comprises two sections: First, the current state of knowledge relating to the LCN morphology is reviewed. This review includes findings in respect of shape, size, orientation, and distribution of osteocyte lacunae and canaliculi as well as a survey on the influence of age and different pathological states on the LCN. Within the second section, potential imaging methods for the assessment of bone tissue in general, and for the LCN in particular are discussed, where the focus is on the 3D imaging capabilities of these methods.

Section snippets

The osteocyte network and the lacuno-canalicular network (LCN)

This section gives an overview of the current state of knowledge relating to the LCN morphology. For this purpose, the nature of osteocytes and osteocyte lacunae and their environment is briefly outlined first. This provides the necessary context for the subsequent review, where osteocyte and osteocyte lacunar morphology and orientation, osteocyte lacunar distribution, canalicular morphology and orientation, and the influence of age and disease on the LCN are discussed.

Quantitative 3D assessment of LCN

Up to now, visualization and quantification of the LCN has not been achieved in a comprehensive way. An ideal imaging method for assessing the LCN within bone should be able to cope with the relative inaccessibility of the LCN and its 3D nature. Furthermore, the assessment of the LCN requires an approach that will provide a resolution, which is several times higher than the dimensions of single canaliculi, as it is discussed later in this section. Ultimately, the method of choice should ideally

Conclusions

Given the inaccuracies involved in 2D measures of the LCN, which imply specific model assumptions, 3D methods are an essential requirement to cope with the 3D nature of the LCN. To this end, this article reviewed different imaging methods suitable for the visualization and quantification of the LCN within bone. LM and CLSM are standard techniques for bone imaging. In particular, CLSM paired with fluorescent labeling allows acquisition of 3D datasets of the osteocyte network and the LCN.

References (164)

  • S.S. Jande

    Fine structural study of osteocytes and their surrounding bone matrix with respect to their age in young chicks

    J Ultrastruct Res

    (1971)
  • Y. Sugawara et al.

    The alteration of a mechanical property of bone cells during the process of changing from osteoblasts to osteocytes

    Bone

    (2008)
  • Y. Sugawara et al.

    Three-dimensional reconstruction of chick calvarial osteocytes and their cell processes using confocal microscopy

    Bone

    (2005)
  • T. Beno et al.

    Estimation of bone permeability using accurate microstructural measurements

    J Biomech

    (2006)
  • C. Palumbo et al.

    Morphological study of intercellular junctions during osteocyte differentiation

    Bone

    (1990)
  • H. Kamioka et al.

    A three-dimensional distribution of osteocyte processes revealed by the combination of confocal laser scanning microscopy and differential interference contrast microscopy

    Bone

    (2001)
  • S.C. Cowin

    The significance of bone microstructure in mechanotransduction

    J Biomech

    (2007)
  • S. Weinbaum et al.

    A model for the excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses

    J Biomech

    (1994)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Delineating bone's interstitial fluid pathway in vivo

    Bone

    (2004)
  • A. Teti et al.

    Do osteocytes contribute to bone mineral homeostasis? Osteocytic osteolysis revisited

    Bone

    (2009)
  • D. Vashishth et al.

    Decline in osteocyte lacunar density in human cortical bone is associated with accumulation of microcracks with age

    Bone

    (2000)
  • J. Power et al.

    Osteocyte density in aging subjects is enhanced in bone adjacent to remodeling haversian systems

    Bone

    (2002)
  • L.N. Metz et al.

    Histomorphometric analysis of the effects of osteocyte density on osteonal morphology and remodeling

    Bone

    (2003)
  • M.G. Mullender et al.

    Osteocyte density changes in aging and osteoporosis

    Bone

    (1996)
  • C.J. Hernandez et al.

    Osteocyte density in woven bone

    Bone

    (2004)
  • G. Marotti et al.

    Quantitative investigation on osteocyte canaliculi in human compact and spongy bone

    Bone

    (1985)
  • K. Kusuzaki et al.

    Development of bone canaliculi during bone repair

    Bone

    (2000)
  • S. Mori et al.

    Trabecular bone volume and microdamage accumulation in the femoral heads of women with and without femoral neck fractures

    Bone

    (1997)
  • S. Qiu et al.

    Age and distance from the surface but not menopause reduce osteocyte density in human cancellous bone

    Bone

    (2002)
  • J.D. Frank et al.

    Aging and accumulation of microdamage in canine bone

    Bone

    (2002)
  • G. Marotti

    Osteocyte orientation in human lamellar bone and its relevance to the morphometry of periosteocytic lacunae

    Metab Bone Dis Relat Res

    (1979)
  • G. Marotti et al.

    Quantitative evaluation on osteocyte canalicular density in human secondary osteons

    Bone

    (1995)
  • Y. Garini et al.

    From micro to nano: recent advances in high-resolution microscopy

    Curr Opin Biotechnol

    (2005)
  • C.W. Jones et al.

    Confocal laser scanning microscopy in orthopaedic research

    Prog Histochem Cytochem

    (2005)
  • A. Ardizzoni

    Osteocyte lacunar size-lamellar thickness relationships in human secondary osteons

    Bone

    (2001)
  • J.G. Hazenberg et al.

    Microdamage: a cell transducing mechanism based on ruptured osteocyte processes

    J Biomech

    (2006)
  • A. Bogner et al.

    A history of scanning electron microscopy developments: towards “wet-STEM” imaging

    Micron

    (2007)
  • D.C. Joy et al.

    Low voltage scanning electron microscopy

    Micron

    (1996)
  • P.G. Howell et al.

    Monte Carlo simulations of electron scattering in bone

    Bone

    (1994)
  • M.A. Rubin et al.

    SEM and TEM study of the hierarchical structure of C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ mice trabecular bone

    Bone

    (2004)
  • L.E. Lanyon

    Osteocytes, strain detection, bone modeling and remodeling

    Calcif Tissue Int

    (1993)
  • K. Tanaka et al.

    Isolated chick osteocytes stimulate formation and bone-resorbing activity of osteoclast-like cells

    J Bone Miner Metab

    (1995)
  • G. Gu et al.

    Osteocyte: a cellular basis for mechanotransduction in bone

    JBSE

    (2007)
  • A.F. Ruchon et al.

    Developmental expression and tissue distribution of Phex protein: effect of the Hyp mutation and relationship to bone markers

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2000)
  • I. Westbroek et al.

    Osteocyte-specific monoclonal antibody MAb OB7.3 is directed against Phex protein

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2002)
  • R. Dai et al.

    Effects of genistein on vertebral trabecular bone microstructure, bone mineral density, microcracks, osteocyte density, and bone strength in ovariectomized rats

    J Bone Miner Metab

    (2008)
  • Tate M.L. Knothe

    “Whither flows the fluid in bone?” An osteocyte's perspective

    J Biomech

    (2003)
  • Y. Han et al.

    Mechanotransduction and strain amplification in osteocyte cell processes

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2004)
  • A.M. Malone et al.

    Primary cilia mediate mechanosensing in bone cells by a calcium-independent mechanism

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2007)
  • S.P. Fritton et al.

    Fluid and solute transport in bone: flow-induced mechanotransduction

    Annu Rev Fluid Mech

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Shared authorship: These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text