Elsevier

Applied Surface Science

Volume 317, 30 October 2014, Pages 955-961
Applied Surface Science

Surface characterization studies of CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The CeO2-ZrO2-CuO catalysts show excellent NH3-SCR activity at low temperature.

  • The catalyst prepared by co-precipitation method shows the best SCR activity.

  • The SCR activity and chemical state are obviously effected by preparation method.

  • The synergistic effect between Cu and Ce contributes to the high SCR activity.

  • The high dispersion of copper species contributes to the excellent SCR activity.

Abstract

A series of CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts were prepared by different methods and applied to the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 reaction at low temperature. The results showed that the SCR activities, morphology, particles dimension, and the surface chemical state of CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts were obviously influenced by the preparation method. The SCR performance results showed that the CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalyst prepared by co-precipitation method presented the best activity in the temperature range of 125–180 °C. The characterization results showed that the Ce4+, Ce3+, Cu2+ and Cu+ species were coexistence in the CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts, and the Cu species mainly existed as Cu2+. It was also found that the high surface area, the synergistic effect between copper and ceria, enhanced acidity and the highly dispersed copper species were responsible for the high SCR activity of the CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalyst.

Graphical abstract

The SCR activities, morphology, particles dimension, and the surface chemical state of CeO2-ZrO2-CuO catalysts were obviously influenced by the preparation method. The high surface area, the synergistic effect between copper and ceria, and the highly dispersed copper species were responsible for the high SCR activity of the CeO2-ZrO2-CuO catalyst.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are the major atmospheric pollutants that cause acid rain, photochemical smog, ozone depletion and global warming, mainly from the combustion of fossil fuels such as coal-fired power plants (stationary source) and motor vehicle engine (mobile source). The selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 (NH3-SCR) is an efficient way to convert NOx into N2 from stationary sources. The commercial catalysts for this process are V2O5-WO3/TiO2 and V2O5-MoO3/TiO2 oxides [1]. Although the vanadium-based catalyst presents high SCR activity and excellent resistance of SO2, this catalyst system also suffers from disadvantages such as the narrow activity temperature window of 300–400 °C and the toxicity of vanadium pentoxide [2]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop the SCR catalyst system with high activity at low temperature (<200 °C).

In the recent years, Ce-based catalysts have been reported to have excellent activity in the low-temperature SCR reaction and attracted increasing attention due to the high oxygen storage capacity (OSC) and strong redox property of CeO2 [3], [4], [5], [6]. In order to promote the SCR activity, some other transition metals such as Fe, Ti, and Cu are often doped into ceria based catalyst [1], [7], [8]. Jiang et al. [9] have reported that the carbon fiber supported CuO-CeO2 showed high activity for urea-SCR of NO at room temperature. Guo et al. [10] have found that CuO-CeO2 catalyst presented excellent low temperature SCR performance and the state of Cu species had great impact on the SCR activity of CuO-CeO2 catalyst. Gao et al. [11] reported that Ce-Cu-Ti catalyst could remain at high performance in the presence of H2O and SO2. Zirconia (ZrO2) has a high surface acidity and a high thermal stability. During the past several years, ZrO2 is widely used as a support in catalysts [12], [13]. Adding ZrO2 to CeO2 has been done to stabilize ceria against high temperature sintering and prevent the decline of oxygen storage capacity (OSC) [14]. The high OSC can promote the oxidization of NO to NO2, which would increase the catalytic activity for reduction of NO with NH3, especially in the range of low temperatures [15], [16]. The SCR catalysts, such as CuO/CeO2/ZrO2 [17], CuO-CoOx/Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 [18], CuO/WO3/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 [19] and WO3/CeO2-ZrO2 [20], have been reported that these catalysts show high NH3-SCR reaction activities in the temperature range of 200–450 °C. However, few reports have been focused on the CeO2-ZrO2 based catalysts for NH3-SCR process at low temperatures (120–220 °C).

It is well-known that the catalytic activity of a catalyst depends not only on the content and chemical components, but also on the particles dimension, morphology and properties of the catalyst. Furthermore, the catalyst preparation method also has great influence on the particles dimension, morphology, physico-chemical properties and the dispersion state of the active components. Different preparation methods such as incipient wetness impregnation [21], [22], co-precipitation [23], [24], hydrothermal synthesis [25] and sol–gel method [26], [27] are often used to obtain catalysts with different physico-chemical properties. These preparation methods act as an important role in promoting the performance of catalyst materials.

In this work, we aim to investigate the NH3-SCR catalytic activity of the CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 systems and the effect of preparation methods on the structure, redox behavior of the systems. SEM, BET specific surface area, XRD, H2-TPR, NH3-TPD and XPS were performed to study the structures morphological and physico-chemical properties of the CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts. The work tried to provide basic knowledge for NH3-SCR catalysis in CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 systems.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

The CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts were prepared by the four methods from Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, Zr(NO3)4·5H2O and Cu(NO3)2·3H2O precursors with CuO content of 20 wt.%. The molar ratio of Cu:Ce:Zr was 3:5:5.

Catalytic activity over CuO-CeO2-ZrO2

Firstly, we investigated catalytic activity over CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts prepared by different methods. The NO conversion and N2 selectivity as a function of temperature in the NH3-SCR reaction are shown in Fig. 1. It is clear that the catalytic activity is influenced by the preparation method. The CCZ-IP and CCZ-SG catalysts are inferior to CCZ-CP and CCZ-HT catalysts in catalytic performance. The CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalyst prepared by co-precipitation method (CCZ-CP) shows the best SCR activity in

Conclusions

CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts for NH3-SCR process were prepared by different methods. It was found that the NO reduction activities of CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts were significantly influenced by the preparation method. The CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalyst prepared by co-precipitation presents the best activity in the temperature range of 120–180 °C. The results showed that the crystalline phase of CuO presented in the CuO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts prepared by co-precipitation and sol–gel method. It also could be seen

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the opening Project of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric environment (2011A060901011) and Pollution Control, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1137603, No. 21307047 and 21307049), High Technology Talent Introduction Project of Yunnan in China (2010CI110), Science and Technology Major Project of Yunnan Province (2012ZB002).

References (45)

  • G.S. Qi et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2003)
  • R.T. Guo et al.

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2013)
  • M. Adamowska et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2008)
  • G. Zhou et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • R. Zhang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • X. Du et al.

    Fuel

    (2012)
  • R. Guo et al.

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2014)
  • X. Gao et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2010)
  • A. Kambur et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2012)
  • Z. Si et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2013)
  • G. Zhou et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2007)
  • G. Qi et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2004)
  • E. Moretti et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2011)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2009)
  • M. Ozawa et al.

    J. Alloys. Compd.

    (2000)
  • S. Damyanova et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2003)
  • H. Li et al.

    J. Rare Earths

    (2010)
  • W.S. Lee et al.

    Colloids Surf. A

    (2008)
  • L. Zhu et al.

    J. Alloys. Compd.

    (2010)
  • K.J. Lee et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2013)
  • Q. Zhang et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2011)
  • S. Lee et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text