On absolute matrix summability of orthogonal series
Introduction
Let be a given infinite series with its partial sums the Cesàro matrix of order . If denotes the nth term of the -transformation of , then Flett [2] defined absolute summability of order as follows. A series is said to be summable if
In an effort to extend (1.1) to other classes of matrices, some authors have interpreted the n in (1.1) to represent the reciprocal of the nth diagonal entry of the matrix.
For example, in [1] with denoting the nth term of the weighted mean transform of a sequence , i.e.,their version of (1.1) becomes
Detailed arguments showing that (1.2) is not an appropriate extension of (1.1) appear in [7], and so will not be repeated here.
The following definitions can be reduced to the correct definitions of such extensions.
Let be a normal matrix, i.e. a lower triangular matrix of non-zero diagonal entries. Then A defines the sequence-to-sequence transformation, mapping the sequence to , where
The infinite series is said to be absolutely summable (), , if (see [2])converges, whereand we write in briefrespectively.
Let be an orthonormal system defined in the interval . We assume that belongs to andwhere .
Among others, Y. Okuyama [3] concerning the , summability of orthogonal series (1.3) proved the following two theorems. The first one is Theorem 1.1 Let and be a positive sequence. If is a positive sequence and the seriesconverges, then the orthogonal seriesis summable almost everywhere.
For the second one, first of all he wrote Theorem 1.2 Let and be a positive sequence such that is a non-increasing sequence and the series converges. If is a positive non-increasing sequence and the series converges, then the orthogonal series is summable almost everywhere.
Theorem 1.1 includes a result of Singh [8] which is an extension, for trigonometric series, of theorems due to Pati [6], Ul’yanov [9] and Wang [10], until Theorem 1.2 generalize a theorem of Okuyama [4].
The main purpose of the present paper is to generalize Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2 for summability of the orthogonal series (1.3), where . Before starting the main results first introduce some further notations.
Given a normal matrix , we associate two lower semi matrices and as follows:and
It may be noted that and are the well-known matrices of series-to-sequence and series-to-series transformations, respectively.
Throughout this paper K denotes a positive constant that it may depends only on k, and be different in different relations.
Section snippets
Main Results
We prove the following two theorems. Theorem 2.1 If for the seriesconverges, then the orthogonal seriesis summable almost everywhere. Proof For the matrix transform of the partial sums of the orthogonal series we havewhere is the partial sum of order v of the series (2.1). Hence
Applications of the main results
We can specialize the matrix obtaining these means as follows
- 1.
mean, when ;
- 2.
Harmonic means, when ;
- 3.
means, when ;
- 4.
means, when ;
- 5.
Nörlund means , when where ;
- 6.
Riesz means , when ;
- 7.
Generalized Nörlund means , when , where ;
- 8.
The means (see [5]).
Now let us show that Theorem 1.2 is included in Theorem 2.2. Namely, for
References (10)
Approximation of functions belonging to the generalized Lipschitz class by summability method of fourier series
Appl. Math. Comput.
(2009)Inclusion theorems for absolute matrix summability methods
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(1999)- et al.
A note on two absolute summability methods
Analysis
(1992) On an extension of absolute summability and theorems of Littlewood and Paley
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.
(1957)On the absolute Nörlund summability of orthogonal series
J. Fac. Eng. Sinshu Univ.
(1980)
Cited by (1)
On ϕ − |a, δ|<inf>k</inf> summability of orthogonal series
2019, Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae