Research report
Increased aggression in males in transgenic Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Behavioural and psychological signs and symptoms of dementia encompass a wide range of neuropsychiatric disturbances which coincide with progressing cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Physical aggression and agitation, which occurs in 20–65% of AD patients, is physically and emotionally stressful, not only to patients but also to immediate family and caregivers. The exact mechanisms underlying the increased aggressive behaviour in AD has yet to be elucidated. We used a transgenic mouse model, denoted Tg2576, which over-expresses a mutated human amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene implicated in familial AD, to investigate aggressive behaviour of males at the stage of amyloid beta pathology preceding overt amyloid plaque deposition in the brain. The aggressive behaviour of transgenic and non-transgenic littermate males was evaluated in a standard resident–intruder test in which an isolated resident male responded aggressively toward an experimentally naïve intruder male of A/J strain. We showed that 7-month-old Tg2576 resident males demonstrated significantly higher and unchanged level of aggression towards intruder males during 3 consecutive encounters as compared to their non-transgenic littermate counterparts. These results validate further the Tg2576 mouse model of AD underscoring its usefulness in studying non-mnemonic changes in behaviour related to the disease.

Research highlights

▶ Aggression coincides with the progressing dementia in Alzheimer's disease (AD). ▶ Tg2576 mouse model of AD shows amyloid brain pathology and cognitive impairment. ▶ Resident-intruder (RI) test assesses offensive aggressive behavior in male mice. ▶ Tg2576 males at early stage of amyloid pathology are more aggressive than controls.

Introduction

The cognitive impairment that occurs in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) is often accompanied by a wide range of neuropsychiatric disturbances collectively referred to as behavioural and psychological signs and symptoms of dementia (BPSD). These BPSD, which are particularly prominent in AD, include delusions, hallucinations, activity disturbances, aggression and agitation, anxiety, depression, circadian rhythm disorders and phobias [1]. In general, BPSD encompass three major areas of behavioural disturbances: agitation and aggression, psychosis, and mood disorders [2]. Physical aggression and agitation occur in 20–65% of studied patient cohorts with dementia [3], and are most common in the moderate to severe stages of the disease [4]. Aggression and agitation are physically and emotionally stressful not only to patients but also to immediate family and caregivers [5], [6], and they often trigger placement in long-term care facilities [7]. Management of BPSD has not been yet standardized, and it depends on the type of symptoms, their severity, and frequency. The interventions employed range from behavioural and environmental approaches to, in selected cases, pharmacological treatment [8]. The exact mechanisms involved in the initiation of aggression in neurodegenerative diseases have not been identified yet. It has been proposed that an imbalance in neurotransmitters which occurs in multiple brain regions of demented patients may lead to increased aggressive behaviour [9].

Mouse models of Alzheimer's disease proved to be valuable for modeling not only cognitive impairment, but also disturbances in non-mnemonic behaviours [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], and these models are routinely used to evaluate potential therapeutic interventions targeting toxic species of amyloid beta (Aβ) protein in the context of memory impairment observed in the models [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].

In our study we used a transgenic mouse model, which over-expresses a mutated human amyloid beta precursor protein (APP) gene implicated in AD, to investigate aggressive behaviour of male mice at the early stage of the increase in Aβ levels, before overt deposition of Aβ plaques in the brain. The model, denoted Tg2576, expresses human APP Swedish mutation (APP695.K670N-M671L) under the PrP hamster promoter [21]. These mice show increase in Aβ levels beginning at 6 months of age, and overt deposition of Aβ in senile plaques between 9 and 12 months [22]. Besides amyloid pathology, the model recapitulates many other neurological features of AD, including astrogliosis [23], microgliosis [24], cytokine production [25], [26], oxidative stress [27], [28], and dystrophic neurites [23]. The Tg2576 model has been one of the most widely used models to study amyloid deposition and coinciding cognitive impairment, including episodic-like memory, object recognition, and contextual conditioning [12], therefore we decided to extend the behavioural characterization of the model to aggressive behaviour. Although increased aggressive behaviour in males of other amyloid-based mouse models of AD was already reported [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], some of these pioneering studies included only brief, 3-min periods of evaluation of aggressive interactions as one of the test in an extensive battery of behavioural screens, while other studies reported aggression based only on a few selected variables.

In our study we used a standard method for evaluating aggression in male mice, in which an isolated resident male, kept in a larger home cage, responds aggressively toward an introduced intruder male [36]. To provide an unbiased assessment of the offensive aggressive behaviour in the Tg2576 model, we used as intruders males of A/J strain. Males of this strain do not initiate fights and do not respond to attacks by retaliating, therefore they are often used as intruders in resident–intruder tests [37], [38]. We also employed longer 10-min observation periods and administered three repeated sessions of resident–intruder encounters in order to reliably address the intensity of attacks and the possible changes in offensive behaviour due to experience with aggressive interactions [39], [40]. This testing paradigm allowed us to ascribe any observed aggressive behaviour to the experimental resident male, minimizing the potential confounding effect caused by retaliation or launching of attacks by an intruder mouse. We report that 7-month-old Tg2576 males, at the early stage of the increase in amyloid-β levels, demonstrate increased, unchanging aggressive behaviour as compared to their non-transgenic littermate counterparts.

Section snippets

Mice

Tg2576 transgenic (HuAPP695.SWE) males and their non-transgenic (nTg) male littermates, kept on C57/B6//SJL mixed genetic background, were obtained from the colony stock maintained by Charles River Laboratories. Twenty-two males (NTg2576 = 11 and NnTg = 11) were used in the study as resident males tested for aggression towards unfamiliar, experimentally naïve males of A/J strain. The A/J male mice (N = 66) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Stock #000646). Both resident and intruder males

Results

The quantitative analysis of the data revealed that two nTg resident males never attacked an intruder male during the 3 resident–intruder test sessions. In contrast, all 11 Tg2576 residents attacked an intruder male. Detailed assessment of attacks revealed that 6 out of 11 nTg residents attacked intruders in session 1 and 8 nTg residents attacked intruders in sessions 2, and 3, respectively. All 11 Tg2576 residents, but one during 1st session, attacked intruders during the whole study (Fig. 1).

Discussion

Most of the transgenic mouse models of AD replicate reliably mnemonic dysfunction and amyloid brain pathology, despite the absence of overt and comparable to human disease cerebral neuronal loss [12], [49], [50]. This concordance in the replication of the major phenotypes of the disease in mouse models is encouraging having in mind the differences in the transgene(s) copy numbers and the type of promoters used to drive the transgene expression [51], [52]. More importantly, the differences in

Acknowledgements

The data collection of the study, cost of animals, and part of the salary of AG, VS and CJ during data collection were supported by Lundbeck A/S. We thank an anonymous reviewer for thoughtful comments on the manuscript.

References (60)

  • C. Kopp

    Locomotor activity rhythm in inbred strains of mice: implications for behavioural studies

    Behav Brain Res

    (2001)
  • I. Dewachter et al.

    Modeling Alzheimer's disease in transgenic mice: effect of age and of presenilin1 on amyloid biochemistry and pathology in APP/London mice

    Exp Gerontol

    (2000)
  • T.L. Spires et al.

    Transgenic models of Alzheimer's disease: learning from animals

    NeuroRx

    (2005)
  • S.Y. Guenette et al.

    Progress toward valid transgenic mouse models for Alzheimer's disease

    Neurobiol Aging

    (1999)
  • K.A. Miczek et al.

    Aggressive behavioral phenotypes in mice

    Behav Brain Res

    (2001)
  • A. Bartolomucci et al.

    Behavioral and physiological characterization of male mice under chronic psychosocial stress

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2004)
  • B. Reisberg et al.

    Behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: phenomenology and treatment

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • P. Aalten et al.

    Behavioral problems in dementia: a factor analysis of the neuropsychiatric inventory

    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

    (2003)
  • A. Burns et al.

    Psychiatric phenomena in Alzheimer's disease. IV: disorders of behaviour

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • V. Senanarong et al.

    Agitation in Alzheimer's disease is a manifestation of frontal lobe dysfunction

    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

    (2004)
  • D.L. Murman et al.

    The incremental direct costs associated with behavioral symptoms in AD

    Neurology

    (2002)
  • M.S. Beeri et al.

    The cost of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in community dwelling Alzheimer's disease patients

    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • C.G. Ballard et al.

    Management of agitation and aggression associated with Alzheimer disease

    Nat Rev Neurol

    (2009)
  • K.H. Ashe

    Mechanisms of memory loss in Abeta and tau mouse models

    Biochem Soc Trans

    (2005)
  • J.C. Dodart et al.

    Does my mouse have Alzheimer's disease?

    Genes Brain Behav

    (2002)
  • J.L. Eriksen et al.

    Plaques, tangles and memory loss in mouse models of neurodegeneration

    Behav Genet

    (2007)
  • D.L. Price et al.

    Mutant genes in familial Alzheimer's disease and transgenic models

    Annu Rev Neurosci

    (1998)
  • A.A. Asuni et al.

    Immunotherapy targeting pathological tau conformers in a tangle mouse model reduces brain pathology with associated functional improvements

    J Neurosci

    (2007)
  • B.J. Bacskai et al.

    Non-Fc-mediated mechanisms are involved in clearance of amyloid-beta in vivo by immunotherapy

    J Neurosci

    (2002)
  • J.C. Dodart et al.

    Immunization reverses memory deficits without reducing brain Abeta burden in Alzheimer's disease model

    Nat Neurosci

    (2002)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Longitudinal assessment of aggression and circadian rhythms in the APPswe mouse model of Alzheimer‘s disease

      2022, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, although the model has apparently been well characterized in terms of appearance of memory impairments and brain pathology, longitudinal studies assessing the course of aggression, hyperactivity and of circadian rhythm changes with relevance for agitation are largely missing. Only a few studies have looked at these phenotypes: e.g. APPswe showed higher aggression at 7 months [2], hyperactivity at 5 – 23 months of age [7, 13, 45] and circadian dysfunction at 7–12 months [45] (for review see: [34]). However, a longitudinal assessment of all phenotypes in the same animals is still missing.

    • Inhibition of Smad3 in macrophages promotes Aβ efflux from the brain and thereby ameliorates Alzheimer's pathology

      2021, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
      Citation Excerpt :

      Deficits in non-cognitive behaviors can characteristically be observed in human AD, mostly starting from early stages. The nesting ability and social interaction are rodent versions of non-cognitive behaviors (Alexander et al., 2011), and impairments in these behaviors are also observed in the transgenic APP/PS1 mice, even at early ages (Zhang and Schluesener, 2013). The prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and several further brain regions are responsible for cognitive faculty and non-cognitive nesting ability (Deacon, 2006; Wesson and Wilson, 2011), while the frontal cortex takes charge of non-cognitive social memory and interactive social behaviors (Bechara, 2002; Hari and Kujala, 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text