Elsevier

Applied Surface Science

Volume 487, 1 September 2019, Pages 1176-1188
Applied Surface Science

Full length article
Targeted plasma functionalization of titanium inhibits polymicrobial biofilm recolonization and stimulates cell function

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.153Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Low temperature plasma simultaneously decontaminates and functionalizes titanium.

  • Plasma exposure creates nanoscale features and superhydrophilic characteristics.

  • Plasma exposure is highly effective in eliminating polymicrobial biofilms.

  • Plasma treated surface inhibits microbial recolonization and biofilm formation.

  • Biocompatibility improved through enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation.

Abstract

Biofilm contamination on an implanted medical device represents a particularity resilient reservoir of infection that inevitably leads to device failure. In this study, we demonstrate that an atmospheric pressure air plasma treatment can simultaneously eradicate biofilm contamination while beneficially functionalizing the underlying surface, creating long-lasting characteristics that inhibit microbial recolonization and promote fibroblast proliferation. By comparing two contrasting plasma treatments the interplay between plasma generated reactive species, biofilm contamination and the underlying surface was uncovered. The composition, wettability and topography of titanium surfaces were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, water contact angle measurements and atomic force microscopy. Exposure to plasma generated chemical species created nanoscale surface features and the introduction of oxygen and nitrogen containing functional groups, resulting in changes to the surface wettability. Using a polymicrobial biofilm model comprising of E. coli and S. epidermidis, it was shown that plasma can effectively eliminate biofilm contamination from the surface, while simultaneously functionalizing the surface to inhibit recolonization. To assess the biocompatibility of treated surfaces the adhesion and proliferation of murine fibroblasts was assessed using fluorescent microscopy, cell viability assays and flow cytometry. It was shown that plasma exposure led to surface characteristics that promote fibroblast adhesion and proliferation.

Introduction

In natural and manmade environments, bacterial biofilms are ubiquitous, yet the significance of biofilm contamination in a clinical setting is often underestimated [1]. Biofilms have a complex architecture, with physiologically organized bacterial microcolonies. It is the structure and organization of the biofilm that conveys numerous advantages over unprotected planktonic cells, providing protection against immune system defense and the diffusion of antibiotics. Several studies have posited that resistance against antimicrobial agents in a biofilm can be up to 1000 times greater compared to single cells [2]. Such contamination presents a particularly virulent form of infection and provides ideal conditions for the emergence of multidrug-resistant colonies. A plethora of life-threatening infections can arise as a result of biofilm formation on indwelling and implanted medical devices, such as urinary catheters, mechanical heart valves, prosthetic joints and endotracheal tubes [3]. In the field of orthopedics, infections related to biofilm colonization of prosthetic devices are one of the most serious and devastating complications. In such cases, complex and expensive revision procedures are typically required, often involving an attempt to clean the device in-vivo or its complete removal and replacement [4]. Despite the incidence of such cases being relatively low, estimated to be in the range of 0.5–5% for total joint replacements, the large population of patients with orthopedic implants means such infections have a major impact in terms of morbidity, mortality and medical costs [5].

One of the most common bacterial species linked to orthopedic implant-related infections are coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species. >40% of all infections are linked to species from this Gram-positive bacterial genus, with S. epidermidis and S. aureus being the most commonly diagnosed bacteria in implant related infections [6]. Infections often arise because the surface of the implanted device provides an ideal environment for bacterial adhesion and the formation of biofilms, which can reach a thickness of >100 mm in some cases [7]. Orthopedic implant infections can develop during different stages of a patient's medical treatment; pre-operatively, when infections are associated with fraction fixation, intra-operatively and during the post-operative period, mainly because of abnormal wound healing. The development of biofilms on an implant surface is a highly dynamic and competitive process, involving different constituents, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, host cells (endothelial cells, fibroblast, bone cells) and microorganisms. Initially, the adsorption of proteins and macromolecules of ECM occurs, and under normal physiological conditions, these components govern the adhesion, migration, proliferation and differentiation of tissue cells. In the case of implanted material, ECM bound on the surface can also act as a substrate for bacterial attachment thus a competitive process is initiated. A positive surgical outcome relies on the ability of fibroblast to adhere and proliferate on the surface of implant, rather than bacterial colonization and ultimately biofilm formation [8].

A number of different technologies are currently under investigation to inhibit biofilm formation on implanted devices. Certainly, the deposition of functional coatings on to devices prior to implantation has shown promise, with drug eluting coatings [[9], [10], [11]], bactericidal coatings [[12], [13], [14]], adhesion resistant chemistries [15,16], and nano-topologies all demonstrating the potential to prevent device colonization [17,18]. While these approaches are highly successful in vitro, it is not clear how effective they are in vivo or how they affect clinical outcomes. Alternative approaches focusing on the in-situ cleaning of a contaminated device are also under investigation, including the use of electrical stimulation on the orthopedic implant surface [19,20], applied pulsed electromagnetic fields [21], laser-generated shockwaves [22] and sonication [23]. Such methods typically rely on a mechanical mode of action to remove adhered bacteria from the implant surface; clearly, these methods are highly successful ex-vivo, but their application in-vivo is problematic meaning recurrent infections are unavoidable [7].

Low temperature plasma is an alternative technique that has shown great promise for both the surface functionalization of medical implants and the rapid decontamination of biofilms on clinical surfaces. Low and atmospheric pressure plasmas have long been used to functionalize biomaterials [24], including the creation of protein-resistant surfaces [25], the modification of surfaces to promote haemocompatibility and encourage cell adhesion [26,27], and the introduction of antimicrobial characteristics [28]. Beyond surface functionalization, low temperature plasma has been used to remove microbial contamination from a wide range of biomaterials [29], including the destruction of biofilms from both polymeric and metallic surfaces [[30], [31], [32]]. Developments within the field of atmospheric pressure plasma technology have enabled the creation of plasma devices capable of creating stable discharges in ambient air that produce controlled mixtures of highly Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species (RONS) directly at the point of need. While the interplay between the plasma, biofilm contamination and the underlying surface is complex and not yet fully understood, there exists an exciting possibility that such plasmas could be used to simultaneously decontaminate and functionalize an implant surface in-vivo, thus removing the infection while imparting preferential surface characteristics to promote cell attachment and inhibit bacterial recolonization.

In this study, we investigated the surface treatment of medical grade titanium using two common atmospheric pressure air plasma systems. By comparing and contrasting the unique characteristics of each plasma treatment, their ability to inactivate polymicrobial biofilms while simultaneously imparting long-lasting antimicrobial and cell-promoting characteristics over timescales that are relevant for post-surgery wound healing were uncovered. It was demonstrated that a direct plasma treatment, where highly reactive RONS interact with the titanium surface, had a significant and beneficial impact on both the composition and morphology of the surface while being able to simultaneously eliminate biofilm contamination. The study unravels the complex interaction between biofilm contamination and the underpinning surface during and after plasma treatment; ultimately demonstrating that a targeted air plasma treatment can be successfully applied to decontaminate and functionalize a titanium surface in a single step. These results suggest that a targeted air plasma treatment could play a considerable role in the fight against implant-associated infections.

Section snippets

Titanium sample preparation

Commercially available titanium coupons with a diameter of 12.7 mm were obtained from Bio Surface Technology Corp. (Bozeman, MT, USA). Prior to testing, all coupons were polished to a high finish using Chemical-Mechanical Planarization (CMP). Following polishing, samples were washed with absolute ethanol in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min and autoclaved under standard autoclaving conditions before biological experiments.

Plasma treatment

To treat the titanium samples two contrasting plasma devices were utilized,

Influence of plasma treatment on surface wettability of titanium surfaces

Measurements of WCA showed that the exposure of titanium surfaces to plasma induced significant changes in surface hydrophilicity, shown in Fig. 2(a) and (b). The surface of untreated titanium samples was found to be hydrophobic in nature, with a WCA value >70°. Following indirect plasma treatment, the wettability of the surface increased, reaching approximately 40–45° regardless of treatment duration. For direct plasma treatment, a drastic change in wettability was observed; ultimately leading

Discussion

Despite over 100 years of progress in orthopedic surgical practice and prosthetic device design, implant-associated infections remain a major complication, with polymicrobial biofilms being a primary cause of implant failure [43]. There is a clear clinical need to develop new strategies to prevent the colonization of devices as and when they are implanted and to uncover new techniques to assist in minimizing the impact of infection on implanted devices that are already in-use. To address this

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that different scenarios of low temperature plasma treatment have markedly different impacts on the ability of polymicrobial biofilms to form and fibroblast cells to proliferate on titanium surfaces. While both plasma treatments were shown to be highly effective in eliminating biofilms from the surface, only a direct plasma treatment was able to induce beneficial and long-lasting changes to the surface composition and morphology. To unravel the interaction

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. Gregor Jakša for his support with the XPS measurements. JLW, MM, JK and UC acknowledge the support of the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Project EP/N021347/1), the EU COST AMiCI action (CA15114) and Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P2-0082).

References (64)

  • N.P. Rhodes et al.

    The effect of gas plasma modification on platelet and contact phase activation processes

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • M. Zelzer et al.

    Investigation of cell–surface interactions using chemical gradients formed from plasma polymers

    Biomaterials

    (2008)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Plasma surface modification of poly vinyl chloride for improvement of antibacterial properties

    Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • O. Lunov et al.

    The interplay between biological and physical scenarios of bacterial death induced by non-thermal plasma

    Biomaterials

    (2016)
  • P.B. Flynn et al.

    Bactericidal efficacy of atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma (APNTP) against the ESKAPE pathogens

    Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents

    (2015)
  • K. Duske et al.

    Cold atmospheric plasma in combination with mechanical treatment improves osteoblast growth on biofilm covered titanium discs

    Biomaterials

    (2015)
  • M. Modic et al.

    Cold atmospheric pressure plasma elimination of clinically important single- and mixed-species biofilms

    Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents

    (2017)
  • J.L. Walsh et al.

    Portable nanosecond pulsed air plasma jet

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2011)
  • J.S. Dalton et al.

    Photocatalytic oxidation of NOx gases using TiO2: a surface spectroscopic approach

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2002)
  • N.R. James et al.

    Surface thiocyanation of plasticized poly(vinyl chloride) and its effect on bacterial adhesion

    Biomaterials

    (2003)
  • A. Tripathy et al.

    Natural and bioinspired nanostructured bactericidal surfaces

    Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci.

    (2017)
  • K. Anselme

    Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials

    Biomaterials

    (2000)
  • L. Bacakova et al.

    Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants

    Biotechnol. Adv.

    (2011)
  • V. Chaurey et al.

    Nanofiber size-dependent sensitivity of fibroblast directionality to the methodology for scaffold alignment

    Acta Biomater.

    (2012)
  • M. Modic et al.

    Aging of plasma treated surfaces and their effects on platelet adhesion and activation

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2012)
  • R.L. Williams et al.

    Stability of plasma-treated silicone rubber and its influence on the interfacial aspects of blood compatibility

    Biomaterials

    (2004)
  • D. Davies

    Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents

    Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2003)
  • D.A. Zaruta et al.

    Indications and guidelines for debridement and implant retention for periprosthetic hip and knee infection

    Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med.

    (2018)
  • W. Zimmerli et al.

    Prosthetic-joint infections

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2004)
  • A. Connaughton et al.

    Biofilm disrupting technology for orthopedic implants: what's on the horizon?

    Front. Med.

    (2014)
  • A.B. Zoubos et al.

    Orthopedics and biofilm - what do we know? A review

    Med. Sci. Monit.

    (2012)
  • K. Jaeger et al.

    Reduction of catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients: a prospective controlled randomized trial using a chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheter

    Ann. Hematol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text