Elsevier

Behavioural Brain Research

Volume 283, 15 April 2015, Pages 233-237
Behavioural Brain Research

Research report
Enhanced heat discrimination in congenital blindness

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.037Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Congenitally blind subjects outperform sighted controls in thermal sensory-discrimination.

  • Congenitally blind subjects are more susceptible to spatial summation of heat than the sighted.

  • Enhanced thermal discriminability of the blind may help in object recognition.

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that congenitally blind individuals perform better than normally sighted controls in a variety of auditory, tactile and olfactory discrimination tasks. However, little is known about the capacity of blind individuals to make fine discriminatory judgments in the thermal domain. We therefore compared the capacity to detect small temperature increases in innocuous heat in a group of 12 congenitally blind and 12 age and sex-matched normally sighted participants. In addition, we also tested for group differences in the effects of spatial summation on temperature discrimination. Thermal stimuli were delivered with either a 2.56 or 9 cm2 Peltier-based thermode. We applied for 5–8 s lasting non-painful thermal stimuli to the forearm and asked participants to detect small increments in temperature (ΔT = 0.4, 0.8, 1.2 or 1.6 °C) that occurred at random time intervals. Blank trials (ΔT = 0 °C) were also included to test for false positive responses. We used signal detection theory model to analyze the data. Our data revealed that blind participants have a higher accuracy than the sighted (d′: Blind = 2.4 ± 1.0, Sighted = 1.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.025), regardless of the size of the stimulated skin surface or magnitude of the temperature shift. Increasing the size of the stimulated skin area increased the response criterion in the blind (p = 0.022) but not in the sighted. Together, these findings show that congenitally blind individuals have enhanced temperature discrimination accuracy and are more susceptible to spatial summation of heat.

Introduction

There is growing evidence that congenitally blind individuals outperform age-and sex-matched normally sighted individuals in various sensory tasks [1]. Indeed, congenitally blind individuals have supra-normal discrimination skills in tactile [2], [3], [4], auditory [5], [6], [7] and olfactory [8], [9], [10] modalities. In a previous study, we measured warmth and cold detection thresholds as well as heat and cold pain thresholds and responses to supra-thresholds heat stimulation in congenital blind subjects [18]. Although blind individuals showed increased responses to pain stimulation, thresholds for innocuous warmth and cold were not different from normal sighted controls. These results do not imply, however, that blind individuals would not perform any better than sighted controls in more complex temperature discrimination tasks. To date, nothing is known about the blind's ability to discriminate thermal stimuli. Based on anecdotal accounts from blind individuals about their use of thermal cues in daily-life activities, e.g. the difference in temperature gradient caused by sunlight hitting the forehead for purposes of spatial navigation, we hypothesized that they would have better heat discrimination skills.

It has been shown that people can discriminate between a broad range of materials by relying solely on thermal diffusivity properties [11], [12], [13]. Because of their lack of vision, blind individuals might rely more strongly on these thermal cues for object recognition, possibly leading to an enhanced sensitivity to detect subtle differences in thermal properties. Furthermore, thermoception also plays a role in avoiding thermal injury [14]. Indeed, nociceptive heat is encoded by the combined activity of thermoceptors and nociceptors, suggesting that warm fibers contribute to the experience of pain [14], [15], [16], [17]. Therefore, a rapid increase in temperature, even within the innocuous range, can be encoded as dangerous. Since congenitally blind individuals have lower heat pain thresholds compared to the sighted [18], [19], they may be more attentive to temperature shifts that may be indicative for an impeding painful stimulus.

Thermal perception is not only dependent on stimulus intensity but also on spatial summation [12], [20], [21]. Indeed, changing the size of a thermal stimulus drastically affects the perceived intensity. This property is especially important in warmth perception in which intensity and spatial extent of the stimulus have equal influence on the perceived intensity [12], [22]. Unpublished preliminary data from our lab suggested that the spatial extent of thermal stimulation more strongly affects perceptual decision making in blind compared to sighted participants. Therefore, we investigated here in a more systematic manner whether congenitally blind differ from normal controls with respect to spatial summation of heat.

Section snippets

Methods

Participants were recruited from our database of congenitally blind subjects or by advertisement. Our study population consisted of 12 congenitally blind (5F; mean age: 39.0 ± 12.2 years; range: 24–61) and 12 normally sighted (5F; mean age: 38.8 ± 14.7 years; range: 21–66) participants. One blind participant and her matched control were excluded from the data analysis due to non-completion of the experiment. All blind participants suffered from blindness due to peripheral origin. Blindness due to

Results

Levene's tests indicated equality of variance for all data distributions, as illustrated in Table 2. The first ANOVA showed that congenitally blind (CB) participants had a higher accuracy in detecting temperature changes than the normally sighted (NS) (d′: CB = 2.4 ± 1.0, NS = 1.8 ± 0.7; F = 5.903, df = 1, p = 0.025).

Further comparisons indicated that all participants –regardless of the group– performed better when using the large 9 cm2 thermode (d′: 2.56 cm2 = 1.8 ± 0.7, 9 cm2 = 2.5 ± 0.7; F = 7.636, df = 3, p < 0.001).

Discussion

The aims of this study were to test whether congenitally blind individuals (1) are better in discriminating small increases in innocuous warmth and (2) are more prone to spatial summation effects of heat. In accordance with our hypothesis, results showed that congenitally blind participants are better than the normally sighted at discriminating temperature changes, regardless of the amplitude of the temperature increase or the spatial extent of the stimulated area. Our findings further

Conclusions

Altogether, our findings indicate that congenitally blind individuals’ hypersensitivity to nociceptive thermal stimuli extends to innocuous warmth and add to a growing literature on cross-modal compensatory plasticity in congenitally blind individuals [1]. An improved capacity for thermal information processing may help blind individuals in object recognition based upon thermal diffusivity characteristics of materials [11], [12]. Our data therefore suggest that when sight is absent since birth

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

HS, MP and RK conceived and designed the experiments. RK and MP contributed with experimental equipment and analysis tools. HS performed the experiments and the data analysis. HS, MP and RK wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ricarda Gmeinder for help with the data collection and Prof. Leon Plaghki for in-depth discussions. The Lundbeckfonden and the Harland Sanders Foundation have supported this research. Thanks to the Vision Research Network, the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Montreal, and the Ministry of Education of Quebec for their support. We are grateful to all the participants to this study.

References (29)

  • M. Wong et al.

    Tactile spatial acuity enhancement in blindness: evidence for experience-dependent mechanisms

    J Neurosci

    (2011)
  • S. Teng et al.

    Ultrafine spatial acuity of blind expert human echolocators

    Exp Brain Res

    (2012)
  • R. Rosenbluth et al.

    Performance of early-blind and sighted children on olfactory tasks

    Perception-London

    (2000)
  • H-N. Ho et al.

    Contribution of thermal cues to material discrimination and localization

    Percept Psychophys

    (2006)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Selective and replicable neuroimaging-based indicators of pain discriminability

      2022, Cell Reports Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mistaking an intense pain stimulus for a mild one can sometimes be life threatening. Previously, studies have examined how pain treatments affect the ability to discriminate between different painful stimuli,1,2,3,4,5 how this pain discriminability differs between different groups (e.g., patients and healthy people),6,7,8,9 and how brain activity responds differently to different noxious stimuli.10,11,12,13 However, how the brain directly encodes pain discriminability has been overlooked almost entirely.

    • Limits of cross-modal plasticity? Short-term visual deprivation does not enhance cardiac interoception, thermosensation, or tactile spatial acuity

      2022, Biological Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Taken together, there is evidence that visual deprivation through blindfolding reversibly affects several perceptual abilities, which indicates that short-term deprivation, to some degree, can produce similar perceptual effects as blindness (Merabet et al., 2008). Recently, sensory abilities related to the body were shown to be altered following visual impairment; for example, studies have suggested that blind people discriminate heat better than sighted individuals (Slimani, Ptito, & Kupers, 2015) and present lower pain thresholds for both cold and heat (Slimani et al. 2013). In addition to being somatosensory submodalities, these processes of temperature perception and heat pain have been reclassified as interoception based on anatomical considerations and the fact that they provide information about the physiological condition of the body, which is a key function of interoception (Craig, 2003a; see also: Khalsa et al., 2017).

    • Testing the exteroceptive function of nociception: The role of visual experience in shaping the spatial representations of nociceptive inputs

      2020, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      This would lead to qualitatively different ways of processing threatening information and perceiving pain. Accordingly, several studies have assumed that early blind people might display differences in their sensitivity to pain as compared to normally sighted individuals (Slimani, Danti, Ptito, & Kupers, 2014; Slimani, Ptito, & Kupers, 2015). However, further reports suggested that hypersensitivity to pain in early blindness might be restricted to changes in the processing of C-fibre inputs (Slimani, Plaghki, Ptito, & Kupers, 2016) and would be related to differences in anxiety levels and attention between blind and sighted participants (Holten-Rossing, Slimani, Ptito, Danti, & Kupers, 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text