Cost-efficiency of animal welfare in broiler production systems: A pilot study using the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol
Introduction
Recently, increasing public concerns regarding animal welfare (AW) led to diversification in broiler production systems in many EU countries, particularly in the Netherlands. A wide array of production systems has been developed to cater different consumer needs regarding AW (De Jonge and Van Trijp, 2013). Developments resulted in three distinct production segments in the broiler sector, which set different requirements in terms of AW, i.e., conventional, middle-market and top-market segments. The conventional segment complies with the Dutch minimum legal requirements (according to the EU Broiler Directive; (EC Directive, 2007)). Accordingly, in conventional systems chickens need to be provided a permanent access to feed and water. Further, a maximum stocking density of 42 kg/m2 is allowed provided that farms have an adequate ventilation and heating system and that mortality rate remains in a predefined range (i.e., mortality should be below 3.40% at 40 days). The length of dark period should be at least 6 h per day, with an uninterrupted dark period of 4 h. The middle-market segment supplies products that exceed the minimum legal standards in terms of AW, but do not meet organic standards. The top-market segment includes systems that comply with organic standards or that are similar to organic systems in aspects, such as provision of free range area and length of growth period. Organic and similar systems use different broiler breeds, which grow slower than that in conventional systems. Also, broilers in organic systems are kept at a lower stocking density (i.e., 21 kg/m2) than in conventional systems and provided with outdoor access.
Increasing requirements for AW usually results in an increase in production costs (Ellen et al., 2012). Because the broiler sector is highly cost-price driven, the conventional system is still the most prevalent system. In 2012, conventional systems accounted for ca. 97% of total broiler production in the Netherlands (Ellen et al., 2012). However, because social acceptance of animal husbandry practices is becoming essential for a sustainable broiler sector in the long term (Bergstra, 2014), farmers are increasingly expected to adopt standards that go beyond the legal minimum, i.e., above-legal standards to keep their ‘license to produce’. From an economic and decision making point of view, the cost-efficiency of various AW systems is of great importance, i.e., how to achieve the highest level of AW at a given cost. The cost-efficiency of the improvement in AW obtained from a certain production system is defined as the ratio of the change in the level of AW and the change in the level of production costs compared to the level of conventional system. To address this question it is essential to make explicit the degree of improvement in the level of AW obtained from a certain production system and to link AW improvements to production costs. Production costs and feasibility of different broiler production systems have been extensively studied (Ellen et al., 2012, Gocsik et al., 2013). These studies suggest that higher AW standards increase production costs in Dutch alternative broiler production systems. More specifically, in alternative systems feed costs increase due to the fact that the feed efficiency decreases as a consequence of using a slow growing breed and a lower stocking density. Further, fixed costs per delivered broiler increase. That is because a lower stocking density results in that the total fixed costs are distributed to a fewer animals. Also, provision of outdoor access usually requires investment in land, which ultimately increases fixed costs.
Further, that the alternative production systems with higher AW standards were more economically feasible than the conventional system, provided that farmers received a price premium for the provision of higher standards. However, to our knowledge, it has not been studied to what extent higher AW standards in broiler production translate into an increase in the level of AW. Hence, it is also unclear to what extent the increase in production costs leads to an increase in the level of AW. The aim of our research was to fill this gap.
The recently developed Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for poultry (WQ protocol) is suitable to assess on-farm AW (Welfare Quality®, 2009). The WQ protocol allows for incorporating the specific welfare measures into an overall welfare score for the production system. Hence, it provides a standardized assessment method to compare the impact of different AW systems on the overall level of farm AW. However, in the scale of AW, there are no meaningful (i.e., completely non-arbitrary) zero value and a golden standard, hence it is difficult to interpret absolute welfare scores. An alternative way to evaluate the level of AW in different AW systems is by analyzing the relative differences, i.e., change in the level of AW compared to a baseline (e.g. AW score of the conventional system). In this way, the somewhat arbitrary nature of welfare measurements is partly overcome due to the fact that it is present in all the measurements across all the AW systems.
Due to the fact that the assessment is primarily based on animal-based measures, the exact contribution of specific systems on overall AW cannot be directly quantified by examining only the attributes of the production system in terms of housing and management. In contrast, when farmers decide on the production systems they usually look at the production system in terms of system attributes, i.e., housing and management. Farmers evaluate how these system attributes contribute to their objectives in terms of AW, but also in terms of several other issues that dominate the public debate on intensive farming, such as environmental emissions and human health risks (Kerkhof et al., 2009). Hence, farmers require information on how these attributes, individually and as a system, contribute to these issues.
In the light of the foregoing discussion, the aim of this paper was to analyze the contribution of different production systems to overall AW and the cost-efficiency of increased AW at the farm level, thereby supporting farmers' decision making regarding their choice of production system.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
To analyze the cost-efficiency of various AW systems, a five-step approach was developed. In the following, all the five steps are described in detail.
WQ index score
Attributional WQ scores and the overall WQ index score are given per production system in Table 6.
The WQ index score sharply increased when shifting from the conventional system (577) to any of the alternative systems: Volwaard and Puur & Eerlijk (736), extensive outdoor (733), and organic (698). It is striking that the WQ index score peaked at the Volwaard and Puur & Eerlijk systems. In other words, no further increase in the WQ index score was achieved in extensive outdoor and organic systems
Discussion and conclusions
The objective of the study was to analyze the contribution of different broiler production systems to overall AW and the cost-efficiency of increased AW at the farm level. In the paper three different production segments are distinguished, namely conventional, middle-market and top-market segments. The conventional segment complies with the legal minimum standards. The middle-market and top-market systems use a slow growing breed. Stocking density ranges from 25 to 31 kg/m2 in middle-market
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr Andy Butterworth and Steve Brown for permission to use data collected in the UK, and to Dr Paolo Ferrari, Dr Valentina Ferrante, Elena Andreoli, Enrico Spagnoli, Susanna Lolli, Nicola Labartino and Mirco Monti for permission to use data collected in Italy. Data collection of data of Dutch farms was carried out as part of the project ‘Simplification of the Welfare Quality Broiler Assessment Protocol’ which was financed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, and we acknowledge
References (69)
- et al.
Potential risk factors associated with contact dermatitis, lameness, negative emotional state, and fear of humans in broiler chicken flocks
Poult. Sci.
(2013) - et al.
Early locomotor behaviour in genetic stocks of chickens with different growth rates
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
(2000) - et al.
The effect of light intensity on the behavior, eye and leg health, and immune function of broiler chickens
Poult. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Behaviour of fast- and slow growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
The impact of nutrient density, feed form, and photoperiod on the walking ability and skeletal quality of broiler chickens
Poult. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators
Poult. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
The influence of the lighting program on broiler activity and dust production
Poult. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
A multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability of different poultry production systems
J. Clean. Prod.
(2012) - et al.
Evaluation of between-line variation for within-line selection against ascites in broilers
Poult. Sci.
(2001) - et al.
Heterogeneity in consumer perceptions of the animal friendliness of broiler production systems
Food Policy
(2014)
Different shades of grey: compromise products to encourage animal friendly consumption
Food Qual. Prefer.
Segregation among test-cross progeny suggests that two complementary dominant genes explain the difference between ascites-resistant and ascites-susceptible broiler lines
Poult. Sci.
Impact of different broiler production systems on health care costs in the Netherlands
Poult. Sci.
Mid-term financial impact of animal welfare improvements in Dutch broiler production
Poult. Sci.
Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets
Poult. Sci.
Influence of the stocking density and rearing season on incidence of sudden death syndrome in broiler chickens
Poult. Sci.
Welfare and environmental benefits of integrating commercially viable free-range broiler chickens into newly planted woodland: a UK case study
Agric. Syst.
Foot pad dermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens and degree of inheritance
Poult. Sci.
Skeletal growth of commercial poultry species
Poult. Sci.
The impact of group size on damaging behaviours, aggression, fear and stress in farm animals
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
Footpad dermatitis in poultry
Poult. Sci.
Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens
Poult. Sci.
Meal feeding is more effective than early feed restriction at reducing the prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens
Poult. Sci.
Nutritional factors of importance for optimal leg health in broilers: a review
Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.
Influence of the provision of natural light and straw bales on activity levels and leg health in commercial broiler chickens
Anim. Welf.
Pig Husbandry in a Changing Social and Economic Environment: Societal Attitudes, Farm Economics and Animal Welfare, Business Economics
Welfare of broilers: a review
World Poult. Sci. J.
The assessment of animal welfare on broiler farms
Economic optimization of animal welfare in the Dutch broiler sector using the Welfare Quality assessment protocol for poultry
The impact of disease on welfare
The effect of morphology on walking ability in the modern broiler: a gait analysis study
Anim. Welf.
Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density
Nature
Simplifying the Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Broiler Chicken Welfare
Animal
Simplifying the Welfare Quality assessment protocol for broilers
Cited by (38)
Impact of juçara (Euterpe edulis) fruit waste extracts on the quality of conventional and antibiotic-free broiler meat
2021, Poultry ScienceCitation Excerpt :Public demand regarding animal welfare has changing livestock production systems over the years (de Jonge and van Trijp, 2013), including the broiler sector. In this context, these production systems need to be flexible as consumers may claim different allegations, such as sustainable rearing, antibiotic-free production, nontransgenic feeding, among others (Cervantes, 2015; Gocsik et al., 2016). For instance, in conventional systems, broilers are raised in controlled environments with no outdoor access, fed with processed food made from animal by-products, and supplemented with synthetic antioxidants (Salami et al., 2015).
Do Animal Welfare Schemes Promote Better Animal Health? An Empirical Investigation of German Pork Production
2021, Livestock ScienceCitation Excerpt :While non-participants can achieve high animal health and high efficiency, such an outcome is more likely for program participants. Similarly, Gocsik et al. (2016) found higher animal welfare in a moderately altered broiler production system, with a relatively small cost disadvantage compared to a conventional system. This study faces several limitations: our sample is restricted to mid to large hog producers in western Germany and transferability of results is therefore limited to similar sized full-slatted floor, indoor rearing facilities, that operate under equivalent animal protection and hygiene legislation.
Analysis of synergies and trade-offs between animal welfare, ammonia emission, particulate matter emission and antibiotic use in Dutch broiler production systems
2021, Agricultural SystemsCitation Excerpt :The impact of price fluctuations on net return to labor and management was tested by using different feed price levels. Feed price was selected as these prices are subject to considerable fluctuations and feed costs are the main cost component in broiler production (Gocsik et al., 2016). In this respect, two cases were analyzed for the period 2015–2019, i.e. a best-case and a worst-case scenario.
- 1
Gocsik and Brooshooft share the first authorship, de Jong is the second and Saatkamp is the third author.