Research paper
Feasibility, safety, and functional recovery after active rehabilitation in critically ill surgical patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2019.07.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The characteristics of critically ill surgical patients differ from those of medical patients. Few studies have evaluated rehabilitation in surgical intensive care units (SICUs), particularly in non-Western countries and in elderly patients.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the rehabilitation characteristics, safety, and functional recovery in non-Western SICU patients.

Methods

Data from patients who received active rehabilitation in 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical characteristics, functional recovery, and safety were investigated and compared in patients aged <65 or ≥65 years. Potential safety events were also compared between the two age groups and according to the reason for SICU admission.

Results

Data from 157 patients were included in the analysis. The number of patients who were able to stand or walk increased from the beginning of rehabilitation to the time of ICU discharge (from 52 to 102 patients, P < 0.01). The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) score also increased during rehabilitation (from 11.6 to 13.9, P < 0.01). Functional recovery did not differ between the two age groups. During 780 rehabilitation sessions, 23 potential safety events (3.0%) were noted; no significant differences were seen between the two age groups. A significant difference was noted when patients were grouped according to the reason for SICU admission (1.7% in postoperative care patients vs 4.5% in patients admitted for other reasons, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Active rehabilitation in critically ill surgical patients is feasible and safe and resulted in improved mobility, regardless of age. However, the reason for SICU admission should be considered.

Introduction

The survival rate of patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) has improved with advancements in ICU treatments. However, ICU survivors often develop physical, cognitive, and mental health disabilities after discharge, which is described as post–intensive care syndrome.[1], [2], [3], [4] Although early physical rehabilitation therapy can prevent or improve post–intensive care syndrome,[5], [6], [7], [8] it can be difficult to implement in the ICU environment because of a lack of specialised teams, equipment, and information, as well as concerns regarding safety.[9], [10], [11], [12], [13]

The majority of previous studies of ICU rehabilitation have been conducted on critically ill medical patients,[7], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20] with few studies conducted on critically ill surgical patients.[21], [22], [23], [24] Several studies have also been performed in mixed ICUs,[25], [26], [27], [28] but the characteristics may be different from those of surgical intensive care units (SICUs). In comparison with medical patients, those in SICUs have different reasons for admission and problems associated with their surgery, such as surgical wounds, postoperative pain, and medical comorbidities. Because of these, the rehabilitation environment, progression, feasibility, and safety in the SICU may differ from those in the medical ICU (MICU). Furthermore, most of the previous studies reporting the safety and feasibility of ICU rehabilitation were performed in well-organised ICU rehabilitation environments. However, ICU resources, such as healthcare personnel and equipment, are limited in many non-Western ICUs. Therefore, the results of previous studies may not reflect the real-world situation and the feasibility and characteristics of ICU rehabilitation require further investigation.[11], [29]

As the elderly population is growing, the proportion of older patients in the ICU is also increasing. These patients may be more vulnerable in a critical care environment and have less potential for recovery.15 Therefore, the feasibility and safety of early rehabilitation may differ from that seen in younger patients. However, few studies have focused on this issue and no studies have been conducted to evaluate the characteristics of rehabilitation according to age in SICU patients.

In the present study, the rehabilitation characteristics, functional recovery, and potential safety events in patients treated in an SICU of a teaching hospital in Korea were investigated. In addition, these parameters were assessed in patients aged <65 or ≥65 years

Section snippets

Clinical characteristics

Data from patients admitted to the SICU of the Asan Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. The SICU is a 14-bed unit, and 500 patients are admitted annually, mainly from general surgery. The SICU also receives patients from orthopaedic surgery, plastic surgery, and urology and gynaecology departments. Patients who underwent liver transplantation were not included because they were treated in a separate ICU. Patients were required to have been treated in the SICU for at least three days

Patient characteristics

During the study period, 157 patients (59.9% male, 40.1% female) were eligible for inclusion in the study; 121 patients (77.1%) received mechanical ventilation; and the average mechanical ventilation time was 12.3 days (11.9 days in those aged < 65 and 12.6 days in those aged ≥65 years). The most common causes of SICU admission were routine postoperative care (59.2%), respiratory failure (18.5%), and septic shock (9.6%). The type of surgery categories were as follows: gastrointestinal, 38;

Discussion

The present study is the first to demonstrate that early active rehabilitation is feasible and safe in an SICU environment in Korea. Although the reason for SICU admission and associated problems differ from those of the MICU, SICU patients were also able to tolerate rehabilitation and showed functional improvement, regardless of age. A previous randomised controlled study of early, goal-directed mobilisation in the SICU showed improved mobilisation throughout the period of SICU treatment,

Conclusion

Active rehabilitation in critically ill surgical patients is feasible and safe regardless of age, although the patient's safety should be checked before treatment. Standing ability and mobility improved during rehabilitation in both age groups (<65 or ≥ 65 years). However, care should be taken when the reason for SICU admission is not routine postoperative care.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning(NRF-2017R1A2B2005321).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yu Jin Seo: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Sae Rom Park: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Jung Hoon Lee: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Chul Jung: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Kyoung Hyo Choi: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Suk-Kyung Hong: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Won Kim: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.

References (38)

  • D.M. Needham et al.

    Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference

    Crit Care Med

    (2012)
  • A. Marra et al.

    Co-occurrence of post-intensive care syndrome problems among 406 survivors of critical illness

    Crit Care Med

    (2018)
  • J.H. Maley et al.

    Resilience in survivors of critical illness in the context of the survivors' experience and recovery

    Ann Am Thorac Soc.

    (2016)
  • P.P. Pandharipande et al.

    Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness

    N Engl J Med

    (2013)
  • M.C. Balas et al.

    Effectiveness and safety of the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle

    Crit Care Med

    (2014)
  • A. Morandi et al.

    Sedation, delirium and mechanical ventilation: the 'ABCDE' approach

    Curr Opin Crit Care

    (2011)
  • P. Nydahl et al.

    Safety of patient mobilization and rehabilitation in the intensive care unit. Systematic review with meta-analysis

    Ann Am Thorac Soc.

    (2017)
  • G. Bourdin et al.

    The feasibility of early physical activity in intensive care unit patients: a prospective observational one-center study

    Respir Care

    (2010)
  • J. Adler et al.

    Early mobilization in the intensive care unit: a systematic review

    Cardiopulm Phys Ther J

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text