The role of saiga poaching in rural communities: Linkages between attitudes, socio-economic circumstances and behaviour
Introduction
Worldwide one in four mammal species are considered threatened with extinction, and hunting is second only to habitat loss in driving this situation (IUCN, 2008). In order to reduce the threat of hunting it is important to understand the factors driving exploitation (Baillie et al., 2004, IUCN, 2008). Multiple socio-economic factors, including poverty, ownership conditions and access to alternative livelihood options, impact people’s decision-making about natural resource use (Holmes, 2003, Adams et al., 2004). Several studies suggest that in order to successfully implement community-based projects, local communities have to value the resource highly in order to be willing to actively manage it (Inamdar et al., 1999, Salafsky et al., 2001). But while positive attitudes towards conservation are argued to be essential for conservation success (Kiss, 2004), positive attitudes do not necessarily imply positive action in terms of changes in resource use behaviour (Ite, 1996, Alexander, 2000).
The Soviet Union was widely considered to have “one of the most effective biodiversity conservation programs in the world” owing to the vast area of protected areas and wilderness, coupled with strict law enforcement (Dinerstein et al., 1994). However, its centrally planned economy provided little incentive for sustainable resource use, since the majority of conservation schemes relied heavily on enforcement rather than on voluntary action of society. The political and economic transition that followed the collapse of the USSR in 1991 led to the breakdown of rural economies throughout the region. The resultant exploitation pressure on wild populations valuable for food and income was further exacerbated by the breakdown of central authority and the cessation of protection efforts, inside and outside of protected areas. For species valuable outside of the Soviet Union’s territory the opening of international borders created access to global markets, facilitated trade and led to a further increase in harvesting pressure (Dinerstein et al., 1994). One species whose fate has been inextricably linked to these socio-political changes is the saiga antelope, Saiga tatarica. From the mid-1990s onwards saiga populations started to decline rapidly – the more accessible ones first, the more remote populations later. The decline, of more than 95% over 10 years, was so precipitate that the saiga jumped from Lower Risk (conservation dependent) in 1999 to Critically Endangered in 2001 on the IUCN Red List (www.redlist.org; Milner-Gulland et al., 2001). Hunting is unequivocally accepted to be the primary reason for this population collapse (e.g. Milner-Gulland et al., 2001). It is generally believed that limited access to alternative livelihood options, lack of environmental education and poverty are the driving forces of saiga poaching (Milner-Gulland et al., 2001, Robinson and Milner-Gulland, 2003, CMS, 2006). However, this inference is based on anecdotal information, and there has been no research on the specific factors affecting saiga poaching, and how they vary between different saiga populations and range states.
In this paper we examine attitudes towards saigas, the role of poaching as a livelihood option in rural communities, the use of saiga products and factors predicting poaching behaviour. The study covers six locations in three countries (Russia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan), representing three saiga populations and a wide range of social and economic situations. The study is unusual in attempting to link attitudes directly to behaviour, a step which is rarely taken but is key in understanding the likely impact of conservation interventions on resource users (Holmes, 2003), and in comparing reported behaviour from two different sources – household interviews and key informants.
Section snippets
Study site
The study was conducted in 2003–2006 in six communities within the range of three saiga antelope populations; the north-western pre-Caspian region (Russian Federation), Ustiurt (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan) and Betpak-dala (Kazakhstan) saiga populations (Milner-Gulland et al., 2001; Table 1). Study sites were chosen on the basis of their location within the saiga antelope range, reported saiga antelope poaching activity and size of the community (sufficiently small to permit representative
Awareness of and attitudes towards saiga population declines
Across all study sites, the vast majority of individuals interviewed were aware of the decline in saiga numbers (95%, n = 456; Table 2). Respondents had encountered saigas and calving aggregations significantly less often within the twelve months leading up to the survey compared to 1991. In the pre-Caspian region 45% (n = 131) people stated that the number of males within the saiga population had declined. In the remaining regions, by contrast, only 8% (n = 325) reported this change. The size of the
Discussion
This study suggests that the exploitation of saiga antelopes is directly linked to poverty and unemployment, but that there is no association between attitudes and poaching involvement. In fact, poaching activity takes place despite local people expressing considerable concern for the species and the vast majority being prepared to actively contribute towards its conservation. These findings support an increasing number of studies suggesting that positive attitudes towards a resource are not
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the financial support of the Darwin Initiative (Project 12-028) and INTAS (Project 03-51-3579), as well as a NERC/ESRC studentship and Wildlife Conservation Society Research Fellowship to AK. We thank the PTES and FFI for grants to cover our work in Uzbekistan. The large number of interviews held were only possible through the help of numerous research assistants: Marina Frolova, Natalia Kusnezova, Niudlya Araeva, Bekzhan Makashev, Victor Fomin, Saberzhan Narmuratov,
References (36)
Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds?
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
(2004)- et al.
Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty
Science
(2004) Resident attitudes towards conservation and black howler monkeys in Belize: the community baboon sanctuary
Environmental Conservation
(2000)Testing the “ecologically noble savage” hypothesis: inter-specific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru
Human Ecology
(1993)- et al.
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(2004) Die Saiga-Antilope
(1963)Research Methods in Anthropology
(2002)- CMS, 2006. Revised Overview Report of the First Meeting of the Signatories to the Memorandum of Understanding...
- et al.
Rarity value and Species extinction: the Anthropogenic Allee Effect
PLOS Biology
(2006) GLIM for Ecologists
(1993)
The R Book
PRA Tools for Studying Urban Agriculture and Gender
An emergency strategy to rescue Russia’s biological diversity
Conservation Biology
Have Participatory Approaches Increased Capabilities?
Endangering the endangered: the effect of perceived rarity on species extinction
Conservation Letters
Generalized Additive Models
The influence of protected area outreach on conservation attitudes and resource use patterns: a case study from western Tanzania
Oryx
Capitalizing on nature: protected area management
Science
Cited by (49)
Assessing the drivers of illegal resource use to improve wildlife conservation interventions
2023, Biological ConservationInfluence of social status and industrial development on poaching acceptability
2022, Global Ecology and ConservationLocal community perceptions of sea turtle egg use in Tortuguero, Costa Rica
2021, Ocean and Coastal ManagementCitation Excerpt :Positive attitudes towards biodiversity conservation are essential for the success of community-based conservation projects (Infield, 1988; Vannelli et al., 2019). Nevertheless, positive attitudes do not guarantee positive behaviors (Friedrich et al., 2014; Kühl et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2011), even when people are benefiting directly by the conservation of the natural resource (Infield and Namara, 2001; Young, 1999). For thousands of years, marine turtles have been part of many societies around the world; some of the oldest evidence of human-turtle interactions date back to 5000 BC (Álvarez-Varas et al., 2020; Frazier, 2003; Olijdam, 2001).
What drives commercial poaching? From poverty to economic inequality
2020, Biological ConservationConservation presence, not socioeconomics, leads to differences in pastoralist perceived threats to argali
2016, Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity