On absolute matrix summability of orthogonal series

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.12.155Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we prove two theorems on |A,δ|k,1k2,δ0, summability of orthogonal series. Also, several known and new results are deduced as corollaries of the main results.

Introduction

Let n=0an be a given infinite series with its partial sums sn,(C,α) the Cesàro matrix of order α. If σnα denotes the nth term of the (C,α)-transformation of s{sn}, then Flett [2] defined absolute summability of order k1 as follows. A series n=0an is said to be summable |C,α|k,k1 ifn=1nk-1|σnα-σn-1α|k<.

In an effort to extend (1.1) to other classes of matrices, some authors have interpreted the n in (1.1) to represent the reciprocal of the nth diagonal entry of the matrix.

For example, in [1] with tn denoting the nth term of the weighted mean transform of a sequence {sn}, i.e.,tn=1Pnv=0npvsv,their version of (1.1) becomesn=1Pnpnk-1|tn-tn-1|k<.

Detailed arguments showing that (1.2) is not an appropriate extension of (1.1) appear in [7], and so will not be repeated here.

The following definitions can be reduced to the correct definitions of such extensions.

Let A(anv) be a normal matrix, i.e. a lower triangular matrix of non-zero diagonal entries. Then A defines the sequence-to-sequence transformation, mapping the sequence s{sn} to As{An(s)}, whereAn(s)v=0nanvsv,n=0,1,2,

The infinite series n=0an is said to be absolutely summable |A|k (|A,δ|k), k1,δ0, if (see [2])n=1nk-1|Δ¯An(s)|kn=1nδk+k-1|Δ¯An(s)|kconverges, whereΔ¯An(s)=An(s)-An-1(s)and we write in briefn=0an|A|k|A,δ|k,respectively.

Let {φn(x)} be an orthonormal system defined in the interval (a,b). We assume that f(x) belongs to L2(a,b) andf(x)n=0cnφn(x),where cn=abf(x)φn(x)dx,(n=0,1,2,).

Among others, Y. Okuyama [3] concerning the |N,pn|k,1k2, summability of orthogonal series (1.3) proved the following two theorems. The first one is

Theorem 1.1

Let 1k2 and {λn} be a positive sequence. If {pn} is a positive sequence and the seriesn=0pnPnPn-1kj=1npn-j2Pnpn-Pn-jpn-j2λj2|cj|2k2converges, then the orthogonal seriesn=0λncnφn(x)is summable |N,pn|k almost everywhere.

For the second one, first of all he wrotew(k)(j)=j-1n=jn2kpn2kpn-j2Pn2+2kPnpn-Pn-jpn-j2.

Theorem 1.2

Let 1k2 and {Ω(n)} be a positive sequence such that {Ω(n)/n} is a non-increasing sequence and the series n=11nΩ(n) converges. If {pn} is a positive non-increasing sequence and the series n=1|cn|2Ω2k-1(n)w(k)(n) converges, then the orthogonal series n=0cnφn(x) is |N,pn|k summable almost everywhere.

Theorem 1.1 includes a result of Singh [8] which is an extension, for trigonometric series, of theorems due to Pati [6], Ul’yanov [9] and Wang [10], until Theorem 1.2 generalize a theorem of Okuyama [4].

The main purpose of the present paper is to generalize Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2 for |A,δ|k summability of the orthogonal series (1.3), where 1k2,δ0. Before starting the main results first introduce some further notations.

Given a normal matrix A(anv), we associate two lower semi matrices A(a¯nv) and A^(aˆnv) as follows:a¯nvi=vnani,n,i=0,1,2,andaˆ00=a¯00=a00,aˆnv=a¯nv-a¯n-1,v,n=1,2,

It may be noted that A and Aˆ are the well-known matrices of series-to-sequence and series-to-series transformations, respectively.

Throughout this paper K denotes a positive constant that it may depends only on k, and be different in different relations.

Section snippets

Main Results

We prove the following two theorems.

Theorem 2.1

If for 1k2 the seriesn=1n2δ+1-1/kj=0n|aˆn,j|2λj2|cj|2k2converges, then the orthogonal seriesn=0λncnφn(x)is |A,δ|k summable almost everywhere.

Proof

For the matrix transform An(s)(x) of the partial sums of the orthogonal series n=0λncnφn(x) we haveAn(s)(x)=v=0nanvsv(x)=v=0nanvj=0vλjcjφj(x)=j=0nλjcjφj(x)v=jnanv=j=0na¯njλjcjφj(x),where j=0vλjcjφj(x) is the partial sum of order v of the series (2.1).

HenceΔ¯An(s)(x)=j=0na¯njλjcjφj(x)-j=0n-1a¯n-1,jλjcjφj(

Applications of the main results

We can specialize the matrix A=(anv) obtaining these means as follows

  • 1.

    (C,1) mean, when an,v=1n+1;

  • 2.

    Harmonic means, when an,v=1(n-v+1)logn;

  • 3.

    (C,α) means, when an,v=n-v+α+1α-1n+αα;

  • 4.

    (H,p) means, when an,v=1logp-1(n+1)m=0p-1logm(v+1);

  • 5.

    Nörlund means (N,pn), when an,v=pn-vPn where Pn=v=0npv;

  • 6.

    Riesz means (N,pn), when an,v=pvPn;

  • 7.

    Generalized Nörlund means (N,p,q), when an,v=pn-vqvRn, where Rn=v=0npvqn-v;

  • 8.

    The C1·Np means (see [5]).

Now let us show that Theorem 1.2 is included in Theorem 2.2. Namely, for an,v=pn-

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (1)

View full text