Magnetic field distortions produced by protective cages around sea turtle nests: unintended consequences for orientation and navigation?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.07.014Get rights and content

Abstract

The Earth’s magnetic field plays an important role in the orientation and navigation of sea turtles. Galvanized steel wire cages are often placed over turtle nests to protect them from predators, but the material typically used in cages has a high magnetic permeability and might therefore affect the nearby field. Here we report magnetometer measurements indicating that standard nest cages do indeed significantly alter the local magnetic field in the area where eggs develop. The mean change in total intensity was 26% at a level corresponding to the top of the egg chamber and 5% at a level corresponding to the bottom. Similarly, the mean change in field inclination was 20% for the top level and 4% for the bottom. In principle, the altered magnetic environment might affect subsequent magnetic orientation and navigation behavior in several ways, although whether turtles that develop in an unnatural magnetic field actually suffer navigational impairment has not yet been studied. Constructing protective cages out of magnetically inert materials provides a way to deter predators without risking unintended behavioral consequences of distorting the ambient field.

Introduction

The Earth’s magnetic field plays an important role in the orientation and navigation of sea turtles (reviewed by Lohmann and Lohmann, 1998, Lohmann and Lohmann, 2003). Hatchling loggerheads have a well-developed magnetic compass that enables them to maintain consistent headings in the absence of other cues (Lohmann, 1991; Light et al., 1993; Irwin and Lohmann, 2003), an ability that presumably helps guide them offshore during their initial seaward migration (Lohmann and Lohmann, 1996a). In addition, sea turtles are sensitive to small differences in field inclination (Lohmann and Lohmann, 1994) and intensity (Lohmann and Lohmann, 1996b) and can exploit the regional fields that exist in different locations along their migratory route as navigational markers (Lohmann et al., 2001). Finally, it has been hypothesized, though not yet demonstrated, that young turtles imprint on the magnetic fields that mark their natal beaches and use this information to return to the same region as adults (Lohmann et al., 1999).

Despite the prominent role that magnetism appears to play in the sensory world of sea turtles, little thought has been given to how anthropogenic influences in general, and conservation practices in particular, might disrupt their natural magnetic environment. A first step toward assessing possible risks is to identify circumstances in which turtles are exposed to unnatural fields that might interfere with the development of normal magnetosensory abilities or prevent the detection of important magnetic information.

A common conservation practice on many sea turtle nesting beaches is to cover turtle nests with galvanized wire mesh cages or screens to protect the eggs from raccoons, foxes, and other predators (Addison and Henricy, 1994; Jordan, 1994; Ratnaswamy et al., 1997; Yerli et al., 1997; Kinsella et al., 1998). Here we report, however, that wire mesh cages significantly alter the magnetic field around the eggs and developing embryos. Whether such field distortions affect the development of the turtles’ navigational system is not yet known. In principle, however, the field changes produced by cages might produce effects on subsequent orientation ability and navigational performance, particularly if turtles do indeed imprint on the magnetic features of their natal beaches. The results underscore the need to consider carefully the sensory biology of animals when designing conservation practices.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

To assess the effect of protective cages on the ambient magnetic field, we measured the field distortions produced by ten cages used on south Florida beaches. Each cage was constructed in accordance with a standard cube design (Addison, 1997) and had dimensions of approximately 60 × 60 × 60 cm (Fig. 1). The local magnetic field within the test area was uniform with an intensity of 39.7 μT and an inclination angle of 58.7°.

For each measurement, we placed the probe of an Applied Physics System 520

Results

All cages altered the local magnetic field at every position tested (Table 1). Immediately below the cages, the mean change in magnetic field intensity was 10.4 μT ± 2.4 S.D. (26% of the ambient field) and the mean change in inclination angle was 11.6° ±  3.0° S.D. (20% of the ambient field). At the level 25 cm below the cages the mean change in field intensity was 2.0 μT ± 0.4 S.D. (5% of the ambient field) and the mean change in inclination angle was 2.2° ± 0.7 S.D. (4% of the ambient field).

Discussion

All of the cages we tested altered the inclination angle and intensity of the magnetic field at all of the test locations. Changes to the local field decreased with distance from the cages but were present throughout the area where turtle eggs develop (Table 1).

Whether developing in an altered magnetic field affects the subsequent behavior of turtles is not known. In principle, however, the field in which turtles develop might influence subsequent orientation and navigation in at least three

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Kirt Rusenko and the Gumbo Limbo Nature Center for assistance with obtaining cages. Work was supported by NSF grant IBN-9816065. We thank C. Lohmann, J. Wang, L. Avens, L. Boles and M. Baltzley for helpful discussions and comments on early drafts of the manuscript.

References (25)

  • P. Weindler et al.

    Development of migratory orientation in pied flycatchers in different magnetic inclinations

    Anim. Behav.

    (1995)
  • S. Yerli et al.

    Mesh grids protect loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta nests from red fox Vulpes vulpes predation

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1997)
  • D.S. Addison

    Galvanized wire nest cages can prevent nest depredation

    Marine Turtle Newslett.

    (1997)
  • Addison, D.S., Henricy, S. 1994. A comparison of galvanized wire mesh cages. vs. flat chain-link screen in preventing...
  • V.P. Bingman

    Magnetic field orientation of migratory savannah sparrows with different first summer experience

    Behaviour

    (1983)
  • B. Bowen et al.

    Population-structure of loggerhead turtles (Caretta-caretta) in the northwestern Atlantic ocean and Mediterranean sea

    Conserv. Biol.

    (1993)
  • A. Carr

    New perspectives on the pelagic stage of sea turtle development

    Conserv. Biol.

    (1987)
  • D.C. Dodd

    Synopsis of the biological data on the loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta (Linnaeus 1758)

    US Fish. Wildlife Serv., Biol. Rep.

    (1988)
  • W.P. Irwin et al.

    Magnet-induced disorientation in hatchling loggerhead sea turtles

    J. Exp. Biol.

    (2003)
  • Jordan, E.R. 1994. Effects of a nest screening program on raccoon predation of sea turtle eggs at Canaveral national...
  • Kinsella, L.E., Godley, B.J., Broderick, A.C., Furness, R.W. 1998. Use of chemical deterrents and wire screening to...
  • P. Light et al.

    Geomagnetic orientation of loggerhead sea turtles: evidence for an inclination compass

    J. Exp. Biol.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: Department of Biology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4010, Atlanta, GA 30302-4010, USA.

    View full text