Research report
Sex differences in human virtual water maze performance: Novel measures reveal the relative contribution of directional responding and spatial knowledge

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Sex differences in humans on virtual water maze navigation are well established when overall performance is measured, e.g., by the total time taken to find the hidden platform, total path length, or quadrant dwell time during probe trials. Currently, it is unknown whether males are better spatial learners than females, or if overall performance differences reflect other aspects of the task unrelated to spatial memory. Here, males and females were tested on a virtual analogue of the Morris water maze. We devised a novel method of analysis in which each trial was divided into an initial trajectory phase and search phase. We also implemented a new measure of spatial learning during early and late training, by including trials in which subjects were only required to indicate where they thought the hidden target zone was located. Consistent with previous reports, males outperformed females on overall measures of task performance. Males also performed significantly better on all initial trajectory phase variables. Interestingly, only small (non-significant) differences were observed during the search phase and when spatial learning was tested without the constraints of a typical water maze trial. Our results suggest that spatial knowledge regarding the location of the hidden target zone is not the main factor responsible for overall sex differences in virtual water maze performance. Instead, the largest sex differences were observed during the initial trajectory phase of the trial, which is thought to depend on effective processing of distal features of the environment.

Introduction

The Morris water maze is commonly used in rodent research to study the neurobiology of learning and memory (for a review, see [5]). The task requires subjects to learn the spatial position of an escape platform that is located in a circular pool of opaque water and hidden just beneath the surface. The importance and widespread use of the rodent version of the task has prompted an increasing number of researchers to investigate the performance of humans on analogous virtual versions [1], [2], [11], [18], [19], [22].

Previous studies in both rodents [4], [24] and humans [1], [2], [18], [19] suggest males perform better on the water maze compared to females. At present it is unclear which mechanisms underlie this sex difference. Are males better spatial learners, or is the advantage derived from other behavioural aspects of the task important to overall performance? Here, we examined which specific elements of behaviour comprising an individual trial lead to sex differences in human subjects.

In humans, it is well established that males outperform females on measures assessing overall virtual water maze performance. For example, Astur et al. [1], [2] reported that adult males were faster in locating the hidden platform during training, a finding replicated in children [19]. These studies also found that when the platform was removed on a probe trial following training, males displayed a stronger search preference for the former platform quadrant. One potential mechanism mediating apparent sex differences on overall task performance in humans is the extent to which distal features of the environment can be used effectively. Two sources of distal information thought to be important to navigation in the water maze are (1) distal cues, defined as distinct visual features of the environment located outside the pool wall and (2) the geometry of the room in which the pool is located [22]. The pool wall itself and landmarks located within its boundaries can also be used, and are referred to as proximal cues. Sandstrom et al. [22] observed that males performed better than females when the geometry of the room was the only useful source of distal information available. Saucier et al. [23] demonstrated in a real-world navigation task that females preferred using landmark information, whereas males displayed a preference for cardinal directions (e.g. North, East) and distances. To determine which visual features in the environment were used during virtual water maze performance, Mueller et al. [18] recorded eye tracking data during the first 3 s of each trial. While both sexes directed gaze towards distal features of the environment significantly longer than the pool wall or search area, shorter trial latencies in males corresponded with a slightly longer focus on distal cues, and faster visual exploration of the environment early during training. These findings suggest that overall sex differences might arise from the ability of males to faster learn and discriminate important features of the distal environment.

Understanding precisely how distal and proximal cue processing influences behavioural water maze performance is receiving increased attention. While self-localisation within the room at the beginning of a water maze trial must be based on distal room cues, the initial trajectory towards a hidden platform can either be determined only by its spatial relationship to distal cues (place learning), or by combining distal and proximal information to select an initial trajectory towards the hidden platform based on its location relative to the pool wall (directional responding) [8], [9], [10], [11]. Hamilton and colleagues argue that each trial begins with a directional response, followed by a local search for the platform controlled by judging distance to the pool wall. This idea is supported by a series of experiments that examined trajectories on probe trials in which the location of the pool was shifted within the room. In this situation, the absolute location of the learned platform position within the room is placed in competition with the relative location of the platform position within the pool. A trajectory towards the absolute location is consistent with place learning within the room, while a trajectory towards the relative location is consistent with a directional response based on proximal cues provided by the pool wall. They found that rats [9], [10] and humans [11] develop a preference to respond in the relative direction of the platform. Eye tracking data obtained from human subjects during performance of a virtual water maze showed that those subjects able to make direct trajectories to a hidden platform location directed their gaze towards distal cues early in the trial, before gradually shifting focus to the pool wall for the remainder of the trial [11]. In contrast, subjects classified as learning a non-direct strategy directed their gaze towards distal cues for a shorter duration early in the trial, before rapidly shifting focus to the pool wall. Although the authors indicated that a similar proportion of males and females were assigned to direct and non-direct trajectory groups, an analysis directly assessing sex differences was not reported.

The present study assessed if overall differences between human males and females on virtual Morris water maze performance could be attributed to specific components of the trial. New behavioural measures and analysis methods were developed in order to assess initial trajectory and local search performance independently. We hypothesised that males would perform better during initial direction selection, since this behaviour appears dependent on distal cues. It was an open question whether sex differences would be observed to a similar extent when accurate searching becomes more dependent on the pool wall.

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty-two subjects (11 male, age range 18–24; 11 female, age range 18–26) participated in the study. All subjects had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and had not previously taken part in similar research. Prior to testing subjects were required to provide written informed consent to the procedures, which were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Apparatus

A custom virtual environment analogous to the Morris water maze (

Pre-training

Males and females exhibited similar performance during pre-training. Independent t-tests did not reveal any significant differences in the number of search trials (mean ± SE: males = 4.6 ± 0.3, females = 5.3 ± 0.6; p = 0.36) or guess trials (males = 1.4 ± 0.2, females = 2.2 ± 1.8; p = 0.50) required to attain the pre-training accuracy criterion (guess distance error < 3 vru). Guess distance error on the successful guess trial was not statistically different (males = 1.5 ± 0.3 vru, females = 1.9 ± 0.2 vru; p = 0.25). Additional

Discussion

Consistent with previous studies, males exhibited better overall Morris water maze performance than females. This was manifested as faster trial times and a higher success rate. Even when considering only successful trials, males found the hidden target zone faster than females. A novel finding of this study is that the difference in performance between sexes was greater during the initial trajectory phase of the trial compared to the search phase. Males displayed only a small (but

Conclusion

Our results suggest overall sex differences in virtual Morris water maze performance can be attributed to the initial trajectory phase of the trial, where the processing of distal features within the environment is most critical. Smaller differences in performance were observed during the search phase, and on trials which tested spatial learning outside the context of a typical water maze trial. The division of each trial into initial trajectory and search phases, based on the work of Hamilton

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by an interdisciplinary research grant from K.U.Leuven (IDO/06/004). We would like to thank Wim Claeys and Charlotte Vanheukelom for their assistance with data collection.

References (26)

Cited by (81)

  • Sex differences matter: Males and females are equal but not the same

    2023, Physiology and Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    Due to different spatial processing, in navigation tasks, male and female brains use different strategies to solve the same problem. Females tend to rely on landmarks, while males more typically rely on more effective strategies of “dead reckoning”: calculating one's position by estimating the direction and distance traveled [76,77]. Functional MRI studies identified consistent differences in activation patterns during visuospatial tasks reflect a true sex-based difference in visuospatial processing.

  • No influence of mineralocorticoid and glutamatergic NMDA receptor stimulation on spatial learning and memory in individuals with major depression

    2022, Journal of Psychiatric Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    This finding supports the independence of spatial memory from cortisol, aldosterone, and DHEA-S. Finally, a plethora of literature supports sex differences in spatial performance (for example Astur et al., 2004; Driscoll et al., 2005; Piber et al., 2018; Woolley et al., 2010). In our sample, we could not detect differences between males (N = 50) and females (N = 182), which might be due to underpowering (although one has to keep in mind, that the study was not designed to detect sex differences in spatial memory).

  • Recovering Spatial Information through Reactivation: Brain Oxidative Metabolism Involvement in Males and Females

    2021, Neuroscience
    Citation Excerpt :

    Sex differences in the spatial domain have been found in human and rodent studies, showing a better performance of men and male animals (Monfort et al., 2015; Fernandez-Baizan et al., 2019). However, these differences can be confined to the initial phases of training (Woolley et al., 2010; Anderson et al., 2013) and seem to disappear in posterior stages, such as retrieval (Piber et al., 2018), or during reactivation (Flint et al., 2007). Thus, we found similar behavioural results for male and female rats, but a different contribution of brain area specific metabolic demands when animals suffer a spatial amnesia-like behaviour of a previously acquired allocentric memory and also, after re-training.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text