Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 28, Issue 31, November 2007, Pages 4608-4618
Biomaterials

Supramolecular crafting of cell adhesion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.026Get rights and content

Abstract

The supramolecular design of bioactive artificial extracellular matrices to control cell behavior is of critical importance in cell therapies and cell assays. Most previous work in this area has focused on polymers or monolayers which preclude control of signal density and accessibility in the nanoscale filamentous environment of natural matrices. We have used here self-assembling supramolecular nanofibers that display the cell adhesion ligand RGDS at van der Waals density to cells. Signal accessibility at this very high density has been varied by changes in molecular architecture and therefore through the supramolecular packing of monomers that form the fibers. We found that branched architectures of the monomers and the consequent lower packing efficiency and additional space for epitope motion improves signaling for cell adhesion, spreading, and migration. The use of artificial matrices with nanoscale objects with extremely high epitope densities could facilitate receptor clustering for signaling and also maximize successful binding between ligands and receptors at mobile three-dimensional interfaces between matrices and cells. Supramolecular design of artificial bioactive extracellular matrices to tune cell response may prove to be a powerful strategy in regenerative medicine and to study biological processes.

Introduction

The supramolecular design of artificial extracellular matrices is key to our understanding of cell–matrix interactions, and of great importance for the future of regenerative medicine. The most common target has been the use of a matrix to activate receptor-mediated biological adhesion mechanisms since they are critical to cell survival and function. Biological cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM) commonly occurs via binding of integrin receptors to specific epitopes present on the surface of ECM proteins such as fibronectin, leading to the formation of focal adhesions (FAs) and related contacts [1], [2]. These adhesions consist of protein assemblies that serve to connect the cell interior to the external environment [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Upon binding of an integrin to its ligand, additional integrins, adapter proteins and cytoskeletal components are recruited to the nascent adhesion, forming a structurally defined FA. The cytoplasmic proteins that are recruited are of two major types, namely scaffolding proteins, which provide the mechanical link between integrins and the actin cytoskeleton, and signaling molecules that trigger and transduce adhesion-dependent cues [3], [4], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. A common ligand present on several ECM proteins is the peptide sequence arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) [15], [16], which is sufficient for triggering cell adhesion.

Most previous work on artificial ECMs has focused on the design of polymeric matrices with attributes such as biodegradable backbones [17], [18], ability to form gels [19], [20], [21], [22], or functionalization with bioactive peptides [23], [24] most notably RGD [25], [26]. Massia and Hubbell first showed that RGD ligand density can affect cell adhesion using peptide coated glass surfaces, reporting complete fibroblast spreading on RGD-grafted glass surfaces at a ligand density of 10 fmol/cm2 (440 nm ligand spacing) and FA formation occurring at an average ligand density of 1 fmol/cm2 (140 nm ligand spacing) [27], [28], [29]. In other work, a lateral spacing between epitopes of 50–70 nm has also been shown to be critical for FA formation [30]. Subsequent studies in different cell types have shown that while there is a maximum density above which further enhancement of cell spreading is no longer observed, it is often higher than that observed by Massia and Hubbell (30 fmol/cm2 for myoblasts [31]) [32], [33], [34]. Studies by Griffith et al. and Mooney et al. using polymers grafted with cell adhesion epitopes have shown that at a given ligand density, cell adhesion can be modulated by the spatial arrangement of the ligands [35], [36]. For example, forming arrays of clustered RGD ligands by coupling multiple epitopes to a single polymer chain enhances cell attachment as compared to distributing the same number of RGD ligands by coupling one epitope per polymer chain [35]. These studies indicate that while a sufficient number of adhesion epitopes are required to sustain cell attachment, the nanoscale presentation of those ligands is also important in regulating the attachment of cells to artificial matrices.

The supramolecular details of biological signal display for optimal cell–matrix interactions in vitro and in vivo remain largely unclear. Supramolecular structure in the ECM is directly linked to epitope density and dynamics, and it is relevant in cell–matrix interactions given the importance of receptor clustering in signaling and the mechanical softness of the interface where cells meet their matrix. Previously studied polymeric systems are inherently disordered, which precludes control of parameters such as the local supramolecular structure or the density and spatial orientation of bioactive signals. Self-assembling monolayers, which can present highly ordered ligand arrays, have been studied, [37], [38] but these systems do not mimic the three-dimensional (3D) filamentous environment of extracellular matrices. In ordered monolayers it is also difficult to change signal accessibility without diluting the signal with mixtures of short and long molecules.

In this work we probe the interactions of cells with supramolecular peptide amphiphile (PA) nanofibers in which the display of RGD epitopes can be altered at extremely high ligand density by changing their local dynamics either through the architecture of molecules or dilution of the epitopes. The nanofibers are cylindrical in shape and have a very high aspect ratio and therefore are able to mimic the soft fibrous environment that naturally surround cells (diameters on the order of 6–8 nm and lengths easily approaching microns) [39], [40], [41], [42], [43]. The fibers, as opposed to monolayers, are able to maintain essentially constant epitope densities with different degrees of epitope packing as a result of sterics and therefore, signal accessibility can be examined in three dimensions. This versatility as one varies the sterics of molecular architecture of monomers is a virtue of structures with curvature that are not pinned on a lattice. These nanostructures are formed from molecules containing an aliphatic tail covalently linked to a peptide segment terminated with the bioactive RGD sequence. Therefore every single molecule in the supramolecular assembly displays an epitope, and cells can explore an environment with essentially van der Waals densities of bioactive signals. This approach also presents to cells a well-defined density of epitopes which is difficult to achieve when grafting epitopes to surfaces or substituting polymers. Upon self-assembly from aqueous solution, the cylindrical nanofibers display their bioactive sequences perpendicular to the long axis of the nanostructure, and inter-fiber contacts create a network that functions as an artificial ECM for cells. In the current study, we have utilized PAs with different covalent architectures in the segment that presents the bioactive epitope, allowing us to explore the effects of epitope dynamics through variations in supramolecular packing of PA molecules, while maintaining high epitope density. Dense tight packing of epitopes with little mobility is achieved with PA molecules with linear architecture, and less efficient packing resulting in more mobile epitopes with branched or cyclic architectures (see Fig. 1) [44]. We examine here the behavior of cells on PA nanofibers to determine if cells can sense and respond to differences in epitope dynamics as supramolecular packing is modified.

Section snippets

Preparation of peptide amphiphiles

Details of linear and branched PA synthesis have been reported elsewhere [44], [45].

Cell culture

3T3 fibroblasts were maintained in phenol red-free Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin/streptomyocin. REF52, B16, and MDA 231 cells were maintained in DMEM media containing phenol red supplemented as for 3T3 fibroblasts.

Cover slip preparation

Ethanol sterilized number 1 glass cover slips were drop cast with 0.01 wt% solutions of PAs, fibronectin, and poly-d-lysine (PDL)

2D cell adhesion and spreading

2D cell adhesion and spreading experiments were carried out using as the substrate supramolecular nanofibers formed by the molecules shown in Fig. 1 cast on glass cover slips. These self-assembling molecules form nanofibers by self-assembly from aqueous solutions. We investigated two types of molecules, linear and branched PAs, with branched ones presenting either one or two RGDS epitopes in linear or cyclic form (See Fig. 2). Cells examined for cell attachment, spreading, and FA formation were

Conclusions

This work has demonstrated the possibility of signaling cells using supramolecular nanofibers displaying cell adhesion epitopes at the extremely high densities associated with van der Waals packing of molecules. Using branched architectures in the molecules that form the nanostructures, greater epitope accessibility to cells at high density can be achieved given their lower packing efficiency and thus additional space for epitope motion. We have observed differential biological cell adhesion

Acknowledgments

S.I. Stupp is supported by the Department of Energy through Grant DOE DE-FG02-00ER45810, and the National Institutes of Health through Grants NIH 1 R01 DE015920 and NIH 5 R01 EB003806.

B. Geiger holds the Erwin Neter Chair in Cell and Tumor Biology and is supported by grants from the Israel Science foundation, the NIH NanoMedicine Center for Mechanical Biology and the Volkswagen Foundation.

References (60)

  • B.T. Houseman et al.

    The microenvironment of immobilzed Arg-Gly-Asp peptides is an important determinant of cell adhesion

    Biomaterials

    (2001)
  • C.-M. Lo et al.

    Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate

    Biophys J

    (2000)
  • A. Engler et al.

    Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses

    Biophys J

    (2004)
  • J.C. Schense et al.

    Three-dimensional migration of neurites is mediated by adhesion site density and affinity

    J Biol Chem

    (2000)
  • R. Zaidel-Bar et al.

    Heirarchical assembly of cell–matrix adhesion complexes

    Biochem Soc Trans

    (2004)
  • F.G. Giancotti et al.

    Integrin signalling

    Science

    (1999)
  • X. Zhu et al.

    Integrin-dependent activation of MAP kinase: a link to shape-dependent cell proliferation (vol 6, pg 273, 1995)

    Mol Biol Cell

    (1996)
  • K.M. Yamada et al.

    Integrin regulation of growth factor receptors

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2002)
  • J. Takagi et al.

    Integrin activation and structural rearrangement

    Immun Rev

    (2002)
  • M.A. Schwartz et al.

    Networks and crosstalk: integrin signalling spreads

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2002)
  • S. Liu et al.

    Integrin cytoplasmic domain-binding proteins

    J Cell Sci

    (2000)
  • C.K. Miranti et al.

    Sensing the environment: a historical perspective on integrin signal transduction

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2002)
  • D.W. Desimone et al.

    The integrin family of cell-surface receptors

    Biochem Soc Trans

    (1987)
  • D.W. Desimone et al.

    Integrin structure, function, and developmental expression

    Biol Bull

    (1987)
  • D.W. Desimone et al.

    Structural and functional analyses of integrin, a glycoprotein complex linking fibronectin to the cytoskeleton

    J Cell Biol

    (1986)
  • B.P. Eliceiri

    Integrin and growth factor receptor crosstalk

    Circ Res

    (2001)
  • R.O. Hynes et al.

    The diverse roles of integrins and their ligands in angiogenesis

    Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol

    (2002)
  • M.D. Pierschbacher et al.

    Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule

    Nature

    (1984)
  • M.D. Pierschbacher et al.

    Variants of the cell recognition site of fibronectin that retain attachment-promoting activity

    Proc Nat Acad Sci USA

    (1984)
  • A. Putnam et al.

    Nat Med

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text