Elsevier

Aquatic Toxicology

Volume 72, Issue 4, 15 May 2005, Pages 351-360
Aquatic Toxicology

Hydrogen peroxide is not the cause of fish kills associated with Chattonella marina: Cytological and physiological evidence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.01.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Chattonella marina, a harmful algal bloom (HAB) causative species, was used to study the mortality, physiology, and pathology of a marine stenohaline fish, goldlined seabream exposed to the toxic alga. The median lethal time (LT50) was 3 h upon exposure to 8000 cells/ml of C. marina. Significant induction of filamental chloride cells (CCs) [i.e. increases in CC fractional area and in the volume density of CCs], concomitant with significant reduction of blood osmolality, were found in C. marina treated fish. To verify whether the toxicity of C. marina was mediated through oxidative stress, a hydrogen peroxide exposure experiment was carried out and the toxicity as well as cytological and physiological changes were compared with the C. marina treatment. Hydrogen peroxide at a concentration of 500 μM H2O2, (i.e. 25 times higher than that produced by 8000 cells/ml of C. marina (20 μM H2O2)) was unable to induce similar CC alterations and osmoregulatory impairment in fish as observed in the C. marina treatment. Non-specific membrane damage such as severe loss of microvilli projections on the CC apical opening and rupture of epithelial membranes in the lamellae were observed. The LT50 was 6 h, two times longer than that with 8000 cells/ml of C. marina. Based on the cytological and physiological evidence and toxicity data, the mechanism by which C. marina kills fish appears to be very different from that caused by H2O2/ROS. Osmoregulatory distress is the major cause of fish death upon exposure to C. marina.

Introduction

Global increases in the frequency and severity of harmful algal blooms (HABs) have posed a significant threat to the world's coastal environment (Anderson, 1989, Hallegraeff, 1993, Landsberg, 2002). The raphidophycean flagellates, particularly Chattonella marina, have caused massive fish kills worldwide, including in Hong Kong, Japan, Canada and Australia (Hallegraeff et al., 1998, Tiffany et al., 2001, Landsberg, 2002).

Over the past decade, reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been considered a likely mechanism for fish kills by raphidophytes. Laboratory studies repeatedly demonstrated that C. marina generates the highest levels of ROS, such as superoxide anion (O2radical dot) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), compared to other raphidophytes (Oda et al., 1992a, Oda et al., 1994, Oda et al., 1995, Oda et al., 1997, Oda et al., 1998, Shimada et al., 1991, Shimada et al., 1993, Tanaka et al., 1994). The ROS produced by C. marina inhibited the growth of the bacterium Vibrio alginolyticus in culture (Oda et al., 1992b, Oda et al., 1997). Ishimatsu, 1996, Ishimatsu, 1996 reported a correlation between the ability of C. marina cells to produce O2radical dot (determined by cytochrome c reduction) and their toxicity to yellowtails (Seriola quinqueradiata). However, no measurements were made on the levels of ROS produced during exposure and the authors did not provide experimental evidence to demonstrate the casual relationship between ROS production by C. marina and fish mortality. Thus, it is not known if the observed fish mortalities were actually caused by ROS.

ROS-mediated gill tissue damage has often been claimed to be the major cause of fish kills by C. marina. For instance, studies by Ishimatsu et al. (1997) and Kim et al. (2001) postulated that fish gill mucus would induce O2radical dot generation from the glycocalyx of flagellates. Sustained O2radical dot generation due to mucus and glycocalyx interactions may then cause severe damage to gill tissue. Marshall et al. (2003) proposed that the high levels of ROS produced by C. marina (in the presence of free fatty acid) would trigger lipid peroxidative damage of gill membranes, resulting in reduced respiratory and osmoregulatory capacity. However, none of the above studies nor any studies to date have provided direct cytological evidence to demonstrate that the levels of ROS produced by C. marina are sufficient to trigger significant gill damage, and subsequent osmoregulatory and/or respiratory impairments and eventual fish mortality.

The toxicity of ROS to biological systems has been well documented (Fridovich, 1978; Cunningham and Capone, 1992). Given that ROS-induced lipid peroxidation may lead to destruction of membrane integrity (Cunningham and Capone, 1992), if the amount of ROS produced by C. marina is sufficiently high, oxidative damage of gill epithelia would probably occur. Powell and Perry (1997) reported hypertrophy of epithelial cells and thickening of gill lamella when rainbow trout were exposed to high doses of H2O2 (100–500 mg/l) for 6 h.

Our recent quantitative cytological studies (Tang and Au, 2003, Tang and Au, 2004) have clearly demonstrated significant induction of chloride cells (number and size) in the gills of moribund goldlined seabream (Rhabdosargus sarba) exposed to C. marina, and the resulting cytological changes were similar to gill chloride cells undergoing active ions excretion. A concomitant 70% reduction of blood osmolality was also detected in the moribund fish (Tang and Au, 2004).

To decipher whether ROS is the cause of toxicity by C. marina, we investigated gill cytopathology and osmolality of fish exposed to a bloom concentration of C. marina (8000 cell/ml), and compared to fish exposed to added ROS at a concentration similar to that released by C. marina. Information obtained from this study will help to elucidate the role of ROS in the toxicity of C. marina, which is important for risk assessment and management of this HAB species.

Section snippets

Fish maintenance

The goldlined seabream Rhabdosargus sarba is an active pelagic species widely distributed in China, Japan, Australia and the Indo-West Pacific (Bauchot and Smith, 1984). Fish (body weight: 180 ± 20 g, fork length: 20 ± 5 cm) purchased from a local fish farm in Sai Kung, New Territories, were acclimated in the laboratory with running seawater for at least 7 days prior to experiments.

C. marina exposure

C. marina (Subrahmanyan) Hara et Chihara (NIES-3) stock culture was kindly provided by the National Institute of

Fish mortality and behavioural changes

When fish were exposed to 8000 cells/ml of C. marina, mortality started to occur after 1 h, and increased thereafter. The median lethal time (LT50) was 3 h. In the exposure experiment with 500 μM H2O2, the LT50 was 6 h. No mortality occurred in either the seawater control or the D. tertiolecta control throughout the two experiments.

Upon exposure to C. marina, fish immediately developed a subdued fright response but resumed normal behavior after ca. 10 min. The moribund fish appeared sluggish,

Discussion

Even though the peak concentration of H2O2 (20 μM) in the 8000 cell/ml C. marina treatment was 25 times lower than that in the 500 μM H2O2 treatment, fish mortality in the presence of C. marina (LT50 = 3h) was two times faster than that of the H2O2 treatment (LT50 = 6h), suggesting H2O2 alone is not sufficient to explain the high ichthyotoxicity of C. marina. The claim that ROS are the principal toxic agents in fish kills associated with C. marina is thus doubtful.

Importantly, the present study

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council (Project No. 9040547 CityU 1105/00M) and a grant from the University Grants Committee (Project No. AoE/P-04/04) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. Support for D. Anderson was also provided by the US National Science Foundation through grant no. OCE-0136861. Appreciations go to Professor M. Watanabe for providing us the toxic C. marina strain from the NIES, and all the staff in the

References (35)

  • Hallegraeff, G.M., Munday, B.L., Baden, D.G., Whitney, P.L., 1998. C. marina raphidophyte bloom associated with...
  • C.V. Howard et al.

    Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy

    (1998)
  • Ishimatsu 1996. Oxygen radicals are probably involved in the mortality of yellowtail by C. marina. Fish. Sci. 62,...
  • A. Ishimatsu et al.

    Histological analysis of the mechanisms of Chattonella-induced hypoxemia in yellowtail

    Fish. Sci.

    (1996)
  • A. Ishimatsu et al.

    A comparison of physiological responses in yellowtail to fatal environmental hypoxia and exposure to C. marina

    Fish. Sci.

    (1997)
  • S. Khan et al.

    Properties of neurotoxins separated from harmful red tide organism C. marina

    Israeli J. Aquacult. – Bamidgeh

    (1995)
  • D. Kim et al.

    Possible involvement of the glycocalyx in the ichthyotoxicity of C. marina (Raphidophyceae): immunological approach using antiserum against cell surface structures of the flagellate

    Mar. Biol.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Hydrogen peroxide in seahorse aquaculture: Determining safe exposure levels using non-invasive biomarkers of stress

      2023, Aquaculture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Considering that low swimming activity and predominantly benthic behavior are described for species belonging to the genus in the field, an increase in activity in a stress state was expected. As we will discuss below, even low hydrogen peroxide concentrations can cause gill or skin damage (Speare et al., 1999; Tang et al., 2005). The increase in activity and opercular beats, besides being stress indicators, may also demonstrate that the animal has a reduced respiratory function (Powell and Perry, 1997; Mansour et al., 2020; Wood and Eom, 2021).

    • A review of karenia mikimotoi: Bloom events, physiology, toxicity and toxic mechanism

      2019, Harmful Algae
      Citation Excerpt :

      Oda et al. (1992) suggested that the ROS produced by C. marina trigger an over-reactive defence response in the fish gill. However, research has shown that the fish kills caused by C. marina might be more accurately attributed to ichthyotoxins, rather than to ROS such as H2O2, which barely affects the fish gill directly at the bloom concentration (Tang et al., 2007, 2005). Like C. marina, K. mikimotoi is both ichthyotoxic and capable of generating ROS, although ROS in most K. mikimotoi strains are at concentrations less than those in C. marina (Zou et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text