Development of a rapid low cost fluorescent biosensor for the detection of food contaminants
Highlights
► We developed a prototype low cost biosensor targeted towards food contaminant analysis. ► Excellent repeatability and reproducibility matching more expensive contemporaries. ► Showed proof-of-principle for two food related compounds. ► Investigated assay development characteristics. ► Produced calibration curves matching rival biosensor sensitivities.
Introduction
Safe food is an essential requirement of modern society, and governmental authorities throughout the world are constantly monitoring the food supply chain in an attempt to ensure an adequate safety level. One well recognised threat is the chemical contamination of food, where compounds such as drug residues, pesticides and natural toxins are unintentionally present in food stuffs.
Biosensor methods can be applied, as rapid screening tools, to detect such contaminants. They can be developed using several types of transducer (Reder-Christ and Bendas, 2011) one of which is based on fluorescence either through quenching (Wang et al., 2011) or labelling of the biological recognition elements, e.g., fluorescently labelled antibody (Taitt et al., 2008). Whilst using labelled antibodies to detect low molecular weight compounds (<1000 Da), such as natural toxins or chemical food contaminants, an inhibition based assay is generally needed to reach the required sensitivity (Yu et al., 2005).
There are a limited number of publications showing fluorescence biosensors being used for the detection of low molecular weight food contaminants. Ngundi et al. (2006) and Sapsford et al. (2006) both demonstrate the use of the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) array biosensor for the detection of mycotoxins. Schultz et al. (2007) show proof-of principle for a portable fluorescence biosensor for the detection of aflatoxin B1 based on quenching. Sun et al. (2011) and Wang et al. (2011) show the use of fluorescence based biosensors for the detection of pesticide residues. Both methods are based on the action of pesticide residues on the activity of acetylcholinesterase and use forms of quenching to indicate enzyme activity thus pesticide concentration.
Commercial biosensors have advanced greatly over the years with improvements in sensitivity, and increased throughput by array format (Malic et al., 2011), multiple simultaneous channels (Roh et al., 2011) or both (Abdiche et al., 2011). These instruments tend to be outside the budgetary restraints of most food contaminant laboratories. A few commercial biosensors have been developed specifically for food analysis. One such example is the surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based Biacore Q (Ferguson et al., 2005) with others being various adaptations of the NRL array biosensor (Ligler et al., 2007). These biosensors have many attributes highly sought after for routine food contaminant analysis such as ease-of-use, fast assay times, sensitivity, good repeatability and reproducibility (GE Healthcare, 2011) with the prototype NRL array biosensor showing multiplexing capabilities (Taitt et al., 2008). However the substantial cost of the Biacore Q limits its customer base to the larger food companies and government facilities and the applications on the NRL array biosensor have mainly been focused on the detection of bacterial contamination and plant toxins that pose a potential terrorism risk (Constellation Technology, 2009, MBio, 2011, ThomasNet News, 2007).
The aim of the present research was to develop, from first principles, a low cost, potentially portable, fluorescence biosensor capable of detecting low levels of contaminants and compounds of interest in food analysis. We demonstrate that a simple and inexpensive fluorescence biosensor can perform to the detection capabilities required in food monitoring laboratories, and hence prove it is possible to engineer an analytical biosensor which also matches their budgetary requirements. The research presented outlines the performance characterisation of the biosensor, the signal inhibition obtained using two model compounds (biotin and domoic acid, Fig. 1) as well as the biosensor detection unit’s performance during assay development leading to the construction of calibration curves.
Section snippets
Reagents
HBS-EP buffer was obtained from GE Healthcare, UK. Domoic acid was obtained from Fluorochem, UK. 1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES), biotin, bovine serum albumin (BSA), ethanolamine, ethylene diamine, fluorescein sodium and N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, UK. The acid surface slide, biotin glass slide and DyLight 488 labelled anti-biotin monoclonal antibody (1.8 mg/ml) were obtained from
Basic characterisation of the biosensor detection unit
A total of 15580 data points were collected during the 4 h measurement and showed an overall signal drift of −253.9 mV (3.1%CV) with a slope of −0.016 mV/s. Typical short term noise (peak–peak) was 9.1 mV. Repeatability (n=23) at 60 s into injection was determined with an average relative signal of 1381.0 mV and 1.0%CV. When comparing average signal from three independent repeatability experiments, reproducibility (n=3) was determined to be 0.6%CV. The slope measured during the 4 h was roughly linear.
Conclusion
A prototype fluorescent biosensor detection unit has been successfully developed that exhibits highly acceptable baseline stability, and in its current form, i.e., a manual system, shows excellent signal repeatability. This unit has been tested using two models and has proven to be capable of detecting binding and inhibition with both compounds with a good degree of repeatability. Furthermore the unit has shown that it can be used as an assay development tool that can result in the production
Acknowledgements
Funding for the project was provided by the Department of Employment and Learning for Northern Ireland as part of the All Island ASSET Centre project.
References (26)
- et al.
Analytical Biochemistry
(2011) - et al.
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
(2011) - et al.
Analytica Chimica Acta
(2005) - et al.
Methods in Enzymology
(1981) - et al.
Toxicon
(2002) - et al.
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
(2004) - et al.
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
(2004) - et al.
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
(2006) - et al.
Harmful Algae
(2007) - et al.
Talanta
(2011)