4
Harnessing and supporting consumer involvement in the development and implementation of Models of Care for musculoskeletal health

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2016.09.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Consumer involvement in the design and delivery of their healthcare is an integral strategy to ensure that health services and systems meet consumers' needs. This is also true for the design and delivery of Models of Care. This chapter presents the identified healthcare needs of people with musculoskeletal conditions and focuses on the current systematic review evidence for consumer involvement interventions in musculoskeletal Models of Care across the micro, meso and macro levels of healthcare. This chapter also presents three case studies of consumer involvement in different aspects of healthcare, offers a series of practice points to help translate the systematic review evidence into practice, and also provides direction to available resources, which support the implementation of consumer involvement within Models of Care.

Introduction

Consumer involvement is becoming an increasingly important part of health systems, health policy and service design. Consumer involvement is seen as ‘an important way to improve our healthcare system’ [1], and encompasses not only consumers being involved in decisions about their own care but also in decisions about how health services and systems are designed and delivered [2]. In some countries, such as Australia [3], New Zealand [4] and Canada [5], consumer involvement is embedded into the national accreditation standards for health services. Internationally, the World Health Organization has promoted concepts such as informed and empowered individuals and families as one strategy for achieving improved health outcomes worldwide [6].

Alongside this environment of increasing consumer participation, there is also increased focus on using Models of Care (MoCs) as a vehicle to drive evidence into policy and practice through whole-of-sector changes at a health system, health service, health professional and consumer level as a way to manage the increasing burden of chronic disease care. MoCs are defined by Briggs et al. (2014) as “an evidence-informed policy or framework that outlines the optimal manner in which condition-specific care should be made available and delivered to consumers. MoCs aim to address current and projected community needs in the context of local operational requirements. The guidance provided is coined as ‘the right care, delivered at the right time, by the right team, in the right place, with the right resources’” [7]. A MoC approach ideally encourages co-design for health policy, programme and service delivery between clinicians and consumers and also between policy makers and consumers, ensuring comprehensive embedding of consumers' perspectives and needs. This intersection of increasing consumer involvement and increased focus on MoC development provides an exciting opportunity to harness consumer involvement activities to inform and strengthen the design and implementation of MoCs.

This chapter will present contemporary, state-of-the-art and practice-relevant reviews for different strategies for consumer involvement informed by the strongest evidence (from systematic reviews [8]). The evidence will be the focus of this chapter, and where possible we have drawn a series of practice points from the systematic reviews to show how to facilitate implementation of consumer involvement across all levels of healthcare design and delivery. Additionally, we have provided some directions to different guides and toolkits from around the world that can be used to support the local implementation of consumer involvement activities as it relates to MoCs.

Importantly, while there are recommendations included in this chapter, it is not intended as a manual for implementation of consumer involvement in musculoskeletal MoCs. The design and implementation of consumer involvement activities is necessarily dependent on local context – including features of the health system, health service, environment and the consumers themselves. Importantly, the ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach is not available to implement consumer involvement activities within MoCs, instead this chapter aims to provide information on the many options available.

This chapter will examine aspects of musculoskeletal MoCs which provide opportunities for consumer involvement and present the systematic review evidence relating to each. To examine the levels of intervention and influence within the health system, we have used the three levels of micro, meso and macro identified by Speerin et al. (2014) [9]:

  • 1.

    The micro level – participation of consumers in the co-care of their condition;

  • 2.

    The meso level – delivery systems, infrastructure and the competencies/training of health professionals; and

  • 3.

    The macro level – health systems, organisations, health policy and socioeconomic factors.

Micro-level consumer participation interventions typically take place between consumers and health professionals; meso-level interventions between consumers and health services; and macro-level interventions between consumers and health system designers (see Fig. 1).

Before the examination of systematic review evidence, a number of case studies have been presented to illustrate how consumer involvement has been harnessed in relation to musculoskeletal MoCs. Additionally, at the end of the chapter, we have outlined some areas for future research to further support consumer involvement in the development and implementation of musculoskeletal MoCs.

Section snippets

Which aspects of healthcare matter to people with musculoskeletal conditions?

As worldwide morbidity and mortality continues to shift away from communicable diseases to non-communicable and chronic conditions [10], health systems worldwide need to adapt to better service health consumers who will have contact with health services and professionals over long periods of time through many life and disease stages. The 2010 Global Burden of Disease study showed that musculoskeletal conditions were the second most common cause of disability worldwide [10]. Disability

A framework for consumer involvement in the development and implementation of musculoskeletal MoCs

In 2011, Lowe and colleagues [15] published a taxonomy of communication and involvement interventions for consumers' safe and effective use of medicines. This publication was based on earlier work performed by the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group in developing a taxonomy of interventions for consumer communication and participation [16]. The taxonomy provides a framework for analysis of consumer communication and participation across all levels (macro, meso and micro) of healthcare.

Real-world consumer involvement: case studies

Three case studies of consumer involvement in different aspects of healthcare are presented to help translate the systematic review evidence into practice and to provide direction to available resources which, through consumer involvement, support implementation of MoCs.

Evidence for involving people with musculoskeletal conditions to support the development and implementation of musculoskeletal MoCs

MoCs are usually constructed from a variety of healthcare interventions, policies and approaches, which include, or have the potential to include, consumer participation. For example, a MoC might recommend a model of service delivery that includes the use of a self-management programme; or advocate the use of decision aids consumer; or specify how consumer-centred care might be delivered; or recommend the use of a consumer advisory committee to aid a MoC design. To strategically manage the

Consumer involvement in components of care at the micro level to support implementation of MoCs (Supplemental File 1)

At the micro level, consumers are most often involved in MoCs as end users through models of service delivery and interventions, which encourage participation in the co-care of their condition. This involvement usually happens within the relationship between the health professional and the consumer. In regard to Lowe's taxonomy, education/information interventions, supporting behaviour change, teaching skills, facilitating decision-making and providing support, all provide opportunities for

Opportunities for consumer involvement in meso-level interventions

At the meso level, consumers can be involved in MoCs through the design of healthcare delivery systems and infrastructure and in the design and delivery of competencies/training of health professionals (Supplemental File 2). This work mainly happens between the consumer and their health service (Fig. 3). In regard to Lowe's taxonomy, activities which minimise risks and harms, and those that improve healthcare quality, exist at the meso level of healthcare.

Because of shortage of good quality

Consumer involvement in components of care at the macro level to support implementation of MoCs

At the macro level, consumers can be involved in MoCs through involvement in the design of health systems, services, health policy and in being involved in addressing socioeconomic factors, which influence health systems and access to healthcare (Supplemental File 3). This work largely happens between consumers and health system designers (e.g., government and private providers). In regard to Lowe's taxonomy, all activities which involve consumers at the systems level exist at the macro level

Limitations

A limitation of the approach of this paper was the decision to primarily present systematic review evidence as this meant some newer strategies might not be presented. However, in the context of a rapidly evolving area of research, a vast amount of single-study trials, and enormous variation in approaches to consumer involvement, we decided that presenting systematic review evidence was the best way to create an evidence-based, international platform for informing how to harness consumer

Future directions and further research

Consumer involvement in healthcare across all levels (micro, meso and macro) is generally under-researched. The evidence that is available is generally at the micro level, and some of the evidence is of a lower quality. This lack of research is particularly an issue at the meso- and macro levels of healthcare. Because of the complex nature of these interventions and the variety of interventions that lie under the ‘consumer involvement’ umbrella, it is unsurprising that study results are often

Conclusion

Including consumers in the design, delivery and evaluation of musculoskeletal MoCs has the potential to improve healthcare delivery by bringing services more in line with consumer wants and needs and supporting more effective implementation of MoCs.

Although the evidence of consumer needs is increasing, the evidence base about effective consumer involvement at all healthcare levels (macro, meso and micro) remains under developed. Despite the current gaps in evidence, in this chapter we have

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

AW is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship clinical level 2 (1063574). RB is supported by an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship (1082138).

The authors thank the editors, associate professor Andrew Briggs and associate professor Helen Slater for their comments and support in preparing this manuscript.

References (71)

  • Accreditation Canada

    Putting patients and families at the centre of care

    (2015)
  • World Health Organization

    People at the centre of health care: harmonizing body, mind, people and systems

    (2007)
  • A.M. Briggs et al.

    Models of care for musculoskeletal health in Australia: now more than ever to drive evidence into health policy and practice

    Aust Health Rev

    (2014)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council

    NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines

  • A.M. Briggs et al.

    Musculoskeletal health conditions represent a global threat to healthy aging: a report for the 2015 world health organization world report on ageing and health

    Gerontologist

    (2016)
  • A.E. Wluka et al.

    Understanding the needs of consumers with musculoskeletal conditions: consumers' perceived needs of health information, health services and other non-medical services: a systematic scoping review

    MOVE muscle bone & joint health

    (2016)
  • E.A. Bayliss et al.

    Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities

    Fam Pract

    (2008)
  • H. Slater et al.

    Painful transitions: young people's experiences of living with persistent pain, their interactions with health services and their needs and preferences for pain management including digital technologies

    (2016)
  • S. Hill et al.

    Interventions for communication and participation: their purpose and practice

  • NPS MedicineWise

    The Cochrane Collaboration's taxonomy of medicine-based interventions directed at consumers to promote evidence-based prescribing and medicines use guides the selection of NPS interventions

    (2012)
  • A.M. Briggs et al.

    Supporting evaluation and implementation of musculoskeletal Models of Care: a globally-informed framework for judging ‘readiness’ and ‘success’

    Arthritis Care Res

    (2016)
  • N. Willis et al.

    “Communicate to vaccinate”: the development of a taxonomy of communication interventions to improve routine childhood vaccination

    BMC Int Health Hum Rights

    (2013)
  • H. Ames et al.

    Mapping how information about childhood vaccination is communicated in two regions of Cameroon: what is done and where are the gaps?

    BMC Public Health

    (2015)
  • A. Oku et al.

    Communication strategies to promote the uptake of childhood vaccination in Nigeria: a systematic map

    Glob Health Action

    (2016)
  • Arthritis Australia

    Time to move: arthritis

    (2014)
  • A.M. Briggs et al.

    Applying a Health Network approach to translate evidence-informed policy into practice: a review and case study on musculoskeletal health

    BMC Health Serv Res

    (2012)
  • C. Davy et al.

    Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review

    BMC Health Serv Res

    (2015)
  • J.B. Neola

    Towards a productive life: children with disabilities see hope with PhilHealth

    (2016)
  • PhilHealth

    Improving access to assistive technology and rehabilitation for children with disabilities (CWD)

    (2016)
  • M. Boers et al.

    The OMERACT handbook

    (2016)
  • P. Cheung et al.

    AB1156 involvement of patient research partners in clinical research: recommendations developed by omeract

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2015)
  • B.J. Shea et al.

    Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

    BMC Med Res Method

    (2007)
  • W. Lowe et al.

    Effectiveness of musculoskeletal education interventions in people with low literacy levels: a systematic review

    Arthritis Care Res

    (2013)
  • S. Lindsay et al.

    A systematic review of self-management interventions for children and youth with physical disabilities

    Disabil Rehabil

    (2014)
  • K. Berzins et al.

    UK self-care support initiatives for older patients with long-term conditions: a review

    Chronic Illn

    (2009)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Precision medicine from the patient’s perspective: More opportunities and increasing responsibilities

      2021, Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: The Perfect Fit for Autoimmunity
    • Patient-perceived health service needs in inflammatory arthritis: A systematic scoping review

      2018, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the importance of care that is meaningful to, and desired by, patients (i.e., a patient-centred approach to care) is increasingly recognized as critical to forming effective therapeutic relationships, supporting self-management, and improving satisfaction with care and health outcomes [7,8]. For this reason, a ‘patient-centred’ approach to care is now accepted as a fundamental component of models of care, clinical guidelines, and a guiding principle of healthcare safety and quality [9–13]. Patient-perceived healthcare needs have been explored in various chronic diseases, for example palliative care [14], oncology [15,16], and diabetes [17].

    • Patients’ perceived needs of health care providers for low back pain management: a systematic scoping review

      2018, Spine Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      To address these problems, health services should provide more flexibility (eg, after-hours services, community-based centers, telehealth services), as well as better coordination of care with different health care professionals, employers, and allied health services. Furthermore, the implementation of Models of Care co-developed with consumers may facilitate self-management and partnership-based service delivery [80]. This review had a number of limitations.

    • Integrating self-management support for knee injuries into routine clinical practice: TRAK intervention design and delivery

      2018, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Treatments, including physiotherapy, that support individuals to exercise or be physically active in general are recommended (Button et al., 2012; NICE, 2014; Dobson et al., 2016), but these need to be delivered within a supported self-care framework that helps individuals to manage their musculoskeletal condition long term (Kroon et al., 2014; Button et al., 2015; Dziedzic et al., 2016). This includes providing health information and education, supporting behaviour change, facilitating communication, teaching technical skills and personalisation of care (Burd and Hallsworth, 2016; De Silva, 2011; Dobson et al., 2016; Dziedzic et al., 2016; Gordon et al., 2016; Rees and Williams, 2009; Walsh et al., 2016). Despite this, a recent systematic review has identified that current supported self-care interventions for knee conditions often have a poorly defined exercise or physical activity component (Button et al., 2015).

    • Childhood vaccination communication outcomes unpacked and organized in a taxonomy to facilitate core outcome establishment

      2017, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Using framework analysis, we then charted and interpreted outcome themes by applying a draft outcome taxonomy, facilitating incorporation of new outcomes raised by the focus groups. Through iterative discussion and informed by our research team's considerable experience with taxonomy development [1,2,32,48,49] and the organizational principles of OMERACTs conceptual framework [30], we organized the outcomes into domains and overarching core areas. In Fig. 3, we present an overview of our taxonomy based on the OMERACT conceptual framework [30].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text