Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 28, Issue 34, December 2007, Pages 5121-5127
Biomaterials

Biomaterial-mediated retroviral gene transfer using self-assembled monolayers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.047Get rights and content

Abstract

Biomaterial-mediated gene delivery has recently emerged as a promising alternative to conventional gene transfer technologies that focus on direct delivery of viral vectors or DNA-polymer/matrix complexes. However, biomaterial-based strategies have primarily targeted transient gene expression vehicles, including plasmid DNA and adenovirus particles. This study expands on this work by characterizing biomaterial properties conducive to the surface immobilization of retroviral particles and subsequent transduction of mammalian cells at the cell-material interface. Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of functionally-terminated alkanethiols on gold were used to establish biomaterial surfaces of defined chemical composition. Gene transfer was observed to be greater than 90% on NH2-terminated surfaces, approximately 50% on COOH-functionalized surfaces, and undetectable on CH3-terminated SAMs, similar to controls of tissue culture-treated polystyrene. Gene delivery via the NH2-SAM was further characterized as a function of retrovirus coating time, virus concentration, and cell seeding density. Finally, SAM-mediated gene delivery was comparable to fibronectin- and poly-l-lysine-based methods for gene transfer. This work is significant to establishing safe and effective gene therapy strategies, developing efficient methods for gene delivery, and supporting recent progress in the field of biomaterial-mediated gene transfer.

Introduction

Genetic engineering of mammalian cells is central to numerous strategies for disease treatment, tissue regeneration, and the study of protein function and cellular processes [1], [2], [3]. Conventional methods for gene delivery include both in vitro and in vivo gene transfer based on viral vectors or DNA-polymer/matrix complexes. In vitro gene transfer typically involves the direct transfection or transduction of cultured cells that are subsequently analyzed for transgene activity and/or implanted for a therapeutic purpose. In vivo gene therapy involves the direct application of the gene carrier to the injured or diseased tissue. However, these approaches are often limited by inefficient transgene delivery and poor specificity. Recent attempts to overcome these limitations have focused on biomaterial-mediated gene delivery, wherein the gene carrier is immobilized to, or encapsulated within, a biomaterial support [1], [2], [3]. The hybrid gene-activated biomaterial is then seeded with cells in vitro or implanted. By co-localizing the gene delivery vehicle and cell adhesion, this method enhances gene transfer and specifically targets cells at the biomaterial interface, thereby reducing the risks associated with direct injection of the gene carrier. Therefore, this approach provides several advantages over conventional gene delivery modalities, including reduced cytotoxicity and immunogenicity of freely diffusible gene carriers, limited ectopic transgene expression in neighboring tissues, improved stability of the gene carrier, and controlled levels of gene transfer and expression.

Strategies for the integration of biomaterials and gene delivery have targeted both viral and plasmid DNA-based gene carriers. Fang et al. originally developed this method in the form of a gene-activated matrix (GAM) in which plasmid DNA was loaded onto collagen sponges prior to implantation into segmental bone defects [4]. Plasmid DNA was later incorporated into poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) scaffolds with tunable degradation properties, allowing for sustained release of DNA from the scaffold for up to 1 month [5]. Subsequently, numerous studies have evaluated strategies for controlled release of plasmid DNA from polymeric scaffolds or immobilization of DNA at biomaterial surfaces [1]. Methods for plasmid release have primarily focused on DNA incorporation into biodegradable polymers, including collagen [4], [6], hyaluronan [7], [8], PLG [5], [9], poly(ethylene glycol) [10], and ethyl vinyl-co-acetate [11]. Immobilization approaches typically utilize the interaction of DNA with cationic agents, including poly-l-lysine [12], polyethylenimine [13], [14], [15], chitosan [16], or dendrimers such as polyamidoamine [17]. More recently, efforts have focused on incorporating the high gene transfer efficiencies of viral vectors into biomaterial-based gene delivery. For example, adenovirus particles have been suspended in hydrogel microspheres of fibrin [18], collagen [18], alginate [19], and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) [20], [21] and implanted for controlled delivery in vivo. Additionally, Schwarz and colleagues have developed a technique for freeze-drying recombinant adeno-associated virus particles onto implants to enhance tissue repair [22].

Although many strategies exist for biomaterial-mediated gene therapy with plasmid DNA or adenoviral particles, both of these methods generate only transient transgene expression. There are many examples of biomedical applications that require prolonged or sustained expression of the transgene. Therefore, an unfulfilled need exists for methods that immobilize or release gene carriers that permanently modify the cellular DNA, such as retroviruses and lentiviruses. In contrast to adeno- and adeno-associated viruses, these particles consist of an unstable lipid bilayer and RNA genome that present unique challenges for incorporation into biomaterials. Retrovirus immobilization to human plasma fibronectin or recombinant fibronectin fragments has been widely utilized to enhance gene delivery to several cell types [23], [24], [25]. However, fibronectin is an intrinsically bioreactive molecule that directs confounding effects on cell differentiation and proliferation [26], [27], [28]. Cationic and anionic polymers have been used to form large virus-polymer complexes and increase the rate of virus sedimentation onto cultured cells [29], [30], [31]. Building on these results, other studies have analyzed the effects of cationic surfaces or molecules to regulate the immobilization and delivery of negatively-charged retrovirus particles [32], [33], [34]. The present study expands on this work by evaluating the effects of surface chemistry on biomaterial-mediated gene delivery.

Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) represent a robust, controlled, and stable biomaterial for analyzing the effects of surface chemistry on biological phenomena [35]. SAMs have been used extensively to study and control protein adsorption and cell adhesion and function in vitro and in vivo. More recently, plasmid DNA has been immobilized onto SAMs for biomaterial-directed gene delivery [36], [37], [38]. In the present work, we demonstrate SAM chemistry-dependent effects on retrovirus immobilization and gene delivery.

Section snippets

Cell culture

NIH3T3 murine fibroblasts (CRL-1658, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were cultured in DMEM, 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin G sodium, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Cell culture media and antibiotics were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), fetal bovine serum was purchased from Hyclone (Logan, UT), and all other cell culture supplements and reagents were acquired from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Self-assembled monolayers

Alkanethiols 1-dodecanethiol

Results

To test the effects of surface chemistry on retrovirus immobilization to biomaterial surfaces, eGFP-encoding retroviral supernatants were incubated on CH3, COOH, or NH2 SAMs or tissue culture-treated polystyrene control (TC) for 16 h. Surfaces were then washed thoroughly with PBS and seeded with NIH3T3 murine fibroblasts. Expression of eGFP was measured by flow cytometry 72 h later as an indicator of retrovirus immobilization and biomaterial-mediated gene transfer (Fig. 1). In contrast to other

Discussion

Biomaterial-mediated gene delivery offers several advantages over conventional methods for genetic engineering of mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo. In particular, this strategy offers the potential to increase the efficiency of gene transfer by co-localizing the cells and viral particles and enhance the safety of gene therapy by avoiding off-target effects of the gene carrier on neighboring cells and tissues. This study characterizes a novel approach to retroviral gene transfer through

Conclusion

We describe a novel approach to biomaterial-mediated gene delivery via surface immobilization of retroviral particles onto alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers, which impart a permanent genetic modification in target cells. Biomaterial-assisted retroviral gene transfer exhibited strong dependence on the biomaterial surface chemistry as well as viral supernatant and cell culture conditions. This strategy is particularly efficient in engineering mammalian cells and compares favorably with other

Acknowledgments

The authors thank T.J. Murphy for generously providing the retroviral vector. This research was funded by the NIH (R01-EB003364), the Georgia Tech/Emory, NSF Engineering Research Center on Tissue Engineering (EEC-9731643), and a Medtronic Foundation Fellowship and NIH Biotechnology Training Grant (T32-GM08433).

References (55)

  • B. Hennemann et al.

    Efficient retrovirus-mediated gene transfer to transplantable human bone marrow cells in the absence of fibronectin

    Blood

    (2000)
  • K. Kuhlcke et al.

    Highly efficient retroviral gene transfer based on centrifugation-mediated vector preloading of tissue culture vessels

    Mol Ther

    (2002)
  • A.K. Pannier et al.

    Substrate-mediated delivery from self-assembled monolayers: effect of surface ionization, hydrophilicity, and patterning

    Acta Biomater

    (2005)
  • F. Yamauchi et al.

    Micropatterned, self-assembled monolayers for fabrication of transfected cell microarrays

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (2004)
  • F. Yamauchi et al.

    Layer-by-layer assembly of cationic lipid and plasmid DNA onto gold surface for stent-assisted gene transfer

    Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • B.G. Keselowsky et al.

    Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding

    Biomaterials

    (2004)
  • C.H. Rundle et al.

    In vivo bone formation in fracture repair induced by direct retroviral-based gene therapy with bone morphogenetic protein-4

    Bone

    (2003)
  • L. Xu et al.

    Neonatal or hepatocyte growth factor-potentiated adult gene therapy with a retroviral vector results in therapeutic levels of canine factor IX for hemophilia B

    Blood

    (2003)
  • L. Xu et al.

    In vivo transduction of hematopoietic stem cells after neonatal intravenous injection of an amphotropic retroviral vector in mice

    Mol Ther

    (2004)
  • J.N. Barbosa et al.

    Inflammatory responses and cell adhesion to self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on gold

    Biomaterials

    (2004)
  • T. Houchin-Ray et al.

    Spatially patterned gene delivery for localized neuron survival and neurite extension

    Mol Ther

    (2007)
  • T. Houchin-Ray et al.

    Patterned PLG substrates for localized DNA delivery and directed neurite extension

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • R. Carbone et al.

    Retroviral microarray-based platform on nanostructured TiO(2) for functional genomics and drug discovery

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • C.A. Gersbach et al.

    Genetic engineering for skeletal regenerative medicine

    Annu Rev Biomed Eng

    (2007)
  • J. Fang et al.

    Stimulation of new bone formation by direct transfer of osteogenic plasmid genes

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1996)
  • L.D. Shea et al.

    DNA delivery from polymer matrices for tissue engineering

    Nat Biotechnol

    (1999)
  • F. Scherer et al.

    Nonviral vector loaded collagen sponges for sustained gene delivery in vitro and in vivo

    J Gene Med

    (2002)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Gene delivery into cells and tissues

      2020, Principles of Tissue Engineering
    • Polymeric vector-mediated gene transfection of MSCs for dual bioluminescent and MRI tracking in vivo

      2014, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Transport vectors have been categorized into two groups: viral and non-viral vectors [21]. In spite of the superior gene transfection efficiency [22], application of viral vectors was restricted because of their shortcomings of potential carcinogenicity, immunogenicity and complicated synthesis procedure [23]. The non-viral vectors, as an alternative safe and efficient gene carrier, arouse a wide concern [24].

    • Gene Delivery into Cells and Tissues

      2013, Principles of Tissue Engineering: Fourth Edition
    • A PLG/HAp composite scaffold for lentivirus delivery

      2013, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reversible association of the lentivirus directly to the HAp embedded in the PLG/HAp scaffold allows for virus retention and preservation of activity. A number of approaches have been investigated for the immobilization of virus, which include vector biotinylation for binding to avidin-modified surface [5], immobilization of antibodies specific for the virus [22,23], phosphatidylserine (PS) functionalization for binding VSV-G pseudotyped lentivirus [6], and extracellular matrix protein [4] or self-assembled monolayer [24] sequestration. These approaches have identified the challenge of providing specific virus immobilization without reduction of activity due to virus destabilization [1].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text