Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
The Oxford Finger Nail Appearance Score - a new scoring system for fingernail deformity following paediatric finger tip trauma
Introduction
Nail deformity can be associated with systemic conditions and commonly occurs following infection and trauma1. The description and classification of fingernail deformity is subjective1,2. However, a quantifiable measure of cosmesis allows differences in appearance between different fingernails and changes within the same fingernail following treatment to be measured and compared. This is important as it allows an objective measure of appearance. In order to quantify improvement in appearance following surgery, Zook et al3 developed a comparative scoring system. This was based on five domains (with between two and five subdomains) resulting in a summation score of major and minor variations. In 2017, we published the results of a pilot randomised control trial of paediatric nail bed injury (NINJA-P) in which 60 children were randomised to having the nail replaced or discarded following nail bed repair4. Cosmetic appearance was an outcome measure, and the Zook score3 was used to assess the cosmetic appearance of the injured nail four months after the injury/surgery had occurred.
In the original NINJA-P study4, two independent assessors used the Zook score3 to assess 25 clinical photographs of the operated fingers of 25 children compared to the corresponding uninjured contralateral finger taken at the four-month time-point (Figure 1). Agreement between assessors was measured by way of Cohen's kappa and percentage agreement on each of the score's domains and the overall score. The overall score measure was created by taking a positive outcome for each component as a 1 and a negative outcome as a 0. The outcome for the components were added together to create a total score of between 0 and 5 (where 0 was the least optimal and 5 was the most optimal nail appearance). Percentage agreement in the nail shape and surface components was 36% and 48%, respectively. Adherence, eponychium and split scored higher at 72%, 88% and 100%, respectively. The agreement for the overall score was 40%, and a weighted kappa for the overall score was 0.36 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.68).
The NINJA-P study identified agreement was poor between assessors for the Zook based score4. It was clear that the original Zook score developed over 35 years ago was not reliable for use in clinical trials to assess the outcome of nail appearance following trauma. As part of a large randomised control trial assessing cosmetic outcomes following nail bed repair5, we modified the score to achieve greater consistency between assessors and added training to reduce inter-rater variability. The aim of the work was to design a score based on the Zook score to improve the consistency and reliability of nail assessments in both clinical practice and clinical trial settings.
Section snippets
Methods
In order to improve the reliability of the score, we simplified the design of the Zook score (Figure 2A) by reducing the dimensionality of the score's components (Figure 2B). This was performed in two stages, as it was thought that the results obtained from the first set of modifications could be improved upon. The reduction of dimensionality of the score involved making all five components of the Zook score binary by comparing the affected nail to the contralateral corresponding non-injured
Results
The first round of modifications led to some improvement in the Zook score. However, the levels of percentage agreement and the kappa statistic for the overall score were relatively low. This prompted the second round of modifications described above, the results of which are reported in Table 1.
Of the 62 photographs, 58 were given a valid assessment by all 10 of the assessors. Three of the photographs were deemed suitable for valid assessment by nine assessors, and one of the photographs was
Discussion
Nail deformity is commonly seen following infection and trauma, yet there are no validated scoring systems by which to quantify the deformity. Current methods use descriptive terms for the appearance of the nail. However, these make comparison difficult when determining outcomes of treatment. Zook et al3 attempted to quantify fingernail appearance using a score utilising five important components of nail appearance, namely: nail shape, adherence, appearance of eponychium, nail surface
Funding
AJ, MDG, CC, AS, JC, DB and AVHG obtained grant funding for this project. This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-1215-20041) and was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Competing Interests
None to declare.
Ethics approval
The National Research Ethics Committee approved this study on 2nd February 2018 (18/SC/0024).
References (9)
- et al.
Reconstruction of a functional and esthetic nail
Hand Clin
(1990) - et al.
An algorithmic approach to posttraumatic nail deformities based on anatomical classification
J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg
(2014) - et al.
A study of nail bed injuries: causes, treatment, and prognosis
J Hand Surg Am
(1984) - et al.
Randomized feasibility trial of replacing or discarding the nail plate after nail-bed repair in children
Br J Surg
(2017)
Cited by (2)
Appearance Outcomes of Repositioned Native Nail Plate as a Free Graft and Artificial Nail Plate in the Reconstruction of the Fingertip Injuries
2023, Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online