Effect of head and shoulder positioning on the cross-sectional area of the subclavian vein in obese subjects

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Head and shoulder positioning may affect cross-sectional area (CSA) and location of the subclavian vein (SCV). We investigated the CSA of the SCV and the depth of the SCV, depending on the head and shoulder positions.

Methods

In 24 healthy obese volunteers, the short axis ultrasound images of the SCV and adjacent structures were obtained in three different head positions (neutral, 30° turned to the contralateral side, and 30° turned to the ipsilateral side) and two different shoulder positions (neutral and lowered). Images of the right and left SCVs were obtained in the supine and Trendelenburg positions. Subsequently, the CSA and depth of the SCV were measured.

Results

Significant differences were found in the CSA of the SCV in different head positions (30° turned to contralateral side vs. neutral: −0.06 cm2, 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.10 to −0.02; Pcorrected = 0.002, 30° turned to contralateral side vs. 30° turned to ipsilateral side: −0.16 cm2, 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.11; Pcorrected < 0.001, Neutral vs. 30° turned to ipsilateral side: −0.10 cm2, 95% CI, −0.14 to −0.07; Pcorrected < 0.001). The CSA of the SCV was significantly different, depending on shoulder positions (neutral vs. lowered: 0.44 cm2, 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.54; Pcorrected < 0.001), and body position (supine vs. Trendelenburg: −0.15 cm2, 95% CI, −0.19 to −0.12; Pcorrected < 0.001). However, the depth of the SCV did not differ with respect to head, shoulder, and body positions.

Conclusions

Ipsilateral 30° head rotation, neutral shoulder position, and Trendelenburg position significantly enhanced the CSA of the SCV in obese participants.

Introduction

Central venous catheterization permits the measurement of hemodynamic variables and allows delivery of medications and nutritional support that cannot be administered safely through peripheral venous catheters [1]. The subclavian vein (SCV) is a favored access site for central venous catheterization because of the lower risk of catheter-related infections and thrombosis, and less collapsibility [2,3]. However, SCV catheterization is more difficult than other venous sites, including the internal jugular vein or femoral vein. Furthermore, serious complications such as pneumothorax, hematoma, or hemothorax can occur during SCV catheterization [1,4,5].

A previous study showed that success at the first pass was significantly correlated with the diameter of the internal jugular vein during catheterization of the internal jugular vein [6]. Therefore, an increased cross-sectional area (CSA) of the SCV may help increase the chance of successful puncture of the SCV. Several strategies have been suggested to increase the CSA of the SCV, including the Trendelenburg position [7,8], or positive intrathoracic pressure [7]. Currently, bedside ultrasonography is widely used for central venous catheterization as it improves the success rate of SCV catheterization and reduces catheterization-related complications [9]. However, ultrasound is not available in all clinical situations. Even with the ultrasound-guided approach, a higher body mass index limits the ability to visualize the SCV [10]. Therefore, an increased CSA may facilitate successful SCV puncture during blind and ultrasound-guided approaches of SCV catheterization.

SCV catheterization is more difficult in obese patients owing to indistinct landmarks and increased depth between the skin and SCV. The introducer needle may be relatively short to approach the SCV, and the entry angle of the needle tip may be increased, thereby increasing the risk of pneumothorax. The Trendelenburg position, a strategy for enhancing the CSA of the SCV, has been reported to increase the peak inspiratory and driving pressure, and reduce lung compliance in obese patients [11,12], which may interfere with oxygenation [12]. The effect of head and shoulder positions on the CSA of SCV has not been investigated yet in obese subjects. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of different head and shoulder positions on the CSA of the SCV in obese participants.

Section snippets

Methods

Ethical approval for this study was provided by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital (No. 30-2019-66), and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03993587, date of registration: June 20, 2019). Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. Healthy adult volunteers, aged ≥19 years and with a body mass index ≥30 kg m−2, participated in this study. Patients who took medicine affecting the vessel tone, and had a history of surgery on the lung or chest wall, previous

Results

A total of 27 healthy obese adult volunteers were recruited from August 2019 to June 2020. Of these individuals, three were excluded due to poor image quality, and 24 were included in the analysis. The participant characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

The CSA of the SCV and the differences in the CSA of the SCV in the different head, shoulder, and body positions are presented in Table 2, Table 3. The RM-ANOVA revealed no significant two-, three-, or four-way interactions among the four

Discussion

This study showed that the CSA of the SCV was significantly enhanced following 30° head rotation to the ipsilateral side compared to the neutral head position and 30° head rotation to the contralateral side in obese participants. The CSA of the SCV was also larger in the neutral shoulder position than the lowered shoulder position, and in the Trendelenburg position than the supine position. In contrast, the depth of the SCV from the skin surface was not statistically different regardless of

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Competing Interest

Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial ties.

References (22)

  • M. Fragou et al.

    Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study

    Crit Care Med

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text