Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 142, Issue 11, November 2009, Pages 2593-2601
Biological Conservation

Assessing the broad-scale impact of agriculturally transformed and protected area landscapes on avian taxonomic and functional richness

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Anthropogenic modification of natural habitat is resulting in a widespread loss of biodiversity. One of the primary responses of human societies to biodiversity loss has been the creation of protected areas. Two of the most important questions in conservation biology are: (1) whether protected areas are playing their intended role as reservoirs of biodiversity; and (2) whether habitat outside protected areas, particularly in agricultural landscapes, plays a significant role in maintaining biodiversity and the ecosystem services that it provides. Even though empirical evidence is still lacking on the exact mapping from functional group richness to specific ecosystem services, functional groups are good indicators of ecosystem functioning and thus service provision. We classified the South African avifauna into nine functional groups and tested at a coarse grain for differences in functional group composition between landscapes containing predominantly agricultural vs. protected areas. We used a matched pair sampling design to control for confounding variance. We found that avian functional groups respond in quantitatively and qualitatively distinct ways to agriculturally dominated landscapes. Raptors and scavengers displayed the most consistent losses, while nutrient dispersers and grazers tended to increase. Spatial detrending and randomisation tests suggested that only raptors and scavengers are negatively affected by agricultural landscapes independently of spatial autocorrelation. Thus, protected area landscapes are serving as important reservoirs of functionally important upper trophic populations while agricultural landscapes facilitate the presence of species that link aquatic and terrestrial systems. These results demonstrate the potential for complementary facets of functional diversity to exist on landscapes containing vastly different land-uses.

Introduction

Croplands and pastures have become one of the largest terrestrial biomes on the planet, occupying around 40% of the land surface (Foley et al., 2005). These landscapes are becoming increasingly important for biodiversity conservation as pressure from anthropogenic activities compromises the effectiveness of reserve networks (DeFries et al., 2007). Reserves alone will not be able to maintain landscape level biodiversity or resulting ecosystem services if they are isolated from the surrounding matrix (Gaston et al., 2002, DeFries et al., 2005). Agricultural landscapes, although unable to support many habitat specialist species, can be important matrix ecosystems that contribute to species persistence by providing areas of phase differentiation, resource consistency and enemy-free areas (Poiani et al., 2000, Robinson et al., 2001, Okes et al., 2008). Thus, landscapes containing both croplands and patches of natural vegetation embedded within the agricultural matrix may interact to foster functional ecosystems. Agricultural landscapes therefore play a potentially important regional role in landscape function and their individual characteristics will ultimately affect the resilience and adaptive capacity of embedded and adjacent ecosystems (Cumming et al., 2005).

Species–area curves and biodiversity ‘hotspots’ have been used extensively in spatial conservation planning (Zimmerman and Bierregaard, 1986, Pearson and Carroll, 1998, Myers et al., 2000, Gotelli and Colwell, 2001). These approaches focus on species representation rather than ecological processes (Gaston et al., 2001, Wiersma and Urban, 2005). Species richness, however, does not fully describe the functional diversity of a community (Doak and Mills, 1994, Diaz and Cabido, 2001, Petchey and Gaston, 2002, Naeem and Wright, 2003) or the resilience of important ecosystem functions (e.g., nitrogen fixation or pest control) to species loss. Functional diversity arises from the relative functional trait richness that species possess (Tilman et al., 1997, Petchey and Gaston, 2006), and the distribution of functions within and across scales provides ecosystems with resilience (Peterson et al., 1998, Allen et al., 2005). Both conservation plans and current global biodiversity scenarios typically lack process-oriented metrics of ecosystems (Cumming, 2007), such as those based on asymmetrically distributed species traits that represent multiple ecological processes. Thus, planning for ecosystem services at landscape levels is constrained by a simple lack of knowledge as to whether or not ecosystems are robust to species loss, how functional group richness varies across space, and how this variation relates to ecosystem resilience (Bengtsson et al., 2003). Although species richness is strongly and positively correlated with functional richness, there is considerable spatial variation in this relationship for South African birds (Cumming and Child, in press). Studies detailing the causes and consequences of functional variation in space and time have the potential to link functional and taxonomic perspectives and will be vital for effective conservation management, especially if conservationists are to develop reserve networks that exhibit functional resilience (Cowling et al., 1999, Allen et al., 2005).

Elucidating the patterns of functional richness in space is a crucial first step in being able to determine the resilience of service delivery, especially since the spatial overlap between ecosystem services and species richness remains ambiguous (Egoh et al., 2009). In this paper we explore how avian functional richness is distributed across either predominantly protected or predominantly agricultural landscapes and discuss the potential mechanisms for these distributions. We use the functional group classification of Sekercioglu (2006) because of its explicit focus on birds as multifaceted actors in ecosystem dynamics. Birds constitute an extremely well-studied taxon and their importance as mobile links in the dynamics of both natural and human-transformed landscapes is extensively documented (reviewed by Sekercioglu, 2006). Declines in avian functional richness are predicted to have severe consequences for the maintenance and provision of a diverse array of ecosystem services (Sekercioglu et al., 2004).

Agricultural practices may provide novel resources that some species are better at exploiting than others, thereby simplifying community and trophic structure while maintaining overall abundance (La Sorte, 2006). For example, generalist waterfowl have successfully spread across agricultural landscapes in South Africa (Okes et al., 2008), with negative effects on local avian diversity (Curtis et al., 2007). If agricultural transformation reorganises avian communities at local scales, it is important to establish whether these effects translate into emergent landscape patterns that can later be used to assess regional functional resilience. Here we provide a first step towards this goal by quantifying and mapping avian functional richness patterns in selected pairs of sites across South Africa.

Section snippets

Matched pair setup and data sources

We used a matched pair sampling design to control for potentially confounding variables. A matched pair format is appropriate because we compared the relative differences in functional richness between similar landscapes that are predominantly covered by agriculture with those that contain protected areas. The pairs themselves were carefully matched in terms of land-use, environmental variables and sampling effort. Furthermore, we used matched pair t-tests to avoid the confounding effects of

Matched pair analyses

117 matched pairs across South Africa were suitable for analysis (n = 234 grid cells, Fig. 1). Agricultural land-use covered an average of 39.9 ± 18.6% of unprotected cells while nature reserves covered an average of 31.4 ± 27.8% of protected cells (both of which are significantly high average values relative to parameter values; see supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). Matched pairs contained similar numbers of checklists per cell (an average of 85 ± 75 and 88 ± 85 checklists per cell for unprotected and

Discussion and conclusions

These results demonstrate that protected landscapes capture facets of avian functional richness that differ from those captured by landscapes that contain agricultural land-cover. Most importantly, scavengers and raptors are negatively affected by agricultural transformation whereas nutrient dispersers, grazers and granivores appear not to be affected. Most landscape studies have tended to focus on spatial sampling extents that are completely covered by a specific land-use type and then compare

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Doug Harebottle and Michael Brooks of the Avian Demography Unit (UCT) for supplying the SABAP dataset as well as helpful advice on its idiosyncrasies. Thanks also to Rob Simmons and Mark Anderson for useful information on vultures and diclofenac in South Africa. This research was supported by the University of Cape Town and a DST/Centre of Excellence bursary from the Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology. We would also like to thank two anonymous referees who

References (60)

  • C.R. Allen et al.

    The use of discontinuities and functional groups to assess relative resilience in complex systems

    Ecosystems

    (2005)
  • M.D. Anderson et al.

    Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in South Africa and possible effects on vultures

    South African Journal of Science

    (2005)
  • J. Bengtsson et al.

    Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes

    Ambio

    (2003)
  • S. Chin

    Choosing a transformation

    Journal of Applied Statistics

    (1996)
  • S.L. Chown et al.

    Species richness, human population size and energy: conservation implications at a national scale

    Ecological Applications

    (2003)
  • R.M. Cowling et al.

    From representation to persistence. requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species-rich Mediterranean-climate desert of southern Africa

    Diversity and Distributions

    (1999)
  • G.S. Cumming

    Global biodiversity scenarios and landscape ecology

    Landscape Ecology

    (2007)
  • G.S. Cumming et al.

    An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience

    Ecosystems

    (2005)
  • Cumming, G.S., Child, M.F., in press. Contrasting patterns of taxonomic and functional richness offer insights into...
  • O.E. Curtis et al.

    Competition with Egyptian Geese Alopochen aegyptiaca overrides environmental factors in determining productivity of Black Sparrowhawks Accipiter melnoleucus

    Ibis

    (2007)
  • R. DeFries et al.

    Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past 20 years

    Ecological Applications

    (2005)
  • R.G. Davies

    The extent, cost and control of livestock predation by eagles with a case study on Black eagles (Aquila verreauxii) in the Karoo

    Journal of Raptor Research

    (1999)
  • R. DeFries et al.

    Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function

    Ecological Applications

    (2007)
  • D.F. Doak et al.

    A useful role for theory in conservation

    Conservation Biology

    (1994)
  • A. Dobson et al.

    Habitat loss, trophic collapse and the decline of ecosystems services

    Ecology

    (2006)
  • D.K. Fairbanks et al.

    The South African land-cover characteristics database: a synopsis of the landscape

    South African Journal of Science

    (2000)
  • J.A. Foley et al.

    Global consequences of land use

    Science

    (2005)
  • K.J. Gaston et al.

    Complementary representation and zones of ecological transition

    Ecology Letters

    (2001)
  • K.J. Gaston et al.

    Persistence and vulnerability: retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas

    Journal of Biosciences

    (2002)
  • N.J. Gotelli et al.

    Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness

    Ecology Letters

    (2001)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Effectiveness of private land conservation areas in maintaining natural land cover and biodiversity intactness

      2020, Global Ecology and Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Detail is however lost through the common approach of classifying remotely sensed data into a binary variable (e.g., natural or non-natural), given that non-natural land cover types impact biodiversity differently (Scholes and Biggs, 2005). For example, although agriculture and mining might both be non-natural, a protected area that lost natural land cover to agriculture may retain more species than one transformed to a mine (Scholes and Biggs, 2005; Child et al., 2009). There is therefore a need to have a complementary proxy for assessing protected area effectiveness, which accounts for the effect of different land cover changes on biodiversity conservation.

    • Implications of farmland expansion for species abundance, richness and mean body mass in African raptor communities

      2019, Biological Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, while the study recorded 104 individuals of 15 raptor species in protected savanna, only four individuals of three raptor species were recorded in the neighbouring farmland. These deficits are broadly similar to those reported here, and consistent with findings reported by Child et al. (2009) in South Africa, in suggesting that African raptor species are particularly sensitive to farmland conversion. Child et al. (2009) showed that among nine functional bird groups examined, scavengers and raptors most often suffered a decrease in richness within agriculturally dominated landscapes.

    • More than just a corridor: A suburban river catchment enhances bird functional diversity

      2017, Landscape and Urban Planning
      Citation Excerpt :

      These groups were present in almost the same proportions as in the bird community of the whole of southern Africa. Moreover, while urban areas are expected to experience a relative decline in the number of insectivores, pollinators, raptors and scavengers (Child et al., 2009; Faeth, Bang, & Saari, 2011), all of these groups were well-represented within the catchment. Given that invertebrate abundance can be severely affected by human disturbance, the presence of several uncommon small-bodied insectivores is a particularly good sign of ecosystem health (Larsen, Sorace, & Mancini, 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text