Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
ReviewFree functional muscle transfer for upper limb paralysis – A systematic review
Introduction
Paralysis of the upper limb is debilitating with severe functional, psychological, and socioeconomic impact1, 2. Whilst surgical intervention can offer cost-effective improvement in quality of life3, 4, reconstructive surgery is far from able to restore function to pre-injury status. Various surgical techniques including tendon, nerve, and free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) are available for reanimation of the upper limb. Intervention selection depends on factors including aetiology and functional impairment, injury to reconstruction time, availability of donor tissues, and the patient/clinician's shared decision-making regarding treatment priorities.5
The major benefits of FFMT over other available techniques include limited donor site morbidity without further compromising upper limb function and the lack of restriction regarding the timing of surgery post-injury. First described in canine studies in 19706 and human subjects for facial reanimation in 1976 7, FFMT has since been utilised for the treatment of upper limb paralysis.8, 9 It is a useful technique particularly for patients in whom the motor unit has become irreversibly denervated, and where there is no adequate local or regional donor tissue that can be sacrificed without unacceptable morbidity. It is often used following failed nerve transfers or in delayed reconstruction. However, the disadvantages of FFMT include complex planning and execution, as well as prolonged recovery and rehabilitation.10
There has been a recent uptake in the use of FFMT in upper limb paralysis.9 However, there is no consensus on clinical indication. Furthermore, functional outcomes and adverse events are poorly understood. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise and appraise the evidence for the effectiveness of FFMT to treat upper limb paralysis.
Section snippets
Methods
This review followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions and was reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement and checklist.11 The protocol was developed prospectively, locally peer-reviewed, and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019139184).12
Study selection
There were 1155 unique records identified through database searching and screening, with 79 passing to full-text review. Thirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1).16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54
Study characteristics
All studies were observational. There were 36 cohort studies and 3 case series (Table 1). Of the cohort studies, 15 studies offered a comparative analysis of 2 or more
Discussion
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of FFMT to reconstruct upper limb paralysis. We identified 39 observational studies. Nearly all studies concluded that FFMT is an effective intervention for upper limb paralysis. However, significant heterogeneity was found in terms of patient population, cause of paralysis, interventions, and outcome reporting. The duration of follow-up varied significantly within and across studies. Only 21 studies reported
Conclusions
FFMT may offer restoration of function and improved quality of life to patients with upper limb paralysis. However, there is currently limited evidence to demonstrate its efficacy in terms of functional and patient-reported outcomes. Although the procedure is technically feasible with a low flap failure rate, there remains a lack of understanding of its impact on patients in their functional context or how this procedure compares to alternative surgical interventions including nerve and tendon
Ethics statement
Not relevant as this is a systematic review.
Conflict of Interest statement
None.
Financial disclosure statement
No funding was directly received for this article. No authors have any relevant commercial associations. JCR Wormald is funded by the Royal College of Surgeons of England.
Acknowledgements
None
References (63)
- et al.
Patient-reported outcome after peripheral nerve injury
J Hand Surg Am
(2009) - et al.
Current concepts of the treatment of adult brachial plexus injuries
J Hand Surg Am
(2010) - et al.
Free functional muscle transfer for the upper extremity
Clin Plast Surg
(2011) - et al.
Functioning free muscle transplantation
J Hand Surg Am
(1984) - et al.
Functional restoration in the upper extremity using free muscle transplantation
Ann Chir Main Memb Super
(1990) - et al.
Functional restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries: results in 167 patients (excluding obstetric brachial plexus injury)
J Hand Surg Am
(1993) - et al.
Free muscle transfer in Volkmann's ischaemic contracture
Ann Chir Main Memb Super
(1994) - et al.
Microvascular free functioning gracilis transfer with nerve transfer to establish elbow flexion
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2010) - et al.
Free Gracilis muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
(2011) - et al.
Secondary shoulder reconstruction in patients with brachial plexus injuries
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2011)
Free functioning gracilis transfer for traumatic brachial plexus injuries in children
J Hand Surg Am
Evaluation of elbow flexion following free muscle transfer from the medial gastrocnemius or transfer from the latissimus dorsi, in cases of traumatic injury of the brachial plexus
Rev Bras Ortop
Functioning free muscle transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injury patients
Injury
Contralateral medial pectoral nerve transfer with free gracilis muscle transfer in old brachial plexus palsy
J Surg Res
Free reverse gracilis muscle combined with steindler flexorplasty for elbow flexion reconstruction after failed primary repair of extended upper-type paralysis of the brachial plexus
J Hand Surg Am
Role of free functioning muscle transfer in improving the functional outcomes following replantation of crush avulsion amputations of the forearm
Injury
The influence of pre-surgical delay on functional outcome after reconstruction of brachial plexus injuries
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
Functioning free-muscle transfer for brachial plexus injury
Hand Clin
Use of the Medical Research Council muscle strength grading system in the upper extremity
J Hand Surg Am
Biomedical and psychosocial factors associated with disability after peripheral nerve injury
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Analyzing cost-effectiveness of ulnar and median nerve transfers to regain forearm flexion
Neurosurg Focus
Cost-effectiveness analysis of combined dual motor nerve transfers versus alternative surgical and nonsurgical management strategies to restore shoulder function following upper brachial plexus injury
Neurosurgery
Free muscle transplants in dogs, with microsurgical neurovascular anastomoses
Plast Reconstr Surg
Free gracilis muscle transplantation, with microneurovascular anastomoses for the treatment of facial paralysis. A preliminary report
Plast Reconstr Surg
Free muscle transplantation by microsurgical neurovascular anastomoses. Report of a case
Chin Med J (Engl)
Functional free muscle transfer for upper extremity reconstruction
Plast Reconstr Surg
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
PLoS Med
Cited by (3)
Secondary surgical procedures following motor nerve injuries
2023, NervenarztComplex upper extremity injuries: targeted muscle reinnervation, free functional muscle transfer, and vascularized composite allotransplantation
2022, Plastic and Aesthetic Research
Presented at: 31 Oct 2019 - British Society for Surgery of the Hand Autumn Scientific Meeting, Dublin, Ireland
05 Dec 2020 - Military Section Colt Foundation Research & Innovation Meeting, Royal Society of Medicine, London, UK
Author involvement: All authors contributed to the design of the project. NT conducted the literature search. Manuscripts were screened by AR and HC, conflicts were resolved by discussion between AR, HC, and JW. Analysis and manuscript preparation was conducted by all authors.
- #
Joint first authors