Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 143, 1 December 2019, 104433
Appetite

Producing food in English and Welsh prisons

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104433Get rights and content

Abstract

Most prison food research focuses on aspects of consumption rather than production yet farming, horticulture and gardening have been integral to the prison system in England and Wales for more than 170 years. This paper explores the interplay between penological, therapeutic and food priorities over the last fifty years through an examination of historical prison policies and contemporary case studies associated with the Greener on the Outside for Prisons (GOOP) programme. Findings are discussed in relation to how joined-up policy and practice can impact positively on whole population health and wellbeing within and beyond the prison setting.

Introduction

While food plays a critical role in the physical and mental wellbeing of people in prison, impacting on many aspects of prison life such as culture, relationships and the construction of positive identities, it is often overlooked as a key feature of incarceration (WHO, 2015). Furthermore, within research and narratives of prison food about nutritional or dietary requirements, food habits or the meaning of food (e.g. Smoyer & Lopes, 2017), to-date there has been an emphasis on the consumption rather than production of prison food which this paper seeks to address.

Between 1990 and 2019, the UK prison population almost doubled, it now stands at just over 82,500 (Ministry of Justice, 2019), representing the highest incarceration rate amongst western European jurisdictions (Sturge, 2018). Within the prison populations the most socio-economically disadvantaged communities, where levels of social exclusion are most marked, are significantly over represented (Ismail & de Viggiani, 2018). Research revealing the strong association between offending behaviour and poor health, low levels of educational attainment and wider deprivation suggests a ‘vicious cycle’ with most prisoners coming from and returning to the poorest or most socially excluded sections of society (Bradshaw, Kemp, Baldwin, & Rowe, 2004). Prisons therefore represent a key organisational setting for health promotion activities (Whitelaw et al., 2001), and not least for initiatives that seek to improve nutrition (Gray et al., 2018).

The prison service in England and Wales currently spends approximately £15m annually on prison food, of which the government requires 25% to be grown in the UK. For a budget of approximately £2 per prisoner per day, catering managers are required to source ingredients for three meals that can be described as “wholesome, nutritious, well prepared and served, reasonably varied and sufficient in quantity” (National Offender Management Service (NOMS), 2010). With a focus on gardening and farming, this paper explores how penological, therapeutic and food priorities have shaped prison food production in England and Wales since 1970 using a combination of primary and secondary data including case studies, qualitative interviews and historical accounts.

Prison food production is a complex topic not least because terms (e.g. agriculture, farming, growing, horticulture and gardening) can have multiple, often loosely defined or interchangeable meaning and associated practices. For the sake of brevity and clarity, we have chosen three activities associated with prison food production: gardening, horticulture and farming, and to differentiate between them on the basis of scale, spatiality and scope. Gardening is a relatively small-scale activity (e.g. raised beds) that can be accommodated within the built environment including high security, or limited space prisons. Garden produce typically supplements the diet of the gardeners. Horticulture is a medium-scale, usually commercial activity that can be accommodated within the boundaries of lower-grade prisons subject to sufficient space to erect ‘liminal’ structures (e.g. greenhouses or polytunnels) proximal to the prison. These liminal structures extend the timescale over which seasonal produce (e.g. salad crops) can be grown as they offer a degree of protection (e.g. from bad weather) for plants and those who tend them. Farming typically involves commercial, large-scale crop growing and animal husbandry which enables it to meet the demand for fresh produce from multiple prisons. However, as the history of prison farming shows, commercial imperatives, although important, have neither been the sole nor the principal reason for large-scale, in-house food production (Wright, 2017).

Section snippets

Connecting nature and health

The consistent message from a diverse body of research is that contact with the natural environment improves psychological health and mental well-being (e.g. Barton, , Bragg, , Wood, , & Pretty, 2016; Maller, Townsend, Pryor, Brown, & St. Leger, 2006; Ward Thompson et al., 2012). Amongst disparate ways of connecting with nature, gardening and ‘care farming’ are heralded as a means to promote health, well-being and flourishing across the life-course for a wide range of disadvantaged and

Prison setting

Underpinned by a number of principles (e.g. equity, participation, empowerment, partnership and sustainability), the settings approach reflects an ecological model that takes account of the dynamic, complex interactions between personal, organisational and wider environmental factors that influence health (Dooris, 2009). Applying this framework to the justice context, it is clear that a health-promoting prison must be safe and secure, and underpinned by principles of human rights, respect and

History of prison food production

In England and Wales, prison farms have been producing food for consumption by prisoners and staff since 1852, when farming was introduced to HMP Dartmoor to provide a healthy and hard day's work in the open air (Lander, 1992). Considered an important means of providing ‘useful and rewarding work for inmates’, farms became an integral feature of the Borstal system (youth detention centres) as they became established in the early 1900s. Between 1939 and 1945 the ‘Dig for Victory’ campaign led to

Growing food in prisons in England and Wales: the case of Greener on the Outside for Prisons (GOOP)

Despite nationwide privatisation of prison food production, a surprising quantity of farms and horticultural facilities as well as knowledgeable staff remain in the prison service. In 2008, shortly after centralised prison agriculture and horticulture in England and Wales ended, Greener on the Outside for Prisons (GOOP), a programme of therapeutic gardening, was established in the North-West of England. Working in partnership with individual prisons, GOOP sought to either extend the reach of

The future of producing food in prisons in England and Wales

Currently, over half of the state prisons in England and Wales (70 of 118) have some form of horticultural activity taking place, and 44 public sector prisons are engaged in commercial horticultural (Coveney, 2019). Procurement strategies are being revised and in regions like the north-west, establishments are re-introducing gardening as a means of supplying their own and nearby prison kitchens with produce, whilst offering meaningful employment and training suitable for a wide range of

Discussion

Globally, prisoners tend to come from marginalised and socially disadvantaged sections of society and exhibit a high incidence of ill health, linked to social exclusion and multiple complex needs (Baybutt et al., 2018). Therefore, as a setting, prisons offer a unique opportunity to invest in the health of disadvantaged and marginalised populations and address health inequalities and social exclusion (Woodall, 2016).

Growing fresh, seasonal produce for use in prison kitchens is a purposeful and

Acknowledgement

Greener on the Outside for Prisons research conducted by Dr. Baybutt was funded by the Big Lottery Fund. The funding body specified that data should be gathered on specific outcome indicators, but also allowed the research team to search for additional outcomes from the programme. We would like to thank all those who have supported and facilitated Greener on the Outside for Prisons programme and participated in the research.We would also like to thank all those who contributed to Outside Time.

References (56)

  • G. Brown et al.

    A summary report of an evaluation of the master gardener programme at HMP Rye hill: An horticultural intervention with substance misusing offenders

    (2015)
  • B.S. Brummett

    Techniques of close reading

    (2018)
  • C. Coveney

    Personal communication. Public sector prison Industries, catering and PE: Land based activity

    (2019)
  • Department of Health

    Health promoting prisons: A shared approach

    (2002)
  • DIS Policy

    Farms and gardens: Historical background

    (1971)
  • M. Dooris

    Holistic and sustainable health improvement: The contribution of the settings-based approach to health improvement

    Perspectives in Public Health

    (2009)
  • M. Dooris

    Settings for promoting health

  • H. Elsey et al.

    Green fingers and clear minds: Prescribing ‘care farming’ for mental illness

    British Journal of General Practice

    (2016)
  • Farms et al.

    Position at 31st march, 1955. Unpublished document supplied by Maurice Codd, Head of HMP farms and gardens 1982-1991

    (1955)
  • A. Farrier et al.

    Mental health and wellbeing benefits from a prisons horticultural programme

    International Journal of Prisoner Health

    (2019)
  • A. Farrier et al.

    Greener on the outside for prisons. UCLan/target: Wellbeing

    (2015)
  • M. Foucault

    Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison

    (1977)
  • A.K. Fournier et al.

    Human-animal interaction in a prison setting: Impact on criminal behaviour, treatment progress, and social skills

    Behavior and Social Issues

    (2007)
  • D. Garland

    Sociological perspective on punishment

    Crime and Justice

    (1991)
  • S. Gray et al.

    Inter-sectoral transfer of the food for life settings framework in England

    Health Promotion International

    (2018)
  • R. Grimshaw et al.

    Horticulture in secure settings

    (2002)
  • R. Hine et al.

    Care farming in the UK: Evidence and opportunities

    (2008)
  • HM Prison Service (undated) Farm conference history 1956-1975 volume 1. Unpublished...
  • Cited by (5)

    • Care-farming as a catalyst for healthy and sustainable lifestyle choices in those affected by traumatic grief

      2020, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is a growing body of evidence relating to the potential health benefits that can emerge from participation within a care-farming program, ranging from client specific outcomes such as reduced depressive symptoms (Pedersen et al., 2012), impacts on recidivism (Pretty et al., 2013), and changing levels of independence (Kaley et al., 2018), to more general impacts on health and well-being, such as increasing social interaction (Iancu et al., 2014), improving confidence, and decreasing stress (Leck et al., 2015). Alongside these specific symptomatic approaches and outcomes, care-farms have also been linked to enabling a level of ‘flourishing across the life-course’ (Devine-Wright et al., 2019, p. 2). Murray et al. (2019, p. 7) discuss how participation in a care-farming scheme ‘appears to aid personal growth through meaningful, motivating, stimulating and calming interactions’, that can be ‘the precursors to changing behaviours’.

    • THE PSYCHOLOGICAL APPEAL OF GARDENS

      2023, The Psychological Appeal of Gardens
    • Prisons as a Setting for Health

      2022, Handbook of Settings-Based Health Promotion
    View full text