Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 32, Issue 17, June 2011, Pages 4130-4139
Biomaterials

Bioengineering embryonic stem cell microenvironments for exploring inhibitory effects on metastatic breast cancer cells

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.035Get rights and content

Abstract

The recreation of an in vitro microenvironment to understand and manipulate the proliferation and migration of invasive breast cancer cells may allow one to put a halt to their metastasis capacity. Invasive cancer cells have been linked to embryonic stem (ES) cells as they possess certain similar characteristics and gene signatures. Embryonic microenvironments have the potential to reprogram cancer cells into a less invasive phenotype and help elucidate tumorigenesis and metastasis. In this study, we explored the feasibility of reconstructing embryonic microenvironments using mouse ES cells cultured in alginate hydrogel and investigated the interactions of ES cells and highly invasive breast cancer cells in 2D, 2&1/2D, and 3D cultures. Results showed that mouse ES cells inhibited the growth and tumor spheroid formation of breast cancer cells. The mouse ES cell microenvironment was further constructed and optimized in 3D alginate hydrogel microbeads, and co-cultured with breast cancer cells. Migration analysis displayed a significant reduction in the average velocity and trajectory of breast cancer cell locomotion compared to control, suggesting that bioengineered mouse ES cell microenvironments inhibited the proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells. This study may act as a platform to open up new options to understand and harness tumor cell plasticity and develop therapeutics for metastatic breast cancer.

Introduction

Invasive breast cancer represents more than 75% of new cases diagnosed in 2009 according to American Cancer Society. As cancer cells grow, they can break away from the main malignant tumor and metastasize to other parts of the body by passage through the bloodstream and lymphatic system, so called cancer metastasis [1]. Tumor invasion and metastasis is the primary cause of death for patients with breast cancer [2]. However, it is difficult to investigate cancer metastasis in vivo [1]. In invasive breast cancer, the loss of epithelial polarity and the rupture of basement membrane occurred. Therefore, tumor cells are in direct contact with a remodeled microenvironment [3]. The surrounding microenvironment of breast cancer cells plays a critical role in tumorigenesis and metastasis [4], [5]. The cancer cell microenvironment is constituted of stroma, soluble factors, and cell–cell interactions [6]. Cross-talk between tumor and stromal cells in the breast tumor microenvironment triggers the secretion of molecules essential for basement membrane penetration and mediators of metastasis in breast cancer [7], [8], [9]. Bioengineering a tumor microenvironment, which can manipulate the proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells, has great potential to understand and inhibit breast cancer metastasis and lead to the prevention and correction of invasive breast cancer.

Metastatic cancer cells share some similarity with embryonic stem (ES) cells (e.g., high proliferative capacity versus self-renewal, tumor initiating versus teratoma formation, and expression of certain pluripotency markers) [10], [11], [12], [13]. Metastatic cancer cells interact dynamically with a microenvironment that facilitates plasticity, tumorigenicity and metastasis [7], [8], while ES cells sustain a microenvironment regulating self-renewal and differentiation [10]. Recent research has linked an ES-like gene expression signature with poorly differentiated aggressive human breast cancer cells [11]. Pluripotent stem cells have the potential to help elucidate early events during tumorigenesis and metastasis, including potential miRNA and epigenetic targets, tumor initiator and suppressor networks, which is unachievable using primary tumor-based studies [12].

It has been demonstrated that the embryonic microenvironment plays a key role in inhibiting cancer metastasis [13], [14], [15]. In particular, it has been shown that the human ES cell microenvironment could reprogram metastatic melanoma cells to assume a less invasive phenotype [16]. On the contrary, human ES cell-differentiated teratomas showed to support the growth and invasion of ovarian tumor cells [17]. This indicates that the undifferentiated embryonic stem cell microenvironment could inhibit cancer metastasis. The in vitro investigation of ES cell-cancer cell interactions will provide valuable insight into fundamental understanding of tumor progression and therapeutic development. As far as breast cancer is concerned, however, little research on the interaction between ES cells and breast cancer cells has been reported. This is partially due to the lack of a suitable in vitro model system which can be used to examine ES cell-breast cancer cell interactions.

Human breast cancer cell line culture has been widely used to investigate cell migration and some important information has been elucidated [18], [19]. With the advancement of microtechnology, cell printing and patterning techniques provide a platform for spatial control of the location of cells and observation of the cell–cell interaction [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. When breast cancer cell lines were cultured as monolayers on 2D plastic substrata or patterned surfaces, however, these cells could not recapture the tumor architecture and missed certain important signals in a tumor microenvironment [12], [13], [28], [29]. Better culture systems are therefore needed to better recapitulate tumor microenvironment for prolonged periods of time. It is well known that the cell culture environment can have a dramatic influence on cell behavior [14]. Bioengineered 3D in vitro models for studying cell–cell interactions can bridge the gap between 2D cell cultures and whole-animal systems [15], [30], [31]. These 3D models provide a unique perspective for stem cell and cancer research [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]. 3D hydrogel-based culture systems have the potential to provide in vivo-like cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions and cell-matrix adhesions [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43]. Bissell and colleagues have pioneered 3D gel models to reconstruct normal and malignant breast tissue architecture [44]. Normal epithelial or breast cancer cells can either be embedded in or grown on basement membrane-like gels, which are used to mimic the in vivo ECM and provide environmental cues [45], [46]. 3D hydrogel-based culture systems have also been used to bioengineer embryonic stem cell microenvironments [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]. In particular, the alginate hydrogel system is superior for studies of cell–cell interactions due to the lack of cell recognition signals in the alginate itself [54], [55]. Alginate hydrogel has been used to culture human breast cancer cells, in which 3D multicellular tumor spheroids were formed [56], [57], [58], and to culture mouse or human ES cells for the maintenance of the pluripotency and directed differentiation of ES cells [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], respectively.

In this study, we explored the feasibility of reconstructing embryonic stem cell microenvironments using the alginate hydrogel for the study of metastatic breast cancer cell proliferation and migration. Mouse CCE ES cells were used as a model system to reconstitute the embryonic microenvironment in vitro. Highly invasive rat mammary carcinoma MTLn3-MenaINV cells were chosen for this study due to their highly metastatic potential [64], [65]. First, mouse ES cells and metastatic breast cancer cells were co-cultured in 2D microwells, 2&1/2D alginate hydrogel films, and 3D alginate hydrogel microbeads. Then an in vitro embryonic microenvironment was constructed by culturing mouse ES cells in 3D alginate hydrogel microbeads followed by the addition of metastatic breast cancer cells. The effects of ES microenvironments on the proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells were explored.

Section snippets

Cell lines and cell culture

Mouse CCE ES cells were obtained from StemCell Technologies (Vancouver, Canada) [66], [67]. Metastatic rat mammary adenocarcinoma parental MTLn3-EGFP cells and highly invasive MTLn3-MenaINV cells were kindly provided by Dr. John Condeelis (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY).

Mouse ES cells were cultured in gelatin-coated flasks with maintenance medium which consists of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM with 4.5 g/l d-glucose) supplemented with 15% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS),

Inhibitory effect of ES cells on metastatic breast cancer cell growth

Mouse ES cells and rat highly invasive mammary carcinoma MTLn3-MenaINV cells were patterned in PDMS stencil and co-cultured in 2D microwells. After one day of cultivation, ES cells took the central location and formed large connected colonies while MTLn3-MenaINV cells grew on the edge, surrounding the ES cell colony (Fig. 3a). Compared to the control containing MTLn3-MenaINV cells alone (Fig. 3b), co-culture with ES cells inhibited breast cancer cell growth. The inhibition rate for MTLn3-MenaINV

Discussion

The interaction between breast cancer cells and neighboring cells in a tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in breast cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis. The breast tumor microenvironment is a complex system composed of many cell types, e.g., myofibroblasts, myoepithelial cells, adipocytes, endothelial cells, and immune cells. All of these cells participate in tumorigenesis and extensive alterations to genetic expression occur in all cell types during cancer progression [72]. In vitro

Conclusions

In this study, we have co-cultured metastatic breast cancer MTLn3-MenaINV cells and ES cells in 2D microwells, 2&1/2D alginate hydrogel films, and 3D alginate hydrogel microbeads and microcapsules. It demonstrated that the presence of mouse ES cells inhibits tumor growth. We further bioengineered the embryonic microenvironment of mouse ES cells in vitro using the alginate hydrogel. This in vitro embryonic microenvironment has successfully inhibited the proliferation and migration of highly

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the NSF sponsored CBET 0846270 (Xie), EEC 0914790 (Xie), and DBI 0922830 (Castracane). Authors Nurazhani Abdul Raof and Waseem Khan Raja contributed equally.

References (107)

  • F.M. Kievit et al.

    Chitosan-alginate 3D scaffolds as a mimic of the glioma tumor microenvironment

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • M. Schindler et al.

    A synthetic nanofibrillar matrix promotes in vivo-like organization and morphogenesis for cells in culture

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • C. Moraes et al.

    A microfabricated platform for high-throughput unconfined compression of micropatterned biomaterial arrays

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • K.M. Yamada et al.

    Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D

    Cell

    (2007)
  • C. Feder-Mengus et al.

    New dimensions in tumor immunology: what does 3D culture reveal?

    Trends Mol Med

    (2008)
  • E. Cukierman et al.

    Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2002)
  • A. Khademhosseini et al.

    Microengineered hydrogels for tissue engineering

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • K. Bott et al.

    The effect of matrix characteristics on fibroblast proliferation in 3D gels

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • M.J. Bissell et al.

    Tissue architecture: the ultimate regulator of breast epithelial function

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2003)
  • I.M. Chung et al.

    Bioadhesive hydrogel microenvironments to modulate epithelial morphogenesis

    Biomaterials

    (2008)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Feeder-free self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells in 3D porous natural polymer scaffolds

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • M. Chayosumrit et al.

    Alginate microcapsule for propagation and directed differentiation of hESCs to definitive endoderm

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • N. Siti-Ismail et al.

    The benefit of human embryonic stem cell encapsulation for prolonged feeder-free maintenance

    Biomaterials

    (2008)
  • N. Wang et al.

    Alginate encapsulation technology supports embryonic stem cells differentiation into insulin-producing cells

    J Biotechnol

    (2009)
  • U. Philippar et al.

    A mena invasion isoform potentiates EGF-induced carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis

    Dev Cell

    (2008)
  • X. Kang et al.

    Adipogenesis of murine embryonic stem cells in a three-dimensional culture system using electrospun polymer scaffolds

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • M. Allinen et al.

    Molecular characterization of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer

    Cancer Cell

    (2004)
  • A.K. Sasser et al.

    Human bone marrow stromal cells enhance breast cancer cell growth rates in a cell line-dependent manner when evaluated in 3D tumor environments

    Cancer Lett

    (2007)
  • V.M. Weaver et al.

    Beta4 integrin-dependent formation of polarized three-dimensional architecture confers resistance to apoptosis in normal and malignant mammary epithelium

    Cancer Cell

    (2002)
  • T. Jacks et al.

    Taking the study of cancer cell survival to a new dimension

    Cell

    (2002)
  • Y. Markovitz-Bishitz et al.

    A polymer microstructure array for the formation, culturing, and high throughput drug screening of breast cancer spheroids

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • E. Sahai

    Illuminating the metastatic process

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2007)
  • P. Mehlen et al.

    Metastasis: a question of life or death

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2006)
  • L. Roennov-Jessen et al.

    Breast cancer by proxy: can the microenvironment be both the cause and consequence?

    Trends Mol Med

    (2009)
  • X.-J. Ma et al.

    Gene expression profiling of the tumor microenvironment during breast cancer progression

    Breast Cancer Res

    (2009)
  • J.A. Joyce et al.

    Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2009)
  • L.-M. Postovit et al.

    Human embryonic stem cell microenvironment suppresses the tumorigenic phenotype of aggressive cancer cells

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2008)
  • R. Peerani et al.

    Niche-mediated control of human embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation

    EMBO J

    (2007)
  • I. Ben-Porath et al.

    An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors

    Nat Genet

    (2008)
  • T.R. Douglas et al.

    A comparison of gene expression signatures from breast tumors and breast tissue derived cell lines

    Dis Markers

    (2001)
  • F. Pampaloni et al.

    The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2007)
  • L.-M. Postovit et al.

    A three-dimensional model to study the epigenetic effects induced by the microenvironment of human embryonic stem cells

    Stem Cells

    (2006)
  • M. Tzukerman et al.

    The influence of a human embryonic stem cell-derived microenvironment on targeting of human solid tumor xenografts

    Cancer Res

    (2006)
  • M. Lacroix et al.

    Relevance of breast cancer cell lines as models for breast tumours: an update

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2004)
  • N. Abdul Raof et al.

    The maintenance of pluripotency following laser direct-write of mouse embryonic stem cells

    Biomaterials

    (2011)
  • A. Khademhosseini et al.

    Cell docking inside microwells within reversibly sealed microfluidic channels for fabricating multiphenotype cell arrays

    Lab Chip

    (2005)
  • J.Y. Park et al.

    Regulating microenvironmental stimuli for stem cells and cancer cells using microsystems

    Integr Biol

    (2010)
  • N.R. Schiele et al.

    Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing

    Biofabrication

    (2010)
  • T. Vargo-Gogola et al.

    Modelling breast cancer: one size does not fit all

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2007)
  • R.A. Marklein et al.

    Controlling stem cell fate with material design

    Adv Mater

    (2010)
  • Cited by (36)

    • 3D brown adipogenesis to create "Brown-Fat-in-Microstrands"

      2016, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mouse ESCs have also been encapsulated in alginate-poly-l-lysine microcapsules and have been exposed to a differentiation scheme leading to functional hepatocytes [98]. Although the mouse ESCs have the ability to grow within the microbeads and microcapsules, the diameter is typically just outside of the 200-μm diffusion limit, and thus, oxygen and nutrients will not be transported to the center of the cell aggregates uniformly [99–103]. Therefore, it is beneficial to fabricate long microstrands with diameters less than 200 μm, to overcome the diffusion limit and prevent necrotic regions in the center of cell aggregates [104] while still allowing for abundant cell growth.

    • Opportunities and challenges in three-dimensional brown adipogenesis of stem cells

      2015, Biotechnology Advances
      Citation Excerpt :

      The biocompatibility of alginate is such that it has been employed and widely used for cell culture, tissue engineering and cell therapy (de Vos et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2012; Orive et al., 2003; Prang et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2006; Wee and Gombotz, 1998). In fact, alginate hydrogels are capable of forming layers on chips (Plouffe et al., 2009), microbeads, microcapsules (Lim and Sun, 1980; Wang et al., 2006), microstrands (Raof et al., 2011a, 2011b), microfibers (Onoe et al., 2013) and nanofibers (Bhattarai et al., 2006), and has the potential to provide versatile building blocks to encapsulate or assemble cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine purposes. Our preliminary work utilizes the capacity of alginate as an encapsulation material by culturing mouse ESCs in alginate microstrands, with a microfabrication technique.

    • Silk scaffolds for three-dimensional (3D) tumor modeling

      2014, Silk Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    • Alginate microcapsule as a 3D platform for the efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to dopamine neurons

      2013, Stem Cell Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has been shown that the alginate encapsulation technique promotes better growth, differentiation, maturation or protein secretion of various cell types including mesenchymal stem cells, mouse ESCs and hESCs (Chayosumrit et al., 2010; Dean et al., 2006; Serra et al., 2011; Addae et al., 2012). Despite the success in many cell types, hESC differentiation studies using alginate encapsulation are limited (Chayosumrit et al., 2010; Addae et al., 2012; Bidarra et al., 2010; Raof et al., 2011; Fang et al., 2007). In this study, we present an approach to differentiate hESCs to mdDA neurons in a 3D microenvironment using alginate microcapsules on PA6 cell co-culture, along with SHH and FGF8a as compared to that under 2D environment.

    • Opportunities and challenges for use of tumor spheroids as models to test drug delivery and efficacy

      2012, Journal of Controlled Release
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are deemed to be responsible for relapse of cancers after treatment, have been cultured successfully as spheroids. Compared with conventional culture, spheroid cultures maintain key properties of stem cells, including gene expression profiles, colony-forming and/or tumorigenic activity, differentiation potential, cytokine secretion, and resistance to chemotherapy [23–36]. As an example, sphere-forming primary human colon tumor cells maintain CD133 expression (a marker of colon CSC), and can generate and expand spheroids under serum-free culture conditions, initiate xenograft tumors, and exhibit resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, whereas cells in 2D conditions fail to do so [25].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

    View full text