Bone tissue engineering evaluation based on rat calvaria stromal cells cultured on modified PLGA scaffolds
Introduction
Traditional bone-defect therapies (autograft, allograft, and synthetic materials) have limitations [1], [2]. There are many clinical reasons to develop advanced bone substitutes, for example, more biocompatibility and more-compatible mechanics [3], [4], [5], [6]. Bone tissue engineering is a promising method for repairing bone defects. Recently, culturing donor cells into poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), or poly-dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) scaffolds has resulted in the development of in vivo substitutes for bone and cartilage [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Although a PLGA scaffold seems to be suitable for tissue engineering, its mechanical strength, small pore size, and hydrophobic surface properties have limited its usage. The surface treatment of a scaffold, therefore, is an important method for achieving good surface characteristics for bone-cell attachment and proliferation.
In a previous study [14], we prepared PLGA scaffolds with a mixture of ammonium bicarbonate and sodium-chloride salt particulate, used as a porogen additive. The polymer scaffolds fabricated using this method demonstrated a highly open, interconnected macroporous structure and better mechanical properties than those made using the standard solvent casting/particle leaching (SC/PL) technique. The good mechanical properties and open pore structure of the PLGA scaffold suggested a promising advantage for bone tissue engineering. However, the hydrophobic surface of PLGA was not adequate for cell attachment and growth. In addition, the relationship between cellular behavior and the pore size of scaffolds prepared using this method needs further study.
Coating a PLGA scaffold with natural material may change its surface properties and improve its physiological function. An extracellular matrix of natural bone tissue is composed of a collagen type I network that deposits calcium phosphate. Such a matrix directly or indirectly influences the regenerated bone cell phenotype and activity. Type I collagen implants have been proved suitable for healing bony defects, which suggests a positive potential for bone tissue engineering in bone regeneration [15], [16]. Chitosan, a copolymer of glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine, is the deacetylated product of chitin, a ubiquitous biopolymer found in the exoskeleton of insects and marine invertebrates. Chitosan carries positive charges that attract bFGF or VEGF, which help wound healing [17]. Little is known about the utility of chitosan in propagating osteoblasts, however [18], [19], [20], [21]. Negatively charged N-succinyl-chitosan was prepared by acylating amino groups of chitosan with succinic anhydride [22]. The effect of N-succinyl-chitosan on osteoblast growth has not been studied before.
In this study, three different natural biomaterials, collagen, chitosan, and N-succinyl-chitosan, were used to coat PLGA scaffolds with two different pore sizes (125–180 and 300–500 μm). Both uncoated and coated PLGA scaffolds were examined for the effect of the coatings on their water absorption ability and degradation rate, and on the attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblasts.
Section snippets
Scaffold preparation
PLGA (75:25) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company Inc. (Milwaukee, WI). Preparation details were previously described [14]. Briefly, a viscous polymer solution (0.1 g/mL) was prepared by dissolving PLGA polymer in chloroform. Sieved NH4HCO3/NaCl (1:1) particulates with two different particle sizes (125–180 and 300–500 μm) were added to the PLGA solution and mixed thoroughly using a glass rod. The weight ratio of salt particulates to polymer was 9:1. The paste mixture of polymer, salts, and
Surface properties of scaffolds
SEM showed that the pore size of the scaffolds was comparable to that of the salt size. Scaffolds with pore sizes of 300–500 and 125–180 μm had a well-interconnected open-pore structure (Fig. 1(a, b) and (c, d), respectively). The scaffold with pore size 300–500 μm was referred as a large-pore scaffold and the one with pore size 125–180 μm was referred as a small-pore scaffold.
The untreated PLGA surface was very smooth (Fig. 1(e)), but the surfaces of the modified scaffolds were rough and had
Discussion
Using SEM, we found that PLGA scaffolds coated with natural biomaterials changed some of their surface characteristics, for example, microstructure, hydrophilic property, and degradation rate. Chitosan and collagen treatment significantly improved the surface hydrophilic property of PLGA scaffolds. The degradation rate was slightly increased in collagen- and N-succinyl-chitosan-treated scaffolds, and was decreased in chitosan-treated scaffolds. It has been reported that water molecules can act
Conclusion
The in vitro degradation of surface-modified PGLA scaffolds demonstrated that chitosan prevented the rapid degradation of PLGA. The pore size of scaffolds did not affect osteoblast behavior, but the surface modification of the scaffold with collagen did modulate osteoblast attachment and proliferation, and modification with chitosan did affect its differentiation. Tissue engineering requires not only the recruitment of appropriate progenitor cells, but also induction of progenitor-cell
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by Grant NSC 89-2314-B-006-147 from the National Science Council of Taiwan. We thank Bill Franke for help in manuscript preparation.
References (33)
- et al.
Three-dimensional culture of rat calvarial osteoblasts in porous biodegradable polymers
Biomaterials
(1998) - et al.
Adenoviral BMP-2 gene transfer in mesenchymal stem cells: in vitro and in vivo bone formation on biodegradable polymer scaffolds
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
(2002) - et al.
Enhanced bone formation by controlled growth factor delivery from chitosan-based biomaterials
J Control Release
(2002) - et al.
Chemical modification of chitin and chitosan—2: preparation and water soluble property of N-acylated or N-alkylated partially deacetylated chitins
Carbohydrate Polym
(1999) - et al.
Ovarian steroids reduced apoptotic death in SV40 temperature-sensitive mutant virus transformed uterine epithelial cells
Life Sci
(1998) Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion
Biomaterials
(1996)- et al.
In vitro degradation of three-dimensional porous poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds for tissue engineering
Biomaterials
(2004) Degradation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres: effect of copolymer composition
Biomaterials
(1995)- et al.
Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1989) - et al.
Morbidity at bone graft donor sites
J Orthop Trauma
(1989)
Autogenous cortical bone grafts in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Bone and cartilage transplantation in orthopaedic surgery. A review
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Bridging large defects in bone by demineralized bone matrix in the form of a powder. A radiographic, histological, and radioisotope-uptake study in rats
J Bone Joint Surg Am
The role of a composite, demineralized bone matrix and bone marrow in the treatment of osseous defects
Orthopedics
Synthetic polymers seeded with chondrocytes provide a template for new cartilage formation
Plast Reconstr Surg
Tissue-engineered growth of bone and cartilage
Transplant Proc
Cited by (129)
Applying extrusion-based 3D printing technique accelerates fabricating complex biphasic calcium phosphate-based scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration
2022, Journal of Advanced ResearchCitation Excerpt :A wide range of biomaterials, such as polymers, ceramics, and hydrogels, have a great potential ability for employing in BTE [31]. Polylactic Acid (PLA) [32,33], Polylactic-co-glycolic Acid (PLGA) [34,35], Polycaprolactone (PCL) [36-38], HA [39-41], β-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP) [42-44], Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA) [45,46], BCP [47-49], and composites [50-54] are the most used biomaterials in BTE due to their acceptable mechanical and cell-friendly properties. Even though many efforts have been made to modify the composition of employed bone scaffolds, reaching a well-adapted composition in BTE has been a matter of discussion, in recent years.
A network analysis of angiogenesis/osteogenesis-related growth factors in bone tissue engineering based on in-vitro and in-vivo data: A systems biology approach
2021, Tissue and CellCitation Excerpt :A wide range of biomaterials can be used as scaffolds in BTE, such as polymers, ceramics, and hydrogels (Bai et al., 2018; Iannazzo et al., 2017; Beheshtizadeh et al., 2020; Short et al., 2015). It has been reported that Polylactic acid (PLA) (Gregor et al., 2017; Gremare et al., 2018; Albannaa et al., 2016; Rodrigues et al., 2016), polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) (Agrawal et al., 1997; Gentile et al., 2014; Karp et al., 2003; Wu et al., 2006), Polycaprolactone (PCL) (Kweon et al., 2003; Nitya et al., 2012; Park et al., 2011; Shor et al., 2009), Hydroxyapatite (HA) (Deville et al., 2006; Yoshikawa and Myoui, 2005; Zhou and Lee, 2011), β-Tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) (Fang Geng et al., 2009; Gao et al., 2016), Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) (Arinzeh et al., 2005; Bakhtiari et al., 2010; Lobo and Livingston Arinzeh, 2010; Ramay and Zhang, 2004), and Gelatin-Methacryloyl (GelMA) (Celikkin et al., 2018; Klotz et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2018) are the most used biomaterials in this field due to their mechanical and cell viability properties. Also, these materials could be utilized as composites in the scaffold fabricating (Baheiraei et al., 2018; Bhaskar et al., 2018; Turnbull et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018).
Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for tissue engineering
2021, Tissue Engineering Using Ceramics and Polymers, Third EditionGallium loading into a polydopamine-functionalised SrTiO<inf>3</inf> nanotube with combined osteoinductive and antimicrobial activities
2019, Ceramics InternationalCitation Excerpt :In our future works, we will further study other animal models and techniques for quantitatively evaluating the bone-defect healing process. The surface of a biomaterial, e.g. its topography and chemical composition, determines how biocompatible the biomaterial is and how it affects cell proliferation, migration, and physiological response in human tissues [38,39]. The porousness of the surface of our synthesised Ga-/Sr-containing nanocomposite coating enhances mechanical interlocking and better cell binding—more than what smooth surfaces can do [40]—which therefore promotes bone ingrowth, and the stability of the implant.
Composite scaffold of micronized porcine cartilage/poly(lactic‑co‑glycolic acid) enhances anti-inflammatory effect
2018, Materials Science and Engineering CCitation Excerpt :The compressive strength of the pure PLGA scaffold (without MPC) was 56 ± 4.1 N, and decreased with an increase in the MPC amount added in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B). Natural polymers such as collagen, chitosan, and silk fiber are hydrophilic substrates, whereas the PLGA polymer acts as a hydrophobic substrate; accordingly, the physical properties of PLGA improve with increasing amounts [20]. Thus, mixing a hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrate reduces the compressive strength due to weak interfacial bonding [21].