Patterns of glaucomatous visual field progression identified by three progression criteria

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.003Get rights and content

Purpose

To determine typical patterns of repeatable glaucomatous visual field progression.

Design

Retrospective analysis of data obtained from two prospective studies.

Methods

Included were 72 eyes of 72 patients tested up to six times over 2 years, and 40 eyes of 40 patients followed annually for up to 12 years. Each patient had two abnormal baseline visual fields, abnormal optic nerves, and serial fields. Progression was identified using three methods: by glaucoma change probability using total deviation (GCP-TD) and pattern deviation (GCP-PD) plots and by a clinical criteria. Progression was categorized as deepening or expansion of an existing scotoma, or a new scotoma.

Results

The percentage of eyes repeatably progressed ranged from 17% to 27%. The most common pattern of progression was a deepening of an existing scotoma in the annual group, followed by expansion. With two follow-ups required, percentages for deepening only were 20% (clinical classifier). A combination of expansion and deepening was most common for the GCP criteria: 15% (GCP-TD classifier), and 10% (GCP-PD classifier) for the annual group. For the semiannual group, deepening was most common with the clinical criteria (11% of eyes), and deepening with expansion was most common by GCP criteria (14%, GCP-TD and GCP-PD). No eyes showed repeatable new scotomas.

Conclusions

Glaucomatous visual fields progress in the area of the visual field where baseline testing showed an existing scotoma. Follow-up testing might be improved by concentrating on already defective locations and using sparser test patterns or screening algorithms in normal areas of the visual field.

Section snippets

Subjects

Included in this analysis of serial visual fields were 112 eyes of 112 patients with glaucoma. The study eye was selected randomly. These patients came from two studies. The first was a prospective multicenter study in which 72 patients were followed at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Hereafter, this group will be referred to as the “semiannual” group. Progression on visual fields was defined by the clinical criteria listed below. When progression was noted, a follow-up field was scheduled within

Results

Baseline mean deviations for abnormal and progressed visual field locations versus abnormal and nonprogressed locations were within 1.0 dB (−5.3 ± 5.6 and −4.4 ± 5.0, respectively). Eyes in the semiannual group had a minimum of four fields and a maximum of six fields. Eyes in the annual group had a minimum of four and a maximum of 17 follow-up fields.

Discussion

As has been shown in earlier studies, progression criteria comparable to those in our study do not always identify the same eyes as progressed or even the same number of progressed eyes.10, 11, 18, 24 For instance, clinical criteria for progression similar to those employed here tend to indicate more eyes as progressed than the GCP using total deviation. Additionally, the GCP using the total deviation plot tends to signal more eyes as progressed than does the GCP using pattern deviation. The

References (25)

  • J.L. Keltner et al.

    Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2000)
  • Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability

    Ophthalmology

    (1994)
  • Cited by (70)

    • The impact of location of progressive visual field loss on longitudinal changes in quality of life of patients with glaucoma

      2016, Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is again an expected result because the same amount of visual field loss over time is likely to have greater impact in the ability to perform daily activities for patients who start off with worse visual fields. Previous studies have shown that visual field defects in glaucoma tend to progress by deepening, expansion of an existing scotoma, or a combination of both.23,24 Therefore, patients with greater inferior or central visual field defects in both eyes at baseline are likely to need more close monitoring and to be candidates for more aggressive treatment.

    • Long-Term Follow-Up of Visual Fields

      2015, Glaucoma: Second Edition
    • Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression

      2014, Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the number of significantly progressing VF test points was similar between the 2 groups. Considering that the most common pattern of glaucomatous VF progression is a deepening of an existing VF defect, followed by its expansion,34 our result suggests that the rate of VF defect deepening is faster in the eyes with focal LC defects than in the eyes without, but that the rate of VF defect expansion is similar between the 2 groups. Reasons for the increased risk and faster rate of VF progression in the eyes with focal LC defects compared with those in the eyes without are unclear.

    • Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression

      2020, Survey of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Linear regression can be applied to global indices, to clusters, or to individual points. Because progression may occur either through an expansion of an existing scotoma or through a general depression across the entire visual field, it is clinically relevant to assess change with global and local measurements.12,14,25 Linear regression applied to global indices and individual locations, and event-based analyses may each identify progression in different eyes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by a grant from the National Eye Institute, NEI EY 08208 (P.A.S.), Glaucoma Research Foundation (P.A.S.), Research to Prevent Blindness and Alcon (P.A.S.), Foundation for Eye Research (E.Z.B., F.M.). Research support from Carl-Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (P.A.S., R.N.W.).

    View full text