ReviewComparison of primary care doctors and dentists in the referral of oral cancer: a systematic review
Introduction
Oral cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the world,1 and approximately 6500 cases are diagnosed/year in the UK.2 The incidence of oral cancer is projected to rise by 33% in the UK from 2014 to 2035, with 20 cases/100 000 people in 2035.3
Disease stage at presentation has a major influence on survival,4, 5 and cancers that are larger and have spread to the lymph nodes have a much poorer prognosis. Two-year crude survival for stage 1 (early) disease is approximately 90% whilst for stage 4 (advanced) disease it is less than 50%.6 Early diagnosis is clearly very important. Unfortunately, approximately 50% of oral cancers present at advanced stage 3 or 4, despite the accessibility of the mouth for relatively easy examination.7
Oral cancer is unique amongst malignancies in that it is referred to specialist care by both primary care doctors and dentists, which is unlikely for other types of cancer.8 Proportions referred by each group vary across studies. A study of 200 oral cancer patients in the UK2 reported that 57% were referred by their GP, 32% by their dentist, 2% via a hospital emergency department, and 9% were unknown. In a Canadian series, 65% of oral cancers were referred by a dentist.9 In the UK, both medical and dental primary-care practitioners are provided with a list of “guideline” symptoms and signs to assist in the referral of oral cancer.10, 11, 12 Several authors have noted the importance of utilising these guidelines in conjunction with a thorough history and examination – the principles of good medical practice are paramount.10 One study,13 however, found that only 18% of family physicians carried out an examination of the mouth in half their patients.
Further differences between the referrals from each group of practitioners have been reported. An American study9 reported that 47% of dentist-diagnosed oral cancers were identified during a non-symptom-driven visit whilst all medical referrals were symptom-driven. In the same study, the average clinical and pathological stage of the non-symptom diagnoses were significantly lower (1.7 and 1.6, respectively) than those of lesions detected during a symptom-directed examination (2.6 and 2.5, respectively). It would seem, therefore, that routine examination of the oral soft tissues at a dental check-up is important in the early diagnosis of oral cancer, and dental practitioners are in a good position to carry out routine soft tissue examinations of the oral cavity.14 However, English NHS data for 2017-18 indicate that only 50.9% of adults had visited an NHS dentist in the previous two years15 and it is probable that those at highest risk of oral cancer are least likely to attend regular consultations.16
The overall aim of this systematic review was to compare primary care doctors and dentists in the referral of oral cancer, focusing on three main objectives: the proportion of diagnosed cancers that were referred by each profession, differences in stage on presentation for referrals from each profession, and differences in delay.
Section snippets
Types of studies
Studies that examined the referral of oral cancer and compared GPs and dentists (that is, the study included data for both professions) were considered for this review. They were required to include one or more of the following outcomes:
- •
Proportion/percentage of diagnosed cancers referred by each profession
- •
Stage on presentation for each profession
- •
Presentation delay in relation to each profession
Studies were required to report on diagnosed oral cancers, rather than suspected cancer referrals.
Search outcome
A total of 895 papers were identified by electronic searches, and nine from other sources. Scrutiny of abstracts found 32 studies on the referral of oral cancer from primary to secondary care. Of these, 22 included data on the referral of oral cancer by primary care doctors and dentists (Fig. 1).
Description of included studies
A total of 22 studies were included in the review (Table 1).2, 9, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 All of them included data on the proportion (percentage)
GP and dentist referrals
This review confirms that both primary care doctors and dentists have an important role in the referral of oral cancer to specialist services. Meta-analysis of GP/dentist referral risk ratios indicated that approximately 14 oral cancers were referred from GPs for every 10 from a dentist, although there was considerable variation between studies undertaken in different countries – and indeed between those in the same country. Subgroup analysis of UK studies similarly demonstrated varying
Conflict of interest
Langton: none; Cousin: none; Pluddemann: NIHR grants and occasional teaching expenses; Bankhead: Funding from NIHR, PGfAR, CRUK, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.
Ethics statement/confirmation of patients’ permission
Not required as this study is a systematic review. No identifiable patient material used.
References (71)
- et al.
Role of general practice in the diagnosis of oral cancer
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2016) - et al.
Focus on head and neck cancer
Cancer Cell
(2004) - et al.
Delays in treatment of oral cancer: a review of the current literature
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
(2014) - et al.
Early detection and diagnosis of oral cancer: strategies for improvement
J Cancer Policy
(2013) - et al.
Is detection of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cancer by a dental health care provider associated with a lower stage at diagnosis?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2003) - et al.
The expanding role of primary care in cancer control
Lancet Oncol
(2015) - et al.
Two-week rule in head and neck cancer 2000-14: a systematic review
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2016) - et al.
The dentist as a referral source of first episode head and neck cancer patients
J Am Dent Assoc
(1983) Oral cancer diagnosis and delays in referral
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1992)- et al.
Delay in diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma; a report from The Netherlands
Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol
(1992)
Referral patterns of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, Australia
Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol
Referral delay in diagnosis of oro/oropharyngeal cancer in Israel
Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol
Oral cancer: a retrospective study of 100 Danish cases
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Factors related to advanced stage oral squamous cell carcinoma in southern Thailand
Oral Oncol
Factors associated with diagnostic delay of oral squamous cell carcinoma
Oral Oncol
The idiosyncratic relationship between diagnostic delay and stage of oral squamous cell carcinoma
Oral Oncol
An assessment of deprivation as a factor in the delays in presentation, diagnosis and treatment in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Oral Oncol
A population-based study of factors associated with early versus late stage oral cavity cancer diagnoses
Oral Oncol
Lateness of diagnosis of oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: factors related to the tumour, the patient and health professionals
Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol
Assessing physicians’ and dentists’ oral cancer knowledge, opinions and practices
J Am Dent Assoc
Oral cancer: material deprivation, unemployment and risk factor behaviour - an initial study
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Screening for oral cancer—a perspective from the Global Oral Cancer Forum
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Initial mismanagement and delay in diagnosis of oral cancer
J Am Dent Assoc
New NICE referral guidance for oral cancer; does it risk delay in diagnosis?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Trivandrum Oral Cancer Screening Study Group. Effect of screening on oral cancer mortality in Kerala, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Lancet
Is early diagnosis of oral cancer a feasible objective? Who is to blame for diagnostic delay?
Oral Dis
Head and neck cancer – part 2: treatment and prognostic factors
BMJ
Oral cancer – the forgotten disease
J Am Dent Assoc
The role of the general dental practitioner in detection and prevention of oral cancer; a review of the literature
Dent Update
The effects of social class and dental attendance on oral health
J Dent Res
Cited by (9)
Do doctors know about “Oral Medicine”?
2022, Journal of Interprofessional Education and PracticeCitation Excerpt :This costs time, money and loss of energy to the patients.15,22,27 Sometimes, this delay in patient care may affect the prognosis of the disease negatively.28,29 The lack of proper referral mechanism may be due to the lack of adequate specialist manpower available in various settings like dental schools, hospitals, academic medical centers, or private practices.27,28
Epidemiological, clinical, and prognostic analysis of oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed and treated in a single hospital in Galicia (Spain): a retrospective study with 5-year follow-up
2024, Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia BucalProfessional delays in referral of patients with mouth cancer: six case histories
2022, British Dental JournalClinical presentation and diagnosis
2021, Dental Cadmos