Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 58, Issue 1, February 2012, Pages 141-150
Appetite

Research Review
Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Vegetarianism, the practice of abstaining from eating meat, has a recorded history dating back to ancient Greece. Despite this, it is only in recent years that researchers have begun conducting empirical investigations of the practices and beliefs associated with vegetarianism. The present article reviews the extant literature, exploring variants of and motivations for vegetarianism, differences in attitudes, values and worldviews between omnivores and vegetarians, as well as the pronounced gender differences in meat consumption and vegetarianism. Furthermore, the review highlights the extremely limited cultural scope of the present data, and calls for a broader investigation across non-Western cultures.

Highlights

► Review of the extant literature on vegetarianism. ► Vegetarianism associated with concern for environment, equality, and social justice. ► Health vegetarians concerned primarily with personal well-being; ethical vegetarians with welfare of others. ► Women more likely to be vegetarian, express greater concern for animal welfare. ► Calls for a broader investigation of vegetarianism across non-Western cultures.

Introduction

Ethical and spiritual concerns have motivated abstention from meat since ancient times, dating back to Greek philosophers Pythagorus, Plato, Plutarch, and Porphyry (Spencer, 1993). More recent philosophical arguments that have been put forth for vegetarianism include anti-speciesism (Singer, 1976), anti-carnism (Joy, 2010), concern with the killing of animals (Rozin, 2004, Vartanian et al., 2007), animal rights (Regan, 1984), and a feeling of community and identity with the animal world (Clark, 1984). In contrast, scientific arguments for the health benefits of a vegetarian diet are relatively recent, first emerging in the 19th century (Whorton, 1994). For all its history, vegetarianism is notoriously difficult to quantify and study. Scholars and laypeople alike vary widely even in how they define vegetarianism, with some self-identified vegetarians eschewing all animal products, and others occasionally consuming meat, fish, and poultry, while still calling themselves vegetarian. Indeed, confusion around the use of the term ‘vegetarian’ has presented problems for empirical research (Weinsier, 2000).

Recent polls indicate that approximately 8% of Canadians (Ipsos-Reid, 2004) and 3% of US Americans identify as vegetarian (Cunningham, 2009). Additional polls estimate rates of 3% in the UK (UK Food Standards Agency, 2009), 1–2% in New Zealand (Bidwell, 2002), and 3% in Australia, with markedly higher rates of 6% in Ireland, 9% in Germany, 8.5% in Israel, and 40% in India (European Vegetarian Union, 2008). Though these are minorities, they are not small minorities. Thus, vegetarianism stands as an important phenomenon that is well worth empirical investigation. Indeed, numerous scholars have begun the process of formalizing the study of vegetarianism, and their results have far-reaching implications for the ways we think about meat consumption and the reasons that many are beginning to eschew it.

Most vegetarians in the West were not raised as such, but made a decision to convert from a meat-eating diet (Beardsworth & Keil, 1991b) for a range of reasons, including concern about animal welfare, environmental sustainability, and personal health (Beardsworth and Keil, 1991a, Fox and Ward, 2008, Rozin et al., 1997). In India, the practice of vegetarianism has been firmly established for centuries, associated with tradition, power and status, and is a practice into which one is generally born. Furthermore, it appears to be chiefly concerned with the domains of asceticism and purity, such that the aim of vegetarianism is to keep the body free of the pollution associated with meat (Caplan, 2008, Preece, 2008, Spencer, 1993). Across the currently surveyed cultures, women are more likely to be vegetarian than men (Beardsworth and Bryman, 1999, Smart, 1995, Worsley and Skrzypiec, 1998, White and Frank, 1994, Stahler, 2005, Worsley and Skrzypiec, 1998), and have been at the forefront of modern vegetarian movements (e.g. Leneman, 1997, Leneman, 1999; Spencer, 1993). As with much of the psychological database (Arnett, 2008), the literature on vegetarianism is largely drawn from Western cultures, leaving the cross-cultural generalizability of the literature open to question (Henrich, Heine, & Norenzayan, 2010).

Thus, this review attempts to answer several important questions: What exactly is a vegetarian, and what motivates him or her to abstain from meat? Among these motivations, which are the most common, and what implications do they have for health, diet, and attitudes toward meat? How do vegetarians and omnivores differ in the ways in their politics, worldviews, and interactions with others, and how do they view one another? Given the drastically different rates of vegetarianism between men and women, how else do they differ in they was in which they approach vegetarianism and meat eating? Throughout the review, the limited cultural scope of the current literature will also be highlighted.

Section snippets

Definitions and motivations

Although a common definition of a vegetarian is someone who does not eat red meat, poultry, or fish, there is considerable inconsistency in the literature and in how people self-identify. In a Canadian survey, the National Institute of Nutrition. (1997) found that 90% of self-identified vegetarians consume milk or dairy products, 78% sometimes consume fish or seafood, 71% sometimes eat eggs, 61% sometimes eat poultry, and 20% sometimes eat red meat. More recently, the number of self-professed

Health-oriented and ethically-motivated vegetarians

Given the very different nature of health and ethics motivations, the one focused on one’s own welfare, and the other focused on the welfare of others, how else do health-oriented and ethically-oriented vegetarians differ? It appears that the process of becoming a vegetarian unfolds very differently, depending on one’s motivations. In a study of vegetarians in Western New York State, Jabs, Devine, and Sobal (1998b) proposed two separate models for the adoption of a vegetarian diet: health and

Attitudes toward meat

Given differences in eating practices, it is perhaps unsurprising that vegetarians and omnivores hold very different attitudes toward meat. In what domains do these attitudes differ, and how deeply do these differences run? In an early study of teenage English girls’ attitudes towards meat, Kenyon and Barker (1998) found that vegetarian girls had strongly negative associations with meat, linking it with the killing of animals, cruelty, the ingestion of blood, and visceral disgust. The

Values and worldviews

Given pronounced differences in attitudes toward meat and its production, to what extent do vegetarians and omnivores differ in their overall worldviews, beyond issues directly related to meat? Several studies provide convergent evidence that vegetarians and omnivores endorse different sets of values, with liberal values more associated with vegetarians and conservative values more associated with omnivores. In a British cohort sample, vegetarians were more likely than omnivores to be employed

Differences in well-being

The aforementioned research suggests links between vegetarianism and higher levels of empathy, altruism, and involvement with charity work. Given the positive associations between pro-social behavior and emotional well-being (e.g., Brunier et al., 2002, Dunn et al., 2008, Thoits and Hewitt, 2001), do vegetarians also report different levels of well-being? Dwyer, Kandel, Mayer, and Mayer (1974) found that among a sample of young adult vegetarians in the United States, 60% reported experiencing

Perceptions of vegetarians and omnivores

Given the broad differences between vegetarians in omnivores in attitudes toward meat, dietary practices, political and social attitudes, and worldviews, it stands to reason that they would view each other (and themselves) in quite different terms. How vegetarians are seen has shifted radically over time. During the Inquisition, the Roman Catholic Church declared vegetarians to be heretics, and a similar line of persecutions occurred in 12th century China (Kellman, 2000). In the earlier half of

Vegetarianism and gender

One factor that often arises in the literature on meat and vegetarianism is gender. Men and women tend not only to view vegetarianism through very different lenses, but appear to interact with meat on fundamentally different levels. Twigg (1979) argues that meat has long stood as a symbol of man’s strength and dominance over the natural world. The idea that meat is primarily a man’s food is found across many cultures, from Africa (Leghorn and Roodkowsky, 1977, O’Laughlin, 1974) and Southeast

Conclusion

In many studies of vegetarianism, there appears to be no universal understanding of the word ‘vegetarian,’ with the diets of self-defined vegetarians spanning the range of no animal products at all, to occasional inclusion of fish, poultry, and red meat (e.g. Barr and Chapman, 2002, Beardsworth and Keil, 1991b, Beardsworth and Keil, 1992, Willetts, 1997), and recent research (e.g. Ruby, 2008, Ruby etal., 2011) demonstrates significant differences between vegetarians and vegans on a broad range

References (131)

  • P.M. Kenyon et al.

    Attitudes towards meat-eating in vegetarian and non-vegetarian teenage girls in England—an ethnographic approach

    Appetite

    (1998)
  • E. Lea et al.

    Influences on meat consumption in Australia

    Appetite

    (2001)
  • M. Lindeman et al.

    Food choice ideologies. The modern manifestations of normative and humanist views of the world

    Appetite

    (2001)
  • P.F. Lovibond et al.

    The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1995)
  • L. Rappoport et al.

    Gender and age differences in food cognition

    Appetite

    (1993)
  • N.J. Richardson et al.

    Current attitudes and future influences on meat consumption in the UK

    Appetite

    (1993)
  • ACNielsen. (2004). Annual Canada Consumer Expenditure Study, Food Grocery...
  • C.J. Adams

    The sexual politics of meat

  • M.W. Allen et al.

    Values and beliefs of vegetarians and omnivores

    The Journal of Social Psychology

    (2000)
  • P.R. Amato et al.

    The new vegetarians. Promoting health and protecting life

    (1989)
  • J. Arnett

    The neglected 95%. Why American psychology needs to become less American

    American Psychologist

    (2008)
  • H.S. Barahal

    The cruel vegetarian

    Psychiatric Quarterly Supplement

    (1946)
  • D. Barnes-Holmes et al.

    Using the implicit association test and the implicit relational assessment procedure to measure attitudes toward meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat-eaters

    The Psychological Record

    (2010)
  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or...
  • A. Beardsworth et al.

    Meat consumption and vegetarianism among young adults in the UK

    British Food Journal

    (1999)
  • A. Beardsworth et al.

    Health-related beliefs and dietary practices among vegetarians and vegans. A qualitative study

    Health Education Journal

    (1991)
  • A.D. Beardsworth et al.

    Vegetarianism, veganism and meat avoidance. Recent trends and findings

    British Food Journal

    (1991)
  • A. Beardsworth et al.

    The vegetarian option. Varieties, conversions, motives and careers

    The Sociological Review

    (1992)
  • A. Beardsworth et al.

    Women, men and food. The significance of gender for nutritional attitudes and choices

    British Food Journal

    (2002)
  • B.L. Beezhold et al.

    Vegetarian diets are associated with healthy mood states. A cross-sectional study in Seventh Day Adventist adults

    Nutrition Journal

    (2010)
  • E. Bjørkum et al.

    Kjøtt, forbrukeroppfatninger og offentlig debatt—en litteraturstudie. [Meat, consumers perceptions and public debate – A literature review]

    (1997)
  • B.C. Breidenstein

    Changes in consumer attitudes toward red meat and their effect on marketing strategy

    Food Technology

    (1988)
  • G. Brunier et al.

    The psychological well-being of renal peer support volunteers

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2002)
  • P. Caplan

    Crossing the veg/non-veg divide. Commensality and sociality among the middle classes in Madras/Chennai

    South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies

    (2008)
  • P. Caplan et al.

    Concepts of healthy eating. Approaches from a social science perspective

  • M. Chin et al.

    Development of the attitudes toward vegetarians scale

    Anthrozoös

    (2002)
  • S.R.L. Clark

    The moral status of animals

    (1984)
  • Cunningham, J. (2009). How many vegetarians are there? Vegetarian Journal, 29(4), Article 3. Retrieved from:...
  • M.H. Davis

    The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping. A multidimensional approach

    Journal of Personality

    (1983)
  • J. De Houwer

    The extrinsic affective Simon task

    Experimental Psychology

    (2003)
  • J. De Houwer et al.

    Implicit attitudes toward meat and vegetables in vegetarians and nonvegetarians

    International Journal of Psychology

    (2007)
  • T. Dietz et al.

    Values and vegetarianism. An exploratory analysis

    Rural Sociology

    (1995)
  • K. Dunlap

    Stammering. Its nature, etiology, and therapy

    Journal of Comparative Psychology

    (1944)
  • E.W. Dunn et al.

    Spending money on others promotes happiness

    Science

    (2008)
  • European Vegetarian Union. (2008). How Many Veggies…? Retrieved from:...
  • N. Fiddes

    Meat. a natural symbol

    (1991)
  • M. Filippi et al.

    The brain functional networks associated to human and animal suffering differ among omnivores, vegetarians and vegans

    PLoS One

    (2010)
  • C.R. Gale et al.

    IQ in childhood and vegetarianism in adulthood. 1970 British cohort study

    British Medical Journal

    (2007)
  • GlobeScan Inc. (2004). Food Issues Monitor International Report 2004, International Public Opinion on Food from...
  • Cited by (601)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Acknowledgements: The author wishes to thank Steven Heine, Jessica Tracy, and Paul Rozin for their invaluable feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

    View full text