Randomized controlled study comparing tonsillectomy safety and patient satisfaction outcomes between HARMONIC ACE® + shears and monopolar diathermy in an adult population – A pilot study
Introduction
Tonsillectomy is one of the most commonly performed otolaryngologic procedures. A variety of techniques [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]] have been utilised including sharp dissection using knife and dissectors, specially manufactured tonsil guillotines, monopolar diathermy, bipolar diathermy, coblation, lasers and the harmonic scalpel. In the recent two decades, the impetus has been to reduce intraoperative blood loss and post-operative pain. The harmonic scalpel is a comparatively low-energy device that is used for this purpose. Studies comparing the use of harmonic scalpel with conventional tonsillectomy techniques [[5], [6], [7], [8], [9]] have been published since the early 2000s describing varying successes in reducing intraoperative bleeding, post-operative pain as well as delayed haemorrhage. While the clinical advantages of harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy are apparent, patient satisfaction outcomes have not been reported. In addition, the Harmonic ACE + 23 cm shears was first launched and utilised for tonsillectomy in Singapore since 2015. While Salomone et al. [16] compared the use of the harmonic shears with cold dissection in a paediatric population, there have yet been any comparison with monopolar diathermy in terms of its efficacy, patient outcomes and satisfaction in an adult population.
In this paper, we compare the efficacy as well as patient clinical outcomes and satisfaction between Harmonic ACE + Shears and monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy in a randomized controlled pilot study performed in a heterogenous adult population.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (serial number 201507-00145) was obtained. An institutional research grant was awarded to study differences in intraoperative bleeding and post-operative pain between Harmonic ACE + shears tonsillectomy and monopolar diathermy tonsillectomy.
Between 1st June 2016 and 30th June 2017, patients were recruited from the outpatient Otolaryngology clinics of the recruiting tertiary hospital. Inclusion criteria included patients aged between 18 and 65 years
Demographics
A total of 20 patients were recruited and randomized equally into each arm – Harmonic Scalpel (HS) or Electrocautery (EC) tonsillectomy. Two male patients in the electrocautery group defaulted their follow-up appointments.
Operative time
The overall median operative time was 25 min. There was no statistically significant difference in operative times between EC and HS arms (Median: 25 min vs 25 min, P = 0.564).
Intraoperative blood loss
The HS group has a higher proportion of subjects who experienced none or minimal intra-operative
Discussion
The use of harmonic scalpel for tonsillectomy was first reported by Ochi et al. [10] and has demonstrated less post-operative pain and delayed haemorrhage compared to the conventional techniques [5]. The harmonic scalpel uses ultrasonic technology to denature protein by mechanically breaking hydrogen bonds in protein molecules, thus generating much less heat from tissue friction (about 50 °C to 100 °C), which minimises collateral tissue damage. Compared to monopolar and bipolar diathermy, there
Conclusion
This is the first reported study comparing the use of the Harmonic ACE® + 23 cm Shears with monopolar cautery in tonsillectomy. The Harmonic ACE® + 23 cm Shears does not exhibit inferiority to monopolar diathermy in terms of patient safety and efficacy and our results suggest that it is possibly more beneficial in terms of intraoperative bleeding, delayed haemorrhage and post-op recovery. A prospective adequately powered study validated by objective outcome measures would be useful to verify
Author statement
James Kwek: Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualisation, Writing.
Celeste Ann Chua: Methology, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing.
Xu Shu Hui: Resources, Investigation, Project administration.
Leonard Tan: Methodology, Funding acquisition.
Huang Xin Yong: Methodology, Investigation.
Ian Loh: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Supervision.
Lee Tee Sin: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Supervision, Project administration, Writing.
Grant
Changi General Hospital Institutional Grant.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors have no other conflict of interests to declare.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Ms Tan Pei Ting from the Clinical Trials and Research Unit, Changi General Hospital, for her assistance in performing data analysis and verifying the results of our study.
References (21)
- et al.
A prospective randomized single-blind trial comparing ultrasonic scalpel tonsillectomy with tonsillectomy by blunt dissection in a pediatric age group
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2005) - et al.
Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy in children: a randomized prospective study
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2003) - et al.
Comparison of posttonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator, and electrocautery
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2006) - et al.
A prospective randomised single blinded study comparing harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy with bipolar tonsillectomy
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
(2006) - et al.
Comparison of three common tonsillectomy techniques: a prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical study
Laryngoscope
(2009) - et al.
Comparison of two methods of tonsillectomy
Laryngoscope
(1993) - et al.
Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients
Laryngoscope
(2006) - et al.
A comparison between cold dissection tonsillectomy and harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol
(2017) - et al.
Harmonic scalpel versus other techniques for tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Aust J Otolaryngol
(2019) - et al.
Harmonic scalpel tonsillectomy versus hot electrocautery and cold dissection: an objective comparison
Ear Nose Throat J
(Oct 2004)
Cited by (5)
Monopolar electrocautery versus sharp dissection in the neck dissection: a retrospective study
2023, Scientific ReportsComparing Patient Satisfaction after Upfront Treatment Versus Wait-and-Scan for Small Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma
2023, Otology and NeurotologyEndoscopic Endonasal and Transmaxillary Approach for Resection of Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma With Preoperative Embolization in a Child
2021, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- 1
Co first author.