Research reportSex differences in human virtual water maze performance: Novel measures reveal the relative contribution of directional responding and spatial knowledge
Introduction
The Morris water maze is commonly used in rodent research to study the neurobiology of learning and memory (for a review, see [5]). The task requires subjects to learn the spatial position of an escape platform that is located in a circular pool of opaque water and hidden just beneath the surface. The importance and widespread use of the rodent version of the task has prompted an increasing number of researchers to investigate the performance of humans on analogous virtual versions [1], [2], [11], [18], [19], [22].
Previous studies in both rodents [4], [24] and humans [1], [2], [18], [19] suggest males perform better on the water maze compared to females. At present it is unclear which mechanisms underlie this sex difference. Are males better spatial learners, or is the advantage derived from other behavioural aspects of the task important to overall performance? Here, we examined which specific elements of behaviour comprising an individual trial lead to sex differences in human subjects.
In humans, it is well established that males outperform females on measures assessing overall virtual water maze performance. For example, Astur et al. [1], [2] reported that adult males were faster in locating the hidden platform during training, a finding replicated in children [19]. These studies also found that when the platform was removed on a probe trial following training, males displayed a stronger search preference for the former platform quadrant. One potential mechanism mediating apparent sex differences on overall task performance in humans is the extent to which distal features of the environment can be used effectively. Two sources of distal information thought to be important to navigation in the water maze are (1) distal cues, defined as distinct visual features of the environment located outside the pool wall and (2) the geometry of the room in which the pool is located [22]. The pool wall itself and landmarks located within its boundaries can also be used, and are referred to as proximal cues. Sandstrom et al. [22] observed that males performed better than females when the geometry of the room was the only useful source of distal information available. Saucier et al. [23] demonstrated in a real-world navigation task that females preferred using landmark information, whereas males displayed a preference for cardinal directions (e.g. North, East) and distances. To determine which visual features in the environment were used during virtual water maze performance, Mueller et al. [18] recorded eye tracking data during the first 3 s of each trial. While both sexes directed gaze towards distal features of the environment significantly longer than the pool wall or search area, shorter trial latencies in males corresponded with a slightly longer focus on distal cues, and faster visual exploration of the environment early during training. These findings suggest that overall sex differences might arise from the ability of males to faster learn and discriminate important features of the distal environment.
Understanding precisely how distal and proximal cue processing influences behavioural water maze performance is receiving increased attention. While self-localisation within the room at the beginning of a water maze trial must be based on distal room cues, the initial trajectory towards a hidden platform can either be determined only by its spatial relationship to distal cues (place learning), or by combining distal and proximal information to select an initial trajectory towards the hidden platform based on its location relative to the pool wall (directional responding) [8], [9], [10], [11]. Hamilton and colleagues argue that each trial begins with a directional response, followed by a local search for the platform controlled by judging distance to the pool wall. This idea is supported by a series of experiments that examined trajectories on probe trials in which the location of the pool was shifted within the room. In this situation, the absolute location of the learned platform position within the room is placed in competition with the relative location of the platform position within the pool. A trajectory towards the absolute location is consistent with place learning within the room, while a trajectory towards the relative location is consistent with a directional response based on proximal cues provided by the pool wall. They found that rats [9], [10] and humans [11] develop a preference to respond in the relative direction of the platform. Eye tracking data obtained from human subjects during performance of a virtual water maze showed that those subjects able to make direct trajectories to a hidden platform location directed their gaze towards distal cues early in the trial, before gradually shifting focus to the pool wall for the remainder of the trial [11]. In contrast, subjects classified as learning a non-direct strategy directed their gaze towards distal cues for a shorter duration early in the trial, before rapidly shifting focus to the pool wall. Although the authors indicated that a similar proportion of males and females were assigned to direct and non-direct trajectory groups, an analysis directly assessing sex differences was not reported.
The present study assessed if overall differences between human males and females on virtual Morris water maze performance could be attributed to specific components of the trial. New behavioural measures and analysis methods were developed in order to assess initial trajectory and local search performance independently. We hypothesised that males would perform better during initial direction selection, since this behaviour appears dependent on distal cues. It was an open question whether sex differences would be observed to a similar extent when accurate searching becomes more dependent on the pool wall.
Section snippets
Subjects
Twenty-two subjects (11 male, age range 18–24; 11 female, age range 18–26) participated in the study. All subjects had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and had not previously taken part in similar research. Prior to testing subjects were required to provide written informed consent to the procedures, which were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Apparatus
A custom virtual environment analogous to the Morris water maze (
Pre-training
Males and females exhibited similar performance during pre-training. Independent t-tests did not reveal any significant differences in the number of search trials (mean ± SE: males = 4.6 ± 0.3, females = 5.3 ± 0.6; p = 0.36) or guess trials (males = 1.4 ± 0.2, females = 2.2 ± 1.8; p = 0.50) required to attain the pre-training accuracy criterion (guess distance error < 3 vru). Guess distance error on the successful guess trial was not statistically different (males = 1.5 ± 0.3 vru, females = 1.9 ± 0.2 vru; p = 0.25). Additional
Discussion
Consistent with previous studies, males exhibited better overall Morris water maze performance than females. This was manifested as faster trial times and a higher success rate. Even when considering only successful trials, males found the hidden target zone faster than females. A novel finding of this study is that the difference in performance between sexes was greater during the initial trajectory phase of the trial compared to the search phase. Males displayed only a small (but
Conclusion
Our results suggest overall sex differences in virtual Morris water maze performance can be attributed to the initial trajectory phase of the trial, where the processing of distal features within the environment is most critical. Smaller differences in performance were observed during the search phase, and on trials which tested spatial learning outside the context of a typical water maze trial. The division of each trial into initial trajectory and search phases, based on the work of Hamilton
Acknowledgments
Funding for this project was provided by an interdisciplinary research grant from K.U.Leuven (IDO/06/004). We would like to thank Wim Claeys and Charlotte Vanheukelom for their assistance with data collection.
References (26)
- et al.
A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: a large and reliable sex difference
Behav Brain Res
(1998) - et al.
Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation
Behav Brain Res
(2004) - et al.
Contribution of sex differences in the acute stress response to sex differences in water maze performance in the rat
Behav Brain Res
(2004) - et al.
Analysis of spatial orientation strategies of male and female Wistar rats in a Morris water escape task
Behav Brain Res
(2006) - et al.
Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory
Brain Res Brain Res Rev
(2001) - et al.
Sequential control of navigation by locale and taxon cues in the Morris water task
Behav Brain Res
(2004) - et al.
Control of rodent and human spatial navigation by room and apparatus cues
Behav Process
(2009) - et al.
Sex differences, or not, in spatial cognition in albino rats: acute stress is the key
Anim Behav
(2008) - et al.
Gender differences in the mesocorticolimbic system during computer game-play
J Psychiatr Res
(2008) - et al.
Sex differences in the expression and antagonism of swim stress-induced analgesia in deer mice vary with the breeding season
Pain
(1995)
Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment
Behav Brain Res
Sex differences in the antagonism of swim stress-induced analgesia: effects of gonadectomy and estrogen replacement
Pain
Sex differences in a virtual water maze: an eye tracking and pupillometry study
Behav Brain Res
Cited by (82)
Age dependent path integration deficit in 5xFAD mice
2024, Behavioural Brain ResearchSex differences matter: Males and females are equal but not the same
2023, Physiology and BehaviorNo influence of mineralocorticoid and glutamatergic NMDA receptor stimulation on spatial learning and memory in individuals with major depression
2022, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchFunctional neuroanatomy of allocentric remote spatial memory in rodents
2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsEffects of home environment structure on navigation preference and performance: A comparison in Veneto, Italy and Utah, USA
2021, Journal of Environmental Psychology