On the transition of base flow recession from early stage to late stage
Introduction
Base flow recession curve in the dry period is a distinct hydrologic signature of a watershed. It provides important information to water managers for decision-making on water supply, irrigation, and management of water quality [19] and aquatic ecosystem services [30]. Baseflow recession has been extensively studied in the last few decades. By eliminating post-rainfall event time reference in hydrograph recession analysis, Brutsaert and Nieber [7] proposed a classical method to analyze the time rate of change in discharge as a function of discharge itself (i.e., -dQ/dt=f(Q)). Logarithmic graphs of ln(−dQ/dt) versus ln(Q) based on observed discharge demonstrate approximately linear relationships, suggesting the following power relationship [7]:
The value of exponent b estimated using observed discharge differs considerably between early stage of recession with high discharge and late stage of recession with low discharge. A sharp change of the exponent value from early recession to late recession has been observed for many watersheds (e.g., [[17], [21], [22], [39]]).
The factors controlling the recession exponent values are complex, including groundwater hydraulics [7], the interconnection of groundwater flow systems [31], spatial heterogeneity of watershed properties [15], stream contraction [2], [3], [4], and evapotranspiration [28]. In those studies which focused on the role of groundwater hydraulics on recession behavior, the total length of stream contributing to base flow is assumed to be constant [8], [32]. Based on the analytical solutions of the Boussinesq equation for a horizontal aquifer with a fully penetrating stream channel, the value of b equals 3 during early recession, and it is 1 for a linearized solution and 1.5 for a non-linearized solution during late recession [7]. Aquifer parameters at the watershed scale, including saturated hydraulic conductivity, drainable porosity and aquifer depth, were estimated based on analytical solutions for early and late recession [7], [8], [26], [29].
The role of flowing stream contraction on recession behavior has been investigated in recent years [2], [20]. The contraction of flowing stream networks is a result of geomorphological characteristics [18]. Perennial streams are active for most of the year, depending upon local climatology and basin characteristics. Ephemeral streams are intermittently active, in response to individual rainfall events [6], [13], [37], and gradually dry up during the recession period [10], [38]. The length of active channel network is highly correlated with streamflow, and power-law relationships between flowing channel length and streamflow are usually identified [12], [14]. However, the linkage between drying up of ephemeral streams and ceasing of early recession has not been fully explored in the existing literature.
We argue that the contraction rate of ephemeral streams is significant at the early stage of recession; however, at the late stage of recession when all ephemeral streams have dried up and perennial streams are the only sources for flowing streams, the contraction rate of perennial streams is negligible. The objective of this paper is to identify the transition of base flow from early recession stage to late recession stage for individual recession events, and investigate the potential linkage between the transition of base flow recession and the contraction of ephemeral streams.
Section snippets
Panola Mountain Research Watershed and data
To investigate the linkage between the transition of base flow recession from early stage to late stage and the contraction of ephemeral streams, at the minimum, we need streamflow data simultaneously recorded at both the outlet and the perennial stream heads of a watershed. Such streamflow observations are rather rare to find since streamflow gauges are usually located on perennial streams. Fortunately, for the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (PMRW) streamflow observations are available at
Contraction of flowing stream to perennial stream head
The streamflow observations at the upstream gauge in the PMRW provide an opportunity to identify the time when flowing stream contracts to the perennial stream head. Using discharge time series of the upstream gauge, we identified the moment when the ephemeral streams dry up (Qe → 0) and the corresponding discharge at the watershed outlet Qp0. Another major ephemeral tributary is located in the southeastern side of the watershed. The drainage areas for both perennial stream heads are about
Flow at the outlet when the ephemeral stream dries up
As shown in Table 1, twenty-three recession events during the 1985–2007 period were selected for analysis. For instance, Fig. 2 shows the observed hydrographs at the outlet and the perennial stream head during the recession of January, 2007. After 57 mm of rainfall, the peak discharge at the outlet reached 5.85 mm day−1; while the peak discharge at the perennial stream head is 7.53 mm day−1. The discharge in volume at the outlet was higher than that at the perennial stream head. The discharge
Conclusions
This paper is focused on the transition of base flow recession from early stage to late stage. A cumulative regression analysis method is proposed to identify the transition flow quantitatively for individual recession events observed in the Panola Mountain Research Watershed. The identified transition flows are then compared with the discharge rates observed when the flowing stream contracts to the perennial stream head. It is found that these two characteristic flows are strongly correlated.
Acknowledgment
The research conducted in this paper is partially supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) through the project “Enhancing groundwater simulation in the IMPACT-Water model for assessment of groundwater irrigation sustainability and food production impacts” led by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). The authors thank Jake Peters for providing the discharge and rainfall data for the Panola Mountain Research Watershed.
References (39)
- et al.
Estimation of ‘drainable’ storage – a geomorphological approach
Adv Water Resour
(2015) - et al.
‘Universal’ recession curves and their geomorphological interpretation
Adv Water Resour
(2014) - et al.
Contributions of riparian and hillslope waters to storm runoff across multiple catchments and storm events in a glaciated forested watershed
J Hydrol
(2007) - et al.
Analytical assessment and parameter estimation of a low-dimensional groundwater model
J Hydrol
(2009) - et al.
Examining individual recession events instead of a data cloud: using a modified interpretation of dQ/dt–Q streamflow recession in glaciated watersheds to better inform models of low flow
J Hydrol
(2012) - et al.
A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology
Hydrol Sci Bull
(1979) - et al.
Geomorphological origin of recession curves
Geophys Res Lett
(2010) - et al.
A general geomorphological recession flow model for river basins
Water Resour Res
(2013) - et al.
A stream length study
Water Resour Res
(1973) - et al.
Regionalized drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau
Water Resour Res
(1977)
Basin-scale geohydrologic drought flow features of riparian aquifers in the Southern Great Plains
Water Resour Res
Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale
Hydrol Process
Drainage density changes during rainfall
Earth Surf Processes
The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow
Water Resour Res
Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order
Hydrol Process
Drainage networks and climate
The variation of drainage density within a catchment
Hydrol Sci J
Power law catchment-scale recessions arising from heterogeneous linear small-scale dynamics
Water Resour Res
Stream recession curves and storage variability in small watersheds
Hydrol Earth Syst Sci
Cited by (27)
A probabilistic framework for robust master recession curve parameterization
2023, Journal of HydrologyA new method for effective parameterization of catchment-scale aquifer through event-scale recession analysis
2023, Advances in Water ResourcesDynamic coevolution of baseflow and multiscale groundwater flow system during prolonged droughts
2022, Journal of HydrologyCitation Excerpt :This hillslope-centric conceptualization greatly simplifies real world landscape conditions, such as complex topography and geology (Zecharias and Brutsaert, 1988; Tague and Grant, 2004; McGuire et al., 2005; Gleeson and Manning, 2008; Yao et al., 2017; Rapp et al., 2020; Condon et al., 2020), and it cannot represent hydrological processes occurring at multiple spatial scales beyond that of hillslopes. It cannot be used to explain watershed-scale emergent baseflow generation behavior with active contribution from deep bedrock groundwater exfiltration, such as the spatial scaling of baseflow proportion and solute concentration (Frisbee et al., 2011; Frisbee et al., 2017; Asano et al., 2020; Iwasaki et al., 2021) and the connection between dynamically active drainage density and baseflow recession characteristics at the watershed scale (Biswal and Marani, 2010; Mutzner et al., 2013; Ghosh et al., 2016; Prancevic and Kirchner, 2019). Baseflow can be sustained by a groundwater flow system (GWFS) characterized by flow paths of different scales, such as those within riparian zones and hillslopes, and watershed-scale deep groundwater flow paths connecting headwaters and main streams (Winter et al., 1998; Jiang et al., 2014; Rumsey et al., 2015).
An improved method to estimate the rate of change of streamflow recession and basin synthetic recession parameters from hydrographs
2022, Journal of HydrologyCitation Excerpt :The recession slope b is assumed to be a constant value in a catchment in this study, but several catchments show that the recession slopes tend to increase from high to low flow parts (for example, HNZ and NLD in Fig. 9b-c). The phenomenon is also found by other several studies (Ghosh et al., 2016; Gao et al, 2017; Tashie et al., 2020a). Thus, further study should put more attention on the variation of recession slope with magnitude of flow.
Incorporating channel network information in hydrologic response modelling: Development of a model and inter-model comparison
2017, Advances in Water ResourcesCitation Excerpt :Hence, subsurface flow is a distinct and complex phenomenon, and it needs to be treated differently from surface flow in a modeling framework. Modelling of hydrological response thus requires understanding of how water is redistributed among different flow paths and how the channel network morphology can help in developing conceptual models (Biswal and Marani, 2010; Ghosh et al., 2016; Gupta et al., 2010; Rodríguez-Iturbe and Rinaldo, 2001). Early hydrological models, based largely on the work of Horton (1933), partitioned total flow into two components: fast surface flow or surface flow, dominating during floods, and slow subsurface flow, dominating during recession periods.