Research paperThe effect of a staged, emergency department specific rapid response system on reporting of clinical deterioration
Section snippets
What is known
- •
There are few published studies detailing the effect of formal systems for recognising and responding to deteriorating emergency department (ED) patients.
- •
In Australia, rapid response systems (RRSs) operate in most inpatient units in major health services; however, they do not typically operate in EDs despite clinical deterioration occurring in between 1.5% and 7.5% of ED patients.
- •
The most common physiological derangements in ED patients that fulfil rapid response system activation criteria are
What this paper adds?
- •
A multi-faceted approach increased staff reporting of clinical deterioration in ED patients.
- •
One in six patients had documented evidence of clinical deterioration in the ED, supporting the argument for an ED specific RRS, particularly for patients with systemic presenting complaints.
- •
The longitudinal nature of the study enables the impact of each separate element of the ED rapid response system as well as the cumulative effect of a multi-faceted intervention to be known.
Background
The majority of patients who suffer in-hospital adverse events with high risk of death (cardiac arrest or unplanned intensive care unit admission) have clearly abnormal physiological signs in the hours before these events and there is a well-documented relationship between abnormal vital signs and mortality.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Rapid response systems (RRSs) are grounded in the premise that early intervention for deteriorating patients improves patient outcomes and decreases high mortality
Design
A retrospective cross sectional design was used to undertake this study. The primary outcome measure was unreported clinical deterioration. For the purposes of this paper, unreported clinical deterioration was defined as presence of documented physiological abnormalities that fulfilled the ED Clinical Instability Criteria (CIC)13 in ED nursing notes and no documentation that these abnormalities were reported to a medical officer. T0 (2009) was prior to any formal system for recognising and
Patient characteristics (n = 600)
Patient's median age was 55 years (IQR = 36–72) and 52.7% (n = 316) were female. Ambulance transport to the ED occurred in 40.3% (n = 242) and the remaining 59.7% (n = 358) arrived by private car. The Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) category distribution was: ATS 1 1% (n = 6), ATS 2 26.3% (n = 158), ATS 3 50.2% (n = 301), ATS 4 21.5% (n = 131) and ATS 5 0.2% (n = 1). The median time to nursing assessment was 11 min (IQR 3–28) and 69% (n = 414) of patients were seen by a nurse within their ATS category time. The
Discussion
It is difficult to understand the true frequency of clinical deterioration in ED patients. There are a number of studies that have used the same definition of deterioration (fulfilling ED CIC) however all have reported results from different patient populations. Considine et al.13 reported that ED RRS activation occurs in 1.5% of ED patients, however, the denominator in that study was all ED patients so patients with minor illnesses and injuries who are unlikely to suffer significant
Conclusion
A staged ED specific RRS decreased the frequency of unreported clinical deterioration. Each specific element of the RRS had an independent but cumulative effect in reducing unreported clinical deterioration. However, the effectiveness of the RRS plateaued when dissemination and implementation were complete and information regarding the RRS reverted to diffusion. Ongoing strategies to ensure clinician engagement with the aims, structure and function of RRSs are needed if ongoing improvements in
Provenance and conflict of interest
Professor Julie Considine is a Deputy Editor of Australian Emergency Nursing Journal but has not been involved in the review process for this paper. This paper was not commissioned.
Funding
This study was funded by the Australian Resuscitation Council (Victorian Branch).
Research ethics statement
This study was approved by the Human Research and Ethics Committees at Deakin University (2012-059) and Northern Health (LR 06/12).
References (39)
- et al.
Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study
Resuscitation
(2004) - et al.
Reduced survival following resuscitation in patients with documented clinically abnormal observations prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2006) - et al.
The uptake of an early warning system in one Australian Emergency Department: a pilot study
Crit Care Resusc
(2012) - et al.
Recognising clinical deterioration in Emergency Department patients
Australas Emerg Nurs J
(2014) - et al.
The objective medical emergency team activation criteria: a case–control study
Resuscitation
(2007) - et al.
Can emergency department triage nurses predict patients’ dispositions?
Am J Emerg Med
(2001) - et al.
Emergency Department hypotension predicts sudden unexpected in-hospital mortality: a prospective cohort study
Chest
(2006) A prelude to outreach: prevalence and mortality of ward patients with abnormal vital signs
15th Annual Congr Eur Soc Intensive Care Med
(2002)- et al.
Incidence and characteristics of preventable iatrogenic cardiac arrests
JAMA
(1991) - et al.
A prospective before-and-after trial of a medical emergency team
Med J Aust
(2003)
Anticipating events of in-hospital cardiac arrests
Eur J Emerg Med
Predictors of critical care admission in emergency department patients triaged as low to moderate urgency
J Adv Nurs
Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients
Br J Anaes
Validity of unplanned admission to an Intensive Care Unit as a measure of patient safety in surgical patients
Anesthesiology
Rates of in-hospital arrests, deaths and intensive care admissions: the effect of a medical emergency team
Med J Aust
Improving the outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest: the importance of being earnest
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
Emergency department rapid response systems: the case for a standardized approach to deteriorating patients
Eur J Emerg Med
Australian hospital statistics 2012–13. Emergency department care
Emergency Medicine: a practice prone to error
Can J Emerg Med
Cited by (19)
Translation of evidence into policy to improve clinical practice: the development of an emergency department rapid response system
2021, Australasian Emergency CareThe prevalence and management of deteriorating patients in an Australian emergency department
2021, Australasian Emergency CareEmergency nurses’ perceptions of their role in responding to escalations of care for clinical deterioration
2020, Australasian Emergency CareCitation Excerpt :To date, the majority of MET research has focused on hospitalised ward patients. Formal systems for recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in emergency department (ED) patients have only been implemented and evaluated in recent years [6,7]. The ED ‘nurse-in-charge’ is the most senior clinical nursing leadership position and these senior nurses are responsible for the safety of the ED patients, staff and visitors [8].
Systems for recognition and response to clinical deterioration in Victorian emergency departments
2018, Australasian Emergency CareCitation Excerpt :The major components of RRS are the afferent limb to detect clinical deterioration, a response or efferent limb, and audit and governance limbs. Recent research reports that up to 40% of Australian ED patients fulfil hospital Medical Emergency Team (MET) criteria at one or more times during their ED care [4,6–9] and approximately 13% of clinical deterioration episodes in ED patients are unreported [4,9]. Although there are systematic approaches established to respond to patients with sepsis, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, major trauma and cardiac arrest within the ED [2], less is known about systems in EDs to respond to clinical deterioration for the broader, more heterogeneous ED population.
Frequency of vital sign assessment and clinical deterioration in an Australian emergency department
2016, Australasian Emergency Nursing JournalCitation Excerpt :Second, at the study site, the ED is the only critical care area of the hospital, unstable ward patients are treated in the ED thereby increasing the number of patients with clinical deterioration in the ED. Third, there were differences in patient populations studied that could account for differences in findings [38,40,41]. In our study, the patients of interest were those who had a presenting complaint of abdominal pain, chest pain, shortness of breath and febrile illness.