Elsevier

Aquatic Toxicology

Volume 156, November 2014, Pages 269-273
Aquatic Toxicology

Aquatic toxicology of fluoxetine: Understanding the knowns and the unknowns

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.08.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Fluoxetine is one of the most prescribed psychotropic medications, and is an agent of increasing interest for environmental toxicology. Fish and other aquatic organisms are excellent models to study neuroactive small molecules like fluoxetine. However, prone to variance due to experimental factors, data obtained in these models need to be interpreted with caution, using proper experimental protocols, study designs, validated endpoints as well as well-established models and tests. Choosing the treatment protocol and dose range for fluoxetine and other serotonergic drugs is critical for obtaining valid test results and correct data interpretation. Here we discuss the value of aquatic models to study fluoxetine effects, based on prior high-quality research, and outline the directions of future translational studies in the field. We review fluoxetine-evoked phenotypes in acute vs. chronic protocols, discussing them in the contact of complex role of serotonin in behavioral regulation. We conclude that zebrafish and other aquatic models represent a useful in-vivo tool for fluoxetine pharmacology and (eco)toxicology research.

Introduction

Fluoxetine (Prozac) is a potent psychotropic drug, acting as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to block the plasma membrane serotonin transporter, SERT (Fabbri et al., 2014, Kalueff et al., 2010, Murphy and Lesch, 2008, Stewart et al., 2013). SSRIs are currently the most prescribed psychotropic medications, and fluoxetine is the most commonly used SSRI. Therefore, fluoxetine has rapidly become one of the most important drugs in biomedicine. With the growing number of disorders treated by fluoxetine/SSRIs (from anxiety to depression and obsessions), both the annual intake and the number of patients taking these drugs, are rapidly rising. In addition to desired antidepressant effects, this also results in increased incidence of serotonin toxicity—a potentially lethal toxidrome associated with an overdose and/or combination of serotonergic drugs (Bertorini, 1997, Haberzettl et al., 2013, Kalueff et al., 2008). Paralleling clinical data, multiple experimental animal models, ranging from rodents (Haberzettl et al., 2013, Kalueff et al., 2008, Kalueff et al., 2010) to aquatic species (Egan et al., 2009, Stewart et al., 2013), have been developed to address various aspects of SSRI antidepressant action and toxicity.

Because of their increasing usage globally, fluoxetine and other SSRIs also represent a growing concern for environmental biology and aquatic toxicology (Brooks, 2014, Clements and Schreck, 2007, Dzieweczynski and Hebert, 2012, Fent et al., 2006, Fernandes et al., 2011, Kohlert et al., 2012, Lajeunesse et al., 2011, Mennigen et al., 2010a, Mennigen et al., 2010b, Mennigen et al., 2011, Morando et al., 2009, Ramirez et al., 2009, Schultz et al., 2010, Schultz et al., 2011, Silva et al., 2014, Sumpter et al., 2014, Sumpter and Margiotta-Casaluci, 2014, Weinberger and Klaper, 2014, Winder et al., 2012).

We have read with interest a recent thoughtful paper in this Journal by Sumpter and colleagues, evaluating the potency of fluoxetine in various aquatic species (Sumpter et al., 2014). As we welcome in-depth analyses of pharmacology and toxicology of this drug (Sumpter and Margiotta-Casaluci, 2014), the field may benefit from further critical discussion of this topic.

Our present contribution to this discussion will be limited to zebrafish (Danio rerio), an aquatic vertebrate species we have worked with extensively, testing SSRIs. This species also represents an excellent model for translational neuroscience of complex human brain disorders (Kalueff et al., 2014a, Kalueff et al., 2014b, Stewart et al., 2014), and is particularly useful for studying genetic (Griffiths et al., 2012, Ziv et al., 2012) and pharmacological mechanisms (Nguyen et al., 2014) of depression and antidepressant action. Finally, zebrafish have been suggested as a sensitive in-vivo neurotoxicological and ecotoxicological screen for various serotonergic drugs, including fluoxetine and other SSRIs (Grossman et al., 2010, Maximino et al., 2013a, Neelkantan et al., 2013, Sackerman et al., 2010, Stewart et al., 2011a, Stewart et al., 2013).

Section snippets

Effects of fluoxetine: lessons from anxious fish

An important distinction should be made, when one tries to understand the effects of fluoxetine in-vivo, between acute and chronic treatments. Acute treatment is not of main interest for translational research, because fluoxetine does not produce therapeutic effects acutely, but may trigger toxicity at high doses (Kalueff et al., 2008, Murphy and Lesch, 2008, Stewart et al., 2013). At the same time, acute fluoxetine treatment can be used as an important neuropharmacological tool, to modulate

Know thy dose: more lessons from fish on Prozac

One of the favorite questions in pharmacology and toxicology research deals with doses, stemming from Paracelsius’ famous notion that “poison is in everything, and nothing is without poison: the dose makes it either a poison or a remedy”. Analyzing fluoxetine doses used in various studies, one can expect the effective concentrations of fluoxetine to be similar for different exposure protocols, species, age groups and treatment durations (Sumpter et al., 2014). In contrast, we think that these

Understanding the knowns and the unknowns

Clearly, critical analyses of model's strengths and limitations are important (Bruni et al., 2014, Maximino et al., 2014a, Sumpter et al., 2014, Zakhary et al., 2011), but they must be fair to both Science and the models. For example, concerns regarding the lack of replication of fluoxetine effects (Sumpter et al., 2014) may not be that problematic, because one can expect that such studies, like in any other area of research, used multi-step validation and replication before publishing. For

Concluding remarks

In summary, we are more optimistic, than our esteemed colleagues (Sumpter et al., 2014), regarding the current status and the developing utility of aquatic models for SSRI pharmacology and toxicology. For example, we note a remarkable potential of zebrafish and other aquatic models for screening serotonergic small molecules, such as fluoxetine and other SSRIs. The limitations (Sumpter et al., 2014), which certainly exist with any animal model, are outweighed by a large number of potential

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. AVK is the Director of the ZENEREI Institute and Chair of the International Zebrafish Neuroscience Research Consortium (ZNRC).

References (86)

  • L. Grossman et al.

    Characterization of behavioral and endocrine effects of LSD on zebrafish

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2010)
  • R. Haberzettl et al.

    Animal models of the serotonin syndrome: a systematic review

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2013)
  • A.V. Kalueff et al.

    Perspectives on genetic animal models of serotonin toxicity

    Neurochem. Int.

    (2008)
  • A.V. Kalueff et al.

    Conserved role for the serotonin transporter gene in rat and mouse neurobehavioral endophenotypes

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2010)
  • A.V. Kalueff et al.

    Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (2014)
  • A.V. Kalueff et al.

    What's wrong with my mouse model?. Advances and strategies in animal modeling of anxiety and depression

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2007)
  • D. Kokel et al.

    Using the zebrafish photomotor response for psychotropic drug screening

    Methods Cell Biol.

    (2011)
  • D. Kokel et al.

    Behavioral barcoding in the cloud: embracing data-intensive digital phenotyping in neuropharmacology

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • A. Lajeunesse et al.

    Distribution of antidepressants and their metabolites in brook trout exposed to municipal wastewaters before and after ozone treatment—evidence of biological effects

    Chemosphere

    (2011)
  • S. Mahabir et al.

    Strain dependent neurochemical changes induced by embryonic alcohol exposure in zebrafish

    Neurotoxicol. Teratol.

    (2014)
  • C. Maximino et al.

    Pharmacological analysis of zebrafish (Danio rerio) scototaxis

    Progr. Neuro-psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • C. Maximino et al.

    Parametric analyses of anxiety in zebrafish scototaxis

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2010)
  • C. Maximino et al.

    Role of serotonin in zebrafish (Danio rerio) anxiety: relationship with serotonin levels and effect of buspirone, WAY 100635, SB 224289, fluoxetine and para-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA) in two behavioral models

    Neuropharmacology

    (2013)
  • J.A. Mennigen et al.

    Waterborne fluoxetine disrupts the reproductive axis in sexually mature male goldfish Carassius auratus

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2010)
  • J.A. Mennigen et al.

    Waterborne fluoxetine disrupts feeding and energy metabolism in the goldfish Carassius auratus

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2010)
  • M.B. Morando et al.

    Fluoxetine treatment affects nitrogen waste excretion and osmoregulation in a marine teleost fish

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2009)
  • Y. Pan et al.

    Strain dependent gene expression and neurochemical levels in the brain of zebrafish: focus on a few alcohol related targets

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2012)
  • J.T. Pittman et al.

    iPhone(R) applications as versatile video tracking tools to analyze behavior in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

    Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav.

    (2013)
  • J.T. Pittman et al.

    Startle response memory and hippocampal changes in adult zebrafish pharmacologically-induced to exhibit anxiety/depression-like behaviors

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2014)
  • H. Richendrfer et al.

    On the edge: pharmacological evidence for anxiety-related behavior in zebrafish larvae

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2012)
  • M.M. Schultz et al.

    Selective uptake and biological consequences of environmentally relevant antidepressant pharmaceutical exposures on male fathead minnows

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2011)
  • L.J. Silva et al.

    A one-year follow-up analysis of antidepressants in Portuguese wastewaters: occurrence and fate, seasonal influence, and risk assessment

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2014)
  • A. Stewart et al.

    Pharmacological modulation of anxiety-like phenotypes in adult zebrafish behavioral models

    Progr. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • A.M. Stewart et al.

    Zebrafish models for translational neuroscience research: from tank to bedside

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • A.M. Stewart et al.

    Perspectives on experimental models of serotonin syndrome in zebrafish

    Neurochem. Int.

    (2013)
  • J.P. Sumpter et al.

    The apparently very variable potency of the anti-depressant fluoxetine

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2014)
  • J.P. Sumpter et al.

    Are some invertebrates exquisitely sensitive to the human pharmaceutical fluoxetine?

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2014)
  • S. Tran et al.

    Individual differences in activity levels in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2013)
  • J. Weinberger et al.

    Environmental concentrations of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine impact specific behaviors involved in reproduction, feeding and predator avoidance in the fish Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow)

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2014)
  • K. Wong et al.

    Analyzing habituation responses to novelty in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2010)
  • M.S. Abreu et al.

    Diazepam and fluoxetine decrease the stress response in zebrafish

    PloS One

    (2014)
  • K.R. Bailey et al.

    Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice: practical concerns and potential pitfalls

    ILAR J./Natl. Res. Council, Instit. Lab. Animal Resources

    (2006)
  • R.E. Blaser et al.

    Measures of anxiety in zebrafish (Danio rerio): dissociation of black/white preference and novel tank test

    PloS One

    (2012)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Effects of fluoxetine on fish: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?

      2023, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      This event is called serotonin syndrome or toxidrome and is potentially lethal and associated with an overdose and/or combination of serotonergic drugs (Haberzettl et al., 2013; Kalueff et al., 2008). There are two relevant review articles with fluoxetine, one by Sumpter and colleagues, addressing the effects of this drug in aquatic vertebrate and invertebrate species (Sumpter et al., 2014) and another by Stewart and colleagues, limited to studies with zebrafish (Danio rerio) (Stewart et al., 2014). However, these papers focus primarily on behavioral-level effects.

    • Adapting classic paradigms to analyze alterations of shoal-wide behavior in early-life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio) – A case study with fluoxetine

      2023, Neurotoxicology and Teratology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given its well-described anxiolytic effect in novel tank tests (Cachat et al., 2011; Egan et al., 2009; Wong et al., 2010), the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine was selected for this proof-of-concept study. As a drug widely prescribed as an antidepressant, fluoxetine has continuously been discharged into the environment (Stewart et al., 2014b; Tisler et al., 2019; Zindler et al., 2019, 2020b, 2020a), where it is not readily photolyzed or microbially degraded, but rapidly adsorbs to sediments (Kwon and Armbrust, 2006). The novel tank test, also known as “novel open tank task” or “novel tank diving test” (Blaser and Gerlai, 2006; Rosemberg et al., 2011), records reactions of fish to an unknown environment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text